.
It's going to far, after all some people here and there are just
criticizing old time friends before asking them if they can share
resources and workload for the better of both projects.
--
Gustavo Franco
On 1/10/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:22:03AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I don't[sic] the same rant over others Debian related companies
Have you ever actually subscribed to any Debian mailing lists?
Hi Andrew,
Don't be fooled by From mail
just reported the current status.
[0] = http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/01/msg00118.html
[1] = http://alioth.debian.org/projects/utnubu/
--
Gustavo Franco
On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:43AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:22:03AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I don't[sic] the same rant over others Debian related
On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:56:35PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:07:43AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
you make to
my packages, in any form you find convenient they could actually do
it... I'm tired of begging for patches.
http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/by_maint/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
--
Gustavo Franco
://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/
[4] = https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ContributingToDebian
--
Gustavo Franco
On 1/11/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E.g. when I repeatedly say I'd like to receive any change you make to
my packages, in any form you find convenient they could actually do
it... I'm tired of begging for patches.
http
On 1/11/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said *in any form you find convenient* but which one do you
prefer: bug reports through Debian BTS, just email, ... ? Please, read
my reply to Daniel's message.
Uploading the diffs
On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensus on this idea of
every Ubuntu changeset, a patch in Debian BTS between DDs
On 1/11/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(...)
I don't
remember Linspire, Progeny, ... employees doing the same thing so it
makes no sense rant against Canonical only.
On the other hand, Linspire and Progeny do not pretend
On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:25:01PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
Are you saying that they're spending more money with PR than really
contributing back ?
I don't know about money, but I'm pretty sure their claims exceed
On 1/11/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 19:54 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensus
On 1/11/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:48:22PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 16:48 +0100, martin f krafft escreveu:
What would you like to see?
I think submitting bugs
On 1/12/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
I agree with similar things being said but i'm yet to hear about the
lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
that anaconda
, and give us something back.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew
On 1/12/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qui, 2006-01-12 às 18:08 -0200, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
- Scott's url with patches isn't part of the give something back
approach that we want. We need to be well informed about patches, but
we don't know exactly how;
Don't we
On 1/13/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:08:52PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
We can't decide how they need to give us something MORE back and
it's their problem?
Whoever said they need to do that? They just need to stop bragging
about shit they don't
said that Daniel helped him, but if he did that in his workhours it's
under Canonical bless.. Do you see ? I just pointed out that there's
a possibility that he was helping you in his workhours, but i won't
cite you as a reference anymore.
--
Gustavo Franco
On 1/13/06, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 1/13/06, Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop trying to twist my words around. Canonical didn't contribute
On 1/14/06, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
Exactly my point Matthew, and calm down David, i wrote: e.g.: David
said that Daniel helped him, but if he did that in his workhours it's
under Canonical bless.. Do you see
with into the Overfiend sentence,
it should be replaced with into *the* Debian troll. Are we going to
list this position in our Organizational Structure[0] ?
[0] = http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
--
Gustavo Franco
this kind of discord
within the Debian community quite comical and amusing.
You ignore that a lot of them are part of the Debian community. This
project would be better if people like you applied part of the
imagination to contribute (at least) with useful comments.
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL
On 1/18/06, Dallam Wych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:57:13PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
You ignore that a lot of them are part of the Debian community. This
project would be better if people like you applied part of the
imagination to contribute (at least
that i'm less than 1/1000 of all this
and while i'm busy helping with something that i think is important
there are others working in others not less interesting tasks.
Etch is coming. :)
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gtimelog
Version : 0.0+svn65-1
Upstream Author : Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://mg.pov.lt/gtimelog/
* License : GPL
Description : minimal timelogging system
gtimelog provides a time
the patches) against Debian packages.
Since Ubuntu Dapper is actually on freeze, what's your timeline to these
patches? Will you include this stuff just on Dapper+1, in the end of
the year?
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco
On 2/6/06, Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco writes (Re: Automatic testing of .deb's):
On 2/2/06, Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to have some idea what people think I should do with the
tests that we're hopefully going to have, eventually for lots
On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what
piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below is
a summary of the common problems, hopefully the list will help everyone
to find and especially
On 2/24/06, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Gustavo Franco]
I think some of these problems can be detected by lintian, adding
some more checks there. It could bring more visibility to so common
errors. Comments ?
A better way to phrase Comments? would be: Here is a proof
On 2/24/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what
piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below
What's wrong with us ? I just read some messages with a no Martin,
can we revert it?, it seems that the default reply is ok Martin, see
you, thanks..
It's volunteer work, he's free to do whatever he wants and spend his
time with more pleasant tasks, but when will we try to solve some of
the real
On 3/9/06, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
Don't you care ?
We do. But asking him to go back to doing something that was such a
source of pain? No way.
(...)
Hi Amaya,
I agree with you, i wasn't simple asking him to go back. My point was
that if we just let
On 3/9/06, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
I agree with you, i wasn't simple asking him to go back. My point was
that if we just let somebody or a team take over that task the problem
will still be there, maybe not all the problems but some of them.
I am also worried
On 3/9/06, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Sure Amaya, what we've got here is failure to communicate Btw, i
hope we don't end in a civil war. :-)
joke
Civil? Not as long as we focus on attacking Ubuntu
/joke
hehe, i think you missed my joke first.
-- stratus
On 3/9/06, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
hehe, i think you missed my joke first.
Maybe, I just saw a GnR quote.
That's what i mean with the civil war thing, not a real war against
anyone or a project. :-)
-- stratus
On 3/9/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to, 2006-03-09 kello 19:21 +0100, Amaya kirjoitti:
1 - lobby (all of them)
2 - get promises in exchange of votes
That reminds me of something I meant to propose some time ago: someone
with a bit of time on their hands could make a wiki
On 3/10/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:38:51AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
What's wrong with us ? I just read some messages with a no Martin,
can we revert it?, it seems that the default reply is ok Martin, see
you, thanks..
It's volunteer work
On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
and what was their answer?
Is there
On 3/13/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
20:38 Ganneff the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not
process
NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something
On 3/13/06, Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:39:11PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing
On 3/13/06, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10592 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
If the ftpmasters are going to stop NEW processing for a while with or
without a special criteria, they should inform us through d-d-a or the
DPL if they think it will generate too much noise
On 3/14/06, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html,
and I have already completed step 1.
[ Andres,
Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems
to be broken with the output like:
(...)
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08ced388 ***
It's probably due to the new glib (GSlice) memory allocator[0], but
it's an application bug. Please first check if it's
On 3/21/06, David Pashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 21, 2006 at 14:42, Gustavo Franco praised the llamas by saying:
Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems
to be broken with the output like:
(...)
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer
On 3/22/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:42:49AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Well, if you're running your favourite glib application and it seems
to be broken with the output like:
(...)
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer
On 3/22/06, Gabor Gombas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:29:01AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
FYI, GMemChunk (old and deprecated by the upstream) was reimplemented to
use GSlice, so no need to change or rebuild code to be affected due to buggy
code. I don't know exactly
On 3/22/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:29:01AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
There's a workaround that is run the application as follows:
$ G_SLICE=always-malloc application
Thanks for the information. Can you explain (or provide a pointer
, ...
Comments?
Regards,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2003.05.23 12:51, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you
subproject guidelines.
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco
, and *.debian.net being a few popular
alternatives).
Yes and it isn't only a list containing these projects.As i said, we need the
guidelines to subprojects too.
[...]
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be the start to 'Debian
Subproject Guidelines' or 'Debian Subproject Policy'.What do you
think, Ben?
Cheers,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.4.1-1 (unstable)
but looking into [1] it points to 1.4-1.
[0] = http://packages.debian.org/moodle/
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/moodle
--
Gustavo Franco
] = http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil/
Hope that helps,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:50:44 -0300, Rosilene Oliveira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time of
application Debian 3.0 to Brazil summer time.
We use
[...]
[0] = http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil/
I'm sorry, the right url is http://packages.debian.org/tz-brasil;
that slash in the end doesn't exists.
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
different headers,
like Sender-ID but the 'publish the (spf) records' step is always
there.
Hope that helps,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to anyone sleeping for two
years see that Debian isn't `too late`. It' s far away from state of
art but the majority of work is being done by volunteers and without
it you wouldn't be booting knoppix, ubuntu and others!
--
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packages.Wait the maintainer response, if is MIA
you will know.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurelien, with the feedback provided by aj and your own. After the
small changes, i think you should upload it for experimental and ask
for tests. If you think it's ok for tests as is, just drop the
package in experimental soon and let us see.
I think the experimental upload (or just a
On 4/23/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco blogged:
In Ubuntu there' s ubuntu-meta source package that results in
[ubuntu-minimal][1], [ubuntu-standard][2] and [ubuntu-desktop][3]. They're
metapackages and the list of packages is built with a tool called germinate
based
On 5/9/06, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I intend to take over the Bacula package. I would first like to say
thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
maintaining it for these years.
(...)
Hi John,
Thanks for this. I'm using backuppc at work and was
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-11 10:00]:
One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
from the BTS?
There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
provide such a way.
I've
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-11 11:20]:
Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
managed by email, usertags are.
What can
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-11 14:39]:
Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
managed by email, usertags are.
What can
On 5/18/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To make this speed up available to everyone, we have 2 main choices:
1. Make /bin/sh point to /bin/dash
2. Change #!/bin/sh for #!/bin/dash in the scripts
We have an even simpler
Well, great we're now in Slashdot as new Java license supporters[0].
Of course, somebody noticed the error[1], but it isn't enough. The
original article[2] contains DLJ also has support from Gentoo and
Debian..
I haven't endorsed anything, so for those who prepared this and
submitted an
On 5/19/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
(b) the Software is distributed with your Operating System, and
such distribution is solely for the purposes of running Programs
under the control of your Operating System and designing,
developing and
On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
script?
Please go ahead. Anything relying on it is buggy
On 5/27/06, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Looking on packages.qa.debian.org, I'm seeing some confusing
information and am hoping someone can help me figure out what's going
on.
The bacula page lists a depends on openssl, which is accurate, and
says not considered -- which I
On 6/1/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am faced with the problem on how to tackle multiline output from
an init.d script, which I have just converted to LSB. Since the
package is mdadm and RAID is kinda essential to those that have it
configured, I'd rather not hide
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nico Golde wrote:
Would be useful if you could provide the package lists for
the two images so we can see whats already included and send
you patches.
The small one contains the standard system only, means, packages which
have Priority:
On 6/6/06, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(this report is a little bit late as it took time to finalize
it...sorry for the inconvenience)
The work on internationalisation (i18n) and localisation (l10n) at
Debconf6 has been particularly interesting and productive.
(...)
You wrote
On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed. Btw, it would be better keep Etch package descriptions updated
during its support cycle, but i think it's impossible with the
infrascture we've, right ?
No. We already have the previous
On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/6/06, Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed. Btw, it would be better keep Etch package descriptions updated
during its support cycle, but i
On 6/6/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ Adding -i18n ]
On 06/06/2006 02:04 PM, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 6/6/06, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(this report is a little bit late as it took time
On 6/6/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2006 04:02 PM, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 6/6/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 06/06/2006 02:04 PM, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 6/6/06
On 6/6/06, Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 02:04:09PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
You wrote a good overview about the possible workflow, but i still
miss exactly how we (or the coordinators) will merge from third
parties (eg: Rosetta) and most important, how we
On 6/7/06, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 03:21:45PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Nice, thanks. While we're at this subject, what's your view on the
Ubuntu language packs? Are we going to extract the translations from
the packages creating
On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks? Months?:-)
It doesn't really work properly anywhere, does it? :-P
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 6/29/06, Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I've got hold of an intel mac that I'm interested in getting Debian
running. I've seen quite a few folks running Debian on MacBook Pro at
Debconf in Mexico, and I'm surprised that there aren't Debian
packages.
The things I'm planning on
On 6/30/06, Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks
On 6/29/06, Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated, but
On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Software suspend which
On 7/17/06, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
New derivatives keyword
---
[...]
The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new feature.
Each time that a new package is uploaded to Ubuntu, the PTS will receive
the diff between the new version
On 7/17/06, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
New derivatives keyword
---
Each time that a new package is uploaded to Ubuntu, the PTS will receive
the diff between the new version and the previous
On 7/17/06, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:59:41PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-patches/
That's indeed great to address my concern but ...
A dumb way to implement that is of course set up a mail account
On 7/17/06, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-07-17 20:48, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 7/17/06, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
New derivatives keyword
---
[...]
The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello everybody,
here are some news about the latest changes made to the Package Tracking
System.
New derivatives keyword
---
The PTS will be used to
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:33:45PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 7/18/06, Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:39:18PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello everybody,
here are some news about the latest
On 7/18/06, Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NEW queue is down to *22* packages, which is totally unheard of.
Only three packages have been waiting longer than a month -- so
Javier's package is no longer in the 'endless wait' state.
At the same time, the RM bugs are in fairly good
On 7/19/06, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-07-18 00:10, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Thanks Scott, i'll stop scottwatcher and update the current page[0]
with details about the new stuff.
[0] =
http://people.debian.org/~stratus/scottwatcher/
This page is confusing
On 7/19/06, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-07-17 20:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The Ubuntu distribution will be the first to make use of this new feature
No, i've told him (and jvw if i recall correctly) about the
scottwatcher's idea / PTS integration and they decided
Katrina,
We accept crack pipe donations.
thanks,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/28/06, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huge Troll Warning
It's sad that many people replied this way when it's obvious that Debian
has stopped innovating long ago.
But I suppose that this is part of the problem.
Debian stopped innovating?
On 7/28/06, Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:46:57AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Debian is a project of volunteers. I am a Debian volunteer. I'm not
going to write something just because you gripe at me about it. I have
no obligation to you. I will work on
On 7/28/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please reply to -project only!
also sprach Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.28.1737 +0100]:
If Debian had slightly less of a culture of Keep your hands off
my package, I'd do it here instead.
I've been thinking about this a lot
On 7/28/06, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:22:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 28, Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian stopped innovating?
Yes. This should be obvious to people who joined the project before 2000.
I'm one, and it's
On 7/28/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.07.28.1838 +0100]:
* Promote NMU LowThreshold wiki list giving it some official status.
The developer needs to be logged and mark if all his packages (where
he's listed as uploader) can
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
