Hi,
Eduard Bloch:
> So, I suggest this new version. Added below for review; I consider
> uploading this to Experimental and submitting for l10n in a couple of
> days.
>
Fair enough.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
Thanks, I've corrected it
Le 10/04/2014 10:18 AM, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 22:08 +, Pierre Mavro wrote:
>> MySecureShell is a solution which has been made to bring more features to
>> sftp/scp protocol given by OpenSSH. By default, OpenSSH brings a lot of
>> liberty to
On 23 September 2014 17:58, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
>
> > Isn't that an implementation detail? Is Python version relevant for the
> > on-the-wire WSGI protocol?
>
> WSGI is an API, not a wire protocol. The Python version of the WSGI
> server would also be the Python version the code is run under, so
Hi!
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 01:55:01 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Guillem Jover , 2014-10-06, 01:33:
> >I realized that any debian/rules file that calls dpkg-buildflags through
> >make's $(shell) function will not honor at least noopt from
> >DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, which affects the build flags returned
* Guillem Jover , 2014-10-06, 01:33:
I realized that any debian/rules file that calls dpkg-buildflags
through make's $(shell) function will not honor at least noopt from
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, which affects the build flags returned by
dpkg-buildflags.
Why?
any package handling the flags inline w
Hi!
While going through the dpkg codebase, I realized that any
debian/rules file that calls dpkg-buildflags through make's $(shell)
function will not honor at least noopt from DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, which
affects the build flags returned by dpkg-buildflags.
This is fixed in dpkg 1.17.14 buildflags.mk
On 26 September 2014 14:58, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:19:24 +0100
> Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
>> Package: wnpp
>> Owner: Dimitri John Ledkov
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> * Package name: obs-build
>> Version : 20140918
>> Upstream Author : Adrian Schröter
>>
Hallo,
* Matthias Urlichs [Mon, Sep 29 2014, 07:29:44AM]:
> > > According to a security audit by Taylor Hornby (Defuse Security), the
> > > current
> > > implementation of Encfs is vulnerable or potentially vulnerable to
> > > multiple
> > > attacks on the encrypted data. This especially affe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luigi Toscano
* Package name: baloo-kcmadv
Version : 0~git20140427
Upstream Author : Lindsay Mathieson
* URL : https://gitorious.org/baloo-kcmadv
* License : LGPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : advanced con
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond
* Package name: mlbviewer
Version : 2014.sf.3
Upstream Author : straycat...@yahoo.com
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/mlbviewer/
* License : GPL 2
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
[not sure if you're subscribed to debian-devel, so CCing]
On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 06:52 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> Since there is no longer a search functionality
> in https://release.debian.org/migration/ to find out why a particular
> package is not in testing yet, can we please put a lin
Since there is no longer a search functionality in
https://release.debian.org/migration/ to find out why a particular package
is not in testing yet, can we please put a link to
https://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html (or something
more appropriate) on that page?
This way someone
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Andersson
Control: block -1 by 739860
* Package name: toxic
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : JFreegman
* URL : https://github.com/tox/toxic
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : a curses Tox base
On 09/28/2014 10:33 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 09:11:44PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>> Does update-menus really need bash? Why?
>
> pipefail is actually a fairly useful bashism.
Use mispipe from moreutils instead.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian
14 matches
Mail list logo
