Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: flash-plugin
Version : 7.0.61.1
Upstream Author : Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://members.chello.be/ws35943/flash-plugin/
* License : GPL
Description
. Would an NMU be appropriate now ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I want to replace the upstream part of cflow by GNU cflow. Any comments
on that are welcome on this bug report : http://bugs.debian.org/353192
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I intend to package open-cobol.
* Package name: open-cobol
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : Keisuke Nishida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.opencobol.org/
* License : GPL, LGPL
discussion? Does it work towards a real solution for the issue being
discussed? Have I read all previous messages of the subject so that my
message doesn't repeat what's already said? And so on.
Thanks,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: phpunit2
Version : 2.3.6
Upstream Author : Sebastian Bergmann
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/PHPUnit2
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: php
Description : Unit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: reniced
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cgarbs.de/stuff.en.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:04 +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:28:16 +0200
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bart,
* Package name: reniced
Version : 1.5
-readable debian/copyright. The program licensecheck in package
devscripts is a good start to find licenses.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
nothing to fix.
+1
I'm curious to know how other maintainers have
addressed such cases in BTS.
A workarond is using the tag wontfix combined with retitling the bug to
something general like confusion about foo doing bar.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:20 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:46:11PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
(and hopefully this madness will now stop)
We all know everyone can triage/patch/... whatever bug in the BTS.
Yes of course.
Still, if some team feels they are
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:35 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070227 20:46]:
You've read this correctly! Starting TEN YEARS AGO, we are in
permanent bug triaging, bug forwarding, but patching party on ALL
bugs, pick one before it's too late!
You may
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 08:51 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:39:54AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
For a general call/cry for help for packages with many bugs, I would
submit an RFH, RFA or O before the number of bugs becomes uncomfortable.
Of course
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 07:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
The relation between Rejects and Voters is currently the highest we
ever had. I'm just asking whether we need some technical improvement
here because I personally add a count of three to the rejects and
have no idea how to vote
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 11:31 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2007-04-12 11:29, Joey Hess wrote:
I wonder if it would be reasonable to make d-i hit one of two urls
depending on whether the user chose to enable popcon, and count the
results.
Isn't this a violation of user's privacy? If
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 10:39 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
However, changing the popcon debconf question to something like the
following might be an acceptable compromise:
Would you like to participate in the Debian package popularity
contest meter? Blah blah blah. You may also
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:32 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:22:37 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
dmidecode output is a big problem. It includes machine UUID and serial
numbers.
Yes.
Perhaps we only want to collect a subset of that information, or at
least
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 02:21 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Looks like with current setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not accept
mail from domain that does not exist for the outside world.
This looks suboptimal for me: why not accept all mail that looks like a
popcon report?
I know that
want to watch these pages to select packages to sponsor:
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/needssponsor.html
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist
More information on the Utnubu subproject can be found here:
http://wiki.debian.org/Utnubu
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 11:21]:
Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian to
newer upstream releases is by comparing Debian with Ubuntu. Here is a
list of packages that are newer
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 21:28 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bart Martens a écrit :
Hi Package Maintainers (DD's and non-DD's),
Now that Etch is released to stable, many package maintainers have
already updated their packages
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:36 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:02:16 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
I have updated the list to hide packages with identical upstream
version numbers but with different epochs. This might hide some
real positives but most likely hides
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Bart Martens]
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high priority to me because this does not change
that Debian Unstable is outdated for the listed packages.
Uh ... I thought
. It should be 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0, right?
You might want to fix that,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 12:16 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:57 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 11:21]:
Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:14 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Bart Martens]
I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental,
but that is not a high priority to me because this does not change
that Debian Unstable
/~bartm/borg/outdated.html
[2] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:07 +1000, Paul Wise wrote:
On 5/10/07, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be better now.
http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/outdated.html
Excellent. For even more usefulness points, this could be integrated
into qa.d.o/developer.php - perhaps
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 19:47 +0200, Amir Tabatabaei wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 08:01 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Should be better now. If you still see false positives, then I'm very
interested.
There is no gaim in unstable any more, but its renamed to pidgin.
At this moment gaim
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 13:31 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:58:54PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 23:07, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
and the debian-www team is recovering from the
and I haven't heard a single
complaint up to now.
So consider this a +1 for me to get write access to all DD by default in
our website.
I agree with giving cvs commit access to the webwml files to all DD's,
or, to encourage all DD's to request that access.
Regards,
Bart Martens
I would
,
- with a newer version at Mentors than in Debian unstable,
- with an ITP or ITA.
So this list does not include packages with RFS messages on
debian-mentors.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reflects who's caring about the packages.
Other opinions?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: line with a count of overrides per package by default and
provide an option to suppress this output if someone wants.
* Don't show the N: line by default and provide an option to turn it on.
Which should we do?
I prefer the second option.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
consistent with the sentiments on the thread to everyone?
No objection from me. Thanks for asking debian-devel for opinions.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not MIA (I still read -devel and I follow the project life), but
you're right, I'm not really active in the packages field.
I'm planning to update chicken in upcoming days, luckily it's not a huge
work, while I just asked Bart Martens to help me to comaintain xchat.
I can confirm that Davide
. And, yes, that's a long time, giving the impression
that the maintainer is no longer interested, or at least temporarily not
active.
solving two bugs more listened on BTS.
If you have fixes for existing bugs in the bts, then please post the
fixes to the bts.
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
I'll adopt aalib.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll no longer be maintaining the following packages. I plan to orphan
them next week and hope to find new maintainers for them before then.
aalib
I'll adopt aalib
use the packaging style conforming to
debian-policy that you feel most comfortable with.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: artphotos
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Gert Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.gertmartens.be/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: none
Description
the .orig.tar.gz without modifications was already uploaded.
Hope this helps,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 09:22 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:40:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:54:56 -0600, Jon Marler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have a question ... How do I keep my Debian maintainer status if I
November 2011:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lustre/news/2016T130707Z.html
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120527044513.gb10
Patrick Winnertz is not MIA.
It would be nice to get some feedback from Patrick Winnertz about this.
First priority is to fix the FTBFS bug 671489. If you intend to update italc
to the newest upstream release, then please retitle bug 672636 to an intention
to NMU.
Regards,
Bart Martens
opinion, not always
possible to judge the potential of a package before it has been in Debian for
some time. Having competing alternatives in Debian is OK, even good, in my
opinion.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 08:48:48PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:45:54 +
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
About allowing new packages in Debian in general : On the one hand you have
a
point that Debian should not collect any free software, but on the other
, then 43 is acceptable, in my opinion.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120624204843.ga22...@master.debian.org
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:18:00PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:48:43 +
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:21:39PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 24 juin 2012 à 20:42 +0200, Arno Töll a écrit :
What makes 42 window
criticism.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120625070555.gc17...@master.debian.org
on the maintenance of the mentioned package.
Anyone can do the effort to find good reasons to object against the ITP, and
that is OK, in my opinion.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
. But this impression may be
colored by the fact that I happen to agree with what Guus wrote.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120629052845
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:50:20PM -0400, John L. Males wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I replied to John in detail via a private e-mail. Summary : I suggested John
to report every problem via bug reports.
Regards,
Bart Martens
of packages in Debian.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120721065147.gb21...@master.debian.org
. And
the
maintainer does not respond within one month after the the third second.
Comments ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
for 6m; left only only zynaddsubfx
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120727055804.gb29...@master.debian.org
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
I intend to orphan zynaddsubfx. Before doing that I invite two additional
DD's
to confirm that they agree with this intent with ma
a bug without signature.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120728094825.gf6...@master.debian.org
://www.debian.org/support
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120910054854.ga1...@master.debian.org
,
- snap --
Looks like a good start for the bug reports.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:57:04PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:12:09PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm afraid I don't have the time right now to thoroughly analyze these
logs and report all the bugs, so some help would be welcome.
I'm offering help, but only
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:35:40PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-09-16 18:36, Bart Martens wrote:
I'm offering help, but only for part of the work : I could write a perl
script
that periodically scans the logfiles and submits additional bugs.
I have written that script, and I
or Uploaders.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120928085341.gb8...@master.debian.org
of the salvaging fits in the existing
procedures.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120928175223.ga2...@master.debian.org
them on -qa sounds like a good idea to me. Can you elaborate on that
side-effect ? I don't understand that part.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
packages. We probably will allow
them to salvage packages OTOH. (And that's totally non-bizarre IMHO.)
I agree with Holger Levsen on this. And the seconding I'm proposing is
obviously to have DDs (maybe also DMs ?) judge between an unwanted hijack and a
welcome salvage.
Regards,
Bart Martens
updated text above. I'm looking forward to a consensus.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121011055051.gb5...@master.debian.org
maximum
duration do you suggest ? I agree that the expiration would raise the questions
you mentioned, to be looked at package per package.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
previous message.)
I don't think we should introduce
voting on the quality of other DD's package maintenance.
Actually I don't see any problem with peer reviews. As long as the quality of
the packages is discussed, with respect for all people involved.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:27:03AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 11.10.2012 07:50, Bart Martens wrote:
- the submitter of the intent to orphan bug must Cc
debian...@lists.debian.org, and file the bug with severity:serious (this
was part of the criterias proposal).
| Anyone
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:20:36AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 11/10/12 at 05:50 +, Bart Martens wrote:
And the maintainer does not respond within one month after the the third
second.
I'm not sure about this delay. This procedure should be used for
uncontroversial cases, where
the point of waiting an extra month.
I don't know where to look for such signal for non-DDs. I think that we should
still allow one month delay in less obvious cases.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00158.html
[4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00199.html
[5] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00261.html
[6] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00242.html
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
attention.
I agree with Steve on this.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121024035534.ga20...@master.debian.org
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:59:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 10/24/2012 11:55 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:40:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I fear a bit the situation nobody care enough to comment, being
interpreted as lack of consensus. But I do think
is neither easy, nor efficient.
The proposed text is quite easy, in my opinion.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121024162732.gc21
the hard part.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026050907.gb10...@master.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:50:10PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:58:16PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:40:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
4. When
easy to
find a consensus on. The real salvaging (the hard work) happens via the
existing ITA procedure.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00261.html
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026055602.ge10...@master.debian.org
join Steve L. with wanting a consensus, so the package can be orphaned only
when there are sufficient ACKs. I expect the cc to debian-qa to draw
sufficient attention from DDs, so I don't expect any problem with this.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
a consensus in a shorter time, so that for obvious cases the salvaging can
proceed without pointless delay.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
? The proposal includes collecting ACKs so that any pointless
delay can be skipped, resulting in the package being salvaged sooner.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the above with s/developer/person/.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026063112.gi10...@master.debian.org
. It's quite another to say this
package is in need of attention but I'm not going to do anything other
than say it's a problem.
It is, in my opinion, also useful to identify problems even without solving the
problems.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026064655.gk10...@master.debian.org
unmaintained packages as orphaned. If you want
NMUs to be more liberal, then please write a proposal for modifying the NMU
procedure and feel free to discuss it in a separate thread.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
easier to sponsor.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121026071211.gm10...@master.debian.org
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:12:03PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 10/26/2012 01:09 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
I expect the cc to debian-qa to draw sufficient DD's attention.
And the ACKs are about agreeing on marking a package as orphaned.
That's the easy part. The salvaging part goes via
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:59:16AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org writes:
I think that sufficient DDs will review the ITOs. Note that most work is
already done by the ITO submitter. Sponsoring a package at mentors
(review
other peoples work) is, in my
to it,
which the current proposal doesn't.)
I would not object against including this in the text.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 26/10/2012 08:46, Bart Martens a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:45:21PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu wrote: AIUI, with the current
proposal, as long as three DDs think it should
be orphaned, so that a new
contributor can become full package maintainer without any restrictions on the
allowed changes.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
cases it will lead to a pointless delay.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121027041826.ga5...@master.debian.org
, and to submit ITA-bugs for packages he/she wishes to
salvage. Sounds revolutionary, but in reality this is more or less already
happening. Thoughts ? Comments ? Am I overlooking something ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
?
Sometimes there are good reasons to not package a newer upstream release, see
for example bugs 672568 and 687690. Sometimes the maintainer is simply gone,
see for example bug 671890.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:16:56PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist bugs
filed lagging behind upstream
patch, because they can be expected to be more
aware
| of potential issues which an NMUer might miss. It is often a better use of
| everyone's time if the maintainer is given an opportunity to upload a fix
on
| their own.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 07:10:06PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:41:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Maybe an example will help get us on the same page. Russ seems to
have the impression that my proposal
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 01:58:28PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
wine: http://bugs.debian.org/585409 (new upstream pushed via nmu)
This is a good example where talking helped to gather all views on all
aspects
from all involved people
1 - 100 of 890 matches
Mail list logo
