Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’

2015-07-11 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-07-11 22:32:31 -0300 (-0300), Antonio Terceiro wrote: > I have a few ideas about this. I have used gerrit before, and it > provides a really nice experience except for 2 little facts: > > - you have to use a web UI thingy to review patches (although that said > web UI does have a really

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’

2015-07-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 06:12:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible > with Git ‘request-pull ’"): > > My reading of https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication> > > leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pu

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’

2015-07-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’"): > A putative decentralised [0] Git pull request feature would IMO require > that anyone with a Git repository can submit a pull request to any > other, without any registration on a privileged c

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’

2015-07-11 Thread Ben Finney
Ian Jackson writes: > Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible > with Git ‘request-pull ’"): > > My reading of https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication> > > leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull > > request” without having a GitHub

git repositories for packages and signed pushes

2015-07-11 Thread Ian Jackson
We've had some discussion of some of these issues already, but let me summarise: Most current workflows for Debian packaging with git involve a git repository somewhere, and in practice it is very impractical not to trust the contents of (at least some branches in) that repository. Currently AFAI

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’

2015-07-11 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Finney writes ("Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’"): > My reading of https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication> > leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull request” > without having a GitHub account. > > Decentralisation

Bug#791536: marked as done (general: Debian 7.8 running EXTREMELY slow. Like chronic stop script error.)

2015-07-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jul 2015 18:34:47 +0200 with message-id <55a145a7.6060...@sourcepole.ch> and subject line Re: Bug#791536: general: Debian 7.8 running EXTREMELY slow. Like chronic stop script error. has caused the Debian Bug report #791536, regarding general: Debian 7.8 running EXTREMELY

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

2015-07-11 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging. > See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status. That is quite a progress. Awesome, thanks! Cheers. -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

2015-07-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I will be working on it. First task is to complete gitlab packaging. See balasankarc.in/gitlab for current status. Gitlab folks sponsored 60 days of work with 3000 usd. I post updates at poddery.com/tags/debian-gitlab-months On 2015, ജൂലൈ 11 6:51

Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project (was: debian github organization ?)

2015-07-11 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Neil McGovern wrote: >> > It will be an instance of gitlab CE, under MIT license and managed by >> > Debian. Gitlab folks will just sponsor the hosting. >> >> Much appreciated, thank you to GitLab B.V. for this generous offer. Just out of curiosity, has anybody ma

Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with Git ‘request-pull ’

2015-07-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 10 juillet 2015 22:00 GMT, Jeremy Stanley  : > Simulating Gerrit's behaviors in this regard would probably not > satisfy the desire for a "replacement for pull requests" however > since Gerrit assumes a LKML-esque "rebase your patch until you get > it right" approach rather than the "keep stack

Bug#792112: ITP: ruby-faker -- easily generate fake data

2015-07-11 Thread Balasankar C
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Balasankar C * Package name: ruby-faker Version : 1.4.3 Upstream Author : Benjamin Curtis * URL : https://github.com/stympy/faker * License : Expat Programming Lang: Ruby Description : easily generate fake data

Bug#792101: ITP: gogs -- Gogs is a self hosted service aiming to provide a similar set of features to gitlab and github.

2015-07-11 Thread John Hackett
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: John Hackett * Package name: gogs Version : 0.6.1 Upstream Author : lu...@gitea.io * URL : https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea * License : MIT Programming Lang: Golang Description : Gogs is a self hosted service aim