On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 1:40 AM Russ Allbery wrote:
> Maybe one of these days I'll take a couple of days and turn it into
> something vaguely maintainable and usable by someone else.
We already have a lot of similar tools for this, unfortunately the
most accurate ones (FOSSology & ScanCode) aren'
Am Sonntag, den 06.10.2019, 22:09 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
> Hi,
>
> > I'm struggling with it for a while now and I couldn't find the solution.
> > I have a package maintained with git-buildpackage. And now, that I
> > "cannot" upload binary packages I tried to compile the new version with
> >
Am Sonntag, den 06.10.2019, 11:27 +0200 schrieb Alf Gaida:
> On 06.10.19 08:18, Attila Szalay wrote:
> > That option means that the system will create not only the binary
> > .amd.changes but another changes too which contains only the source
> > packages. And I would like to use this method to be
Hi!
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 12:43:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 at 02:41:29 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > It does, it's specifically mentioned as a branch that will be
> > rewinded. See the “Branch management for next and pu after a feature
> > release” section.
>
> gitwor
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 4:16 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, November 9, 2019 3:05:21 PM EST Ole Streicher wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > Scott Kitterman writes:
> > > I'd like to suggest thinking about this from the perspective of new
> > > contributors. Copyright-format 1.0 has a lot of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcos Fouces
* Package name: python-rq
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Vincent Driessen
* URL : https://python-rq.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Simple job queues for Python 3
RQ
Hi!
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 11:36:19 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 17:51:28 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I think we should adopt sysusers.d fragments as the preferred mechanism
> > for creating system users
>
> I have been tempted to write a small reimplementation of syste
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcos Fouces
* Package name: python-flasgger
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Bruno Rocha
* URL : https://github.com/flasgger/flasgger/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Extract swagger sp
On Saturday, November 9, 2019 3:05:21 PM EST Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Scott Kitterman writes:
> > I'd like to suggest thinking about this from the perspective of new
> > contributors. Copyright-format 1.0 has a lot of specific requirements.
> > Do we really want to recommend that be
Hi Scott,
Scott Kitterman writes:
> I'd like to suggest thinking about this from the perspective of new
> contributors. Copyright-format 1.0 has a lot of specific requirements. Do
> we
> really want to recommend that before someone can package software for Debian
> they need to learn this t
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 06:23:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 12:29:11PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:27:19PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> > > Maybe apt could deprecate /etc/apt/trusted* and apt-key(8) in bullseye
> > > and
> > > ab
On Saturday, November 9, 2019 9:07:39 AM EST gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:40:28 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> Some remarks:
> > Andreas Tille dixit:
> > >explicit wish to not use DEP5. I wonder what other reasons might exist
> > >to explicitly stick to the non-machine reada
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 12:29:11PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:27:19PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> > Maybe apt could deprecate /etc/apt/trusted* and apt-key(8) in bullseye and
> > abandon them in bullseye+1. The whole concept of having one keyring that
> > a
gregor herrmann writes:
> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:51:45 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> DEP-5 is the fastest way to write a d/copyright in some cases, but in
>> others it is not. Part of this is that DEP-5 somewhat encourages people
>> to include more detail than is needed.
>>
>> I think we should
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 02:27:19PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
>
> Maybe apt could deprecate /etc/apt/trusted* and apt-key(8) in bullseye and
> abandon them in bullseye+1. The whole concept of having one keyring that
> authenticated all sources is wrong. I had my share in making /etc/apt/
> t
Hi Timo,
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 07:33:10PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> Hallo Wouter Verhelst,
>
> 03.11.19 18:35 Wouter Verhelst:
> > The software from the package downloads the metadata index and validates
> > the GPG signature; and if everything checks out, adds configuration to
> > /etc/
gregor herrmann dixit:
>Lately we as a project, guided by the DPL, have been in
>recommendation mode anyway: "Use dh(1) unless you have a reason not
>to", "Use git(1) and salsa unless …".
>
>I think "Write d/copyright in Copyright-Format 1.0 unless you have a
>specific reason not to do this for a
On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 10:51:45 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> DEP-5 is the fastest way to write a d/copyright in some cases, but in
> others it is not. Part of this is that DEP-5 somewhat encourages people
> to include more detail than is needed.
>
> I think we should be optimising for reduced contr
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:40:28 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Some remarks:
> Andreas Tille dixit:
> >explicit wish to not use DEP5. I wonder what other reasons might exist
> >to explicitly stick to the non-machine readable format.
> I prefer human-readable format. I also often deal in software whi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jochen Sprickerhof
* Package name: python-tasklib
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Rob Golding
* URL : https://github.com/robgolding/tasklib
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Task W
20 matches
Mail list logo
