Hi,
The reason spice is still using celt-0.5.1 is that celt as
a protocol / format is considered not finished yet by celt
upstream and thus the bitstream format may change (and does
change) with every new upstream release.
In order to provide compatibility between different spice
client and
Hi,
On 11/17/2010 01:04 PM, Ron wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hans de Goede writes:
The if at all part depends on if it will be doable without too much
pain to support both celt-0.5.1 and celt 1.0 in the same binary.
This is important to us as we care a lot about protocol
compatibility.
Are you
Hi,
On 11/19/2011 04:39 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:05:00 +0100
Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com wrote:
This is a bit unusual bug-report I'm afraid normally I would've
send this as an email to the Debian package maintainer of
timidity, but it seems that timidity is
Hi,
On 11/19/2011 09:59 PM, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Neil Williams wrote:
CC'ing the only person to express some interest. Geoffrey, if you are
no longer interested in timidity, despite signs of interest from a
possible new upstream, please retitle #585039 as O: instead of
Hello TAMUKI and a lot of others
(Cc: Various Debian people involved in $subject)
On 12/03/2011 01:09 PM, TAMUKI Shoichi wrote:
Hello Hans,
(Cc: TiMidity++ developers)
From: Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com
snip
So now I've a nice and polished version of timidity, and given
that the
5 matches
Mail list logo
