Hi there,
I am trying to understand some license issue I am having. Could
someone let me know if the following is compatible with a debian
package:
From the [For License Of Certain Hewlett-Packard Patents Relating To
Lossless and Near-Lossless Image Compression] page (*)
The following
Hello,
I am trying to package a *binary* package. This is a commercial
software but for ease of installation I am simply repackaging it.
I am getting closer to my goal, one of the remaining issue is:
E: libactiviz: ldconfig-symlink-referencing-wrong-file
usr/lib/libvtktiff.so.5.4 -
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to package a *binary* package. This is a commercial
software but for ease of installation I am simply repackaging it.
I am getting closer to my goal, one of the remaining issue is:
E
files.
(*)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Debian Installer instal...@ftp-master.debian.org
Date: Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:17 AM
Subject: gdcm_2.0.10-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
To: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com, Debian-Med
Packaging Team debian-med-packag
Hi there,
I am suffering from the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530384
which is basically the same as:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511709
and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488770
All I am trying to do is replace
Hi,
I am getting a bizarre dep problem on alpha (only), see:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gdcm;ver=2.0.10-1;arch=alpha;stamp=1242615584
...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
mono-devel: Depends: mono-runtime (= 2.0) but it is not installable
Depends:
Hi there,
I could find the naming convention for C# binding:
http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ch-packaging.html#s-gac-naming-versioning
I am now looking for a similar page for a library that would be
wrapped in Java. What would be the convention for a foo.jar requiring
a gluelib
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Matthew Johnsonmj...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon Jun 08 18:12, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
I could find the naming convention for C# binding:
http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/cli-policy/ch-packaging.html#s-gac-naming-versioning
I am now looking
Hi,
Could someone let me know what I should do when a binary package is
restricting me to a subset of architecture ? For instance libvtkgdcm
requires libvtk5-dev, but not libgdcm-tools. How can I express that in
my single control file for gdcm ?
Ref:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
hi,
I am reposting a previous post under a different Subject line,
hoping to get more (read: any) feedback.
I am currently maintaining the gdcm package:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
Is is written in -somewhat- portable C++ and should build with any
decent C++ compiler.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Alexander
Reichle-Schmehlalexan...@schmehl.info wrote:
Hi!
Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
Binary package should be fine
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Samuel Thibaultsthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre, le Mon 22 Jun 2009 16:13:58 +0200, a écrit :
My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
Binary package
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Russ Allberyr...@debian.org wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com writes:
Let's consider one source package 'foo' which can be build using a
--enable-super-duper-3rd-party-lib. My control file is then:
Source: foo
Hello,
I had a network issue and had to re-run dupload a second time. Now a
partially *.changes files was updated, and I cannot do anything
anymore:
$ dupload --force gdcm_2.0.10-5_amd64.changes
dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
Checking signatures before upload..signatures are
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Joerg Jaspertjo...@debian.org wrote:
On 11789 March 1977, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I had a network issue and had to re-run dupload a second time. Now a
partially *.changes files was updated, and I cannot do anything
anymore:
Either wait for the files
'lo
Where should I report broken links from:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/new-maintainer
There is a link to :
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/new-maintainer.html#mentors
which does not exist.
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: vera++
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Maciej Sobczak
* URL : http://www.inspirel.com/vera/
* License : Boost
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: cdash
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Julien Jomier julien.jomier at kitware.com
* URL : http://www.cdash.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: PHP, XSL
'lo
I am reading:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292205
But everytime I chroot into my 32bits system, part of my system
still sees me as my user:
$ sudo chroot ./Debian32Chroot
# id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
# echo $HOME
Hi,
I have setup a ia32 chroot on my amd64 system, but I cannot install
default-jdk which is needed for my software:
Ref:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292205
Full log is:
$ sudo -H chroot ./Debian32Chroot
# apt-get install default-jdk
Reading
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlowgoswin-...@web.de wrote:
apt-get install schroot
RTFM
Did you *actually* read it yourself ?
I'd suggest you reread it:
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292437
There is no mention to chroot -H
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org wrote:
Which obviously hadn't been updated in *years*. RT*appropriate*FM.
1. This is the #1 link on a google search,
2. this is listed as *Please either ask in IRC channel if unsure or
refer to the The Debian GNU/Linux AMD64 HOW-TO
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Johannes
Wiedersichjohan...@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
You do not need to be rude when I explicitly quote the actual doc I am
reading, which obviously should not recommend the use of chroot
FWIW, this is the wrong mailing list
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: kwstyle
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Julien Jomier julien.jom...@kitware.com
* URL : http://public.kitware.com/KWStyle/
* License : BSD
Programming
Steve,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Steve M. Robbinsst...@sumost.ca wrote:
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the upload of boost-defaults, a new package
that supplies unversioned -dev packages for Boost (libboost-dev, etc.)
that simply depend on the current default Boost version (today, it
is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: srcml
Version : 20061109
Upstream Author : Dr. Michael Collard, Jonathan Maletic
* URL : http://www.sdml.info/projects/srcml/
* License : GPL
Programming
Hi there,
I am running into an issue, dicom3tools does not compile properly on
the buildd machine. The error is:
...
rm -rf transynu.h
nawk -f ../../.././libsrc/support/transyn.awk \
role=extern outname=transynu
../../.././libsrc/standard/transyn.tpl
transynu.h
rm -rf sopclu.h
Nevermind, the basic idea is described here:
http://www.gnu.org/manual/gawk/html_node/Special-FD.html
Sorry for the noise,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mathieu
Malaterremathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I am running into an issue, dicom3tools does not compile properly on
the
Just for fun today, I tried to see the complete list of debian dev:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php
- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?all=1
List is empty for me...
weird...
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
I am currently working on integrating debian packaging system in
cpack (part of CMake, see cmake.org). Basically cpack used to have a
simple tarball system for creating package on *NIX. I simply had to
encapsulate this tarball within an 'ar'ball, with a control and a
md5sums file (*)
I
Hi Antti-Juhani
On 8/6/07, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:34:40PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am currently working on integrating debian packaging system in
cpack (part of CMake, see cmake.org). Basically cpack used to have a
simple
hi there,
I am looking for a package which would provide a csharp binding to a
C/c++ library to serve as reference (wrapped using swig).
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible,
but I do not know about the ABI. I really do not feel comfortable with
option 1.
OK - I just trust you
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible,
but I do not know about
Andreas,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a
couple of gray areas remaining:
- should I keep the version number 62 (aka 6b) from IJG
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: dicom3tools
Version : 1.0.20081122
Upstream Author : David A. Clunie dclu...@dclunie.com
* URL : http://www.dclunie.com/dicom3tools/workinprogress/
* License
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Description : Tools for handling DICOM files, with conversion
from proprietary formats.
Unix, Mac and Windows (Cygwin) command line utilities
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Agustin Martin agmar...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:14:29PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 02:06:40PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On mar, 2008-12-16 at 13:57 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Description : Tools
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: gdcm
Version : 2.0.10
Upstream Author : Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* URL : http://gdcm.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: pvrg
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Andy C. Hung ach...@cs.stanford.edu
* URL : ftp://havefun.stanford.edu:pub/jpeg/JPEGv1.2.tar.Z.
* License : PUBLIC
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 12/17/08 03:57, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: pvrg
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Andy C. Hung
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 12/17/08 03:29, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: dicomscope
Version : 3.5.1
Upstream Author : OFFIS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: dicomscope
Version : 3.5.1
Upstream Author : OFFIS DICOM Team di...@offis.de
* URL : http://dicom.offis.de/dscope.php.en
* License : Copyright (C) 1994-2004
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: devide
Version : 8.5
Upstream Author : Charl P. Botha c.p.bo...@tudelft.nl
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/devide/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: opensourcepacs
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : UCLA Medical Imaging Informatics group
* URL : http://www.mii.ucla.edu/opensourcepacs/
* License : LGPL
Hi there,
I am working on the dicomscope package, and I was told there is an
issue with my package:
...
E: dicomscope: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libjInterface.so
N:
N: Although the package includes a shared library, the package does
not
N: have a shlibs control
Hi there,
After reading the documentation of 'man deb' I cannot see any
reference to any arbitrary length for filename in a deb package. For
instance I have filepath (including sub directories) that reach ~100
characters. the tar format completely support that, but I am having
some weird issue
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:46 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
After reading the documentation of 'man deb' I cannot see any
reference to any arbitrary length for filename in a deb package
Hi Bart,
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 20:43 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:46 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi
Hi there,
I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using
cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package.
I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently
struggling on how to do it properly when installing python module
(what is
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using
cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package.
I
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on cleaning
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb
handled by cmake.
Then please forget it. That doesn't make proper debs.
because...
Because
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:25:23PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
$ superdupertool libfoo.so
= this lib requires libstdc++6 at least version 4.0.2
dpkg-shlibdeps run during build does that and then dpkg-gencontrol
Hi there,
Because of the recent feedback I got in building debian package
using cmake, I decided to rewrite the current -broken- support.
As far as I understand :
1. dpkg-buildpackage *has* to be the entry point (nothing else, not
even 'cmake')
2. dpkg-buildpackage requires a 'debian'
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 23 juin 2008 à 22:11 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
That's just rude. Even if you are a super star in the debian-world
and a fantastic hacker, your comment can not possibly be coming from a
grown up
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:20 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Stop. Don't even try to go further. This is NOT the right way. Your
brand new wheels are going to drive you straight into a wall after way
too much effort
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: activiz.net
Version : 5.6.1
Upstream Author : kitware kitw...@kitware.com
* URL : http://www.kitware.com/products/avdownload.php
* License : BSD
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: mummy
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : kitware kitw...@kitware.com
* URL : http://www.kitware.com/products/avdownload.php
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Dear DDs,
A user discover the wrong source for paraview 3.8.1 were pushed to
debian repository. To fix this mistake, I asked for the removal of the
paraview package to be able to quickly reupload it.
This was very quickly executed by ftpteam. However even if paraview
has been removed from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: PythonQt
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Florian Link florianl...@users.sf.net
* URL : http://pythonqt.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: Log4Qt
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Martin Heinrich martin_heinr...@users.sf.net
* URL : http://log4qt.sf.net/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C
Hi,
What is the status of dep5(*) copyright file in debian ? I am using
dh_make for preparing packages, and I had report that the default
generated copyright template should be replaced by a dep5 one.
Should I fill a bug report ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
(*) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
--
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Mika Pflüger deb...@mikapflueger.de wrote:
It seems that PAW is upstream dead (last activity on the website was in
I believe there is a recent activity on debian-science to resurect that package:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2011/03/msg0.html
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: pcl
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Radu Bogdan Rusu (r...@willowgarage.com)
* URL : http://pointclouds.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: cminpack
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : Frederic Devernay frederic.dever...@m4x.org
* URL : http://devernay.free.fr/hacks/cminpack/cminpack.html
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: charls
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Jan de Vaan jan.dev...@versatel.nl
* URL : http://charls.codeplex.com
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen s...@debian.org
wrote:
Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org writes:
I hope that some appropriate re-directions may be set up real soon now,
so that previous URLs can continue to work as before...
If you have a specific example of
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Martin Alfke tux...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the new link for URL such as:
https://alioth.debian.org/~malat-guest/
Thanks !
This one is working:
https://alioth.debian.org/users/malat-guest/
This does not point to my public_html pages. I hosted my gpg
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: igraph
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Gabor Csardi, Tamas Nepusz
* URL : http://igraph.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: r-cran-igraph
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Gabor Csardi Gabor.Csardi at unil.ch
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: pixelmed
Version : 20090816
Upstream Author : David Clunie
* URL : http://www.pixelmed.com/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: wrapitk
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : gaetan.lehmann
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/wrapitk/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: vtkedge
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Kitware, Inc.
* URL : http://www.vtkedge.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Library
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: utfcpp
Version : 2.2.3
Upstream Author : Nemanja Trifunovic
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/utfcpp/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Hi there,
I am starring at:
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=gdcm
-
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gdcmarch=hppaver=2.0.13-1stamp=1256783874file=logas=raw
Linking CXX shared library ../../bin/libvtkgdcmJava.so
make[3]: Leaving directory
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to
have to do something about the size. For now, I'm going to blacklist
this package altogether.
Even though
Hi there,
Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect:
There is directory:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/195.22/
However latest version detected is 190.42.2
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=nvidia-graphics-drivers
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org wrote:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 18:28 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect:
There is directory:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux
Hi there,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Friday 20 November 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
If you ever want this to be available on Debian CDs, you're going to
have to do
Hi there,
I am trying to compile tulip (*) for debugging with:
$ export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='noopt debug nostrip'
$ apt-get source tulip
$ cd tulip-3.1.2
$ dpkg-buildpackage
After installation, here is what objdump reveals (**). Does this means:
1. I did not export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS ?
2. There
Hi there,
I am reading:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526092#20
Could someone please let me know why exactly fop-hyph.jar cannot be
included as a debian package ? LPPL is technically allowed in debian,
right ?
Ref:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com writes:
I am reading:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526092#20
Could someone please let me know why exactly fop-hyph.jar cannot be
included as a debian
[Sorry for duplicate]
Hi there,
I am struggling to rebuild my package. I am thinking there is an
issue with libvtk-java. So I tried in my pbuilder env the following:
# apt-get build-dep vtk
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: xslthl
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Michal Molhanec, Jirka Kosek, Michiel Hendriks
* URL : http://xslthl.sf.net
* License : zlib/libpng License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: xsddiagram
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Regis Cosnier regis.cosnier.free.fr
* URL : http://regis.cosnier.free.fr/?page=XSDDiagram
* License : GPL
Hi there,
I am looking at the page:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/doc-base-unknown-section.html
Clearly the line (and the href) is bogus:
Refer to Debian doc-base Manual section 2.3.3 (The section field) for
details.
Where should I fill a bug for that ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Dear all,
I am interested in a set of programs, the ‘BEDtools’, whose source includes a
convenience copy of the gzstream library.
http://bedtools.googlecode.com
http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/compgeom/gzstream/
A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: GoFigure2
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : gofigure2-developers at lists.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://gofigure2.sf.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Dear Debian Developers,
I would like to request a give back of GDCM on MIPS due to bug #591998. Even
after looking at the latest java-common upload:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/java-common/news/20100809T203343Z.html
I still do not understand when the buildd machine will be updated so
Dear DDs DMs,
I am looking for help on bug #568910. I have been banging my head on
this bug for quite some time. I spent litterally hours tracking it
down, without any success so far.
Before filling an RFH, I thought I could drop this note on dd@l.d.o
hoping someone would jump in and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: openslide
Version : 3.2.4
Upstream Author : Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science.
* URL : http://www.openslide.org
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: volview
Version : 3.4.0
Upstream Author : Kitware kitw...@kitware.com
* URL : http://www.kitware.com/products/volview.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am looking for help on bug #568910.
The bug occur when trying to spellcheck a document. Originally serna
source is pre-shipped with convenient aspell version 0.50.5, the
debian packaging is made so that it uses the system aspell library
(0.60.6).
Generally the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: jai-core
Version : 1.1.4
Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems, Inc.
* URL : http://java.net/projects/jai-core
* License : JRL
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: jai-imageio-core
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems, Inc.
* URL : http://java.net/projects/jai-imageio-core/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: net-luminis-build-plugin
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : luminis
* URL :
https://opensource.luminis.net/wiki/display/SITE/OSGi+Bundle+Ant+Task
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: opendap
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : OPeNDAP, Inc.
* URL : http://www.opendap.org
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Project
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: visad
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Bill Hibbard
* URL : http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/visad.html
* License : GPL, LGPL, BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com
* Package name: netcdf-java
Version : 4.2
Upstream Author : University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata
* URL : http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java
1 - 100 of 953 matches
Mail list logo
