On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 06:30:19PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
[My apologies in advance for the cross-posting.]
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Daniel Wallin wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
So, I've been trying to build the Debian package with the latest from
the 0.8
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
which package should I file a bug to have all unix
user/group permissions ignored?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:25:05PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 31 mai 2009 à 06:00 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
If Debian should not be a tool to support software restrictions like
this, then against which package should I file a bug to have all unix
user/group
of the file.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
am preparing a new upstream release right now
for upload, so this would be a good time to make the change if people
think it is necessary/desirable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
electricsheep[1] deserves a prioritary adoption: a major upstream
version has been released and Debian's is now deprecated.
I'd like to adopt electricsheep.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
):
Is there some magic I can put into a prerm/postrm script that will
handle that?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
What is the point?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in
doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively
little time (sick family members).
I like doing bug triage as well. I guess it is because I am a neat
freak and anal about organization.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:12:07AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:38:24PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
People should be given assistance and encouragement in
doing it. I actually like doing it, but I have unfortunately relatively
little time
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:47:38AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
getting mired in a sea of bugs
, someone NMUs to fix
the bug and the mainainer immediately uploads to revert the NMU? It
seems that there needs to be some way to handle situations like that.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
, and it failed here with kmail.
Is the crypt+sign mail format standard ?
The last vote (on the package upload rules) worked for me sending
encrypted from mutt.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
an understudy or standby ?
Could we call it co-maintainer or something like that?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
installed on my development machine
and I do not experience the slowness you talk about. It was installed
about 3.5 years ago.
How much RAM/CPU does the machine have? How fast are the disks?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
of installed packages is terribly
to
the end users)
I think that is the principal problem. I use apt-proxy and have about a
dozen machines (counting virtual machines) that all hit that one
apt-proxy.
I am not sure how best to solve that problem.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
or the like. I'm not saying that your situation
is not possible, simply that trading size for compression/decompression
time would benefit far more people than it would hurt.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:09:50PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:12:33AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2007 à 21:15 +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
I think compression ratio is better
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:24:53AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 20.51:16 Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
man procmailrc
On gmail?
gmail does support POP.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
for the configuration.
My goal is that it is secure.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if the password is correct or not.
You mean that the passwords go in the clear?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packages? It seems like
Nico's original gripe is valid.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
defined in some sane way and then get
enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
So the simple(r) option is subscribe to pts.
Doesn't the key used to sign the upload tell you?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
So the simple(r) option is subscribe
and then requires a security update, it would not be buildable
in stable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in the next
source upload?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:56:30PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Your case is probably better handled with a simple higher-or-equal
dependency.
Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (= 1.0.1-1) and (
1.0.1-2) be more correct
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:49:07PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:24:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Maybe I misunderstand, but wouldn't something like (= 1.0.1-1) and (
1.0.1-2) be more correct? That way
there as
well.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluated to be less than the
empty string. If a package is the target of a security upload in
stable, you can be certain that the testing/unstable version
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:54:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, the ~ character is stated to be evaluated to be less than the
empty string. If a package
are becoming increasingly unpopular.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it, right? Then $1
becomes the package name.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the
filename. In the future this might be added as an additional feature,
but there are some problems with this.
I'd be interested to know in what problems there are with this.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
, via
regular mails to d-d-a and in the developers reference.
I think that having a centrally located list of teams within Debian and
where someone can go to learn more/get involved is a good thing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
possibly monitor
upstream development for every package (even just those which don't have
active maintainers), we can't really know.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of the package. Especially in the case of mass
filings resulting from things like rebuilding the archive or other
cases (like the bug reporter not knowing/being able to access the stuff
in NEW), I think there should be a bit of leniency.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
for other packages providing GnomeVFS methods), so that its
timestamp changes.
This might be a really impetus and test case for the new dpkg triggers
that have been proposed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
friend) for the existence of new kernel..
How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:50PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:21:03AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
How is what you describe different from what cron-apt already does?
That's precisely why I asked for details about this feature :-)
Anyhow, what I'm
: iceweasel-linky
I was thinking something similar. I am sponsoring Arnaud Renevier for
his noscript package. Initially, he called it just noscript. It was
rejected by the ftp-masters as too generic. Arnaud renamed it to
mozilla-noscript and that was accepted.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
was a marketing gimmick.
Besides, there are other units of measure which carry the same name and
have different numerical values based on context (think statute miles
and nautical miles), though I don't think any such examples can be found
in the SI.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
defaulting to a close
approximation. Language is imperfect. People make do.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 12 juin 2007 à 03:29 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
It has never been anything but a gross imprecision introduced by people
incapable of following rigorous standards.
It has never been anything more than
would personally prefer to apt-get
install some Perl module, rather than install it myself from CPAN or
some other source. It makes life much easier when one manages many
machines.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
), but from the description it appears to be
somewhat outdated (eg Fedora Core 2).
Also, based on my experience trying to build a CentOS 3 chroot (CentOS 3
being fairly old at this point), it just doesn't work.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
are simply ignorant or selectively ignoring reality. If you
hear someone make that complaint, kindly keep him (or her) from
sticking his (or her) foot too far down the throat and point them to
unstable.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
because of RC bugs. So, if you want
packages moving into testing quicker, get the unstable version, test and
file bug reports when you find a bug and also try and submit patches to
the bugs that are already keeping it out of testing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
are seeking, either in Debian proper, a derivative or in
an effort that you lead yourself.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
?
As the target user for this sort of package is a sysadmin type, I
would saw it is an important enough detail that it should be in the
short description.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
continued I found that you had already come up
them and that I just had to read on. In short, it seems well thought
out.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
., there is no NAT in IPv6 and IPsec is part
of the spec instead of requiring encapsulation).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:18:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Roberto C. Sánchez [Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:30:19 -0400]:
I am curious as to what people generally think of how the libluabind
SONAME will be going forward. I know that certain packages (like
libssl) have the complete version
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:39:37PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Roberto C. Sánchez [Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:34:20 -0400]:
It’s certainly not desirable. Do you have an estimation of how many
reverse dependencies libluabind will have? Goswin’s remark about API
compatibility is also
Debian machines already have things like Perl and
Postgres installed/configured and the admin team has only so much time
on their hands?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
opera.com locally installed? If so, it will still
show up in your apt-cache. A better indicator is `apt-cache policy
opera` to see *where* it came from.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, seems odd that it should need testing, runs great on my machine
and thousands of others. Perhaps we are a little overzealous, no?
Ummm, why do you troll like this?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
-source software but I don't hesitate to use commercial
software if it is free or a better tool for doing the job.
Please indicate how Opera is more free or better than the web browsers
already included in Debian.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:59:52AM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 14:52:05 27.08.2007 UTC-04 when Roberto C. Sánchez did gyre
and gimble:
RCS Please indicate how Opera is more free or better than the web browsers
RCS already included in Debian.
flame
Opera's interface
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:32:58PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:44:09PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it seems that it would belong in non-free. I see nothing about
redistribution mentioned in gthe Opera license. The opera EULA
://www.debian.org/security/faq#oldversion
There appear to be several spaces before my sig.
Yes, but not the double-dash (--) on a line by itself.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nearly
always goes to experimental first), but rather the distribution as a
whole. That is, all software that makes it to into testing should be
stable and release quality and ready for testing with *the rest of the
packages slated for the next release*.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
.
None of them have empty pages on bugs.d.o.
Regards,
-Roberto
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:12:33PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The same
exact thing could be said of Apache, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and any of a
number of other packages which received tremendous testing upstream.
None of them have empty pages
little testing?
Additionally, what insight do you have into the Opera development
process and methodology that qualifies you to make that claim
specifically about Opera?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
.
Then file bug reports or email the maintainers. If you had bothered to
actually read the documents which people have siggested, you would be
able to do this if you come across issues or things you don't
understand.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
.
Yes, but even though it was done in the past, why on earth should it be
done today? Back then, there were no alternatives. Today there are
many.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(we confine the use of libcracklib to the separate pam_cracklib
module, to keep cracklib out of base); so there probably isn't any modern
justification for this default at all.
Just curious, what is the rationale for wanting to keep cracklib out of
base?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 05:20:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:38:23PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Just curious, what is the rationale for wanting to keep cracklib out of
base?
Size and complexity. Adding libpam-cracklib to base would be a 2MB increase
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
users.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
allow relinking against new
versions of the libraries (at least in most cases) without the need for
access to the source.
However, I tend to be in agreement with others on this list that the
best solution would be a Free software release of Opera.
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:43:09PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Zitat von Roberto C. Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dynamic linking is what the security team likes since it means that you
only update the code once for the whole system. However, in the event
that there is an update which makes
.)
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:16:07PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 13:23:46 Edward Welbourne wrote:
I'm confused. Pierre appears to be saying static is bad, Bruce
closed must be static
to be in Debian and
the Debian Policy manual does not enumerate them either.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Opera owes Debian something
Am I misreading you?
I think that that he meant that Debian does not owe Opera anything.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. It only finally worked when I used plain
'DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage'. Additionally,
the DEBBUILDOPTS variable in ~/.pbuilderrc did not help either.
Have I overlooked something. Is there an option or something that I
missed?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:05:49AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
env_keep in /etc/sudoers
or alternatively,
export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip in .pbuilderc is probably what
you're looking for.
Aww crap. I can't believe I overlooked the sudo thing.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that, the people who are interested in tracking you are able to
track you based on other things as well.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on ARM, everything should be OK.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:43:17PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I think that perhaps Paul meant to say an arch any package. If the code
must always be compiled for a particular flavor of ARM processor,
regardless of the host architecture of the machine which will be
controlling
would not be allowed
to have maintainer scripts and would only be allowed to install
binaries in certain paths.
Please define a normal package.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:55:05PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
For that, you will have to ask the ftp masters and the security team. I
am not in a position to speak to their official stance in terms of what
requirements they might have for software like opera
to try to find or download an upstream tarball,
and it could make git-buildpackage's existing code to try and create an
.orig.tar.gz much more accurate.
I sure would find it quite helpful.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:45:25AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Scribit Roberto C. Sánchez dies 04/10/2007 hora 18:13:
wxWidgets has been released a long time ago and we're still missing
it.
Yes, though for a good [1] reason.
Sure, wxwidgets has numerous bugs, but is it that surprising
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
think that would be a problem if for some reason you have source
directory and the build directory on different partitions.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it is
non-free.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
them to relicense eaccelerator. If that
rewrite is complete, then the software may be distributable. However, I
have not looked into it for quite a while.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
for Debian, what is the point of adding another?
I don't see the relevance
shell for instance).
Additionally, packages with embedded sources require patching, while
packages which statically link only require rebuilding.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this provide?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/*).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
