On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:03:50PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
I'm not even sure how they derive that information, Debian's Apache might
provide it in the banner information (Since when? BTW, has this always been
the case?) but many other web servers in Debian won't. This
Hi all,
A small annoyance I have with debian's menu system is an inconsistency
in the naming of programs on the menus:
Apps/Tools
ASclock
EditRes
Oclock
...
bbpager
docker
...
The ordering of the menu is dictated by the menu system rather
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:10:20PM +0100, Jason Chambers wrote:
You can get the case ignored when ordering by adding the following
to /etc/menu-methods/menu.h.
sort=tolower($title)
Then run update-menus to regenerate them.
I've had a play around with this, and found that putting a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:00:05PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
if I get kernel 2.4.22 as a debian package I expect kernel 2.4.22 as
a debian package, not something else... any debian specific changes
should result in kernel name change, that's what's expected in kernel
world (when I get ac
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:48:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or
kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt.
Or kernel-image-hx ... what caught me out was believing
kernel-image-2.4.xx or whatever was relatively pristine. However naive
that makes
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:12:38PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
All he had to do was install an older version of libc6 and every other
package
would have been happy. All the infrastructure is there to do this, the old
packages are
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:23:14PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know whether this package needs to match the kernel version or
not, but if not I think the name is poorly chosen.
So your substantive reason is: The name of the new package
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:23:30PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
It does not need to. Feel free to propose a patch to document this
more clearly (I don't really want to rename it again...)
Add something like this to the
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
Before that realization, it seemed like the type of random cruft that
sometimes gets pulled in on dist-upgrade; a name change would help
alleviate that initial perception, IMO. Why not libc6-linux-headers?
I'm in two minds
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 10:37:24PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In what situation would the linux-kernel-headers package be needed
seperate from libc?
Ths issue is not whether
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 05-Nov-03, 19:14 (CST), Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering
about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not
linux-kernel-* or linux
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:43:52PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:14, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering
about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not
linux-kernel-* or linux-* ? If alternative
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:55:03PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux?
This will prevent confused users (or: lazy to read the description users)
from asking this again and again.
system-headers-linux is a bit vague and without
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:45:24PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:37:16PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:45:32AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:55:03PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
What not rename linux-kernel
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:04:00PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Andrew Lau wrote:
So is vrms now up for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
us for misrepresenting him! = )
Nominations are now open.
debian-legalint
I think this one, or a variation, has good prospects..
--
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:45:51PM +0800, David Palmer wrote:
Hello,
I thought that I might make a beginning at learning.
I've searched the web, found information that goes beyond the definition
of plethora, so I thought that I'd ask here.
(1) What is the best language to start with?
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:19:02PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
For personal pet projects, I use 2 spaces per nesting level. Some people
think that's Pure Evil(tm),
Most noteably perhaps, Linus Torvalds, although...
although I fully agree with you about wasting
screen real estate in 80 columns
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:44:03PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
No, but if you don't do it, you forfeit your right to whine about
duplicate work when it turns out that you're not the only one who has
been doing work without telling anybody about it.
So, _both_ people involved should have
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:17:26PM -0800, A.J. Rossini wrote:
Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:50:29PM -0800, A.J. Rossini wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To install a package directly, with apt downloading any necessary
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 07:06:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Similarly, to check the build depends of a source package file:
apt-get build-dep apt-listchanges-1.49-11104cl.src.rpm
Should this be the job of apt-get? Fetching a list of build-depends is a
similar job to that performed by
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:08:17PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Afaik: 2.4.23 contains literally 100s of changes, one of these was a
small change to do_brk(), which looked like a normal non-critical
bugfix to everybody involved. Some time later Debian was hacked and
backtracing how the
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:53:54PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure that's a good idea. I'm using Gnome and I'd like to keep a
simple applications' menu, not having hundred entries like in my
debian's menu. Having too many entries in a menu
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:19:24AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... apt-get build-dep somesourcepackage ...
apt-get build-deb ...
Just to clarify, build-dep is the proposed action rather than build-deb?
--
Jon Dowland
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:10:27PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 02:10:56PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Should this be the job of apt-get? Fetching a list of build-depends is a
similar job to that performed by apt-cache for other fields. I always
associate apt-get
On 6 Feb 2013, at 17:37, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:
Do we finally have mechanisms to start processes without root but with
elevated capabilities?
We also need fallback for non Capability-capable supported kernels (wow that's
an awkward sentence)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I think gnome-shell-extensions has an extension that changes the behaviour to
what you desire.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Paul Gevers wrote...
Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
added, as seen in #703298.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:30:46AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Additionally, if you don't want to see them, you can append
;avatar=no. I'll also enable this to be set by default using cookies
too. [But since the BTS doesn't use cookies at all currently, please
don't hold your breath.]
Don't
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 03:06:47PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
In this case, though, what about making the request on the BTS' side? This
would reveal nothing about the user who actually reads a bug page to
gravatar. The bandwidth needed to do so is totally negligible.
I think that's what
solution. Then we
end up stuck with the sub-optimal solution.
I think downloader packages where required for licensing reasons are an uneasy
necessary evil, but for when the maintainer doesn't have time to package
something? This seems like a really slippery slope to me.
--
Jonathan Dowland
That explains why rc-buggy started showing up against experimental
packages on packages.debian.org. I assumed it was a PDO bug. I guess
everyone has stopped laughing now. Can we get rid of it? (It's also
very misleading).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:32:57PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
on a more personal note, why oh why would you ever want the system to suspend
when you close the lid? That's what a suspend button is for.
My suspend button requires a function modifier and is ignored if the screen
saver is
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:48:09PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
If a package fails to do what it is supposed to do, isn't that a valid
argument that it is RC?
No.
Or virtually every bug would be RC.
gnome-power-manager is meant to suspend a user's laptop when they shut
the lid and put it in
to #677792, sadly too
late for wheezy now but I'm still interested.
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130331081939.GA25996@debian
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:48:08AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
IMO it's important to remember that it's fundamentally the release team
that is at fault for problems here, not the R maintainer.
Can you please remind me what you do for Debian? Aside from flame debian-devel.
I've forgotten.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
So help speeding up the release process.
The universal rebuttal to all complaints about the release process. Sadly
it misses the point at the heart of most complaints: far too much work is
needed to become release-ready, and there is not
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 07:57:50AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
I don't think the time for this discussion is now, so I'll restrain
myself from saying more. The release is near, and there's going to
be plenty of time until the next freeze :)
When the pain of the freeze will be a fast-fading
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:45:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
You seem to believe that unstable is more important than stable
releases. I do not. One of us is in the wrong project.
If, you are suggesting here, that the release process in Debian is utterly
set in stone and nobody may raise
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian
BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults
accordingly.
In the case of our bts tool, I think it would be rather too much work
to
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
My point.
Sorry Ben!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130402204348.GC5048@debian
The NEW queue is not just for double-checking licenses.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013040318.GB11273@debian
On 4 Apr 2013, at 20:16, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:
otherwise the workflow becomes clumsier
Just to be clear, did you read Russ' blog - are you referring to the merge
trick he uses in his workflow for this purpose?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
This java code should be replaces with something in perl/python/non-JVM.
Why?
Is there already some logic/templates in Debian that I could build on?
dh-make-perl perhaps?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:26:29AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
they haven't done so in the past), and that can guide the way similar
bugs are
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 07:28:32AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Can we *PLEASE* stop making new threads. It's getting *REALLY* hard to
keep playing whack-a-mole with my bozo bin.
Fix your mailer… I see precisely one thread, correctly linked together
via message-id and references headers, with
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:52:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
If I upload new packages A and B, that A depends and B, and
that A gets approved, but B doesn't, then we end up with
package A being in Debian, but never installable.
Has this ever happened? I believe the FTP masters do look at
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:11:05AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
That was the part I didn't understand. What are people doing to solve
this generated files at release problem? I've solved this as upstream
and a Debian developer by having tarballs.
Run the 'dist' stages as part of the 'build'
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
document,
vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a DMCA safe
harbor.
Does it mean
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
This ruby gem is needed by FPM (see my ITP[0]).
Hi Laurent, thanks for the clarification — to ask a related question.
What's the worth of FPM on Debian? Especially given the issues that
Wouter has raised in the bug¹
¹
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:51:39PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
- If mentors.debian.org needs to follow the DMCA, why would
mentors.debian.net be exempt of it ?
It's not, but Debian is not hosting mentors, the .net domain is a forwarding
service
of sorts, so to take on the responsibility
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:04:40PM +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
Aslo, we have sso.debian.org, whose use we should expand.
I'd love to see that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:18:05AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Charles, failing that, shall we coordinate off-list? Re-building in chroot
takes about a minute or two each but sadly some of these package appear
effectively orphaned (eg gpplot2, single upload 15 months ago -- is that
really
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:46:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:28:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
% ls -lh debian/rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 mrvn users 1 Apr 16 12:27 debian/rules - /usr/bin/dh
I don't understand your point, other than to demonstrate that
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:38:14AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Well yes, but if you do even small things such as generate the
package manually instead of using debhelper, prepare to be shouted
at by the British Cabal with threats of using superpowers to remove
such packages from Debian.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:22:05PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I also posted on Debian Planet, how to find patches applied in Ubuntu
via Debian PTS together with categories of useful fixes that are
relevant to Jessie and may be already solved/patched in Ubuntu. [1]
I perceived that blog
It would be nice if the long description (at least) gave a bit more of a
concrete overview over the type of utilities that are included. Look at e.g.
moreutils, devscripts for examples of how to do this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 07:22:05PM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Ideally, i'd like to see debian to branch or use t-p-u, such that sid
can continue accepting new uploads and not freeze. E.g. something
similar to how fedora operates. I vaguely recall that something like
that has been proposed
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
dh_make -f ../foo-1.tar.gz
dpkg-buildpackage
I think one valid point the OP makes which each of these suggestions — in
isolation — seem to miss, is there are *too many ways to do it*. The
suggestions you (and others)
Is there a mobile version?
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Apr 2013, at 17:52, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
http://www.afaik.de/usenet/faq/zitieren/ (in German, English and Dutch)
Please. Read it. Follow it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi Paul,
This has been discussed many times on -devel, including before you became a DD.
Many people, including Roger and Marco, have spent a *lot* of time thinking
about this and working on proofs of concepts, etc. already. Please take some
time to read up on the previous threads before
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:56:04PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
That said, I'm not in support of moving things to /usr; it's completely
backward.
…
If we do this, I'd prefer to make /usr a symlink to / on new installs
I've always thought that myself, but it seems most folks who are pro
merge tend
On 7 May 2013, at 17:26, Simon Chopin chopin.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't assume that only DDs read debian-devel.
Don't worry, I haven't: I just don't know of a more accurate heuristic for
determining when somebody started to get involved.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:21:26PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I don't see why, in this context, that's a useful heuristic to have. If
you want to debunk someone's argument,
I'm not sure I'd characterize what I tried to get across as debunking someone's
argument. More so, questioning
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:52:25PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Being able to write tools to extract the license of any given package.
Well, extract what the maintainer thought the license was when they wrote
debian/copyright. What correlation that has with reality is an open question.
--
To
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 06:26:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Oh, sorry, I forgot, you work for Canonical (which totally explains some
of your writings in the other eMail too, which I’m not going to comment
on). Of course, for *buntu people it’s not about choice.
I think you are totally out
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:17:34AM +0400, Dmitry Papchenkoff wrote:
Maybe there should not be a separate package for each tool, but at
least st and dmenu should be packaged separately.
Why?
Moreover, there IS a package named stterm in unstable which ships st
separately (I've found it then
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:22:12AM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
2013/5/24 brian m. carlson sand...@crustytoothpaste.net:
Gentlemen,
This is well-worn territory on -devel. Please bear in mind the OP's wish
not to open this can of worms again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:07:06AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 05/23/2013 03:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
How on earth does that contradict with the fact that 40%, i.e.
the minority of all contributions are done by the original
author. 40% still means that 60% of the code
If
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:50:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
A large number of contributors to an *init system* is not
something that should be a goal in and of itself
Then
Furthermore, the statistics for systemd are themselves a distortion
isn't really relevant here, let's please not
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:02:22AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Now that we are done with systemd for the time being, can we have the
flame war about replacing Exim with Postfix as the default MTA?
Are there any objections other than but I like it this way!?
As things stand, for the vast
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:42:20AM +0200, Franck Routier (perso) wrote:
this description is from the upstream readme. I have submited a bug
report to ask for a correction.
Should I patch the readme inbetween ?
If you mean the package description, then yes: it should be tailored
to Debian. When
Hi Adam,
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 05:56:06PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
A while ago, someone raised the possibility of recompressing PNG files.
From my brief experience of working on games-thumbnails, I can appreciate that
the space savings may well be worth it at scale, but performing
On 28 May 2013, at 14:04, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
Some plugins for photoshop etc store data in the fields that get removed
by pngcrush and friends. In a sense, doing this is removing source data.
This is a bug that should be fixed in the optimiser(s). However, it could
Hi Simon,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:05:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
The participants in this thread are debian-devel subscribers: the sort
of people who know that Debian is a Unix system, know what a Unix system
is, and have some idea of what a btrfs scrub cron job, or indeed an
MTA,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:50:15PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
Do you have any reason at all to believe that these were problems with
systemd, rather than problems in Debian configuration or mostly
independent bugs in other software that happened to trigger under
systemd?
Whether or not systemd
Hi Pol,
Your question is more on-topic for the debian-mentors list. You might get
more help there.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:38:52PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:53:56 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
I think that ease of configurability is a major plus for Postfix when
compared to Exim, since a common configurations is just a few lines long.
How many lines
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:36:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Well, in that case, it failed to be as simple to configure as qmail.
Is ease of configuration an important criteria for default MTA? More
important than sensible-default?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
We'll need binaries for sdl 1 and 2 coexisting from two different source
packages I believe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
It's amazing how much simpler Debian life becomes if one simply ignores
bug severities entirely. Of course harder to do nearer to release, but
we live in a time of relative luxury right now…
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
At some point in the recent past the SDL team was effectively dead and
the games team took over maintenance. ISTR sponsoring at least one upload
of an SDL component during that time. However, it's possible that the SDL
time was revived since.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:10:22PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Life for the maintainer or for the user?
Well, the severity of a bug, from a user POV, makes no guarantee on
how serious the maintainer takes it, nor whether they will actually
fix it. Admittely some users get comfort from being
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:45:07PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Sendmail has just one more layer of indirection by virtue of the m4
macros. Postfix has most of its behavior hard coded in the C sources,
while exim's behavior can be controlled by run-time configuration if
an advanced user wants to
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:10:38AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Since you repeat this claim: over the last year and a bit, systemd has
seen 21 releases. I agree this is quite a lot, but it's hardly twice a
week.
The number of Linux releases over the samer period is only about half that,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:00:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
To this exim expert, configuring exim is done as follows:
zcat /usr/share/doc/exim4/examples/example.conf.gz /etc/exim4/exim4.conf
Absolutely. At some point in the last few years I was recommended this course
of action by a
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:05:24PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
The only class of users I can imagine the current situation not optional
is someone being used to postfix[1].
Well, that's not me…
When I remember learning exim I found it quite nice that the config is quite
self-explaining
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:08:17AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
OpenPGP and S/MIME don't guarantee anonymity as they don't (and can't
really) encrypt the headers/envelope
Erm, they also identify the recipients, as it's the recipients key to which
the messages are encrypted. (and typically the
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:41:27PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
DFSG #4: Our priorities are our users and free software
A court prosecuting/persecuting one of our users is not in scope
I'm now struggling to understand which side of the argument you are arguing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:22:50AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Being able to systematically link bugs to hardware would be useful, then
other owners of the same hardware would (a) be able to check for outstanding
bugs before upgrading (b) try to reproduce and confirm bugs
And if one uses more
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:59:41PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0
Anything other looks bad :-)
I think guilt attempts to address something that 3.0 leaves unresolved.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:10:07PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Faheem Mitha wrote:
So, I suppose anyone using the software needs to download it. I'll
provide a script to download the data, but if I want to build a
Debian package containing that data, how
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
It is also impossible to patch the binary format unlike SQL.
Interesting. For the first time, I've realised there can be a clash between
preferred form for modification and preferred form for use.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e3a10ec6-e8d6-4c82-8c0e-523f2931a...@debian.org
On 20 Sep 2013, at 14:49, Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote:
I mean, not really, right?
I wouldn't write it if I didn't think so.
If I want to use a .so, I want the ELF, but I want to modify it in C
The classic case we all know well which doesn't map to this situation.
This just
Please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/108274b5-05b0-4a9b-8ee4-54bd1b353...@debian.org
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:30:59PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
My proposal is to remove unrar-free from Debian, for the reasons
mentioned above, and add a patch to src:unar that include a wrapper
script that provides a command-line wrapper compatible to both
unrar-free and unrar-nonfree, so
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:04PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
For all my qmake and cmake based projects, neither that has a make dist,
I've asked my VCS for a tarball of the tag and blessed that one as 'the
release'.
+1
Anecdotally, one of my upstreams has a broken tarball which is a git
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:41:15AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
In Debian, there are only two packages depending, recommending,
suggesting or build-depending on pdksh right now:
…
graphviz (U)
shunit2
These surprised me, so I took a peek.
In shunit2's case, ksh is optionally used as
in the area will understand. Quite a challenge.)
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2013093019.GA16565@debian
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:31:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
P.S: Even if I'm spending the most of my days on packaging OpenStack for
Debian, it's still too big for me alone, and I would accept some help...
May I make a suggestion?
Instead of filing ITPs for every Openstack component, file
1 - 100 of 537 matches
Mail list logo
