Davide Natalini [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all
I'm trying to get static naming for my network interfaces with udev,
without success.
As far as I can tell, network interface names are given by the kernel
and they've nothing to do with udev.
To get a stable naming you should use some package
Hello!
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.01.18.1254
+0100]:
As far as I can tell, network interface names are given by the
kernel and they've nothing to do with udev.
To get a stable naming you should use some package
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Jan 19, Davide Natalini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
udev now can rename the interfaces, because they haven't a name yet.
udev still loads the modules, you just have been lucky.
This is not a solution in any way.
Maybe network interface renaming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Jan 19, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merging that into Debian would mean that udev would replace some
ifupdown planned functionality.
Wrong.
I think that ifupdown maintainers are the ones who can say that for
sure, looking
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only (very minor) drawback is that above haskell scripts when
compiled is about 7MB in size, but the huge gain in reliability
I think you're somewhat joking about using Haskell, but your script
weights:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ ls -lh a.out
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interestingly the size is highly dependent on the architecture:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l postrm-*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 6960782 Jan 30 14:10 postrm-amd64
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ballombe ballombe 266065 Jan 30 14:09 postrm-i386
[EMAIL
El jue, 07-10-2004 a las 09:52 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen escribi:
* Duncan Findlay
| On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| * martin f krafft
|
| | What do you think?
|
| API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
|
|
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I have found the exim-4 packages to be extremely well organized and
handy. I used to use the one-file method, and was simply delighted
when I found how easy it was to switch and tweak the individual files
that I needed to when I had to create a more complicated mail
Paolo Pantaleo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have spent some time to write the bash completion for apt-file command.
I have written a pair of email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i didn't get any
response. Now i want to submit a patch for bash_completion file that
add the apt-file support.
[EMAIL
Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have to, I will also continue to host the backport APT repository,
although I would prefer not to.
Wouldn't this be a good candidate for volatile.debian.net?
Regards,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
10 matches
Mail list logo
