Re: Built-Using and Cython

2013-03-06 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Russ Allbery writes: > Nikolaus Rath writes: > >> Russ says that it's only necessary "there are licensing reasons", but >> I'm not sure what that means. It seems that pretty much every open >> source license requires you to make the source code available (including >> Cython), so I'm not sure why

Bug#702485: ITP: reposurgeon -- a tool for editing version control repository history

2013-03-06 Thread Mike Swanson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mike Swanson * Package name: reposurgeon Version : 2.24 Upstream Author : Eric S. Raymond * URL : http://www.catb.org/esr/reposurgeon/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : a tool for editing ver

Bug#702481: ITP: libcatalyst-plugin-fillinform-perl -- module providing Fill-In-Form for Catalyst

2013-03-06 Thread USB
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)" * Package name: libcatalyst-plugin-fillinform-perl Version : 0.12 Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-FillInForm/ * License : Artistic

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#699749: Incompatible change in the ifupdown hooks interface

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:26:47 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > > On 6 March 2013 13:45, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> A quick grep over all unpacked packages shipping ifupdown hooks > >> show 60 hook scripts which don't have ADDRFAM set. > >> I haven't checked them individually, though. > > They

Bug#702464: ITP: python-django-bitfield -- Django module implementing BitFields

2013-03-06 Thread Luke Faraone
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luke Faraone * Package name: python-django-bitfield Version : 1.6.4 Upstream Author : DISQUS * URL : http://github.com/disqus/django-bitfield * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : Django m

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 13142 March 1977, Johannes Schauer wrote: >> That obviously depends a bit on what is actually needed to run (and then on >> talking to DSA, but they don't bite so much :) ). > If it is found useful, then I have to figure out who to contact about > this. For it to live on debian.org seperately

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 13:46 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus > > > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less > > > dashes in the interface too. > > IMO

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#699749: Incompatible change in the ifupdown hooks interface

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On 06.03.2013 15:21, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello. > > On 6 March 2013 13:45, Michael Biebl wrote: >> A quick grep over all unpacked packages shipping ifupdown hooks show 60 >> hook scripts which don't have ADDRFAM set. >> I haven't checked them individually, though. > > They usually check

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Michael Tautschnig (2013-03-06 19:22:37) > What about parallelizing parts of the job? Sure, the html page I linked to contains 38 different data points: - 11 architectures from stable - 13 architectures from testing - 14 architectures from unstable The most trivial way of paralle

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] > CPU: > > The whole script producing the output above took 7 hours to run on a 2.5GHz > Core i5 for all suites and all architectures (38 combinations). This is > because > generating strong strong dependencies for all packages in the archive takes > 8-10 minutes with current archive s

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 18:03 +0100 schrieb Arno Töll: > Hi, > > On 06.03.2013 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus > >>> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less >

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Johannes Schauer, le Wed 06 Mar 2013 18:56:47 +0100, a écrit : > I wrote a shell script which outputs the following static html: > > http://mister-muffin.de/bootstrap/selfcycles.html > > If you guys find this useful, then I can see how to get this generated > periodically and published somewhere

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, I wrote a shell script which outputs the following static html: http://mister-muffin.de/bootstrap/selfcycles.html If you guys find this useful, then I can see how to get this generated periodically and published somewhere under the debian.org domain. Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2013-03-06 09:07:

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 06.03.2013 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus >>> Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less >>> dashes in the interface too. >> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-n

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: >>> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into >>> devscripts. >> >> why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in >> devscripts. Whats your reas

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: >> IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into >> devscripts. > > why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in > devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? It's up to people interested dcut(classic) to su

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting The Wanderer (2013-03-06 14:46:49) > In that case, this (part of it) is a problem with my misunderstanding the > terminology being used. The terminology is based upon the dependency representation in the dependency graph. We have two different types of graph, the source graph which on

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 14:08 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place > your point being? I guess the point is that you can use dput-ng even if you don't want to replace your "

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
On Mar 6, 2013 8:09 AM, "Holger Levsen" wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place > > your point being? If you don't want to, you don't have to purge the old dput, as you seemed concerned about usi

Re: multi-tarball packages in version control

2013-03-06 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > The only problem is that svn-buildpackage does not support this. Or > rather: it should have, but a long standing bug (with a partial fix > attached to it, to which the maintainer did not comment. But since > uploaded one or two versi

Re: packaging with git: automatic setup of remotes/upstream when cloning

2013-03-06 Thread Jon Dowland
I (used to) document the upstream branch location in debian/README.source. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130306134716.GA11387@debian

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread The Wanderer
On 03/05/2013 10:46 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting The Wanderer (2013-03-05 15:35:37) You can build either one without a matching version of the other, but you won't get full functionality. In order to get the full functionality of both, from what I've been able to tell you need a mi

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place your point being? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archi

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mar 6, 2013 7:46 AM, "Holger Levsen" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus > > > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less > > > dashes in the interface too. > > IMO it's better to

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus > > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less > > dashes in the interface too. > IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into > devscripts. why?

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#699749: Incompatible change in the ifupdown hooks interface

2013-03-06 Thread Michael Biebl
On 06.03.2013 00:20, Steve Langasek wrote: > FWIW, I agree with Andrew that this isn't an interface change; this is a > latent bug in the avahi hook which has merely been exposed by this behavior > change in ifupdown. ifupdown supports more address families than ipv4 and > ipv6 (specifically, it

Re: DM upload permission

2013-03-06 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 08:13 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote: > > > dcut dm --uid "Tobias Stefan Richter" --allow nexus > > Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less > dashes in the interface too. > > dm "Tobias Stefan Ric

Re: Bootstrapping: list of 81 self-cycles in Debian Sid

2013-03-06 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 13141 March 1977, Johannes Schauer wrote: >> > The code generating that list is part of the debian bootstrap project [1] >> > and as such it would be a bug if architecture:all package were required to >> > be recompiled for the reason you mentioned. >> In that case, rather than putting this up