Accepted xfstt 1.9.3-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 02:10:33 +0200 Source: xfstt Binary: xfstt Architecture: source Version: 1.9.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guil...@d

Re: PIE and static libraries

, improvements, wording tweaks, etc. Thanks, Guillem From d3a6f97736bade62a8945f91c22593f22f3e2ae4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 19:20:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] man: Document interaction between PIE and libraries Prompted-by: Christian Seiler &

Re: Debian i386 architecture now requires a 686-class processor

Hi! On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 16:57:48 +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-05-18, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Why aren't those bugs RC? That's indeed a good question! It would probably be best if a neutral party would do that. :) > Either we give both users on old hardware a

Re: Debian i386 architecture now requires a 686-class processor

Hi! On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 19:17:15 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Saturday 07 May 2016 13:23:30 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Last year it was decided to increase the minimum CPU features for the > > i386 architecture to 686-class in the stretch release cycle. This > > means

Re: Bug#824130: ITP: libgames-support -- Useful functionality shared among GNOME games

Hi! On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 17:39:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Michael Biebl > > * Package name: libgames-support > Version : 1.0.2 > Upstream Author : Michael Catanzaro > * URL :

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 12:08:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I'm not a fan myself for turning on hardening flags in the compiler itself, > but if you do that, then dpkg issues like https://bugs.debian.org/823869 > need to be addressed (whether all obscure build systems picking these up, or >

Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?)

Hi! On Sun, 2016-05-15 at 21:45:55 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2016-05-15 20:49 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier : > > Bálint Réczey: > >> I think making PIE and bindnow default in dpkg (at least for amd64) would > >> be > >> perfect release goals for Stretch. > > > > I support the

Accepted dpkg 1.18.7 (source) into unstable

n-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg

Accepted dpkg 1.18.6 (source) into unstable

n-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg

Accepted dpkg 1.18.5 (source) into unstable

n-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg

Re: Bug#823052: ITP: python-mkdocs-bootswatch -- Bootswatch themes for MkDocs

Hi! On Sat, 2016-04-30 at 21:57:47 +1000, Brian May wrote: > Would appreciate it if somebody could confirm that the license is BSD > and if so what version of the BSD license this is. > > https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs-bootswatch/blob/master/LICENSE That looks like a BSD-2 clause license but

Accepted libbsd 0.8.3-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 11:11:35 +0200 Source: libbsd Binary: libbsd-dev libbsd0 libbsd0-udeb Architecture: source Version: 0.8.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Changed-By: G

gcc-on-diet (was Re: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default)

Hi! On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 18:28:59 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Justification: wasting many megabytes of space and download Yes. > We're shipping broken toolchain packages that are intentionally too > large, and this is causing issues elsewhere. The "netinst" CD

Time for a .changes file format 2.0?

Hi! Samuel Thibault recently reported in #818618 that the Binary field in the .changes files does not get filtered to only include the binary packages that are being uploaded, as documented in the ancient doc/programming.sgml in dpkg 1.3.3 [P], current debian-policy and now in the dpkg

Re: Bug#821066: ITP: glide -- Vendor package management for golang

Hi! On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:34:37 +0800, ChangZhuo Chen wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)" > > * Package name: glide There is already an unrelated glide source package in the archive. Which also generates several *glide* binary

Re: Possible MBF: Packages depending on iceweasel but not firefox/firefox-esr

On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 20:31:13 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 12:39 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > Leaving aside any other reasons: many packages have a versioned > > dependency on iceweasel, and we don't have versioned provides. > Yes we do, since dpkg 1.18. Actually since

Re: Archive changes

Hi! On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:32:40 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a > > long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, > > it should

Accepted dpkg-repack 1.43 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 09:03:09 +0100 Source: dpkg-repack Binary: dpkg-repack Architecture: source all Version: 1.43 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <debian-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: G

Accepted device3dfx 2013.08.08-4 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:19:35 +0100 Source: device3dfx Binary: device3dfx-source Architecture: source all Version: 2013.08.08-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Changed-By: G

Accepted dpkg-repack 1.42 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 23:10:41 +0100 Source: dpkg-repack Binary: dpkg-repack Architecture: source all Version: 1.42 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <debian-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: G

Re: Debian package on Windows

Hi! On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 14:05:33 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > [ for -devel: this is a reply to a post to debian-apache, please see > https://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2016/02/msg4.html ] Inlining parts of that mail here: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 01:09:18 +, Eric Mittelette

Re: libmd (was Re: Having a single, good arc4random in Debian)

Hi! On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 01:18:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > [ Just posting to debian and fdo mailing lists, but this might be of > interest to other distros, please feel free to forward. ] This still applies. > On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:25:36 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >

Accepted debsig-verify 0.14 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:32:58 +0100 Source: debsig-verify Binary: debsig-verify Architecture: source Version: 0.14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dpkg Developers <debian-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem

Accepted libmd 0.0.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:43:54 +0100 Source: libmd Binary: libmd-dev libmd0 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem

Re: Are two Vcs-{Git|Svn|...} and Vcs-Browser fields sensible?

Hi! On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 20:23:08 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 02/02/16 17:38, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > I must say that I do not like this proposal. The current situation does > > result > > in under-maintained packages requiring churn, but that's true for many > > aspects > > of them,

Accepted libbsd 0.8.2-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:25:11 +0100 Source: libbsd Binary: libbsd-dev libbsd0 libbsd0-udeb Architecture: source Version: 0.8.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Changed-By: G

libmd (was Re: Having a single, good arc4random in Debian)

Hi! [ Just posting to debian and fdo mailing lists, but this might be of interest to other distros, please feel free to forward. ] On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:25:36 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 18, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > More background information follows.

Re: Having a single, good arc4random in Debian

Hi! On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 09:57:27 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steven Chamberlain writes: > > I think it would be good for Debian to standardise on a single, good > > arc4random implementation, available to any application that wants to > > use it. > > > I'd like it to

Re: What is the correct way to set owner to package's files?

Hi! On Wed, 2015-12-30 at 16:46:23 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > Two caveats: > > 1) Be aware that a user "foo" on your build system might have different >UID than the user "foo" on the customer's system, and files' metadata >has owning user and group recorded as a pair of

Accepted dpkg 1.18.4 (source) into unstable

n-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg

Accepted libbsd 0.8.1-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:10:23 +0100 Source: libbsd Binary: libbsd-dev libbsd0 libbsd0-udeb libbsd0-dbg Architecture: source Version: 0.8.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> C

Accepted libbsd 0.8.0-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:40:34 +0100 Source: libbsd Binary: libbsd-dev libbsd0 libbsd0-udeb libbsd0-dbg Architecture: source Version: 0.8.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> C

Accepted libbsd 0.8.0-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 23:34:00 +0100 Source: libbsd Binary: libbsd-dev libbsd0 libbsd0-udeb libbsd0-dbg Architecture: source Version: 0.8.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> C

Heads up: New -Wdate-time in default dpkg-buildflags output

Hi! On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 17:32:31 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > As part of the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we added a > "reproducible/timeless" feature area to dpkg which exports -Wdate-time > via CPPFLAGS [1]. > > In our CI infrastructure we enabled that in Spring. > > We now think this

Re: quedada octubre Sevilla

Hola! On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 09:28:06 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > Nos vemos hoy, no? > > * viernes 23 octubre > * 20:00h en el Pub Merchant (Sevilla) > * https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/es/2015/SevillaMeetingOctober Yo al final no podré ir. :( Pero si se organiza otra me apunto!

Re: Replacing ldconfig maintscripts with declarative methods

Hi! On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 16:14:38 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > As of debhelper/9.20151004, dh_makeshlibs is now using triggers rather > than maintainer scripts to invoke ldconfig. > > * Lintian in untable + testing is already aware of this > * Lintian has /not yet/ been backported. Lintian

Re: Defaulting to i686 for the Debian i386 architecture

On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 19:15:54 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > question to the Hurd and KFreeBSD maintainers ... change that on these > platforms too? As it currently stands, this is not a question when it comes to dpkg, that specific change is all or nothing. The Debian ←→ GNU cpu mapping is

Re: Bug#800093: ITP: libdpkg-parse-perl -- module to parse various dpkg files into Perl Objects

Hi! On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 12:37:22 +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 13:12 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 21:12:57 +0300, Andy Beverley wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Owner: Andy Beverley <a...@andybev.com> > >

Accepted libaio 0.3.110-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:48:30 +0200 Source: libaio Binary: libaio1 libaio1-udeb libaio1-dbg libaio-dev Architecture: source Version: 0.3.110-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.

Re: Bug#800093: ITP: libdpkg-parse-perl -- module to parse various dpkg files into Perl Objects

Hi! On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 21:12:57 +0300, Andy Beverley wrote: > Package: wnpp > Owner: Andy Beverley > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org > > * Package name: libdpkg-parse-perl > Version : 0.03 >

Accepted dpkg 1.18.3 (source) into unstable

n-d...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Hi! On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 13:26:12 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Seems Osamu Aoki is working on at least part of the puzzle: > > https://bugs.debian.org/797045 > > Merging multiple sources *really* shouldn't be necessary. And the > metadata for those sources will

Re: Improving your archive and package system for small package

Hi! On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 17:28:38 +0200, Adrien CLERC wrote: > This may have been discussed before, but could we achieve something like > this with virtual package? With the implemented version Provides, which means having versioned virtual packages, this is actually probably a good solution,

Re: Facilitating external repositories

Hi! On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:53:17 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: A repository with a whitelist cannot install packages with names outside that whitelist. It should also not be able to have packages with Provides: or Replaces: headers outside that whitelist (so you can't ship a package that

Accepted libpmount 0.0.17-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:34:27 +0200 Source: libpmount Binary: libpmount-dev libpmount0 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.0.17-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem

Accepted unace 1.2b-14 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 04:30:18 +0200 Source: unace Binary: unace Architecture: source Version: 1.2b-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org

Accepted xfstt 1.9.2-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 04:04:19 +0200 Source: xfstt Binary: xfstt Architecture: source Version: 1.9.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org

Accepted dpkg 1.18.2 (source all amd64) into unstable

...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules

Re: Heads up: Upcoming dpkg-buildpackage -j precedence change

Hi! On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 14:21:54 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 10:02:27 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:16PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: $ make -jN -f debian/rules build and $ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N debian/rules build

Bug#793404: massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline commands

Control: block -1 by 657390 [ Blocking on that, because there's currently no other such bug. So not to imply this is lintian maintainers sole responsibility. ] Hi! On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 12:19:36 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: dpkg-buildpackage -B will run debian/rules 4 times: once to determine if

Re: Facilitating external repositories

Hi! On Sat, 2015-07-25 at 11:10:25 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: I would suggest reviewing Ubuntu's solution for adding PPA sources.list snippets and seeing if we can take any inspiration from it or make our solution more compatible with it.

Re: LFS status, and enabling it opportunistically on next SONAME bump

Hi! On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 19:00:18 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: The tag being experimental is orthogonal to its severity. If you are interested in seeing it become a non-experimental tag, I can recommend having a look at writing a patch for #787853. From memory, the information needed is

Bug#793404: massive waste of CPU time in debian/rules by inline commands

Control: block -1 by 793330 Hi! On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:43:46 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Package: general Severity: minor The problem: I see lots of $(shell ...) stuff. In boost, there are about 12 such calls. And they run dpkg-architecture or dpkg-parsechangelogs or similar commands.

Re: Huge data files in Debian

Hi! On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 12:03:36 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote: But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package size of 3.5 GB. What is the best way to deal with them? Loosely following the discussion about the Icedove icons, it

Re: Timezone name in Debian changelog format

Hi! On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 10:56:58 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:40:58AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: So given that the timezone name has never been accepted, many time-parsing functions ignore it, it is redundant, declared obsolete by RFC5322 and Debian policy

LFS status, and enabling it opportunistically on next SONAME bump

Hi! Our Large File Support on some 32-bit architectures is a bit poor, and this has been going on for a while now: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-file-built-without-LFS-support.html (Although this includes some false-positives as reported in #787853.) In addition, the problem is

Re: Bug#791857: ITP: daemonize -- tool to run a command as a daemon

Hi! On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 16:45:12 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org * Package name: daemonize Version : 1.7.6 Upstream Author : Brian Clapper, b...@clapper.org * URL :

Re: Bug#790399: ITP: structlog -- tructured Logging for Python

Hi! On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 02:58:41 +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 01:56:55PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:22:30AM +0200, Adrien CLERC wrote: Le 29/06/2015 02:51, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit : * Package name: structlog It

Re: Bug#790933: ITP: drive - Google Drive tool

Hi! On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 09:09:42 +0200, Sophie Brun wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sophie Brun sop...@freexian.com X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name : drive Version : 0.2.5 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Odeke od...@ualberta.ca

Accepted arj 3.10.22-14 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 03:11:36 +0200 Source: arj Binary: arj Architecture: source Version: 3.10.22-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org

Timezone name in Debian changelog format

Hi! The other day, while fixing some dpkg code, I noticed that the Debian changelog trailer regex intended to support a timezone name inside parenthesis, like this: -- Name m...@example.org Sat, 30 May 2015 03:18:43 +0200 (CEST) is bogus (since its inception in dpkg 1.3.0, 1996-08), and it

Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler

On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 16:07:20 +0100, Wookey wrote: (Guillem - I was wondering if you had any response to my post on this therad. I do. I hope I haven't derailed your progress by asking awkward questions without really providing solutions. I should really take your suggestion and try to

Re: Is the Debian dependency system broken? (wget vs libgnutls-deb0-28)

Hi! On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 09:18:34 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: There is not a lot of documentation about how to handle that from an upstream point of view. There is the info page (section VERSION) of ld about -version-script. That's true, there's lots of information spread all over the

Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide

On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 14:08:24 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 06/14/2015 05:46 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: Well if you want reproducible output, then use the same tool version. That's not possible: Jessie, Sid and Trusty don't have the same version, and we need to generate the orig.tar file

Accepted device3dfx 2013.08.08-3 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 03:32:34 +0200 Source: device3dfx Binary: device3dfx-source Architecture: source all Version: 2013.08.08-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover

Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide

Hi! On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 16:48:21 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2015-06-14 05:46:00 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:08:29 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 06/13/2015 10:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: As a friend

Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide

Hi, On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:08:29 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 06/13/2015 10:55 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: I've been using xz compression for a long time, but I see a big defect which is today pushing me to turn it off for the .orig.tar

Re: DEB_SIGN_KEYID vs DEBSIGN_KEYID

Hi! On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 10:36:41 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: For devscripts you can define a variable DEBSIGN_KEYID. For dpkg it is called DEB_SIGN_KEYID. git-buildpackage doesn't support a keyid environment variable at all, as it seems. All ignore the default-key option set in

Accepted inetutils 2:1.9.4-1 (source) into unstable

inetutils-tools Architecture: source Version: 2:1.9.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server inetutils-inetd

Accepted dpkg 1.18.1 (source all) into unstable

...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules

Accepted inetutils 2:1.9.3-2 (source) into unstable

inetutils-tools Architecture: source Version: 2:1.9.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server inetutils

Re: static linking

Hi! On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 18:21:40 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: What's the preferred way to set Built-Using: http://sources.debian.net/src/chromium-browser/42.0.2311.135-2/debian/control/?hl=82#L82 This one is wrong in two ways, it's missing the exact version, and the field does not belong

Accepted dpkg 1.18.0 (source all) into unstable

...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules

Heads up: Changes in dpkg-shlibdeps directory search list

[ Please follow up on d-d and d-cross (M-F-T set). ] Hi! There are several cleanups and order changes in the pipe for the default dpkg-shlibdeps shared library directory search list in dpkg 1.18.x. It was previously, in decreasing order of preference: 0. «dpkg-shlibdeps -l» (or via

Re: Heads up: Upcoming dpkg-buildpackage -j precedence change

[ reproducible-builds people, please see below. ] Hi! On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 10:02:27 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:40:16PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: $ make -jN -f debian/rules build and $ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N debian/rules build I prefer

Re: Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler

Hi! On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 01:34:08 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 05/10/2015 03:32 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: CC_FOR_BUILD = gcc the above mentioned wiki pages still talk about HOSTCC and BUILDCC. Please clarify when to use these. I think HOSTCC and BUILDCC should never be used, because

Accepted inetutils 2:1.9.3-1 (source) into unstable

inetutils-tools Architecture: source Version: 2:1.9.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: inetutils-ftp - File Transfer Protocol client inetutils-ftpd - File Transfer Protocol server inetutils-inetd

Accepted unace 1.2b-13 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 03:56:11 +0200 Source: unace Binary: unace Architecture: source Version: 1.2b-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org

Accepted device3dfx 2013.08.08-2 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 00:48:58 +0200 Source: device3dfx Binary: device3dfx-source Architecture: source all Version: 2013.08.08-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover

Re: Bug#761348: ftp.debian.org: need machine-readable metadata about suites repositories

Hi! On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 15:24:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Various places in Debian infrastructure (QA especially) hard-code aspects of the Debian archive (suite, code, component, arch names etc). This

Re: Heads up: Upcoming dpkg-buildpackage -j precedence change

On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 19:56:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:49:25 +0100, Wookey wrote: I'm happy if you change this - it seems like fixing a bug to me, but I will just throw in this observation from recent arm64 archive-rebuilds, that -j and

Allowing both cross building and using an alternative compiler

[ Please followup on debian-devel (M-F-T set). ] Hi! There are currently two goals people are pursuing that seemed to initially conflict with each other: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/CrossBuildableBase https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/honorCCandCXX But they can be made to

Heads up: Upcoming dpkg-buildpackage -j precedence change

Hi! “Recently” when adding support for «-jauto» to dpkg-buildpackage, I noticed that the semantics for the -j option were quite unorthodox. The value from the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS paralle= option takes precedence and overrides any explicit value passed on the commend-line via -j, (when -j should be

Re: Experimental ddeb support in debhelper and lintian (Was: Re: -dbg packages; are they actually useful?)

Hi! On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 22:11:18 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: A) Use .deb (i.e. the regular extension) with a new section. Is there any problem with using the existing debug section? Or is the different section used to distinguish that these are autogenerated perhaps? B) Use .ddeb (i.e.

Re: Bits from the dpkg project: 1.17.x series, general news

Hi! On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 15:01:48 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 18/04/2015 21:27, Guillem Jover a écrit : Portability in dpkg is very important, to be able to support downstreams and people who use it on other systems, or even package it in other (non-GNU/Linux) distributions

Accepted dpkg-repack 1.41 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 17:04:52 +0200 Source: dpkg-repack Binary: dpkg-repack Architecture: source all Version: 1.41 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dpkg Developers debian-d...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover

Accepted arj 3.10.22-13 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 04:22:18 +0100 Source: arj Binary: arj Architecture: source Version: 3.10.22-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org

Re: CUT rolling release debian BUT a cautionary comment

Hi! On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 03:50:50 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 12:38:53PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: If I remember correctly btrfs mostly showed its ugly experimental state by being very slow which is hard to justify in an environment where everyone already

Accepted unace 1.2b-12 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:47:45 +0100 Source: unace Binary: unace Architecture: source Version: 1.2b-12 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org

Accepted dpkg 1.17.24 (source all) into unstable

...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules

Re: dpkg-capoverride (?)

Hi! On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:30:02 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: Would it worth to have a procedure like dpkg-capoverride so that whenever a package needs to change a capability, the change gets registered somewhere other than the filesystem itself? Yes and no. It might be more convenient, but

Re: new pre-dependency: perl{,-base,-modules} - dpkg (= 1.17.17)

[ CCing debian-release. ] Hi! On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 20:12:55 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: In order to fix trigger related wheezy-jessie upgrade failures in xfonts-traditional (#774844, cc'd), I intend to make the main perl binary packages (perl, perl-base, and perl-modules) Pre-Depend on dpkg (=

Re: length of a package extended description

Hi! On Sun, 2015-01-11, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On 10 January 2015 at 17:27, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: I think fixing translator tools would be an improvement, because it would reduce translator work in other situations too, by chunking the description on long lists

Re: length of a package extended description

Hi! On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 07:20:31 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Please also note that identifying lists in package descriptions might be a very interesting thing to do, given the various way you (maintainers) all have to make lists, given the loose rules for writing package descriptions

Accepted dpkg 1.17.23 (source all) into unstable

...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org Description: dpkg - Debian package management system dpkg-dev - Debian package development tools dselect- Debian package management front-end libdpkg-dev - Debian package management static library libdpkg-perl - Dpkg perl modules

Re: one package altering other package's postrm

On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 15:26:37 +, Philip Hands wrote: Alexandre Detiste alexandre.deti...@gmail.com writes: I've sent a one-liner patch, as this put the least work on cron maintainers: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773095 I guess they can apply it right away,

Re: one package altering other package's postrm

Hi! On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 14:26:19 +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: On 2014-12-14 00:36, Guillem Jover wrote: There are some possible more “correct” ways to fix this, for example: * Move the handling of those (and any other) common files or dirs (like /etc/cron.allow, /etc

Re: one package altering other package's postrm

Hi! On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 23:09:08 +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote: Would it be OK / ugly / forbiden to do a rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/info/cron.postrm in systemd-cron preinst script ? This would be just wrong and unnecessary. This is not the prerm case in

Re: The inittab interface - Re: Bug#766187: runit: Fails to install runit after fresh install of jessie beta2

Hi! On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 14:56:56 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2014, at 12:24, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:08:49PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: On 24/11/14 21:41, Gerrit Pape wrote: Better than (2) would be to make the existence of /etc/inittab still

Re: Javascript trigger design

Hi! On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 06:46:33 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/01/2014 04:26 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: No, triggers unfortunately are not that simple: if you install/upgrade openstack-dashboard together with some of the packages it wants a trigger on, $1=triggered will sometimes

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >