* Julien Cristau:
I think the problem is that you can't know in advance whether the device
still exists or not, and whether it will be plugged in later (because
everything runs asynchronously).
Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the
norm. It seems wrong to
* Bastian Blank:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:15:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Sure, but hotpluggable PCI(e) interfaces are the exception, not the
norm. It seems wrong to optimize for this case.
udev sees network devices, not pci devices. and hotpluggable network
devices are common
* Maik Merten:
img gives clear semantics: It's an image.
Animated GIF, anyone?
video gives clear semantics: Video.
Does it begin to run automatically? Can be paused? Saved? What
happens if there are two videos on the same page? Are they
synchronized? Which one gets to play the audio?
* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz:
In trying to send mail to an alioth ml I got:
The following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-Verification failed for [EMAIL
PROTECTED]\nCalled: 207.44.202.99\nSent: RCPT
* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz:
Why bother distributing it over the mailing list? It's rather likely
you can't contact the author of that message because his or her
mailing system is thoroughly misconfigured.
Is 'forced to relay through a gateway' an instance of 'thoroughly
misconfigured'? Or
* Miguel Gea Milvaques:
I've readed swfdec last version is able to reproduce youtube
videos. I supose last version is still not in Debian, so you'll need
to compile it.
youtube-dl and mplayer work surprisingly well for that purpose.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Warren Turkal:
Educational reasons. I could see someone demonstrating breaking weak
passwords
with such a tool.
But you already need root privileges to install the Debian package,
which makes the whole thing not very convincing. Of course, it
doesn't matter how you get hold of such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:17:22 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Simon Richter:
I plan to make the package cross-buildable for all of Debian's official
plus a few unofficial architectures (armeb for example), split each
library into its own package in order to save space when installing on
an embedded system
Is this really necessary? I think for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:58:39 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Ron Johnson:
Does the BTS ack *mean* that an actual living breathing human has
eyeballed the bug?
No, it doesn't.
But would an ack from a human being mean that the bug will be fixed in
due course?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
* Nikita V. Youshchenko:
What do people look on the following idea: not allow packages to migrate
from sid to testing if they have unanswered bug reports with severity =
normal?
I don't think fiddling with testing propagation in this way is a good
idea. After all, even if the package has
* Guillem Jover:
The resulting .changes will get a field like this:
Source: bacula (1.38.11-7)
which can be used to track back from which source this binary
originated.
Yeah, but this only helps if you've got a source version to compare
to. You could derive that from a binary version if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:35:10 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* John Goerzen:
sid seems to contain bacula 1.38.11-7+b1, a binary-only NMU for i386,
which breaks bacula-console and various other packages due to broken
deps. The changelog file is signed only buildd_i386-saens.
packages.qa.debian.org doesn't know about 1.38.11-7+b1.
Here's the build log:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:52:59 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Matthew Garrett:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P3 server machines can easily handle more RAM, I've had P3 servers with 1G
and
2G before. But desktops are limited (desktop and server versions of the P3
CPU have significant differences among other things).
Like any other
* Anthony Towns:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 03:28:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
It is now; the katie - dak rename broke it.
Uhm, it seems that it's still lacking James' recent changes. Are you
sure the mirror is working?
They're there and it is. Grep for Binary-Upload-Restrictions.
Oops
* Yaroslav Halchenko:
The question is: are there any helper tools for doing source code
validation subject to possibly available snippets of code which might be
for illegal activity (ie sending out private information, or serve as
backdoors, etc)?
There are several commercial bug finding
* Anthony Towns:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is their a developer-accessible mirror (on a non-restricted host) of
the archive maintenance which are in production, including (most of)
the configuration?
There used to be a mirror on merkel.debian.org
* Ian Jackson:
To restore a package in state `triggered' to `installed', dpkg will
run the postinst script:
postinst triggered trigger-name trigger-name ...
Is this completely POSIX-conforming if there are many triggers?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Is their a developer-accessible mirror (on a non-restricted host) of
the archive maintenance which are in production, including (most of)
the configuration?
There used to be a mirror on merkel.debian.org, but it's no longer
current.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:49:17 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:14:41 +0100
Source: xml2rfc
Binary: xml2rfc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.32.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL
* Anthony Towns:
The key we'll be using (and indeed are already using) is available as:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/archive-key-4.0.asc
It's expected to be valid until sometime after lenny is released.
Thanks a lot for stopping the yearly key rollover madness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Paul Waring:
I've seen a lot of announcement/verification emails (such as Amazon
orders) which go out from an address that does not exist -
In the SMTP envelope? I strongly doubt that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:52:21 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Gabor Gombas:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:23:13AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
But who has created the allow-hotplug-line? I thought hotplug is dead?
Doesn't matter, udev handles allow-hotplug interfaces just fine, I use
it on several machines.
I've seen it quite a few times that udev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:06:11 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Steffen Moeller:
I do not like project in the package name too much. If you think of
how www.r-project.org is presented in Debian (as r-..) then it would sound
strange to me to add project to a project that does not have project in
its name.
It's less confusing than root-system, I
* Christian Holm Christensen:
Shared libraries: libroot5.13 for the core libs
libroot-*5.13 for add-on libs
Libdevel pkgs:libroot-dev for the core libs
libroot-*-dev for add-on libs
These shouldn't be a problem, I think.
Plugins:
* Thomas Dickey:
It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
wrong place. I'd point out that it doesn't solve the problem, and
that the program is still subject to the same issue as reported, [...]
This is not correct. Gracious write operations to the home directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:08:56 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Benjamin Seidenberg:
Less archive/mirror bloat.
Which is easily nullified if the more complex Architecture: all
approach needs more bug fixes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:47:43 +0100
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* David Weinehall:
We do rely quite heavily on the glibc too, yet its documentation is
nonfree...
The manpages-dev package documents most of the important interfaces,
and it's in main. 8-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
* David Weinehall:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 07:13:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
[...]
Nonfree. http://packages.debian.org/susv3
Uhm, no?
susv3:
Installed: 6.1
Candidate: 6.1
* Roberto C. Sanchez:
Then, I guess the relevant question has to do with whether or not
adduser (and the rest of the components that touch or use the username)
are RFC2822 compliant.
Most certainly they are not. Embedded NUL characters are allowed in
local-parts.
I don't think this is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:46:10 +0200
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Joey Hess:
To make a Vcs-Svn field work, dpkg-dev needs to be modified to recognise
that field. A simple modification but it would need to be done for all
the other ones for other RCSes, which could be a problem since there are
more and more of them. If we wanted to use a formalised field
* Stefano Zacchiroli:
As an answer specific for this case. The field is still an X- field,
because I actually don't know how and if it should be standardized.
If you use the X- prefix and the field gains widespread acceptance, a
transition is needed. Debian might be able to do this in a
* Hendrik Sattler:
Am Freitag 15 September 2006 17:27 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
If I update 600 Sarge systems to Etch, they would currently install
discover as a depends.
No, it is only a recommends:
Which means it will be automatically installed if you follow the
documented upgrade
* Goswin von Brederlow:
However, patching rred to apply patches in a single run would be a
good start because all further optimizations will need it.
Why should the number of chunks matter?
If you use the naïve algorithm, it does. But rred implements
something more involved, leading to a
* Lionel Elie Mamane:
Well, I have found one. Myself. You just have to interpret the part
after the second point as the integer part of an infinitesimal:
Let ε be an infinitesimal, that is a strictly positive number
(that is ε 0) smaller than any strictly positive real number
(that is ∀
* Carlos Z. F. Liu:
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html
This talks about a different OPL, not the VIM one. The one below,
downloaded from http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml. The you may
not sell this work (clause 1) looks troubling, though, although there
eixsts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:43:55 +0200
Source: xml2rfc
Binary: xml2rfc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.31.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL
* Goswin von Brederlow:
What code do you need there? If the rred method keeps the full Index
file in memory during patching it can just be fed all the patches one
after another and only write out the final result at the
end. Combining the patches is a simple cat.
#383881 suggests that I/O
* Nathanael Nerode:
In reality, as user A, I switched to using cdrdao for making serious audio
CDs and CD-RWs, and for burning disks from .iso files: this uses
Schilling's scsilib, but not the rest of cdrecord.
What about mkisofs?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
* Thomas Bushnell:
As a countermeasure, the FSF tries to extend copyright to interfaces,
so that you do create a derivative work merely by programming to a
specific interface of a library written by someone else, without
copying their code. I'm not sure if this is such a bright idea.
* Simon Huggins:
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
maintainer addresses HAVE to accept bug reports and mails from
non-subscribers. This setting is not correct, please fix it asap.
If messages do indeed get through to the list why is this a problem?
You can't
* Daniel Schepler:
And since dynamic linking is done at the time the program is run, this would
appear to me to be what applies. In particular, it appears to me that you
could satisfy the GPL and still dynamically link against a non-free library,
and distribute both, by invoking the mere
* Michael Biebl:
So, what should I do now:
1.) Wait for a 0.10 release. I think my users wouldn't be happy ;-)
2.) Use an epoch.
3.) File a bug report against dpkg.
2) is the typical approach.
If it's not a bug in dpkg, could someone please elaborate on the
reasoning of this behaviour.
.
* martin f. krafft:
Thanks to the work of our DPL Anthony aj Towns (and all the other
people who have worked on this without my knowledge), I am happy to
announce that dak, our archive management software, finally supports
the use of the tilde ('~') in version numbers.
Should we really start
* Don Armstrong:
Should we really start using this feature even though it violates
section 5.6.12 of the Policy?
Policy was written like that because the changes delineated in
martin's message had yet to be implemented. It should be updated
accordingly, but that by itself is no reason not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:32:36 +0200
Source: debfoster
Binary: debfoster
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: debfoster Maintainer Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer
* Milan P. Stanic:
For new kernels there are new upstream releases at:
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/ and they are named as
iproute2-kernel.version-releasedate
Do the newer versions include documentation of the semantics of the ip
commands (and not just the syntax)?
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:40:16 +0200
Source: debfoster
Binary: debfoster
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: debfoster Maintainer Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer
* Marc Haber:
The machine in Question is a P3 with 1200 MHz. What's making the
process slow is the turnaround time for the http requests, as observed
multiple times in this thread alone.
Then your setup is very broken. APT performs HTTP pipelining.
On my machines, I see the behavior Miles
* Mike Hommey:
The fix is to combine the diffs before applying them, so that you only
need one process the large Packages file once. I happen to have ML
code which does this (including the conversion to a patch
representation which is more amenable to this kind of optimization)
and would be
* Mario Holbe:
We did. 0.5.4-6sarge1 was on s.d.o as soon as possible. Since there were
no newer version in unstable, the version on s.d.o should have had
automatically override even the unstable version. Of course, if you
don't source in s.d.o, you don't get security updates :)
In this
* Peter Eisentraut:
The upgrade to the new egroupware upstream drops several applications such as
the trouble-ticket system and the forum (because they were unmaintained or
the functionality was picked up by something else). I'm not sure how to
arrange an upgrade to this new version. On
* Martin Zobel-Helas:
After we got some basic overview of what had to be done, we decided to delay
all kernel-related updates until r3. Otherwise we would have delayed r2 even
more, as that kernel update requires a complete rebuild of the Debian
Installer. Frans Pop is currently taking care
* Yui-wah LEE:
What is a clean way to introduce a delay between the
scripts in /etc/init.d ?
Attempts at synchronization based on time are doomed to fail.
I could force a delay between the two scripts by
introducing another script (run at S26) that does
nothing but sleep for a fixed time
* Bastian Blank:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Gordon Grubert wrote:
Problematic Debian-Client (structurally identical to Suse-Client):
- Linux DEBIAN-CLIENT 2.6.15.1
- Yukon Gigabit Ethernet with default drivers (Debian Sarge AMD64)
Sarge don't have a kernel 2.6.15. But this is
* Ian Jackson:
Florian Weimer writes (Re: use of invoke-rc.d $PACKAGE stop || exit $? in
prerm scripts):
Ian Jackson:
If the old package's prerm fails, dpkg tries the version from the new
package instead, precisely to avoid this problem. See the policy
manual for details
* Mark Brown:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that
problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed
libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it
works
* Manoj Srivastava:
I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of
what I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other
people who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I
find that my decision to vaive my personal requirements of two
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve
* Michael Meskes:
This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state that I
certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to belong to?
Exactly. It does not tell us anything about your views regarding that
person or the purpose of the key itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
I suppose it would be preferable to fix the stop target of the init
There is nothing preferable about it. Stop targets *are* to exit with
status 0 if the service is already stopped.
Makes sense. In this case, fixing
* Ian Jackson:
Francesco P. Lovergine writes (Re: use of invoke-rc.d $PACKAGE stop || exit
$? in prerm scripts):
Unfortunately sometimes the daemon does not stop for an error in the
maintainer script and that prevents upgrading for ever, even when
the package has been corrected. [...]
If
* Andreas Barth:
Why that? It would only affect packages that (correctly or wrongly) also
depend on libdb4.2. (And libdb4.2 unfortunatly doesn't have versioning,
otherwise, it wouldn't be any issue; lidb4.3 and libdb4.4 are better in
that regard.)
Berkeley DB 4.2 was compiled such that every
* Nikita V. Youshchenko:
* Nikita V. Youshchenko:
However, if I will build library against libdb4.4 instead of
libdb4.2, this will probably break any binaries built against the
library - both packaged and local.
What kind of interface does libetpan expose? Based on the package
* Nikita V. Youshchenko:
However, if I will build library against libdb4.4 instead of
libdb4.2, this will probably break any binaries built against the
library - both packaged and local.
What kind of interface does libetpan expose? Based on the package
description, I wouldn't expect the
* Michael Prokop:
Using:
invoke-rc.d $PACKAGE stop || true
/etc/init.d/$PACKAGE stop || true
would be a replacement already used in some packages like for
example at, binfmt-support, dnsmasq, drbd0.7-utils, freeradius, hal,
scanlogd, sl-modem-daemon, snort.
I suppose it would be
* Nathanael Nerode:
(2) Upstream status.
There hasn't been a new upstream for sysklogd since 2001.
All of the others are active upstream.
Have you checked if SuSE's syslog-ng is heavily patched? If it's
mostly alright, it's probably a good indicator that syslog-ng is the
way to go (and I
* Turbo Fredriksson:
I've had some time left and I thought I'd spend that to fix some
bugs...
What should I do with this bug? Roxen2 is only available in 'oldstable'
(woody)... But how do I direct an upload there? Or should I put it into
sarge, so that it can be removed THERE instead?
Hmm?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:38:05 +0200
Source: debsecan
Binary: debsecan
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Marco d'Itri:
On May 16, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that many ISPs now block outbound port 25 (at least on
consumer-level service), except for what is relayed through their mail
servers.
Agreed. It's not reasonable to expect that port 25 connections from
large
* Emmanuel le Chevoir:
Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
license: the Operating System Distributor License for Java (DLJ)[2][3
* Bill Allombert:
I don't think it is appropriate to use debian-devel-announce to
advertise non-free softwares epecially when we are striving to provide
a free alternative.
I tend to agree.
Any pointer to that discussion ? I could not find any on debian-legal.
From reading the license I
* Norbert Tretkowski:
(Nice when the error is because the mail was over 50MB.)
There are better ways to transfer big files than SMTP.
That's presumably why the receving side rejected the message.
Apparently, nullmailer cannot deal gracefully with that situation. 8-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Roberto C. Sanchez:
Out of curiousity, what happens when someone tries to login and /usr is
unavailable? If the shell is set to something in /bin, it will still be
used. What is the default action when the user's shell is not available?
It's also interesting how this interacts with
* Frank Küster:
Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
which are generated on a Debian system, and somehow TeX is involved
are.
And those which haven't been rebuilt could well be non-free anyway
(because we lack the source code). 8-
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve.
Exactly, and this begs the question why we rotate keys at all.
--
To
* Pierre Habouzit:
Proposal 1:
Proposal 2:
Proposal ...:
Sure, it is possible to devise arbitrarily complex schemes. For a key
that is basically used to create a digital signature that protects
against tampering along the mirror network, even yearly key rotation
is way over the top.
IMHO,
* Lionel Elie Mamane:
Why can't we have a master key that signs the yearly keys? After all,
we have a long-term unique X.509 master key, so what's the difference
with OpenPGP?
End users are typically not exposed to the X.509 keys, which makes
things a lot easier.
By the way, if you've got a
* Goswin von Brederlow:
Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/rsync-and-debian.html
Has anyone ever done some log file analysis to figure out how much
bandwidth would be saved by transferring package deltas
* Simon Josefsson:
text/xml2rfc
From the debian/copyright file:
| The software is released under the following license. Note that the
| output produced by xml2rfc may include more restrictive copyright
| statements, to conform with ISOC and IETF requirements. This is why
| some of the
* Marco d'Itri:
On Apr 21, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KERNEL==*.*, GOTO=persistent_net_generator_end
No visible change.
There's an error message in the syslog:
Apr 21 10:05:30 l udevd-event[6705]: rename_net_if: error changing net
interface name eth0.1_ifrename to eth0
* Mike Bird:
Metapackages are great. Need to add KDE to a system? Wham. Done.
If you don't like them, don't install them.
The KDE case is different because the dependencies of the kde package
are already intertwined.
Ideally, tasksel would be changed to use the dependencies of
any meta
* Marco d'Itri:
On Apr 21, Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure there are people who use both ifrename and udev, and if udev
Which part of ifrename does not work with udev you did not understand?
Certainly nameif works with udev. Why should I care about missed
events for my
* Adam Borowski:
Idea: if /etc/iftab is present on upgrade, you can consume it,
producing relevant rules in that place (and displaying a message to
the admin).
There's also /etc/mactab, which is processed by nameif (from the
net-tools package). Ideally, this one should be processed, too.
* Marco d'Itri:
On Apr 20, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like a bug in udev. It should not try to identify devices
based on names a user can and will change.
I think I missed which alternative design you are proposing.
I'm not familiar with udev, sorry.
This change
* Marco d'Itri:
On Apr 21, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This change also broke the vlan package, which hasn't got to do much
with interface renaming (from a user perspective). New VLAN
interfaces are called eth0.1_ifrename instead of eth0.1.
Interesting, I think this happens
* Marco d'Itri:
udev receives the hotplug event for eth0
udev starts dispatching the event for eth0
udev runs ifrename which renames eth0 to eth1
udev cannot detect this and continues dispatching the event for eth0
This looks like a bug in udev. It should not try to identify devices
based
* Christian Marillat:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
Accoridng to Policy section 4.4, it's okay to list other changes
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here
* Russ Allbery:
Accordingly, for my packages, I mention (as sub-bullets to the * New
upstream release bullet) any upstream change that:
* Closes a Debian bug (and include the bug closer).
* Is a major feature enhancement or a major bug fix likely to be of
interest to a substantial
* Daniel Stone:
Why? If your library's ABI is changing with every revision, you should
be bumping the soversion.
Or you shouldn't provide a DSO at all.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
401 - 500 of 844 matches
Mail list logo
