?
So, what do you think, and is anyone willing to sponsor these tiny packages?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpqTORqornu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libmail-dkim-perl
Version : 0.18
Upstream Author : Jason Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://jason.long.name/
* License : Same as Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
some mechanism in place to detect
such a case when or if it happens?
Deal with it when people complain. Also, this kind of information can be
shared so that not every mail admin has to find it out himself by users
complaining.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
/SBL, are
high-quality enough that you can outright reject. Others, like SpamCop, are
likely to include some of the bigger names from time to time. DUL lists might
be good candidates.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
On Monday 17 July 2006 23:27, Thomas Bushnell BSG took the opportunity to
write:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Deal with it when people complain. Also, this kind of information can be
shared so that not every mail admin has to find it out himself by users
complaining.
Are you
one which builds both the library and the development files.
BTW, isn't the version number of the latest stable release 1.0.4?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpVJmwKfkud8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
don't have a
separate follow-up command either (for everyone's information, Mutt has one -
press L to reply to list). IMHO, the best policy still is not to CC the
author unless he asks for it.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
to let mutt
know anything manually. It seems to use List-Post.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpxsFMYUD0Je.pgp
Description: PGP signature
straightening things out could help.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpQQ7nWGwdKx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
as well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
... Or we could
builds the Heimdal module packages. Currently I don't think there is any
other solution to this problem, and solving it for real would require
rather serious changes to how packages are built, but it might still be
meaningful to bring it up on -devel, which I've done now.
--
Magnus Holmgren
On tisdagen den 28 april 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Many of the more popular MUAs on your list have this command already,
Can you name any others apart from mutt that come with this by default?
Kmail is one.
--
Magnus Holmgren
--cert-digest-algo SHA256 or something?
Also, does gpg have an option to make it output the hash algorithms of key
(ID) signatures? I can't seem to find one.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
in Debian?
I created a package some years ago, but abandoned the ITP. See
http://bugs.debian.org/352653 for reasons.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
, to allow one source package to
generate more than one binary package by linking against each of a number of
mutually conflicting libraries (libkrb5 and heimdal, to name a real example).
But that would require quite big changes.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
that can
be applied in other contexts as well.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org
* Package name: pdkim
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Tom Kistner t...@duncanthrax.net
* URL : http://duncanthrax.net/pdkim/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On lördagen den 22 augusti 2009, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org writes:
* Self-contained, no dependencies (except libc), thanks to code
included from the PolarSSL project.
From a Debian perspective, that's a policy violation, not a feature!
Please arrange
On måndagen den 24 augusti 2009, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2009-08-23 Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org wrote:
On lördagen den 22 augusti 2009, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org writes:
* Self-contained, no dependencies (except libc), thanks to code
included
On tisdagen den 1 september 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
currently there is the large mysql / octave / hdf* / nattle /
...-transition going on which includes about 170 source package
changes and about 120 binary changes (recompilations) for every arch.
nattle?
--
Magnus Holmgren
Is doc-base lacking a section for SSH clients/servers and other remote control
software? Sure, you can transfer files and monitor other computers using SSH,
but that's not all you can do.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description
. Gunnar might be thinking of Mail-Followup-To or setting Reply-To to
the list yourself, but the fact is that it isn't well-defined how to setup
the mail header to express all your preferences for replies and followups.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list
of libdomainkeys
unclear, Etch frozen, and additionally libmail-dkim-perl including support
for DomainKeys, I suggest that these two WNPP bugs be closed.
--
Magnus Holmgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpGUAyWLfeVZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
?).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack) -- Dave Evans
pgpgEYnWGQuLZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(dh_installdebconf: Should try to
figure out the debconf version needed).)
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpC5AkB1jxN2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-Version to 3.7.2 without changes.
* Apply 20_spf_dns_include_std_headers.patch: Include arpa/nameser.h and
netdb.h from spf_dns.h instead of defining the constants needed unless
certain HAVE_ macros are defined (Closes: #405885).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 23 March 2007 20:53, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (...)
Have not taken a look at the package, but does the short description
Description: Sender Policy Framework library, written in C
really have to say
else has an interest in this package and could think of cooperating
with me.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpLI9SIFNf5l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 01:42, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2007, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren:
DebPool is a Debian package archiver written in Perl by Joel Aelwyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Like mini-dinstall it's a lightweight replacement
for the real deal that manages
-debpool or debpool-2g. Or anything that is better. :-) I just
wanted to make clear that no one is stealing debpool or anything.
Discussion can then continue on an associated mailing list.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
currently, is that correct?)
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpCoTtdoWjDC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it that way because that adds some personal touch about the
place the upload was made from.
Also, using UTC-only destroys information, which is generally a Bad Thing,
IMHO. Recalculating the timestamp to UTC or your own time zone isn't that
hard, and can be done programmatically.
--
Magnus
of
choice and think that any number of alternatives can be made available for
the user to choose from.
* Did you get the init script to work?
start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /usr/bin/debpool shouldn't work,
since /proc/(pid)/exe points to /usr/bin/perl.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 05 April 2007 23:04, Andreas Fester wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
[...]
* You've indented the main loop in bin/debpool. While I think that's how
it should be, I also think it's best to undo it until we have merged all
contributions.
Sure. I did this to make the main loop more
see what the admins say. What the package should be called can be decided
later.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpOsH7Rb1Nr6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debpool-devel
or by sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpXRCHs0cSic.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, Zak Elep intended to adopt it, but
didn't follow through. So it's an ITA hijack, like myself did with sa-exim
some time ago.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpAGX4B1qCMD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and
Sources files that apt downloads. So as long as name collisions can be
avoided (for example in simple repositories holding just one version and
architecture of a package at a time), the file name technically shouldn't
matter, should it?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
is
upgraded.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.9
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpcUKFMrobgk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are currently resurrecting the old debpool
somewhere in the page.
Having two pages, one more user oriented and one more developer oriented,
might perhaps be reasonable? But I agree that one of the pages should be
renamed, if only to make capitalization consistent.
--
Magnus Holmgren
of both worlds. Maybe some of this is
already possible?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpUUCyXgLchh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
else has to use stgit too to get all the benefits, right?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpce1QkD9DWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 14:52, Marcus Better wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Now, how do you combine these? Several people have thought: The VCS
can handle the changesets. Putting patches under VCS is silly!
I fully agree. Unfortunately Subversion doesn't make it easy for you. You
can keep
in
oldstable.
Question: Can the second source package take the first source package's (less
awkward) name, or does it have to wait until oldstable is archived?
Concrete example: lsh/lsh-utils (see bug 340354).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail
On Thursday 31 May 2007 14:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote, Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:04 PM
Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The second
one gets rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies and is
removed from unstable, testing, and (after
to be referenced comes to mind. What else, if
symbols aren't versioned?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpCQBuAd0W6k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 02 June 2007 14:58, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 18:03 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Many applications allow their functionality to be extended by means of
plugins, often in the form of libraries that the application dlopen()s.
Usually the application provides
to tell
dh_installman which manpages to install in which package, then dh_installman
looks at the .TH lines of those manpages and determines what sections to put
them in.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpJdzAt5Vfdg.pgp
packages
or other cases where no real functionality is lost by not immediately
upgrading?
I'm not talking about a situation where a main package changes its dependency
on the old package name to the new package name, thereby causing the
transition to take place.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL
but this needs to be done
everywhere. Have something accurate.
I'm in favour! (But are you requesting that aptitude use SI prefixes
correctly, or that it use IEC (binary) prefixes?
--
Magnus Holmgren
pgpaVIzYUqkyh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 11 June 2007 18:53, Miles Bader wrote:
shirish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
everywhere.
No it doesn't.
The SI binary prefixes are an abomination.
Why - besides pronunciation?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
If everybody waits for somebody else to change first, then no change can ever
happen.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your
On Monday 11 June 2007 15:07, shirish wrote:
Ugh,
The second example I wanted to give was of libburnia
http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/877 . Sorry
Uh, tell them that kiB should be KiB. Don't ask me why.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:25, Joey Hess wrote:
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
In that case you're just sloppy. Prefixes and symbols for units are case
sensitive.
--
Magnus
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:41, Joey Hess wrote:
Alex Queiroz wrote:
On 6/11/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
Like in kg or km?
This thread is about units of data.
kbit? kbit/s? kB/s?
--
Magnus Holmgren
.
There is a comment: /* This 1024 vs 1000 stuff is just plain evil */
None of these put a space between the number and the unit, as is proper, but
that I don't think can be reasonably expected.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
prefixes have to be rejected for not being a perfect solution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_solution_fallacy
I don't like those Special Interest units in all situations ;)
SI units aren't special. They are universal.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc
bytes, before people started to use
it as if to mean 1024. There is confusion; hard drive manufacturers'
advertising material is not the only place where kilobyte != 2^10 bytes.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:44, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 08:36:39AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
That's an argument that's been heard before but it's *wrong*. SI prefixes
*are* used with non-SI units without losing their normal meaning and
there is no reason why
.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpEKOaSzboZ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:54, Miles Bader wrote:
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No it doesn't.
The SI binary prefixes are an abomination.
Why - besides pronunciation?
Well among other things, the end result of this whole mess will likely
be to _increase_ confusion, rather
the change (e.g. in a legend).
So, just because some developers *might* do things wrong, that doesn't mean it
will surely happen.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgp8O7rhl7WEV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the whole kibibyte crap has much of
a leg to stand on, regardless whether a self-imposed Academie Anglaise
says.
I get 59 500 hits for kibibyte and 1.5 million hits for kilobyte. That's
about 4%, not 0.3%. In fact, it's sufficiently widespread to earn a place in
dictionaries, IMHO.
--
Magnus
exactly
as a decimal fraction in Kibyte, because 0.1 Kibyte is a non-integral number
of bytes). Hence, having two sets of prefixes to choose from depending on
what fits best is the best option.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 15:36, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 02:36:55PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 14:09, Adam Borowski wrote:
English linguistic is a descriptive science -- what is correct and what
is not depends on what people use. This stays
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 15:46, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 14:57, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Josselin Mouette may or may not have written...
[snip]
When I use a computer program, I don't want to wonder whether it uses
precise units or approximate ones
just a matter of
getting used to them.
Do you have anything to add that hasn't already been said?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpSvfcE221IF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 19:57, Joey Hess wrote:
I had generally assumed that most programmers were reaonsable and used
powers of 2, but this thread is certianly changing my mind about *that*.
It's not that unreasonable. Humans generally count in base 10 - computers
count in base 2.
--
Magnus
against IEC prefixes. On the contrary, it may well be a prime
example of a confusion that wouldn't have happened if the IEC prefixes had
been adopted by then.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpQnKqXRd0XO.pgp
Description: PGP
the public.
Good. Let's then teach the public that borrowing well-defined SI prefixes
and giving them a different meaning in some situations was a bad idea, and
that an adequate solution exists.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed
instead be lat. _Mus_ for the genus
or _Mus musculus_ for the species known as the common house mouse).
--
Magnus Holmgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irrelevant though, since most of the time 1 GB is
correct, 1 GiB is also correct.
Again, this is an extreme example. A more average case might be 3.2
GB, which is *not* a substitute for 3.2 GiB. Do you not agree that
rounding can be done to more than one significant digit?
--
Magnus Holmgren
the commonly used
ones we all know and love.
An appeal to emotions, once again.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the BOINC
client automatically downloads the right executable.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there, and leave the level of the
relatively few other entries the same, or maybe in some cases increased by
one.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpjZhQH0G5DU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
directly; there is no need to convert them into .menu
files first (and really no reason to convert .menu to .desktop either).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better
hundreds of machines spread around the
world.
Um, but what does it *do*?
Answer: http://www.theether.org/pssh/docs/0.2.3/pssh-HOWTO.html#AEN38
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail
.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack) -- Dave Evans
pgpbFaTSRYi4I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and annotate the bugs appropriately.
It can happen that a dead package chooses to walk the earth again, can't it
(not in these cases, but in some)?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpBBPUGBkAGR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 20 July 2007 12:19, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
It would be nice, I think, if the BTS would automatically notice
when a package has been removed from unstable and annotate the bugs
appropriately.
It actually already does this; see
http
://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg01265.html
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpbA7JJO5e22.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 23 July 2007 18:47, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 23, Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Packages containing servers that can be started from inetd should all
provide an xinetd configuration file in /etc/xinetd.d. They will
instantly work with
Way too much work, and better
from their own update-inetd, to facilitate
switching from one inet-superserver to another. On the other hand, perhaps
that should be the administrator's decision: If they don't ever want to use
inetd they shouldn't have to have update-inetd installed.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sunday 29 July 2007 16:22, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
But: AFAIU, /etc/inetd.conf is now owned by any package, because it's used
Just to make myself clear: s/now/not/
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better
you can configure your software the way you want it.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpTwiADkSS75.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. There the files are
separated, with symlinks from /usr/lib/pikeversion to the corresponding
location under /usr/share/pikeversion.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ssvnc
Version : 1.0.20
Upstream Author : Karl J. Runge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/ssvnc.html
* License : GPL 2
Programming Lang: C, Shell
mentions
this explicitly, possibly because there are very few such executables.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: policyd-spf-fs
Version : 0+svn21
Upstream Author : Matthias Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.freestone.net/software/policyd-spf-fs/
* License : LGPL 2.1
* get no say in that matter.
On the other hand, Opera isn't asked to make their browser free software _for
Debian_, but for their users. Debian is not an end, but a means.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better
on the
packages in the correct order if using deliberately overlapping lists.)
I also note that dh_movefiles might do globbing in a different way and that it
doesn't actually move files (it copies and then removes the original)
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list
.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
deleting those which don't correspond to an actual upload to
Debian. Would that be acceptable, or is debian/changelog _strictly_
prepend-only?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On tisdagen den 2 oktober 2007, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 04:47:16PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
I'm taking over a package (pike7.6) that up to when it was orphaned got
an automated changelog entry each time the upstream build number was
incremented. Hence debian
to use substitution variables in package names.
But if we forget about variable package names, wouldn't dpkg-substvars be a
good idea?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
in the
same manner).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
consistently use /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch.gz,
do you do that too?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus
better)?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack) -- Dave Evans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
?
Remember that hyphens are allowed in upstream versions. Since hyphens are
generally used to separate upstream from downstream, it would more clearly
indicate that the -dfsg* suffix is not really part of upstream's version
number.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
