severity 306015 grave
thanks
Hi Steve,
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than This is not a missing dependency, feh
I know that downgrading RC bugs makes your RC bugs metric look better,
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:26:19AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:04:44AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
And then there is this yada packaging you used.
Not that I was a friend of yada, but AFAIK it's
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:08:50AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
BTW: The interaction between the two MySQL server packages in
unstable/sarge at purge time is *ahem* interesting.
They are really time bombs ready to explode
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
severity 306015 grave
thanks
Hi Steve,
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:40:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:24:34AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to
adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly
reported as non-RC, and neither your
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
30 May 2005
Release
And if everything goes well, we'll be ready to release at the end of the
month.
...
Setting goals is the easy part of release management.
Ensuring that the goals are met is the hard part of the work
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
grave - serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
difference between them (both are RC)
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
are there to inform the developer
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:05:24PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
plan?
Can
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:45:21AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Joey Hess wrote:
bb
I did not checked your complete list but our most frequently used
programs at exhigition boothes. It currently has no RC bug (the only
grave bug was solved two weeks ago.
So something
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:07:44PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Joey Hess]
So here is a list (from update-excuses) of all 491 packages that is
being held out of sarge[1].
I would be even more interested in seeing which packages in woody are
now missing in sarge. Anyone have such a
At the bottom is a complete list of the 2070 binary packages present in
woody but not in sarge (including nun-US and contrib/non-free).
Correction: 2069 binary packages
The entry packages: was a bug in my quickdirty scripting...
cu
Adrian
--
Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 03:54:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, it's called garbage in, garbage out. If people aren't going to file
bugs at the proper severity, and if package maintainers aren't going to
treat release-critical bugs with the appropriate urgency when they *are*
filed at
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adrian Bunk]
The entry packages: was a bug in my quickdirty scripting...
Thanks for making a nice summary of the relevant packages. :)
Feel free to include the script to generate the list when you generate
dynamic list
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:42:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Speaking as somebody who is quite unrelated to release issues (except
that I keep my packages bug free) I have some questions:
were at the correct severity and tagged correctly, your
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:50:48AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:42:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
How often does a quick NMU that gives a fast improvement
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:36:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
submitter?
I believe
submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
works just fine.
I'm quite
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:39:04PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
Hi,
Hi Thomas,
how important is it to have unzoo, now that zoo is in main?
unzoo is only able to list and extract files, not to add new ones.
the functionality of unzoo is a subset of the functionality of zoo?
In this case a
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:07:36AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005 12:30:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Completely MIA maintainers are one part of the problem.
But then there's the class of maintainers who manage to upload a new
upstream version and perhaps fix some RC bugs
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:33:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
Steve Langasek schrieb:
If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer ( 2.6.8) kernel, why
not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other big issues
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Short version:
Should users first upgrade dpkg and aptitude before upgrading the rest of
the system or can the upgrade safely be done using Woody's version of the
package tools?
Long version:
The current version of the release
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:44:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Adrian Bunk [Mon, 16 May 2005 18:14:20 +0200]:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The current version of the release notes tells users to (simplified):
1. apt-get install aptitude
2. change
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to
2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people
could still be using it with current kernels.
cc'ing debian-devel. If the
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:44:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
...
Note that in (4), the command is aptitude, not apt-get.
Does this make any difference?
...
It does.
My fault, I confused (4) with (3).
cu
Adrian
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:23:35AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
...
the following upgrade paths work:
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server/sarge - mysql-server-4.1/sarge
but this does not:
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server-4.1/sarge
so at this point,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
According to http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/, the official
count of release-critical bugs affecting testing is 61. Since security
bugs are an, er, renewable resource, and can be fixed out-of-band, we
can exclude them
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:17:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:55:12AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
According to http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/, the official
count of release-critical
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
...
And all have problems:
package | danger
-+--
kernel-image*| kernel-source* update replaces source
| rebuild differs
| but old
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 05:33:01PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
Other issues like #308762 are also still possible on direct
mysql-server/woody - mysql-server-4.1/sarge upgrade paths - and
there will be users doing such upgrade
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
...
I see the same three options. Joey has said he is working on a final woody
point release for the last weekend in May; you'll probably need to
coordinate with him and get something uploaded soon if you want to try for
this
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:35:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:08:28PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
3 does not sound so bad to me; it's arguably user error anyway to replace
a
package-provided
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Quoting Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before?
Regards Nico
Becuase it is, in fact, a different
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
and per-arch patches).
I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage.
IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to
unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty
straightforward and doable for sarge.
Package unrar
As far as I understood it, the missing infrastructure for
testing-security was the reason why the release of sarge was delayed by
more than half a year.
As far as I have seen, it seems most security updates go either through
unstable or through testing-proposed-updates.
Can anyone point me to
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 08:33:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to
unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty
straightforward
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to
Debian without even sending me a patch first?
This gpg key belongs to Jani Monoses (Cc'ed).
Perhaps he can tell what happened (looks like an accidental upload
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:39:30AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 03:56:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Can anyone tell me what this means, and who is trying to upload this to
Debian without even sending
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:02:06PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:35:59AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:10:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:46:09AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
As far as I understood it, the missing infrastructure for
testing-security was the reason why the release of sarge was delayed by
more than half a year.
As far
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:57:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
...
Timeline
...
1 June 2005
~15 RC bugs (excluding security bugs)
0 RC bugs not tagged sarge
...
How do you measure RC bugs?
If you only look at the output of the BTS - that's horribly wrong.
Why?
Because many
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:04:51PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?ignore=sidignsec=onfullcomment=onnew=7
thats a decent unoffical count...
... that doesn't (and can't) in any way address the problem I described
in my email.
N Jones
cu
Adrian
--
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But setting up autobuilders doesn't require a new infrastructure
(and shouldn't require more than half a year).
In this case, it did because of scalability issues
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:17:29PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
Adrian, I've noticed lately that almost every post you send is about the
release; Pointing out problems with some feature or other of it or with
the actions of the hard working people who are trying to get sarge out
the door.
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:40:33AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:19:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:04:51PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?ignore=sidignsec=onfullcomment=onnew=7
thats a decent
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
For http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~sarge, there are already diffs in a
database that are exactly the diffs between sarge sid changelogs.
Anyway, this problem is already long time known, and the solution will
be implemented
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:45:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Or do you _really_ want to release sarge with many dozens of already
known and fixed bugs?
I'd worry about it more if we hadn't suffered from the same or similar
problems with ever previous Debian release, TBPH
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:07:11PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
I noticed that Adrian moved a bug report for a kernel in sid (2.6.10
IIRC) to the 2.6.8 kernel so it appeared as a Sarge RC Bug? I didn't
see anything that showed that it was a 2.6.8 problem, maybe it is, but
it looked like second
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:56:16PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But setting up autobuilders doesn't require a new
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:56:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:25:39AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:56:16PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Mark
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:29:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Since it seems noone of the release team bothered to pay this part of
the price for the testing release process, I'm sometimes using one or
two spare hours to go
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:58:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:27:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
Why are there always extremely aggressive timelines (with at least three
publically announced release dates for sarge already passed) instead of
making
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:27:04PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:02:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:58:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyone who can't distinguish between an officially announced release
date
and a projected
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:45:21PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
...
You're a native German speaker right Adrian? Perhaps you could help
Debian instead by pointing out the journalist's mistake(s).
...
OK, I can try to send them a message that Debian developers have asked
me to point them to
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
...
- freeze unstable for uploads of library packages with new ABI
versions. If a new soname is introduced now, it has to be changed a
few weeks later again. Packages depending on these libraries
would need to be uploaded
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 05:12:46PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Adrian Bunk writes:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
...
- freeze unstable for uploads of library packages with new ABI
versions. If a new soname is introduced now, it has to be changed
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:06:14PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
...
BTW, the CVS source already contains a debian/ folder, as the author
accepted to let rfc2388 become a Debian native package :-)
Please don't package it as a native Debian package.
You can ship it with an empty Debian diff but
Due to upstream bugs and/or packaging mistakes some Debian packages like
Abiword [1] or Wireshark [2] are currently unintentionally built without
any compiler optimization [3].
This results in programs being both significantely bigger and
significantely slower than they should be.
It would IMHO
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Due to upstream bugs and/or packaging mistakes some Debian packages like
Abiword [1] or Wireshark [2] are currently unintentionally built without
any compiler optimization [3].
This results in programs
I just tried compiling the emacs22 package from unstable with gcc 4.3,
and ran into an issue similar to what Martin described back in
May 2007 for another package in #425544, with the following differences:
- it's not an infinite loop but a one minute hang
(see the alarm() in conftest.c)
- the
Hi Michael,
as I've already explained, the horrible hack in your NMU would affect
all packages using libfontconfig even though without a doubt the actual
bug is in your package (xpdf).
And as I've already said, abusing the fact that the maintainers seem to
be a bit inactive at the moment to
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:32PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
So to summarise: for many years the perl package has provided
/usr/bin/rename, a stanalone utility implemented in perl. The issue is we
don't want to provide the utility from the perl package any more because
it's been added
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:14:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Hi Thomas,
...
If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter
packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note that
this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid ugly
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
...
license-problem-nvidia-intellectual (1 packages, 1 tags)
Huh, what a false hit, so not using this.
Actually seems to be a real hit, when you scroll to the bottom of
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:13:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
...
license-problem-nvidia-intellectual (1 packages, 1 tags)
Huh, what a false hit, so not using this.
Actually seems to be a real hit, when you scroll
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:48:52AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
After ***forcing*** users to use libav instead of ffmpeg in debian
therefore making it to stuck with outdated fork istead of rapidly
developing original it's too late to talk about freedom..
Gosh, we are not forcing you
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-13 20:37:47)
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which
option (libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best
for jessie based on the information
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hi!
Do you have a good idea how to avoid all the problems of mixing both
libraries while also creating a sufficient usage of the FFmpeg libraries
in a way that both libraries can be in testing at the same time, or are
you
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries in the archive at the same time is what I
called insane in the RFP and where I expect additional probems due
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 06:46:37PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.02.2014, 21:37 +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Are you as Debian Multimedia Maintainer willing to discuss which option
(libav, FFmpeg, some solution of shipping both) will be best for jessie
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2014-02-14 09:06:34)
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:16:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Having both sets of libraries
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:14:10AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
All of the bugs have been filed. Just under half have been
fixed. Almost all the rest have tested patches. I'm going to start
uploading 10-day delayed NMUs to try to close these out.
If you have an issue with this please speak now
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:02:59AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Adrian Bunk (b...@stusta.de) wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:14:10AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
All of the bugs have been filed. Just under half have been
fixed. Almost all the rest have tested patches. I'm going to start
hanged-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
valgrind - instrumentation framework for building dynamic analysis tools
valgrind-dbg - instrumentation framework for building dynamic analysis tools
(de
valgrind-mpi - instrumentation framework for building dynamic analysis tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 12:30:08 +0200
Source: gprolog
Binary: gprolog gprolog-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.5-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Salvador Abreu <s...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:06:47 +0200
Source: xkbset
Binary: xkbset
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:52:34 +0200
Source: gaim-themes
Binary: pidgin-themes
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 22:41:38 +0200
Source: ipgrab
Binary: ipgrab
Architecture: source
Version: 0.9.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 23:29:29 +0200
Source: libpcl1
Binary: libpcl1-dev libpcl1
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:56:00 +0200
Source: gnome-ppp
Binary: gnome-ppp
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.23-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 22:19:44 +0200
Source: gnubik
Binary: gnubik
Architecture: source
Version: 2.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:32:23 +0200
Source: getstream
Binary: getstream
Architecture: source
Version: 20100616-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
hanged-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
xnbd-client - Network Block Device client with support for live migration
xnbd-common - Network Block Device - common files
xnbd-server - Network Block Device server with support for live migration
Closes: 760833 763684
Changes:
xnbd (0.3.0
cka...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
libvorbisidec-dev - Integer-only Ogg Vorbis decoder, AKA "tremor" (Development
Files)
libvorbisidec1 - Integer-only Ogg Vorbis decoder, AKA "tremor"
Closes: 739864
Changes:
libvorbisidec (1.0.2+svn1
cka...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
nautilus-image-converter - nautilus extension to mass resize or rotate images
Closes: 648118 727469
Changes:
nautilus-image-converter (0.3.1~git20110416-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Set maintainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:40:33 +0200
Source: tvtime
Binary: tvtime
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 00:23:07 +0200
Source: mknbi
Binary: mknbi
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.4-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:18:12 +0200
Source: xstow
Binary: xstow
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:53:46 +0200
Source: black-box
Binary: black-box
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.8-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
bogofilter - fast Bayesian spam filter (dummy package)
bogofilter-bdb - fast Bayesian spam filter (Berkeley DB)
bogofilter-common - fast Bayesian spam filter (common files)
bogofilter-s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:49:02 +0200
Source: ck
Binary: libck0 libck-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:57:39 +0200
Source: gawk-doc
Binary: gawk-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.1.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:18:25 +0200
Source: gvpe
Binary: gvpe
Architecture: source
Version: 2.25-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: TANIGUCHI Takaki <tak...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:46:53 +0200
Source: uzbek-wordlist
Binary: hunspell-uz
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:06:30 +
Source: gawk
Binary: gawk
Architecture: source
Version: 1:4.1.4+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
gnustep-common - Common files for the core GNUstep environment
gnustep-make - GNUstep build system
gnustep-make-doc - Documentation for GNUstep Make
Closes: 838278
Changes:
gnustep-mak
hanged-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org>
Description:
libx86-1 - x86 real-mode library
libx86-dbg - x86 real-mode library - debugging symbols
libx86-dev - x86 real-mode library - development files
Closes: 851263
Changes:
libx86 (1.1+ds1-10.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maint
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 00:45:25 +0200
Source: pyew
Binary: pyew
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 00:59:52 +0200
Source: ratfor
Binary: ratfor
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <b...@d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 01:39:52 +0200
Source: fileschanged
Binary: fileschanged
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian B
201 - 300 of 1146 matches
Mail list logo
