Re: Mass bug-filing to move to python3-pygame

2018-10-31 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >that is fine in general. Since Python 2 is supported in Buster, please >use severity: normal for now. Most of these games are considered to be >complete and/or no longer supported upstream. If we want to preserve as >many of those games as possible, we should come up with a plan how we >can p

Re: Mass bug-filing to move to python3-pygame

2018-10-31 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 31.10.18 um 17:46 schrieb Dominik George: > Hi, > > as the maintainer of pygame, I'd like to bring the move to Python 3 forward, > and thus intend to ask all rdepends that are applications to try and move to > python3-pygame. Hi, that is fine in general. Since Python 2 is supported in Buster,

Re: Confusing our users - who is supporting LTS?

2018-10-31 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 12:04:47PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > When I say "the circumstances were different", I mean that at the time, > it was about paying people to do release management of testing, and that > it was originally suggested by the DPL. In this case, it is about > paying people t

Re: Use case for -dbg package

2018-10-31 Thread Joseph Herlant
Cool, thanks for your answers Matthias and Colin! :)

Mass bug-filing to move to python3-pygame

2018-10-31 Thread Dominik George
Hi, as the maintainer of pygame, I'd like to bring the move to Python 3 forward, and thus intend to ask all rdepends that are applications to try and move to python3-pygame. The packages are: angrydd ardentryst bambam bouncy bubbros childsplay deluge-gtk ffrenzy fofix freealchemist fr

Re: Mass bugfiling potential: bundled implementation of md5

2018-10-31 Thread Ian Jackson
Florian Weimer writes ("Re: Mass bugfiling potential: bundled implementation of md5"): > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 02:56:23PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > > What exactly are the benefits? > > You can use Systemtap or LD_PRELOAD to detect remaining uses of MD5. > (Well, one implementation of it at least

Re: Use case for -dbg package

2018-10-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 06:01:38PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote: > I was reviewing Tobias' updates on the use of dbg packages vs dbgsym > in dev ref and was wondering if there was any other know use cases > where we cannot use dbgsym over dbg packages for building debugging > symbols. > > As far as

Re: RFC: yet another list of data duplicated: public-suffix.txt

2018-10-31 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:48 AM Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:07:36AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > I suppose the way to go is to create a data package and get a MBF > > after getting a consensus here. > > Is that a different list then > https://packages.debian.org/sid

Re: RFC: yet another list of data duplicated: public-suffix.txt

2018-10-31 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:43 AM James Cowgill wrote: > > Hi, > > On 31/10/2018 10:07, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > It seems that public-suffix.txt from mozilla fundation is embeded in a > > few package. > > > > The Public Suffix List is a catalog of certain Internet domain names. > > The term is

Re: Confusing our users - who is supporting LTS?

2018-10-31 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:56:26PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 04:31:38PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 01:14:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Debian can't afford to pay developers in general, and previous > > > proposals to pay specific d

Re: RFC: yet another list of data duplicated: public-suffix.txt

2018-10-31 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:07:36AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > It seems that public-suffix.txt from mozilla fundation is embeded in a > few package. > > The Public Suffix List is a catalog of certain Internet domain names. > The term is also known by the form effective top-level domain (eTLD

Re: RFC: yet another list of data duplicated: public-suffix.txt

2018-10-31 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:07:36AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I suppose the way to go is to create a data package and get a MBF > after getting a consensus here. Is that a different list then https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/publicsuffix/filelist ? Bastian -- War is never imperative.

Re: RFC: yet another list of data duplicated: public-suffix.txt

2018-10-31 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On 31/10/2018 10:07, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > It seems that public-suffix.txt from mozilla fundation is embeded in a > few package. > > The Public Suffix List is a catalog of certain Internet domain names. > The term is also known by the form effective top-level domain (eTLD). > The Mozilla

RFC: yet another list of data duplicated: public-suffix.txt

2018-10-31 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Hi, It seems that public-suffix.txt from mozilla fundation is embeded in a few package. The Public Suffix List is a catalog of certain Internet domain names. The term is also known by the form effective top-level domain (eTLD). The Mozilla Foundation maintains suffix list for the security and pri

Re: Use case for -dbg package

2018-10-31 Thread Matthias Klose
On 31.10.18 02:01, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was reviewing Tobias' updates on the use of dbg packages vs dbgsym > in dev ref and was wondering if there was any other know use cases > where we cannot use dbgsym over dbg packages for building debugging > symbols. > > As far as I rememb

Bug#912407: ITP: mailfromd -- General-Purpose Mail Filter

2018-10-31 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Roland Rosenfeld * Package name: mailfromd Version : 8.6 Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff * URL : https://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/mailfromd/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : General-Purpos