Accepted ldraw-parts 1502+ds-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:29:04 +0200 Source: ldraw-parts Binary: ldraw-parts ldraw-mklist Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1502+ds-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> C

Re: Auto-detecting -dev package dependences from pkg-config

Quoting Josh Triplett (2016-12-12 18:19:03) > (I'd love to auto-generate Build-Depends too, but that would require a much > larger overhaul, and the last time that came up the answer was a resounding > "no".) for reasons why auto-generated Build-Depends are a bad idea, see:

Re: How to get history into dgit

Hi, Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2016-12-11 21:17:50) > I would like to start using dgit for one of my packages, using the > dgit-maint-merge workflow. > > If I understood correctly, following the dgit-maint-merge(7) > instructions for the initial setup will give me a repository with only > the

Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems

Hi, Quoting Ian Jackson (2017-01-09 18:33:51) > Johannes Schauer writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"): > > Sbuild could do this cleanup itself if there was a way to > > automatically determine whether the user would like their tree to be > &g

Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems

Hi Mattia, Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2017-01-09 11:27:30) > On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Mattia, please see below for a pbuilder-specific question. > > Thanks for CCing me; I'm not following this thread anymore (as it > surpassed the thres

Accepted multistrap 2.2.2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 18:53:43 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#843773: Bug#843773: misleading timestamps in binnmus

Hi, Quoting Wouter Verhelst (2016-12-01 16:24:16) > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > But maybe to talk about this option: what would speak against changing the > > "nmu" command of wanna-build to also add an option that allows setting

Accepted multistrap 2.2.4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 01:37:28 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Accepted multistrap 2.2.3 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 22:54:46 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Accepted multistrap 2.2.5 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 10:14:48 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Accepted multistrap 2.2.6 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:06:05 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Accepted multistrap 2.2.7 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:37:21 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Re: wording: "reverse dependence" vs "depender"

Hi, Quoting Ben Finney (2017-01-01 23:37:19) > Adam Borowski writes: > > I wonder, would it be better if we switched to using the word "depender" in > > place of "reverse dependency"? > > I don't know a simple term in English that carries that meaning. > > To me,

Accepted sbuild 0.73.0-2 (source) into unstable

-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb libsbuild-perl - Library for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources sbuild - Tool for building Debian bin

Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems

Hi, Quoting Thibaut Paumard (2017-01-07 07:12:59) > I manage my patches using quilt. I would really prefer if sbuild et al. > would revert the patches after building by default, but that's life. I > respect that other people have other views. you could always file a wishlist bug against sbuild

Accepted botch 0.21-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:16:33 +0100 Source: botch Binary: botch botch-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.21-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems

Hi all, Mattia, please see below for a pbuilder-specific question. Quoting James Clarke (2017-01-08 12:14:07) > This turns out to be true. Working in a patches-applied tree: > > $ dpkg-source --before-build . > $ dpkg-source -b . > $ dpkg-source --after-build . > > leaves the

Accepted botch 0.21-1 (all amd64 source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:45:42 +0100 Source: botch Binary: botch botch-doc Architecture: all amd64 source Version: 0.21-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Accepted sbuild 0.73.0-1 (source) into unstable

-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb libsbuild-perl - Library for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources sbuild - Tool for building Debian bin

Accepted multistrap 2.2.8 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:37:05 +0100 Source: multistrap Binary: multistrap Architecture: source Version: 2.2.8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT sent to the submitter

Hi, Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-27 17:56:59) > Current procedure of subscribing to a bug is an abomination: you need FOUR > mails for something that could be done by default. I feel you. This is why I long stopped subscribing to bugs I file. The ping-pong is too bothersome for me. Now I just

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

Hi, Quoting James McCoy (2016-12-18 16:04:47) > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:26:09PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2016-12-18 14:14 GMT+01:00 James McCoy : > > > > Well, sbuild's man page documents that the aptitude resolver will check > > alternatives. If

Re: depending on libssl1.0-dev, buildd fails to find it

Hi, Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2016-12-18 11:38:24) > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:27:12PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > > As Arno hinted at, it's to have reliable builds. A transient inability > > to install the first arm of an alternation should caused a dep-wait > > state, not building with the

Re: pro-tip: preinstall debhelper in your sbuild

Hi, Quoting Timo Weingärtner (2017-03-24 16:56:51) > These apt settings keep my systems clean and I guess they would also help > build chroots: > > Apt::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant "false"; > Apt::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false"; > Apt::Install-Recommends "false"; >

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

Quoting Steffen Möller (2017-07-29 18:05:27) > On 29.07.17 17:51, Jeff wrote: > > On 29/07/17 17:26, Steffen Möller wrote: >> The HPC community does not want > > to need root privileges to get their > >> software installed/used on the HPC setup. This excludes regular >> > Debian packages,

Accepted botch 0.21-4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 13:13:10 +0200 Source: botch Binary: botch botch-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.21-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Bug#870687: ITP: rss-bridge -- generate ATOM feeds for websites that don't have them

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: rss-bridge Version : 2017-08-03 Upstream Author : sebsauvage <sebsauv...@sebsauvage.net> Mitsukarenai <mi...@suumitsu.eu> Pierre Ma

Re: User-installable Debian packages?

Quoting Paul Wise (2017-07-22 13:34:46) > I would wager most Debian packages are not bit-for-bit identical when you > vary the installation prefix (and Debian build tools don't support doing that > AFAICT), but you can almost fake user-installable packages using existing > binary packages using

Bug#867274: ITP: node-webrtc-adapter -- shim to insulate apps from WebRTC spec changes and browser prefix differences

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: node-webrtc-adapter Version : 4.1.0 Upstream Author : Philipp Hancke <philipp.han...@googlemail.com> * URL : https://github.com/webrtc/adapter * License :

Bug#867272: ITP: node-sdp -- SDP parsing and serialization utilities

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: node-sdp Version : 2.2.0 Upstream Author : Philipp Hancke * URL : https://github.com/fippo/sdp * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript Description

Bug#867288: ITP: libjs-toastr -- Javascript library for non-blocking notifications

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: libjs-toastr Version : 2.1.3 Upstream Author : John Papa <j...@johnpapa.net>, Tim Ferrell <timothyferr...@gmail.com> * URL : http://codeseven.github.io

Bug#867286: ITP: libjs-bootbox -- programmatic dialog boxes using Bootstrap modals

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: libjs-bootbox Version : 4.4.0 Upstream Author : Nick Payne <n...@kurai.co.uk> * URL : http://bootboxjs.com/ * License : Expat Programming Lang

Bug#867290: ITP: libjs-blueimp-md5 -- MD5 implementation in JavaScript

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: libjs-blueimp-md5 Version : 2.7.0 Upstream Author : Sebastian Tschan <m...@blueimp.net> * URL : https://github.com/blueimp/JavaScript-MD5 * License : Expat

Accepted node-browserify-lite 0.5.0-1 (source) into unstable

-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: node-browserify-lite - bundle client-side JavaScript using Node.js-style module syntax Changes: node-browserify-lite (0.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload * Import upstream r

Accepted rss-bridge 2017-08-03-3 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 23:11:01 +0200 Source: rss-bridge Binary: rss-bridge Architecture: source Version: 2017-08-03-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes S

Accepted rss-bridge 2017-08-03-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:16:44 +0200 Source: rss-bridge Binary: rss-bridge Architecture: source Version: 2017-08-03-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes S

Accepted rss-bridge 2017-08-03-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 22:06:01 +0200 Source: rss-bridge Binary: rss-bridge Architecture: source all Version: 2017-08-03-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Re: fdisk becoming non-essential, dependencies needed.

Quoting Julian Andres Klode (2017-08-19 00:18:54) > > > Currently (for Buster) the fdisk package is being made > > > 'pseudo-essential' via a dependency from the Essential util-linux > > > package, where the tools was split out from. (This is also to support > > > upgrades from Stretch to Buster.)

Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?

Quoting Jonathan Dowland (2017-05-15 10:25:30) > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:06:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > git: 18907 > > svn: 2377 > > ^ how many of these are from teams (like pkg-gnome, at one point at least) > who want to switch to git but lack the time or person-power or motivation

Re: Intended MBF: maintainer scripts not using strict mode

Hi, Quoting Christoph Biedl (2017-06-27 00:37:33) > Let's be honest: Shell scripts, while easy to write, carry too many risks of > unsafe programming. So while your proposed fixing is a step in the right > direction, this is all just band-aid. We (as in Debian) should look forward > and try to

Re: infinite number of Debian workflows (Re: Moving away from (unsupportable) FusionForge on Alioth?)

Quoting James Clarke (2017-05-22 16:25:38) > But I notice that for the sbuild path, schroot is completely missing, Maybe I should also point out that schroot is just the *default* sbuild chroot backend. It also supports the "sudo" mode (which essentially just uses "sudo chroot") and the

Accepted vcmi 0.99+dfsg-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 08:12:26 +0200 Source: vcmi Binary: vcmi Architecture: source Version: 0.99+dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Games Team <pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Re: Too many Recommends (in particular on mail-transport-agent)

Quoting Christian Seiler (2017-06-07 15:26:35) > - You install package A, which Recommends: B, but you don't > want B, notice that at the time, and either remove B > afterwards, or install A with --no-install-recommends. But > then you install package C at a later point in time,

Bug#878355: ITP: orocos-bfl -- Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> * Package name: orocos-bfl Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Tinne De Laet, Klaas Gadeyne * URL : http://www.orocos.org/bfl * License : LGPL-2.1+ Programming Lang: C++ Descr

Accepted searx 0.12.0+dfsg1-1 (all source) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:16:41 +0200 Source: searx Binary: searx python3-searx Architecture: all source Version: 0.12.0+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Re: ftp master uploads disappearing?

Quoting Andreas Metzler (2017-09-27 19:38:22) > Andreas Tille wrote: > [...] > > To answer Mattias question why not using source uploads all the time: > > Once I have build the package to see whether all those lintian issues > > are fixed I want to fix I have a sensible package

Re: allowed uses of non-baseline CPU extensions

Quoting Josh Triplett (2017-10-24 04:29:32) > Philipp Kern wrote: > > I think that's a very important observation. I don't think you can > > necessarily conclude that the system where the package is initially > > installed is the system were the code is executed. > > > > In many kinds of

Accepted searx 0.13.1+dfsg1-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:25:20 +0100 Source: searx Binary: python3-searx searx Architecture: source Version: 0.13.1+dfsg1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Accepted searx 0.13.1+dfsg1-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:06:41 +0100 Source: searx Binary: python3-searx searx Architecture: source Version: 0.13.1+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Accepted searx 0.13.1+dfsg1-3 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:49:13 +0100 Source: searx Binary: python3-searx searx Architecture: source Version: 0.13.1+dfsg1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Accepted botch 0.21-5 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:13:50 +0100 Source: botch Binary: botch botch-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.21-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schau

Accepted vcmi 0.99+dfsg-4 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 22:34:11 +0200 Source: vcmi Binary: vcmi Architecture: source Version: 0.99+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Games Team <pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Accepted ros-robot-state-publisher 1.13.5-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

: 1.13.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: libjoint-state-listener0d - Robot OS robot_state_publisher listener library librobot-sta

Accepted ocaml-atd 1.12.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable

OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: libatd-ocaml - syntax for cross-language data types in OCaml - plugins libatd-ocaml-dev - syntax for cross-language data types in OCaml - development files libatdgen-o

Accepted ocp-indent 1.6.1-1 (source) into unstable

Maintainers <debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: libocp-indent-lib-ocaml - OCaml indentation tool for emacs and vim - libraries libocp-indent-lib-ocaml-dev - OCaml indentation tool for emacs and vim - development libraries ocp-in

Accepted morty 0.1.0-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 08:41:04 +0200 Source: morty Binary: morty Architecture: source Version: 0.1.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Johannes Schauer Description: morty

Accepted morty 0.1.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 20:14:33 +0200 Source: morty Binary: morty Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team Changed-By: Johannes Schauer Description: morty

Accepted sbuild 0.76.0-3 (source) into unstable

-By: Johannes Schauer Description: buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb libsbuild-perl - Library for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources sbuild-debian-developer

Accepted sbuild 0.76.0-2 (source) into unstable

-By: Johannes Schauer Description: buildd - Daemon for automatically building Debian binary packages from Deb libsbuild-perl - Library for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources sbuild - Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian sources sbuild-debian-developer

Re: Announce: docker-buildpackage

Quoting Ian Jackson (2018-05-01 16:38:28) > Geert Stappers writes ("Re: Announce: docker-buildpackage"): > > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 09:41:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > > > > I've written a tool for isolated deb builds

Re: Announce: docker-buildpackage

Quoting Chow Loong Jin (2018-05-03 06:27:01) > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:23:56AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > [...] > > Frankly, I don't see the point in writing this kind of software. Sbuild > > works super well with the overlay backend, and already has throw-able > > chroots in tmpfs.

Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

Quoting Hleb Valoshka (2018-01-04 19:35:28) > On 1/3/18, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > Do we really need systemd-less builds? I'm not convinced this is something > > relevant to Debian. > [...] > https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec#Derivative_specific_profiles > > At least

(was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

Quoting Wookey (2018-01-09 06:03:26) > On 2018-01-08 20:36 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > How, then, would you tell by looking at the package name+version which kind > > of package you have? > The package header says what profiles it was built with. The package > name+version doesn't change -

Derivative specific build profiles (was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

Quoting Jeremy Bicha (2018-01-09 17:35:30) > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > So we > > could talk about whether we should allow more build profiles that change > > binary > > package contents but so far I don't s

Re: build profiles and functional differences

Quoting Simon McVittie (2018-01-09 17:42:04) > On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 at 15:40:04 +, Wookey wrote: > > On 2018-01-09 15:07 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > > Thus, we keep packages built with a different build profile but the same > > > name/version/arcitecture b

Re: (was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

Quoting Adrian Bunk (2018-01-09 20:54:31) > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:22:33PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:35:30AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > > At times, Ubuntu needs to avoid certain build-dependencies because > > > they would add an unwanted "universe" binary

Re: (was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

Hi, Quoting Steve Langasek (2018-01-10 21:52:44) > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 03:07:01PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > Such a header could be introduced but that would be undesirable for two > > reasons: > > > - it would make it hard to check whether the binary packag

Storing build profiles in binary packages (was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

Quoting Steve Langasek (2018-01-10 21:49:02) > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:36:50PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 12:09:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Top-posting to just say +1, and that I was going to reply with much the > > > same. > > > > I don't even think

Re: [yay for broken usage of was: in the Subject header]

Quoting Philipp Kern (2018-01-11 00:20:17) > On 2018-01-10 22:53, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > But unless we want to pull a full Gentoo here and really make the > > information with which build profile a given binary package was built part > > of the binary package and

Re: (was: Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)

Quoting Paul Wise (2018-01-10 02:40:07) > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > No, there is no header in the binary packages that indicates with which > > profile a source package was built to generate the given binary package. > Is this information

Re: Effect of build profiles

Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2018-01-11 22:15:44) > On Jan 11 2018, Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > We can check whether two binary packages built with a different set of > > build profiles active are actually the same by using the tools from > > the reproducibl

Accepted searx 0.14.0+dfsg1-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:45:35 +0100 Source: searx Binary: python3-searx searx Architecture: source Version: 0.14.0+dfsg1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Accepted searx 0.14.0+dfsg1-2 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:20:01 +0100 Source: searx Binary: python3-searx searx Architecture: source Version: 0.14.0+dfsg1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

Quoting Simon McVittie (2018-01-03 14:30:55) > On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 at 15:12:51 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > > Please introduce official nosystemd build profile so downstream > > distributions can send patches to package maintainers with > > systemd-less build instead of keep them in home. > > In

Re: Bug#892612: ITP: conbuilder -- container-basade package builder for Debian packages

Hi, Quoting Benjamin Drung (2018-08-01 16:28:54) > > Build Debian packages using OverlayFS and systemd namespace > > containers. > > > > conbuilder creates a base filesystem using debootstrap, then > > overlays it with a filesystem to install the required dependencies > > and finally runs the

Re: Failed to create sbuild chroot for cross-compiling

Hi, Quoting Holger Wansing (2018-08-25 20:30:15) > The manpage of sbuild-createchroot contains commandline examples for several > use cases, but not for cross-compiling. yes, because sbuild-createchroot has nothing to do with cross-compiling. chroots that you use to compile natively or cross

Accepted vcmi 0.99+dfsg-3 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:07:52 +0200 Source: vcmi Binary: vcmi Architecture: source Version: 0.99+dfsg-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Games Team <pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Jo

Re: MBF proposal: python modules that fail to import

Hi, Quoting Adam Borowski (2018-04-15 22:30:47) > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:45:45PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > > The src:file package doesn't ship python{,3}-magic any longer, the change > > > was two months ago. Mind to

Accepted orocos-bfl 0.8.0-4 (source) into unstable

Maintainers <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: liborocos-bfl-dev - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library development files liborocos-bfl-examples - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library examples liborocos-bfl0.8 - Oro

Accepted rss-bridge 2018-03-11-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 01:14:55 +0200 Source: rss-bridge Binary: rss-bridge Architecture: source Version: 2018-03-11-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes S

Accepted ldraw-parts 1801+ds-1 (all amd64 source) into unstable

o-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: ldraw-mklist - LDraw mklist program ldraw-parts - LDraw parts library Changes: ldraw-parts (1801+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release * debian/copyright: fix insecure-copyrigh

Accepted orocos-bfl 0.8.0-1 (source amd64 all) into unstable, unstable

Maintainers <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: liborocos-bfl-dev - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library development files liborocos-bfl-examples - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library examples liborocos-bfl

Accepted orocos-bfl 0.8.0-3 (source) into unstable

Maintainers <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: liborocos-bfl-dev - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library development files liborocos-bfl-examples - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library examples liborocos-bfl0.8 - Oro

Accepted orocos-bfl 0.8.0-2 (source) into unstable

Maintainers <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Johannes Schauer <jo...@debian.org> Description: liborocos-bfl-dev - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library development files liborocos-bfl-examples - Orocos Bayesian Filtering Library examples liborocos-bfl0.8 - Oro

Re: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS vs DEB_BUILD_PROFILES: What is right and what is wrong?

Hi, Quoting Axel Beckert (2019-01-06 01:39:09) > while trying to get the nocheck build profile working, I stumbled over > some discrepancies between > > * Debian Policy §4.9.1, > * dpkg-buildflags (behaviour + man page), and > * lintian's long description of the tag >

Re: Q: Debcheck warning "Package declares a build time dependency on debhelper-compat (= 12) which cannot be satisfied on $arch"

Quoting Paul Wise (2019-01-19 04:38:04) > > At > > > > https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable=fonts-sawarabi-mincho, > > it show as below but debhelper-compat (= 12) is satisfied in sid > > > BuildDepends > > > > > > Package declares a build time dependency on debhelper-compat (= 12)

Re: Rebuilding reverse-deps in salsa pipeline?

Hi, Quoting Pirate Praveen (2018-12-15 07:17:14) > On 12/15/18 4:11 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > I'm wondering if somebody implemented a salsa pipeline to rebuild the > > reverse-deps of a library? > > > > Is there some example/docker image to build on? >

Re: Is screenshots.debian.net at risk?

Hi, Quoting Geert Stappers (2019-03-24 09:53:58) > > bear with me if the topic of the upcoming european copyright law (aka §13) > > has been discussed in other mailing lists. As being responsible for > > screenshots.debian.net I honestly am a bit worried about the implications. > > As usual???

Re: duprkit User Repository

Hi, Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-04-08 11:58:26) > The header script is not really what debian/rules does. For example, > when you are going to build some official Debian package, you may want > to do the following: > > $ debcheckout foobar > $ cd foobar; gbp export-orig; debuild -S -nc > $

Re: Support status for isolation-machine feature from Debian Infra?

Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-03-08 12:08:54) > (2) Is it a good idea to write a test script, that manually sets up a qemu VM > then tests the module[1]? (Such that we can get rid of the isolation-machine > restriction, and make Debian CI test the ZFS kernel module) I attempted that for my package

Bootstrapping debhelper (was: Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH)

Quoting Sam Hartman (2019-05-13 21:49:20) > > "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes: > Holger> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 03:37:55PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > Bernd> gcc also needs a compiler to build - so I think it should be > Bernd> safe to allow debhelper to build its package using

Re: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH

Quoting Adrian Bunk (2019-05-14 10:11:46) > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:08:21PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Mon, 13 May 2019 22:22:32 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > In my experience, keeping existing packages at exotic build systems or > > > ancient dh compat levels causes fewer

Re: QA expectations (Was: Do we want to Require or Recommend DH)

Quoting Holger Levsen (2019-05-14 17:38:15) > > Now one can turn this argument upside down. One can say: unstable is the QA > > area. Britney prevents testing migration on autopkgtest/piuparts/ missing > > binaries. In that case, we should simply stop filing such things in the BTS > > and stop

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

Hi Simon, Quoting Simon McVittie (2019-09-04 12:09:27) > I would like to propose this build profile for addition to > . I'll add it to the wiki if > there seems to be rough consensus. > > Name: noinsttests > Changes content of binary packages: No ("C: N"

Re: Common configuration of Debianish build etc. tools

Quoting Russ Allbery (2019-09-11 18:15:45) > I think this is a good idea. +1 Patches to sbuild welcome! I wonder which configuration should take precedence in case a setting is specified in the common configuration file as well as in another way that the program understands -- probably the

Re: unsigned repositories

Hi, Quoting David Kalnischkies (2019-08-05 10:09:09) > So far all usecases mentioned here seem to be local repositories though. > Nobody seems to be pulling unsigned repositories over the network [for good > reasons]. So perhaps we can agree on dropping support for unsigned > repositories for

Re: B-D on src package? (was: Re: Challenge from Julia's non-standard vendored openblas"64_"

Hi, Quoting Mo Zhou (2019-07-28 16:03:43) > On 2019-07-28 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote: > > This is maybe not directly helpful to you right now, but: > > > > If we could build-depend on source packages, you could combine these > > two ideas into something that might be less awful. > More than once

Re: unsigned repositories

Hi, with my sbuild-maintainer-hat on I would also like to vehemently argue against apt dropping support for unsigned repositories. Quoting Simon McVittie (2019-07-29 09:01:47) > On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 00:17:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > echo "deb [trusted=yes] file://$base ./" > >

Re: B-D on src package? (was: Re: Challenge from Julia's non-standard vendored openblas"64_"

Hi, Quoting Stephen Kitt (2019-08-06 18:43:24) > > recently there was some discussion about this in #debian-apt. I don't have > > the logs of that discussion so others might want to expand on what I > > remember from back then. In no particular order plus my own thoughts. > > > > apt developers

Re: sbuild: do not fail when there are alternatives

Hi, Quoting Geert Stappers (2019-07-20 07:50:11) > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:28:36PM -0300, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 00:21:10 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > > > > * Centralize the list of supported archs in the seccomp packages. By > > > either creating an empty

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >