On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
I wonder if somebody plans to package this one.
...
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Fulcrum scientific plotting tool update
Also look at our Guppi plot program, http://www.gnome.org/guppi/ - it
doesn't do as much as Fulcrum yet because it does not build on
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
the two don't seem to work together at this point.
I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version of
gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
stuff to do so. The conflicts could be
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Mmmh. I just checked. The reason why gtk-- is currently w/o gnome support
is, because I never installed libgnome-dev I think. I'm just doing it now
and will recompile gtk-- (or better: I'll try to compile gtk-- 0.9.17) with
gnome support.
Any
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Marc Singer wrote:
I think that keeping it on the CD is spurious because the CD
represents what we know works. Packages that don't work can be
downloaded from the FTP servers by the people who want to fuss with
them. Gnome is high profile because it has fancy
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
maybe a compromise would be to leave the packages in slink, make sure
the Description: field highlights their alpha status, and automatically
close all non-packaging bugs (and forward them upstream if it makes
sense to do so).
I hope this is what
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Stephen Crowley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.0.2 can
downgrade,
i see the 1.0.1 package nowhere ...
Hi,
Gnome ships with icons for different kinds of files, and right now .deb
packages have the Debian logo as icon. I've been asked to make sure this
is OK from a trademark point of view. I can't find the logo license on the
web site (?) - could someone clue me in on the current status, or give
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
Try looking at http://www.debian.org/logo (or logos)
Thanks!
It looks like a) the license is expired and b) it doesn't apply to Gnome
anyway because Gnome is not clearly half Debian related. Though arguably
we're talking about .deb packages rather
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I'd like to remove that check and make it a better one. Is checking
for $DISPLAY sufficient?
Why not just try to open the display, and if that fails bail out to text
mode? (Since $DISPLAY might be invalid, or there might be a -display
command line
On 29 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Ah, it's lovely. No more dselect for this boy.
Feature request: Shouldn't it be possible to put a package
on hold even if the newest version is installed?
This is causing much confusion - Keep is not Hold. Right now there's no
Hold feature at all.
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Jonathan Walther wrote:
The concern has been raised about people using older versions of apt
suddenly unknowingly breaking the law. I propose that the new mirroring
scheme only apply to those distributions (potato? the one after?) which
implement the policy. All the
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:01:26PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
As far as I can tell /etc/menu, /usr/lib/menu, and /usr/share/menu will go
away once we start using the desktop entry spec and /usr/share/applications
directory. Anything natively supporting the desktop spec won't have any
reason
Hi,
FWIW, the solution we're planning for Red Hat is to create a symlink
libpng10.so to the old libpng, then link imlib and gnome-libs
against -lpng10. This way the ABI of imlib/gnome-libs is preserved,
but -lpng can be moved to libpng3.
I'll attach the imlib and gnome-libs patches. (This step
, or the required tools for building from
scratch), the www.gnome.org people would be happy to include that.
Havoc Pennington http://pobox.com/~hp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they has been in common usage for hundreds of years. If anyone wants to
read more a good article is Language and the Culture of Gender: At the
Intersection of Structure, Usage, and Ideology, Silverstein, _Semiotic
Mediation_, 1995.
Thanks,
Havoc Pennington
http://pobox.com/~hp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
16 matches
Mail list logo
