Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-24 Thread Preben Randhol
y are gzipped. I'm only talking about the pure doc packages. Thanks in advance Preben Randhol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-24 Thread Preben Randhol
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 10:28:36 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wasn't there a discussion a month or so ago regarding whether PDF > files should be gzipped or not? Unfortunately I wasn't on the list then, but My opinion is that they shouldn't 1. You don't save much space ad pdf is

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-24 Thread Preben Randhol
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 05:52:26 +0900 Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, we have fast CPUs so it is not too bad. Under gnome, fileroller > will open it for you from filer. But I don't want to unzip a pdf to my home directory. This wasts space. Last pdf I saw gzipped was only 6% smaller.

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-24 Thread Preben Randhol
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:31:39 +0200 René van Bevern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello, > > > 2. xpdf doesn't want to open gzipped pdfs by default which > > makes this a pain in the **tt for people w

Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file

2006-06-24 Thread Preben Randhol
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:35:53 +0900 Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For architecture: all *-doc packages, there is no technical and > practical reason to gzip *.pdf file. I agree. packages are gziped so > package size d nt change. We do it just because of policy and bcause > helper scrip

Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/06/2006 (05:08) : > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:51 -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote: > > > > I have no idea how debhelper works. Are there anybody out there that > > > can help with getting it to stop gzipping files in -doc? > > > > dh_compress already ha

Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/06/2006 (12:17) : > I think I gave wrong impression to you. Yes :-) I thought you meant the usual: OK I'll fix your problem if you provide the solution :-) > Most of PDF.GZ are under me and tetex-doc people. Once we find good > technical solution, we m

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:21:10 +0200 Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that a notable addition (by Olaf v.d.S. IIRC) was that it > could be worthwhile to improve viewers. E.g. kghostview will > correctly open .pdf.gz while gnome-gv will not. Similarly kdvi > opens .dvi.gz. Altough

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 12:08:17 +0200 Rolf Kutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you think users with small machines shouldn't > be able to install docs, too? It's just a one line > script to gunzip all pdfs in /usr/share/doc. I don't find this a good argument as it is equally a one line script to bz

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:59:39 +0200 Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006, Preben Randhol wrote: > > > > Do you think users with small machines shouldn't be able to > > > install docs, too? It's just a one line script to gunzip all

Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working anymore. Sound that is. One *may* use aoss, but then the user needs to open a terminal and write: aoss program-name because launching from the menu it won't work. So I consider aoss only as a temporary dirty hack before alsa takes o

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:30:45 +0100 Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yet I've got several machines with limited disk space where I really > *do* care if things are compressed. After all, disk space is *always* > used up when it's in use and CPU is only used on the odd occasion when > you

Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?

2006-06-26 Thread Preben Randhol
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:35:19 +0200 Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote: > > With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working > > anymore. Sound that is. One *may* use aoss, but then the u