ITP: newlisp -- a LISP like, general purpose scripting language

Control: retitle -1 ITP: newlisp -- a LISP like, general purpose scripting language * Package name: newlisp Version : 10.7.0 Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller * URL : http://www.newlisp.org/ * License : GPL and compatibles Programming Lang: C Description

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 12:04:59AM +1200, bounce-debian-devel=cbannister=slingshot.co...@lists.debian.org wrote: Weird! Don't know what happened here. :( -- The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that

Bug#827062: ITP: xmonad-extras -- various modules for xmonad that cannot be added to xmonad-contrib because of additional dependencies

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lev Lamberov * Package name: xmonad-extras Version : 0.12.1 Upstream Author : The Daniels Schoepe and Wagner * URL : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-extras-0.12.1 * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: H

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:33:07PM +0300, Antti Jarvinen wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes: > > The release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 is getting nearer. > > Thanks for the warning, I'm finding myself listed.. For the > problematic package I maintain the API changes are already fixed > upstream but is there any

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 07:41:25PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > 2016-06-11 14:30 GMT+02:00 Kurt Roeckx : > > > > > Hi, > > > > The release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 is getting nearer. Some packages > > will no longer build with the new version without changes. Most > > of those changes should be trivial, l

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

Kurt Roeckx writes: > The release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 is getting nearer. Thanks for the warning, I'm finding myself listed.. For the problematic package I maintain the API changes are already fixed upstream but is there any idea about schedule when (at latest) the fixing version should be included?

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

2016-06-11 14:30 GMT+02:00 Kurt Roeckx : > > Hi, > > The release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 is getting nearer. Some packages > will no longer build with the new version without changes. Most > of those changes should be trivial, like you can't allocate some > structures on the stack anymore and need to us

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

❦ 11 juin 2016 10:46 CEST, Holger Levsen  : >> We do patching as part of our daily packaging already: to replace (or >> circumvent) non-dfsg functionality, to integrate into our environment, >> and everything else that upstream is not willing or able to apply >> himself but is good in our opinion

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Robert Edmonds >unbound (U) Thanks. Opened a bug report with upstream: https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/bugs-script/show_bug.cgi?id=777 -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org

Bug#827042: ITP: xmonad-wallpaper -- xmonad wallpaper extension

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lev Lamberov * Package name: xmonad-wallpaper Version : 0.0.1.3 Upstream Author : Ye Yan * URL : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/xmonad-wallpaper * License : LGPL-3 Programming Lang: Haskell Description : xmo

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On 2016, ജൂൺ 11 7:13:41 PM IST, Holger Levsen wrote: >I well *know* there are situations where an "Open Source" software is >accompanied by a differently licenced very similar product ("enterprise >edition") and where this "Open Source" variant is basically just a >scam. If you substitute "Free

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 04:24:49PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > Ole, it seems you didn't understand what Alexander ment when he described > > his > > reasoning with a single word, "nagios"? > I'd be interested in that story. I don't know that much, just that nagios ain't part of Debian anymor

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

Antonio Terceiro writes: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:51:18AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Holger Levsen writes: >> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> >> We do patching as part of our daily packaging already: to replace (or >> >> circumvent) non-dfsg functionali

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:46:30AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > We do patching as part of our daily packaging already: to replace (or > > circumvent) non-dfsg functionality, to integrate into our environment, > > and everything els

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:51:18AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Holger Levsen writes: > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> We do patching as part of our daily packaging already: to replace (or > >> circumvent) non-dfsg functionality, to integrate into our enviro

OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hi, The release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 is getting nearer. Some packages will no longer build with the new version without changes. Most of those changes should be trivial, like you can't allocate some structures on the stack anymore and need to use the correct _new() and _free() function. It can als

new stuff

Hi, Here is some information on the new stuff that may seem helpful to you, read more here Yours sincerely, Kyle Nelson

Unidentified subject!

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

Holger Levsen writes: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> We do patching as part of our daily packaging already: to replace (or >> circumvent) non-dfsg functionality, to integrate into our environment, >> and everything else that upstream is not willing or able to a

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > We do patching as part of our daily packaging already: to replace (or > circumvent) non-dfsg functionality, to integrate into our environment, > and everything else that upstream is not willing or able to apply > himself but is good i

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > Pirate Praveen writes: > >> Debian needs feature X but it is already in the e.nterprise version. We > >> make > >> a patch and for commercial reasons it never gets merged (they already sell > >> it > >> in the enterprise version). Which means we will

Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian (Re: GitLab B.V. to host free-software GitLab for Debian project)

Pirate Praveen writes: >> Debian needs feature X but it is already in the e.nterprise version. We make >> a patch and for commercial reasons it never gets merged (they already sell it >> in the enterprise version). Which means we will have to fork the software and >> keep those patches forever. Be