Happy new year to everyone!
gcc 2.95.3 appeared in Sid, but it hasn't been announced by the
GCC steering committee yet. Is this some kind of early access
version?
Regards
Harri
Ben Collins wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 04:03:45PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Happy new year to everyone!
gcc 2.95.3 appeared in Sid, but it hasn't been announced by the
GCC steering committee yet. Is this some kind of early access
version?
It's based on the CVS branch, which
Hi folks,
Is it possible to keep an eye upon package consistency on the
hosts 'http.us.debian.org'?
Each time I run 'apt-get update', some of the package lists on my
machine seem to be outdated, even if the last update has been done
just a few jiffies ago. But usually the following 'apt-get
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 08:50:06PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Is it possible to keep an eye upon package consistency on the
hosts 'http.us.debian.org'?
Each time I run 'apt-get update', some of the package lists on my
machine seem to be outdated, even
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:33:27PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
[...]
Maybe its too difficult to provide consistent package files for the short
window while the mirror updates are running. No cons.
But is it possible to set some kind
Hi folks,
To reduce network load and speed up upgrades I have installed a
caching proxy on one of my machines (using Apache). But it
doesn't work very well. Packages are downloaded from http.us.debian.org,
even if they should have been taken from the cache due to an
upgrade of another machine
Brian May wrote:
Have you told squid that it can use greater then 100MByte (the
default)?
I haven't tried Squid yet, cause Apache was already in place.
Of course I will try it.
Many thanx for your configuration hints.
Regards
Harri
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Brian May wrote:
Have you told squid that it can use greater then 100MByte (the
default)?
I haven't tried Squid yet, cause Apache was already in place.
Of course I will try it.
I've got the same effect using Squid. When I tried to install
Xpilot (just
Hi Alex,
Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
Hello.
Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable
branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x
packages from me.
Olivier Chapuis clarified the situation in his reply [2] to my
question in fvwm-workers mailing list.
FVWM
Hi folks,
Would it be possible to get rid of the need to install EMail (e.g.
exim or sendmail) by default?
I think it is pretty ugly that the installation from scratch of Sid
on my PC got stuck several times, because EMail is not correctly
configured. I would prefer to avoid installing a local
Hi Simon,
Simon Richter wrote:
Harald,
Would it be possible to get rid of the need to install EMail (e.g.
exim or sendmail) by default?
A lot of packages need at least the /usr/sbin/sendmail program, to be
able to send email to the admin, for example cron or at, which send the
Sure.
I am not
Hi folks,
What is the recommended way to install Gnome or KDE? The task-XXX
packages are gone for some time now, without appropriate replacement,
as it seems.
Regards
Harri
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the recommended way to install Gnome or KDE? The task-XXX
packages are gone for some time now, without appropriate replacement,
as it seems.
apt-get install kde
Ahh
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the recommended way to install Gnome or KDE? The task-XXX
packages are gone for some time now, without appropriate replacement,
as it seems.
tasksel may help you
Tasksel doesn't
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Did you try
apt-get install gdm ?
gdm is just the display manager. It's not the head of a task as
kde is.
It install all libraries and binaries. Moreover, it not so clear what
a GNOME wm should be... Ximinian? Gnome 1.4BETA?
What's the current status of
May you should consider VMware's current beta of 3.1?
Good luck
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Nikita,
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hello.
I wanted to install g++ 3.2 (instead of 3.1 that is buggy) on our server
running woody with several packages from unstable.
I noticed that g++ 3.2 depends on recent libc6. Is it safe to install libc6
from unstable now? Are libdb problems resolved?
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
yes
welcome to the c++ abi transition
Maybe this has been suggested before, but...
Probably more C++ abi changes will follow. To support a
smooth migration I would like to suggest to create empty
packages describing the C++ abis.
A package maintainer could add
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
A single C++-ABI package would just mean that all c++ packages are
kept back (or removed) from the very start of the c++ transition up to
the very end. There will be a lot of packages at the end of the
dependency chains that you don't have installed and that will
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I can follow your argument. Dpkg should allow installing
different C++ abis on the same machine. Only within each
dependency chain the abi version number must be unique, so
it should become some kind of package attribute
Hi folks,
I've got a problem with marking broken packages as fixed.
If there is (lets say) a grave functionality bug for package
M in unstable or testing, then a bugfix in experimental
doesn't help me. (I made very bad experiences with experimental,
e.g. broken version numbers, currupted apt
Hi folks,
What happens if a package maintainer ignores upstream's
version number (either on purpose, or by accident, e.g.
a typo)? Is this allowed?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
El dom, 31-07-2005 a las 19:13 +0200, Harald Dunkel escribió:
Hi folks,
What happens if a package maintainer ignores upstream's
version number (either on purpose, or by accident, e.g.
a typo)? Is this allowed?
If it is done on purpose and for a given reason
Philipp Kern wrote:
The maintainer could use an epoch to fix it. (It's like a 1: prefix.)
2.5.130.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1
2.5.13-0.CVS.2005.07.19.01-1
Is it really important to have the 0 split away? I think while dashes
are perfectly valid when there is a Debian revision they
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
You can also add the epoch number to your own packages. Thus, they will
be always newer than those coming from Debian, so they won't be
upgraded. Of course you don't have to add epochs to upstream sources.
That is not the goal of an epoch.
Upstream provides
Hi folks,
Would it be possible that the Mozilla plugins depend upon
a virtual mozilla-plugin-browser package? All browsers with
the same plugin interface could provide this feature, and
foreign browsers would not be kept out.
Many thanx in advance
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi folks,
Many packages FTBFS (silently!) if an environment variable TAPE
is set. That happens if your rules script uses something like
tar -c modules | bzip2 -9 omfs.tar.bz2
for example. If $TAPE is set, then tar writes to $TAPE instead
of stdout (possibly corrupting the tape you had
Hi Bas,
You could write 'tar cfz file.tgz files' instead of 'tar -c -f file.tgz -z
files'.
Seems that looking for a missing '-f' or 'f' would be pretty error-prone and
much more difficult than a simple test ! -s watchdog.tar after building
the package.
My point is: We need some central quality
Hi Eduard,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
verify his/her own package. But in this case a central check would be cheap
and easy to implement. Almost zero effort compared to the damage done by
corrupting tapes.
Oh, come on. People who put $TAPE into the default environment may also
link /dev/null to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I am using upstream's build procedure for creating Linux kernel packages
(make deb-pkg). For 2.6.38 it gives you these packages:
linux-firmware-image_2.6.38-1_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.38_2.6.38-1_amd64.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/11 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 16:49 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Obviously the dkms script should not be run by the postinst script
of linux-image, but of linux-headers. Shouldn't we distinguish
between the hooks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/21/11 14:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 06:17 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Do you think that dkms should drop its /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms
script? AFAICS this script might be called before the headers are
installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ben,
On 03/31/11 15:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:59 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
[...]
Of course I understand that this is highly complex. Maybe it would help to
introduce some scheme to register event handlers to run after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Having 3+ packages within a single main repository is
pretty bulky. Would it be possible to distinguish between
the core Debian and main somehow?
I don't want to keep anybody out. I just would like to use
the core packages of Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/11 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org?
Backports for Squeeze contains just about 400 package,
AFIACS.
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/11 09:05, Paul Wise wrote:
Alternatively you might want to install from testing directly. Not
everything from testing is installable on stable, which is where
backports comes in.
Installing testing for the whole system is no option. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/11 07:26, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
This is one of those recurrent discussions coming up on debian-devel. It
is my impression (as a lurker) that most Debian Developers do not want
to have second-class packages and it is a feature that all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Neil,
On 06/04/11 12:36, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:12:42 +0200
Harald Dunkel ha...@afaics.de wrote:
Installing testing for the whole system is no option. The base
system (the core packages) should be provided by the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Neil,
On 06/04/11 19:01, Neil Williams wrote:
Testing compatibility is the larger problem. Automated tests can only
go so far. Dependencies are one thing, bugs which arise because one
setup is using a version which has already been replaced
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/11 13:17, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 08:29 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Understood. If you reduce the number of packages to be released by
focusing on a core package set with 1000 or 1500 packages instead
of +3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/11 07:06, Russ Allbery wrote:
I still think this whole conversation is based on a false premise. I
think the original request originated from a belief that there is some
separable part of core Debian which could be held stable, and that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/07/11 00:59, Russ Allbery wrote:
Harald Dunkel ha...@afaics.de writes:
Not exactly. I would like to get a stable build and runtime environment
for the packages in main/testing.
Yes, that's what I'm saying doesn't actually exist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/11 07:24, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I do not see that. All packages were available at build time in
the right version. Where should this broken dependency come from,
unless you are ignoring dependencies on promoting packages from
unstable
Hi folks,
I would like to install a private package diverting
/etc/profile (to support /etc/profile.d). Problem:
There is no owner for this file.
What would you suggest?
Any helpful comment would be highly appreciated.
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/11 12:32, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
Hi Harald,
Am Montag, 2011-07-04 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
I would like to install a private package diverting /etc/profile (to support
/etc/profile.d). Problem: There is no owner for this file.
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
would it be possible to support combined dependencies,
e.g. if package A and B are installed, then package C(A)
has to be installed, too?
That might be helpful for dkms packages, for example.
A would be the kernel, B the dkms package, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
On 08/20/11 08:55, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
What event would induce installation of C(A)?! Let's assume neither A nor B
are installed.
apt-get install A (no point installing C(A)) apt-get install B (B does not
depend on C(A),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Does anybody know some way to bind an action to the button
most usb sata docking stations come with?
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Hi folks,
How can I tell a Debian package to conflict with a real
package foo, but not with other packages providing foo?
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi folks,
I am running a transparent http proxy integrated with clamav.
Problem: If I run apt-get source pymilter, then I get
# apt-get source pymilter
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
NOTICE: 'pymilter' packaging is maintained in the 'Svn'
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:46:23 +0300
Marius Gavrilescu mar...@ieval.ro wrote:
That package contains a directory named test/ with emails with spam, viruses
and similar. This might have caused the clamav warning.
Its not a warning. The download failed.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:54:53 +0300
Marius Gavrilescu mar...@ieval.ro wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Its not a warning. The download failed.
Yes, I should have said failure. Anyway, the probable cause
is the existence of emails with viruses as tests
Hi folks,
would it be reasonable to introduce a new bug severity
new upstream?
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi folks,
how comes that network-manager-strongswan has been dropped
from testing? This package is extremely important for road-
warrior setups using IPsec.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Thijs,
On 07/16/14 12:35, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
As it turns out, this package got removed because it has an unfixed
release critical bug (which interestingly enough you yourself reported).
When this bug is fixed, the package will transition back to testing.
Of course I know that I
Hi Simon,
On 07/16/14 12:36, Simon McVittie wrote:
If the change you proposed works correctly, an NMU seems appropriate.
I am using the fix in a private package since I
created the bug report. Seems to work fine (using
strongswan 5.x).
I have appended a diff to the bug report. Hope
this
On 07/16/14 15:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
Especially if the NMU is properly done (eg documented in the BTS, uploaded to
DELAYED-foo, etc) I've hardly seen any complaints in recent years.
Surely I could have done better in providing a clean
fix to #741415, making it more easy for the Debian
On 07/16/14 23:22, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
So we are proposing the following scheme:
a/ Upload a new init package. This is a new, essential package that
will replace sysvinit as the package that ensures your system has an
init system. We want to build this binary package from a package which
Hi folks,
On 07/17/14 03:16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Wookey woo...@wookware.org [140716 23:48]:
I do think there is plenty more room for soialising more NMUing. There
are piles of bugs in the archive that mostly just need uploading, and
many packages with a backlog of minor bugs, or
On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
To try to kill your frustration, I have sponsored the upload of your fix
to the delayed/10 queue. If everything goes well, then in 15 days,
network-manager-strongswan will be back in Jessie.
Thanx very much for your help
Regards
Harri
--
To
On 07/16/14 17:56, Thomas Goirand wrote:
BTW, it feels weird that the package build-depends on debhelper when it
really is using CDBS. The debian/copyright is also quite wrong, as it
doesn't include the copyright notice for the GPL v2 (and I believe
that's mandatory, right?). Not commenting
On 07/28/14 11:38, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
I don't currently use the network-manager strongSwan plugin but that's
mostly because it doesn't work.
AFAICT it didn't work due to #741415.
Today its broken again. It says
Could not find VPN plugin service for
PS: The error message is:
Setting up git-man (1:2.1.2-0~xgo70+1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of git:
git depends on git-man ( 1:2.1.2); however:
Version of git-man on system is 1:2.1.2-0~xgo70+1.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi folks,
I am building local git packages for Wheezy derived from the
official source package. Problem with debian/control:
:
Package: git
Architecture: any
Multi-Arch: foreign
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, perl-modules, liberror-perl,
git-man ( ${source:Upstream-Version}), git-man (
On 10/22/14 16:57, Simon McVittie wrote:
1:2.1.2-0~xgo70+1 is less than 1:2.1.2, because 1:2.1.2 is equal to
1:2.1.2-0 in version number order, and 0~x is less than 0.
You can confirm this:
% dpkg --compare-versions 2-0~x lt 2-0 echo yes
yes
I would suggest 1:2.1.2-0+xgo70+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:04:37 +0100
Source: xrsh
Binary: xrsh
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.92-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2005 23:00:22 +0200
Source: xrsh
Binary: xrsh
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.92-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:26:58 +0100
Source: blockade
Binary: blockade
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 20041028-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:59:10 +0100
Source: xrsh
Binary: xrsh
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.92-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:57:34 +0200
Source: blockade
Binary: blockade
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 20041028-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel hdun...@aixigo.de
Description:
network-manager-strongswan - network management framework (strongSwan plugin)
Closes: 741415
Changes:
network-manager-strongswan (1.3.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* use charon-nm instead of charon (Closes
On 02/05/15 16:58, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
I understand that it can make you sad, especially since you missed the
final deadline by only a few days, but you didn't waste your time: its
too late for jessie, but you will be able to push your package into
jessie-backports, once it is available,
On 02/04/15 12:22, Dominique Dumont wrote:
According to PTS [1], this package was kicked out because of
a FTBS [2]. Is this bug fixed ?
Sorry, I had built network-manager-strongswan on Wheezy
to use it on Wheezy and Jessie. I didn't notice the FTBFS
on sid.
Building on Jessie I still get
Hi folks,
Do you think it would it be possible to fix network-manager-strongswan
for Jessie? Currently it seems it has been kicked out due to #773764,
even though the report provides an easy fix to make it work at least
for xfce4 and gnome on Jessie.
I have pushed an NMU (1.3.0-1.2) to mentors
On 02/05/15 15:38, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Sorry that's not possible: this package was removed from Jessie back in
September. Freeze policy excludes package removed more than 1 week ago [1]
Highly discouraging. Feels like I wasted my time.
:-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 02/04/15 12:22, Dominique Dumont wrote:
According to PTS [1], this package was kicked out because of
a FTBS [2]. Is this bug fixed ?
I have pushed a new version 1.3.0-1.3 to mentors, providing a
workaround for #773764 as well.
On 02/06/15 10:01, Dominique Dumont wrote:
network-manager-strongswan is still in unstable and will be part of stretch
once jessie is out and the RC bugs are fixed.
Sorry, I thought it was kicked out completely.
Your work is definitely not a waste of time: it can be used for stretch or
Hi folks,
I would like to use upstream's Debian/Ubuntu packages for a
certain tool 'foo'. Its closer to what I need, and I don't
have migrate between both versions before asking the mailing
list for help or for reporting/fixing problems.
Problem: The Debian maintainer messed up the version
Hi Daniel,
On 02/20/15 13:09, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Just to understand your problem: there is a package foo. Debian provides
it with version 1:A-B and upstream provides some self-compiled packages
with the same name under version C-D (and C-D 1:A-B) and you want to
force apt to install the
Hi Andreas,
On 02/20/15 18:54, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Harald,
Is there any reason why you do not even now are talking about package
name and upstream URL featuring the same name? Its not fruitful to
leave your discussion partners in the dark.
Sorry, but I don't want to blame anybody
On 02/24/15 15:09, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Sorry, but I don't want to blame anybody producing bad packages.
It shouldn't matter here.
Should be:
Sorry, but I don't want to blame anybody to produce bad packages.
Name and upstream URL shouldn't matter here.
Sorry for my bad English.
Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:24:00 +0100
Source: network-manager-strongswan
Binary: network-manager-strongswan
Architecture: i386 source
Version: 1.3.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel ha...@afaics.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
Trying to get rid of my old GPG key I stumbled over this:
For devscripts you can define a variable DEBSIGN_KEYID. For
dpkg it is called DEB_SIGN_KEYID. git-buildpackage doesn't
support a keyid environment variable at all, as it seems.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/08/15 18:48, Guido Günther wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks,
Trying to get rid of my old GPG key I stumbled over this:
For devscripts you can define a variable DEBSIGN_KEYID. For dpkg
Hi folks,
Some years ago I have setup an iscsi target using targetcli 2.0 on Wheezy.
Actually it works pretty well, but there were some serious upgrade
problems to 2.1 and 3.0, making targetcli go away for Jessie :-(. See
#764005 and #751226. I lost confident in a newer version.
Now I have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:48:41 +0200
Source: network-manager-strongswan
Binary: network-manager-strongswan
Architecture: i386 source
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics.de>
C
Hi folks,
For running a local set of meta packages I would like to
express package dependencies depending upon other packages
installed, e.g.
Package: xyz
Version: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
, dbus (systemd >= 215)
Hopefully you get the meaning. Package xyz could make sure
that dbus
Hi folks,
On 01/15/2016 05:07 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> Whenever discussions about new dependency syntax come up I like to remind
> people of all the time (about six years now) and effort it took to get the
> build profile syntax [1] accepted by the archive, supported by all tools and
>
On 01/14/2016 10:11 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:35:31AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> For running a local set of meta packages I would like to
>> express package dependencies depending upon other packages
>> installed, e.g.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 11:01:58 +0100
Source: mg
Binary: mg
Architecture: source
Version: 20160118-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics.de>
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel <ha...@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:37:58 +0100
Source: mg
Binary: mg
Architecture: source
Version: 20160118-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics.de>
Changed-By: Harald Dunkel <ha...@
On 07/05/16 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an
> unresponsive host:
>
Sorry, this was supposed to go to debian-user.
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
this morning I found "apt-get update" getting stuck due to an
unresponsive host:
# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
#
Hi Martin,
On 07/05/16 10:09, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On 2016-07-05 06:32, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> I didn't mention klecker-ftp anywhere in my config files.
>> Its not on the round-robin list for ftp.debian.org either:
>>
>> # host ftp.debian.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2016 09:47:28 +0100
Source: network-manager-strongswan
Binary: network-manager-strongswan
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 1.3.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:42:42 +0200
Source: network-manager-strongswan
Binary: network-manager-strongswan
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 1.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics
Hi folks,
zur RAM Erweiterung gibt es heute um 12:00 eine kurze Downtime
der Jenkins Server
invde8i001
mbrjenkins01
nvode7i001
semde7i001
sprjenkins01
Regards
Harri
Sorry for the noise, that was a bad To: address.
Regards
Harri
On 10/18/2016 09:14 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> zur RAM Erweiterung gibt es heute um 12:00 eine kurze Downtime
> der Jenkins Server
>
> invde8i001
> mbrjenkins01
> nvode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 14:25:40 +0200
Source: network-manager-strongswan
Binary: network-manager-strongswan
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 1.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Harald Dunkel <ha...@afaics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
trying to push a new version of mg to collab-maint I get an error
message "unable to update info/refs+"
{harri@cecil:mg (pristine-tar) 588} git push
Counting objects: 4, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
Compressing
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
