Quoting Daniel Hartwig (mand...@gmail.com):
> Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
> (following the same change in tasksel)? There is already a patch
> committed. I'll give this more of a test this week with some induced
> errors during the installation.
I hesitated
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:12:32AM +0530, magina antimage wrote:
> please help me
I'm afraid that the debian-devel list is not meant for support.
If you believe you have found a bug, then feel free to report a bug.
http://bugs.debian.org/
If you need support, then please see this link :
http://w
Hi,
I have ported Debian for my target x86 board,and facing some problem in
volume-control
when i click on it's icon I am getting error:
"The volume control did not find any elements and/or devices to control.
This means either that you don't have the right GStreamer plugins
installed, or tha
also sprach Luca Capello [2012.09.09.2029 +0200]:
> Or, if this is tightened to OSM, 'gnome-osm-maps'.
except the 'm' on "osm" is already a "map", so maybe osm-client.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`.
On 10 September 2012 06:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If anybody wants to see something land into this release, it would be
> nice to mention it now instead of after the end of the merge window.
Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
(following the same change in tasksel)
Just a quick suggestion. As a compromise, instead of enabling Xfce as the
"universal default" in tasksel *entirely* ... How about only enabling Xfce
as default for the CD* distribution, and leaving the default as GNOME for
all non-CD distributions? (DVD, netinst, ...)
That will express true "bipa
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 11:06:17PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> >> 32-bit PC and 64-bit PC mean nothing,
> >
> > I think a lot more people know which of those they have.
>
> Do they, I wonder? Anyway, while it seems a nice idea to try and
No, they do not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> It specifies:
>
> Files-Excluded:
> __MACOSX
> [a-z]*.jar
>
> with the purpose to save ReadSeq.jar inside the source package. This
> works with the old method:
>
> $ find . -name "[a-z]*.jar"
> ./rdp_classifier_2.5/lib/junit.j
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Features expected to be merged:
> - UEFI support (Steve). Before anyone asks, and as far as I can tell:
>it's not about supporting secure boot.
> - IPv6 support in d-i (Philipp).
> - Possibly more xz-related unblocks (Ansgar).
>
> If anybody wan
Le Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Files-Excluded field and security implications
> > of uscan and debian/copyright."):
> > > Le Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:44:36AM +0900, Char
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson
* Package name: python-django-filebrowser-safe
Version : 0.2.12+dfsg
Upstream Author : Stephen McDonald
* URL : http://github.com/stephenmcd/filebrowser-safe/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python, Jav
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 00:07:46 +0200, a écrit :
> Features expected to be merged:
> - UEFI support (Steve). Before anyone asks, and as far as I can tell:
>it's not about supporting secure boot.
> - IPv6 support in d-i (Philipp).
> - Possibly more xz-related unblocks (Ansgar).
>
Hello,
tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the
prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and
explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me.
That's why I'm going to propose the same timing for beta 3: 3 weeks for
development and bug fix
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 23:06 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On 9 September 2012 16:49, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 22:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >> But I object to "32-bit PC" and "64-bit PC". i686, amd64, x86-32,
> >> x86-64...
> >> at least those a
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 03:15:27PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Files-Excluded field and security implications of
> uscan and debian/copyright."):
> > Le Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:44:36AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > > in the case of the Files-Excluded field, the co
On 9 September 2012 16:49, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 22:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> But I object to "32-bit PC" and "64-bit PC". i686, amd64, x86-32, x86-64...
>> at least those are correct.
>
> But none of them are widely understood.
But they are googleabl
On 12-09-09 at 08:09pm, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:54, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, David Paleino wrote:
> >> It would be nice if you could use a less generic name. :)
> >
> > Honestly, I've been thinking about that even before you raised your
>
OK,
so let's go on picking 'gnome-osm-maps'.
Thank you all folks!
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 09/09/2012 20:48, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> I am not a specialist, but it looks to me that
> p gnome-inm-forecast - the Spanish weather forecast
> applet for the GNOME Desktop
>
> whose homepage is http://kutxa.homeunix.org/trac/gnome-inm-forecast
>
> is official gnome ei
On 09/09/2012 20:26, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
> wrote:
>> gnome-maps ?
>
> I'd avoid gnome-maps, as upstream != GNOME
>
I am not a specialist, but it looks to me like
p gnome-inm-forecast - the Spanish weather forecast
applet
Hi there!
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 20:09:11 +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 19:54, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, David Paleino wrote:
>>> It would be nice if you could use a less generic name. :)
>>
>> Honestly, I've been thinking about that even befor
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
wrote:
> gnome-maps ?
I'd avoid gnome-maps, as upstream != GNOME
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90
On 09/09/2012 19:54, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, David Paleino wrote:
>> It would be nice if you could use a less generic name. :)
>
> Honestly, I've been thinking about that even before you raised your
> objection :-)
>
> Any suggestions? Would 'maps-client' be a go
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, David Paleino wrote:
> It would be nice if you could use a less generic name. :)
Honestly, I've been thinking about that even before you raised your
objection :-)
Any suggestions? Would 'maps-client' be a good name?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotregl
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:21:57 +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alessio Treglia
>
> * Package name: maps
It would be nice if you could use a less generic name. :)
Thanks,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson
* Package name: libjs-uploadify
Version : 3.2+dfsg
Upstream Author : Reactive Apps, Ronnie Garcia
* URL : http://uploadify.com/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: JavaScript, Flash
Description : JavaS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: maps
Version : 12.07.4
Upstream Author : Sigurd Gartmann
* URL : https://launchpad.net/maps
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : OpenStreetMap client for the GNOM
On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 22:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > If "64-bit PC" is too vague, the alternative designator for the amd64
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 22:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2012, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > If "64-bit PC" is too vague, the alternative designator for the amd64 arch
> > > is the vendor neutral "x86-64". The v
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> There were only a few still using cia.navi.vc. Changed now.
Excellent, thanks!
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson
* Package name: python-django-grappelli-safe
Version : 0.2.10+git20120907.89b0bde
Upstream Author : Stephen McDonald
* URL : http://github.com/stephenmcd/grappelli-safe/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 04:06:36AM +0400, a...@mvpro.net wrote:
> I see, that Debian Wheezy comes with new congestion control named 'yeah',
> it's rather good innovation, but by my tests TCP-Fit congestion control
> should be the best for now.
The question is not only one of finding the local opti
This one time, at band camp, Paul Wise said:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>
> > cia.navi.cx is deprecated, but now has stopped working.
> >
> > You should use cia.vc instead.
> >
> > Looking on vasks there are many team tooks that submit to cia.navi.cx
> > (mail mail
33 matches
Mail list logo
