On 6/8/05, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Y en otro sitio que no sea el caballo?
Dónde está eso? Podríamos hacer algo por aquí por Wellington :)
abrazos,
martin
On 1/15/06, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for
people who can't understand sarcasm?
debian-announce is not meant to play games. Someone made a (perhaps
honest) mistake, and were duly criticised. But you know the rules.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:57:38 +0200, Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Fluendo guys have a nice track record of providing high-quality
media streaming of Free Software conferences using Free codecs, e.g. at
GUADEC (GNOME conference) and AKademy (KDE conference). Maybe we could
team up
Sean,
sounds really good. How do your scripts relate to the db management
scripts provided by wwwconfig-common, maintained by Ola Lundqvist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
I suspect your package should be either supercede wwwconfig-common or
be rolled into it.
cheers,
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:28:39 -0500, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my code is a superset of what's done in wwwconfig-common.
That sounds great! thanks for your work on this front. I'll be reading
your doco in more detail, as I have to sort out the path forward for
twig...
martin
--
To
On 5/29/06, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, what do we do if the central people don't show up? It's been
known to happen at KSPs.
Put more than one in each subgroup, and have a coordinator ready to
shift the central people around if a given subgroup is really
orphaned. Or split
On 7/2/05, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-01 23:34]:
and we are doing a sociological survey on Debian in order to
better understand the Debian community.
didn't tbm do some research into this?
Yes and no. There is currently a lot of
On 8/19/05, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to see people migrating to Arch
Being a long-time Arch user, let me tell you that Arch has been
orphaned upstream. Currently baz is the only version being developed,
and it's unclear for how long, as Canonical has their eyes on
On 8/21/05, Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm quite confident that there will be an upgrade path from Arch archives to
bzr archives. Canonical, amongst other people, have too much invested in
Arch to just let that history fester. As for hct, I understand it is a
wrapper frontend to
On 8/20/05, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
To which I'd respond that
On 8/31/05, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does git aide you in identifying the differences in changes
between two trees?
George's got it right. In practice, I normally use gitk --all, or use
cogito thus:
cg-log -r onebranch:otherbranch
cg-diff -r onebranch:otherbranch
On 8/31/05, Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for the record, to avoid other folk getting confused - bzr isn't a
'patch orientated SCM'. bzr's design incorporates elements from all of
the VCS systems around when the project was started (and updated since
then) - its not derived from GNU
I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
subscribers are usually pretty clued-in and interested. Perhaps it is
the natural place to discuss web-apps? At least until traffic is
sufficient that the Debian
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jon Dowland
jon+debian-de...@alcopop.org wrote:
only to say that this is really just applying a patch, no need to panic.
How about defaulting to assume if the maintainer hasn't posted,
there's no reason to panic. Assume the maintainer knows better than
slashdot
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
- VIA C3 before Nehemiah and
- National Semiconductor Geode (GXm, GXLV, GX1 and GX2).
That affects XO-1 hardware being manufactured now, and C3s are among
the viable CPUs for low cost, low dissipation school server style
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote:
This is a summary of last month's thread about the feasibility of
removing support for /usr on a standalone filesystem.
The issue was raised by the udev upstream maintainer along with the udev
package maintainers of the major
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm very dissappointed with this, to be honest.
Agreed - devel-announce is for, um, project announcements. Not a jokes
list. And with the large and varied group of users and developers
Debian has, tact and tolerance are a good
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1: Thankfully, it hasn't been required yet
I am confused:
it might be a small misunderstanding. 'Required' is not the same as
'requested' in English (though they are in some latin languages).
Steve McIntyre has
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
Manners, Josselin, and discretion. There are some places where it's just
not appropriate to blurt out whatever you're thinking.
+10 from here.
Of course, Josselin thinks and jokes differently from others, as it's
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Homosexuality can be an *accusation* ‽
It still is in some countries. That's why mature people don't play
with that openly in international projects.
Perhaps you didn't know.
cheers,
martin
--
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Our country is very far from exempt of human rights violations. Those
trying to frame the current discussion in terms of cultures or countries
are forgetting that every culture and country has its share of
intolerant
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
If jed can deal with files that large, sure. But if it expects to be
able to load the entire file into memory - as most text editors do -
stat() will be only the first of its problems.
Old vi was able to work with files
Hi Andre,
I would suggest using most of the ideas outlined in
http://infrastructures.org/ - though the text on the website is a bit
dated, you can manage a large infrastructure of 50K systems combining
the conceptual framework laid out by Steve Traugott, with Debian tools
and modern configuration
Hi Kees, Jamie, DDs,
I am looking at hosts that are runing other linuxen that may have weak
keys now, or see those weak keys uploaded inadvertently in the future.
Is there a straightforward way to get hosts that are !(Debian|Ubuntu)
to use that blacklist? PermitBlacklistedKeys support in
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:31 AM, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clint Adams wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 06:35:20PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Wrong. You neglected to request to be CCed.
My M-F-T was clearly a request to be Cc'd.
Which possibly only goes to show how broken that header
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Ben Finney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because I've configured all of the above, and *still* get individual
copies of messages that were sent to the list. I'm not subscribed to
the Debian mailing lists, so there is no duplicate that can be
detected by such
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Ben Finney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not interested in receiving them in my email. I participate in the
Debian mailing lists via a non-email interface, which makes it much
more manageable. (For me, that is. I don't expect everyone to follow
my habits in
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think everyone involved did a wonderful job, especially given the
appalling constraints they were under. There is a difference, though,
between acknowledging the excellent work that was done and burying one's
head in the
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NW Because it is in the documentation, not the script. Didn't you read the
NW reply? It is not a route of attack, it is AN EXAMPLE in the
NW documentation!
This script marked as executable.
User can start its.
if
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
-- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network protocol
that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
This is actually your best argument so far, but I don't think it's
completely true
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Stupid question: with this wording of the AGPL, who, in his right mind,
will be licensing a DNS or POP server under this license ? (Except maybe
someone who didn't read it)
There are lots of people who pick a license without
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Toni Mueller t...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 11.11.2009 at 23:46:59 +0100, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, this is one of the awkward things I find in the AGPL. If it's not
a webapp, what then?
please see this:
http
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Adding HOWTOs
to README.Source is IMHO not worth the overhead it produces on the
maintainer's side. Every R user knows (well, should know) how to deal
with those files.
Yes, but you can not assume that ftpmaster is an R
On 9/9/06, John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using noatime for quite awhile now. mount(8) does not
mention nodiratime anywhere, and I have never used it.
Same here. But googling for nodiratime shows it's definitely in the
kernel, and in wide use. Learned something today...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:18:04 +0300
Source: twig
Binary: twig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED
35 matches
Mail list logo
