Re: Summary: Git Packaging Round 2 [comments by 11/05/2019]

2019-10-07 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:22:46PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > [...] as a last opportunity for > others to comment. what's the deadline to grok this 20k and respond? -- cheers, Holger --- holger

Summary: Git Packaging Round 2 [comments by 11/05/2019]

2019-10-07 Thread Sam Hartman
This is a summary of discussions we had in August and September around how we want to use salsa. Presented so those involved in the discussion can see if I'm calling consensus correctly and as a last opportunity for others to comment. A few tweaks from my original proposed recommendations. If y

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 11:29 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think "re-bootstrap, don't upgrade" is an equally good principle for > autopkgtest and sbuild? Both will be equally susceptible to accumulating > cruft during upgrades that wouldn't have been there in a fresh debootstrap, > which is unde

ITP: libdata-url-java -- Support for the data protocol as specified in RFC 2397.

2019-10-07 Thread Felix Natter
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Felix Natter * Package name: libdata-url-java Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Rob Spoor * URL : https://github.com/robtimus/data-url/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Support for the

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Wise writes ("Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos"): > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:23 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > FYI, this is because autopkgtest has an abstraction for multiple > > container/virtualization mechanisms (lxc, lxd, qemu, schroot) > > It seems like this

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2019-10-07 13:43, Johannes Schauer wrote: Quoting Philipp Kern (2019-10-07 13:21:36) On 10/7/2019 1:17 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:29 PM Simon McVittie wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >>> Specifically, currently autopkgtest is

Potrzebujesz strony WWW, a nie chcesz zapłacić fortuny za realizację? Sprawdź nas.

2019-10-07 Thread Agencja WWW
Planujesz zmianę swojej *Strony* lub *Sklepu internetowego*? A może interesuje Cię nowy projekt? Jedno jest pewne, trafiłeś w dobre ręce. Odpowiedz do nas maila z informacją* Tak*, a my przygotujemy dla Ciebie bezpłatną wycenę. Nasz Doradca Klienta wytłumaczy Ci sposób działania, po czym

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, shameless plug for mmdebstrap incoming. Quoting Philipp Kern (2019-10-07 13:21:36) > On 10/7/2019 1:17 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:29 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > >> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > >>> Specifically, currently autopkgte

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:21 PM Philipp Kern wrote: > In that case it'd probably be better to make bootstrapping faster rather > than trusting random binaries on the internet. (Unless we grow an > "assemble an image from debs" service on, say, ftp-master.) > We already have such, the cloud image s

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On 10/7/2019 1:17 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:29 PM Simon McVittie wrote: >> >> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >>> Specifically, currently autopkgtest is limited to providing a read-only >>> layer >>> for certain backends and its upstream ha

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:29 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Specifically, currently autopkgtest is limited to providing a read-only > > layer > > for certain backends and its upstream has no intention of widening the > > scope of >

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 at 07:22:53 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Specifically, currently autopkgtest is limited to providing a read-only layer > for certain backends and its upstream has no intention of widening the scope > of > the software [1]. This means that to upgrade an autopkgtest backend,

Re: Debian and our frenemies of containers and userland repos

2019-10-07 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 1:23 PM Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Quoting Paul Wise (2019-10-07 03:38:55) > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 7:23 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > > > FYI, this is because autopkgtest has an abstraction for multiple > > > container/virtualization mechanisms (lxc, lxd, qemu, schroot) > >

Bug#941893: RFA: pam-dbus

2019-10-07 Thread Joachim Breitner
Package: wnpp Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, pam-dbus (which allows you to configure a guest account where people can log in when you approve it by approving a notification popup) was a fun experiment from me years ago, but I never used it, and have not touche