-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:47:49 +0100
Source: fio
Binary: fio gfio
Architecture: source
Version: 3.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Steigerwald
Changed-By: Martin Steigerwald
Description:
fio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:28:59 +0100
Source: fsmark
Binary: fsmark fsmark-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Martin Steigerwald
Changed-By: Martin Steigerwald
Bjørn Mork - 07.06.19, 19:22:
> Adam Borowski writes:
> > => Install gtk3-nocsd by default in all desktop tasks but Gnome.
> > It's not>
> > perfect but it helps.
>
> That's nice. Thanks for the tip. I enjoy nice tools like eog and
> evince, but have always been annoyed by the
Adam Borowski - 07.06.19, 21:09:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 11:24:03AM -0700, James Lu wrote:
[…]
> > > * default font is ugly and poorly hinted -- the latter is
> > > especially jarring> >
> > > on a low-resolution screen I'm at right now, the former still
> > > applies to one's proper
Adam Borowski - 07.06.19, 17:24:
> This is about GUI appearance and ergonomy.
>
> I'll concentrate at XFCE, as I consider GNOME3's UI a lost cause, thus
> I'd find it hard to bring constructive arguments there.
Similar to you I do not "get" GNOME 3. I have no idea why I would like
to use it.
Adrian Bunk - 08.05.19, 21:45:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:38:26PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >...
> >
> > So let's pick compressors to enable. For compression ratio, xz
> > still wins (at least among popular compressors). But there's a
> > thing to say about zstd: firefox.deb zstd -19 takes
Hello.
Theodore Ts'o - 14.07.19, 22:07:
> So requiring support of non-systemd ecosystems is in general, going to
> require extra testing. In the case of cron/systemd.timers, this
> means testing and/or careful code inspection to make sure the
> following cases work:
>
> * systemd &&
Hi Sam!
I took long time to write this even on still recovering from a pace in
my life that feels too quick for me. But I intended this to be carefully
worded in order to not hurt anyone. I hope I succeeded. My invitation:
Before taking anything personal and making the choice to feel hurt
Russ Allbery - 08.08.19, 20:33:58 CEST:
> Ondřej Surý writes:
> > So, just to clarify… so, it’s ok to hate systemd, but it’s not ok
> > to
> > hate sysvinit (spaghetti of shell scripts)?
>
> Personally, I'd be happy if people would just stop hating on any free
> software in general. Even buggy
Vincent Bernat - 09.08.19, 07:00:41 CEST:
> ❦ 8 août 2019 21:47 +02, Simon Richter :
> >> inetd performance is very low because it needs to spawn one
> >> instance for each connection. systemd socket activation has
> >> absolutely 0 overhead except on the first connection (where
> >> systemd
Ian Jackson - 09.08.19, 11:27:31 CEST:
> Ondřej Surý writes ("Re: Please stop hating on sysvinit"):
> > On 9 Aug 2019, at 09:22, Martin Steigerwald
> > wrote:
> > > Actually as a user of my services I do not even notice any
> > > difference,
Philipp Kern - 08.08.19, 14:48:48 CEST:
> On 2019-08-08 14:43, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 02:35:13PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >> And there’s the problem. If we keep with sysvinit as a baseline of
> >> features provided by the init, we end up with just every init
> >>
Dear Mo.
Mo Zhou - 24.09.19, 04:58:06 CEST:
> For desktop users, non-systemd init plus a mordern desktop environment
> such as Plasma or Gnome would be impossible on Debian, as they depend
> on systemd. Some other distro such as Gentoo and FreeBSD have somehow
> removed the systemd dependency for
Marco d'Itri - 31.10.19, 15:45:47 CET:
> On Oct 31, Simon Richter wrote:
[…]
> > The freedom to configure a system without things I do not want is
> > one of the main reasons that made me switch over from Windows to
> > Debian, a bit more than twenty years ago.
>
>
Theodore Y. Ts'o - 31.10.19, 16:03:29 CET:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 01:19:56PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > alienate me away from Debian. This laptop, for the sake of packaging
> > flexible I/O tester, is the last of my machines still running on
> > Debian. All t
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand - 01.11.19, 01:26:58 CET:
> On 10/31/19 5:13 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > It is similar with "the" cloud.
>
> Why is there quotes around "the", and why do you think there's only a
> single instance of a cloud o
Adam D. Barratt - 01.11.19, 07:47:48 CET:
> On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:54 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 22:40 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Oct 31, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > When elogind enters testing there would be many more people
> > > > running
> > > > Debian
Martin Steigerwald - 01.11.19, 09:25:07 CET:
> Adam D. Barratt - 01.11.19, 07:47:48 CET:
> > On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:54 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 22:40 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > > On Oct 31, Svante Signell wrote:
> &g
Marco d'Itri - 07.12.19, 11:45:36 CET:
> On Dec 07, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > The rest options, i.e. B A D H G, look nearly the same to me:
> > "first tier support for systemd, second tier for others"
> >
> > The only difference I noted is the bug severity for non-systemd
> > support.
> >
> > In
Hi!
I thought about just silently unsubscribing from debian-devel… but as I
got the impression that almost no one argues for the freedom to choose
the init system here in this thread, I decided to speak up:
Theodore Y. Ts'o - 31.10.19, 00:57:48 CET:
> And if we do this in core Debian
Martin Steigerwald - 31.10.19, 13:19:56 CET:
> While I do not expect maintainers of Debian packages to implement
> support for alternate init systems themselves, I still believe if
> someone works constructively and consistently on making such support
> available in Debian, it w
Andrey Rahmatullin - 05.02.20, 22:17:14 CET:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:44:43AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > > We just had a GR where the project voted it was just fine to
> > > systemd all the things, so this sort of thing is to be expected.
> >
> > Are you suggesting that voters fully
Scott Kitterman - 06.02.20, 06:27:44 CET:
> >Are you suggesting that voters fully understood the implications?
> >Is this OK now to replace everything with systemd counterparts?
> >
> >I certainly voted with considerations for _init_ system.
> >
> >If I recall correctly, no GR option suggested to
Martin Steigerwald - 06.02.20, 12:26:32 CET:
> Vincent Bernat - 06.02.20, 07:58:32 CET:
> > ❦ 6 février 2020 09:50 +11, Dmitry Smirnov :
> > >> and 2) continuing to use rsyslog isn't an option if the default
> > >> changes.>
> > >
> > > N
Vincent Bernat - 06.02.20, 07:58:32 CET:
> ❦ 6 février 2020 09:50 +11, Dmitry Smirnov :
> >> and 2) continuing to use rsyslog isn't an option if the default
> >> changes.>
> > No. I just don't want default to change. IMHO rationale for this is
> > weak but everybody keeps arguing that it would
Ansgar - 06.02.20, 13:25:06 CET:
> On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 12:30 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Especially as I found that I did not use journalctl in my daily
> > practice anyway.
>
> Given you wrote earlier that you moved all but one of your machines
> away from
Martin Steigerwald - 06.02.20, 14:32:57 CET:
> Ansgar - 06.02.20, 13:25:06 CET:
> > On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 12:30 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > Especially as I found that I did not use journalctl in my daily
> > > practice anyway.
> >
> > Given you w
Sam Hartman - 06.02.20, 17:11:20 CET:
> >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Steigerwald writes:
> Martin> Well, that is *exactly* why I thought the GR is not going
> to Martin> be helpful.
>
> Martin> Cause in *no way* it appeared t
Dear Ondřej,
Ondřej Surý - 01.01.20, 09:39:35 CET:
> Andrew,
>
> look at the subject, then look at what you wrote. If you can’t find
> enough kindness in the situation and you are angry then it might be
> better to not write anything at all.
If one outcome of the GR is to ask people to shut up…
Dear Andrej, dear Andrew,
Andrej Shadura - 01.01.20, 13:02:00 CET:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 at 12:40, Andrew McGlashan
>
> wrote:
> > reasonable stakeholders, it is very limited to a small group of
> > Debian users known collectively as DDs .. the current "gods" of
> > Debian whom have ultimate
Hi Marco, hi,
Marco d'Itri - 21.07.23, 10:55:39 CEST:
> On Jul 21, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > You are totally correct.
> > > Kernel team, please blacklist HFS/HFS+ for automounting.
> >
> > Isn't this a userland policy decision? udisks will happily trigger a
> > module load for hfsplus if
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
