Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: avinfo
Version : 1.0.a15
Upstream Author : George Shuklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/
* License : GPL
Description : Audio/Video
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:20:50AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
Steve,
And as others have pointed out, the purpose of stable is to minimize
disruptions. For many users, living with known bugs with known workarounds
is a *lot* better than identifying new bugs.
Yeas. Let the choice to
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
Steve,
I see main problem with testing that broad platform changes are going
there. That's why things break sometimes there.
That's why I think, that the Stable platform with new desktop software
might be the choice
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:20:48AM +0200, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
Stanislav,
I see Your point, however this is far from user-friendliness.
First solution -use other distro. Wow, what a great idea. Looking at
statistics and Linux users in neighborhood, You can be _sure_ they
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:38:33AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
David Lopez Zajara (Er_Maqui) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Personally i'm an xmms user, and now, with this, i have tested other
options. Audacious isn't an option at all. Yes, we have the same
I've recently tried to switch
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:28:05PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Random segfaults during playback, random segfaults while scrolling the
playlist; can't have it running for more than 2 minutes.
If you are using the version from Etch I would
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:38:18PM -0400, Tim Hull wrote:
I just reported an ITP Bug for restricted-manager [1]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436722
Just making sure you know this...
You do not have to do this, and I think you have already realized why.
--
package powersaved
reopen 503991
thanks
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:28:36AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Package: powersaved
Version: 0.15.20-3
Severity: serious
This severity is totally exagerrated. wishlist would have been much more
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:57:07AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
It is not free software. I had a quick peek at the license in the .deb
available from Opera's website, and it would not seem that they allow
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: fuse-convmvfs
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Z.C. Miao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://fuse-convmvfs.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: awesome
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://awesome.naquadah.org/
* License : GPL (original dwm code is under MIT/X
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: avinfo
Version : 1.0.a16
Upstream Author : George Shuklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cdde
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Eric Lathrop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://ericlathrop.com/cdde/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi debian-devel,
I wanted to ask this for quite a long time: Does aptitude (I think
apt-get does the same) really have to lock the status database area
when _downloading_ packages?
For example, I am running an update on a slow connection and want to
uninstall or install with dpkg a few packages
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:21:07AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Stanislav Maslovski [Fri, Feb 04 2011, 03:10:54AM]:
Hi debian-devel,
I wanted to ask this for quite a long time: Does aptitude (I think
apt-get does the same) really have to lock the status database area
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:00:40AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Stanislav Maslovski
stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com wrote:
This is possible, however, it is an extra busy work for a user. In any
case, I think that holding a lock only for downloading
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:47:21AM -0200, Fernando Lemos wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Stanislav Maslovski
stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If you want to have that level of control, why don't you just check it
manually? Use --download-only with apt-get (no dpkg locking
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
Shachar Shemeshshac...@debian.org writes:
I am subscribed to lots and lots of mailing lists. All mail from those
lists gets automatically delivered to dedicated folders automatically.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:29:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:20:10 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Given that Fedora are adopting /run, and it has been something
we have wanted in the past, is anyone working on implementing
/run in Debian?
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:11:03AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
But if network-manager would become default and ifupdown an optional
replacement, I would question Debian's capacity to make technically
excellent decisions and wonder, how much we have been dragged along
by user-friendly distros
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:56:40PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:37:26PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
If that happens I will seriously think about moving to another distro
(I have been using Debian since around 1999). Or maybe to a *BSD.
You're entitled
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:07:12PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Debian is not about market-share, so losing users is no thread. It is
only an information for us that we no longer helpful to some of our
users.
The
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 03:50:36PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 04:42:11PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
I understand that you are in a position that forces you to think about
public relations and such, but if I were a DD I would be more happy if
DPL
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:26:20PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 03 avril 2011 à 21:32 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
Analogously, when I see such great technical suggestions as
replacing ifupdown on default installs with network-manager, I can't
help thinking
wrote:
Le dimanche 03 avril 2011 à 21:32 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
Analogously, when I see such great technical suggestions as
replacing ifupdown on default installs with network-manager, I can't
help thinking (and sometimes commenting) that if this trend continues,
then at some
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:28:42PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I have read all e-mails in this thread, and what constructive criticism
you may have given is buried under uncompromising prejudice. For
example:
If you mean the ifupdown-based configuration, then I cannot agree that
it is
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:00:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:52:33AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Yes, a user can do anything with ifconfig if his time has no value. I am
happily using network manager on my laptop, because unlike ifconfig it's
easy to
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:35:10PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 11:55 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
Well, actually configuring a wireless network with wpa_supplicant and
ifupdown is not hard at all and does not require too much time, _if_ a
user has
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:33:31PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 10:39 -0300, Ben Armstrong a écrit :
But the average laptop user really does have a hard time with the
status quo. Something needs to change in the next release.
I think squeeze already does a lot
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:06:28PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 04 avril 2011 à 16:19 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov a écrit :
User MUST study each OS he uses.
No, he must not. The OS must adapt to the user’s needs, not the
opposite.
If he doesn't want he will be
forced to pay
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Sould not there be an option to select between the old network configuration
and NM?
Nowhere have I seen it argued that NM will be the *only* networking
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:57:10PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
2011/4/4 Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com:
I am not happy that network manager bypasses ifconfig to do this; I
would have much preferred a daemon that could properly integrate with
the existing infrastructure
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:30:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[skipped]
It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copy-books and by
eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the
habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
What I do not understand is WHY the Debian Project can not do an install
in two steps. I mean installing the bare base using ifupdown and if
the user choose the Desktop-Task replace it with NM.
AFAICT, the main concerns with
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Stanislav Maslovski,
Am 2011-04-04 01:11:15, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:26:20PM +0530, Josselin Mouette wrote:
May I suggest that you install a squeeze system with the desktop task
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:39:23PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
mathieu...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
This said, I don't think NM can be the magic bullet to fix everything.
Even RedHat while shipping NetworkManager on servers last I
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:08:19AM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
On 05 Apr 00:55, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
What I do not understand is WHY the Debian Project can not do an install
in two steps. I mean installing the bare
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Stanislav Maslovski
| AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
| process is that its suport of wireless networks is very limited: only
| WEP is supported, and there are problems with lost
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:09:42PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Stanislav Maslovski
| AFAICT, the main concerns with the current ifupdown-based installation
| process is that its suport of wireless networks is very
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 02:08 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
Well, that is not the question of how many, that is the question of
can you do a given task or not with a given tool. NM is limited in all
possible ways I
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and get them to
work manually for your specific setup, and since it’s not event-based
you have to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 April 2011, 19:05:11 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and get them to
work manually for your
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Michael Welle wrote:
Hello,
several init scripts use such a fragment for sourcing init-functions:
if ! [ -x /lib/lsb/init-functions ]; then
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
else
echo E: /lib/lsb/init-functions not found, lsb-base (= 3.0-6) needed
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:17:14PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On 28/02/2010 01:32, Ben Finney wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Yes, I overall agree with your arguments. However having it in the
policy means we get bug reports about manual pages and have to deal
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:32:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 04 mars 2010 à 15:20 +0100, Bill Allombert a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:26:06AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
No. It’s just that they ship with HTML documentation, which is much more
suitable for
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:45:26PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:58:48 +0100
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be wrote:
Hi dear Teams,
At the risk of getting involved...
Where was the criticism that started this thread posted to? I didn't
notice it pass on -devel.
I think
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:31:42PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
We would like to know what needs attention, what bugs still need to be
fixed in your package before squeeze is released, which features or new
upstream versions you want to see in squeeze which are not ready yet.
Furthermore
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot
migrate to testing
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:04:58PM +0900, Kazuo Oishi wrote:
Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr writes:
Anyone, could you teach me why net.ipv6.bindv6only need to be set
to 1 globally, and why other good programs need to be changed?
I think it should revert.
I've no strong opinion
Hello d-dev,
I noticed yesterday that after an upgrade I got a /usr/lib64 dir
with some (not neded) stuff in it. I am not running any 64 bit arch.
$ dpkg -S /usr/lib64 # says:
libg2c0-dev, fakeroot, libgfortran1-dev: /usr/lib64
I have found that there is a bug [1] on fakeroot reporting the
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:18:45PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
On Sat October 21 2006 13:35, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Hendrik Sattler may or may not have written...
64bit kernels are not available in the i386 archive. That makes the
64bit libs rather useless, doesn't it?
No - you
Hi,
Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100429080919.ga17...@kaiba.homelan
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:11:01AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:09, Stanislav Maslovski
stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/bugs.debian.org
I can ping it:
PING
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:40:53PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Apr 27, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
reasonable commenter), and now you're saying that Julien Cristau is the
peanut gallery.
No, I am not.
But you're breaking peoples' systems *now*. And breaking systems
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 04:00:57AM +0200, Thomas Hochstein wrote:
Felipe Sateler schrieb:
I mean, is there a reason for why I would want a non-UPG system?
What about a hosting environment where you need to have user files
world-readable (HTML documents or (PHP) scripts readable by
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:11:30AM +0400, William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
- Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
(blah blah blah blah)
Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
lilo upstream, it's going away.
That is why I love reading d-dev. Some
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:43:32PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2010 14:40:41 -0400 (EDT), Andreas Barth wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:52 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pretty
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
* Package name: xkbind
Version : 2010.05.20
Upstream Author : CHG sme...@by.ru
* URL : http://xkbind.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:23:00PM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
If collaboration among users should work nicely out of the box, we will
finally need three small things. I am not sure in which package some of
them should go, though.
1) An install? option to populate /etc/skel/ with the
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:20:00 +0400 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski
stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com:
Do not worry. They are not to be created by default.
If you read the subject it even explicitly reads optionally
create.
Those
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:35AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
[skipped]
BTW, mutt seems to incorrectly fill the References: header when I
reply to your mail.
Just a second test. Please ignore...
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:59:18AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:53:03 +0400
schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
But why Debian should care about the precise details of local
admistration policies?
If you have read #248130
Yes, I have.
and know debian,
I am with Debian
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:36:09AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
Am Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:43:20 +0400
schrieb Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com:
The great thing about Debian is that it can mean and handle so many
different things for so many people.
Yes, that is why we
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:39:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.07.2010, 23:14 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org
wrote:
Debian contributors don't have to be Debian users at the beginning. They
can come from
Hi debian-devel,
As we all know, squeeze is frozen now. This was a long awaited event,
although for some importans software that we have in the distro it
would be beneficial if this moment could happen later. One of such
examples is libcairo2.
The last release by ustream [1] is 1.8.10. At the
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 18:27 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Thus, getting to the main point of this long e-mail: what are we going
to do with libcairo2 in squeeze? If we keep it at 1.8.10, I think it
makes sense to apply
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:31:53PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 08/09/2010 07:13 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
know what does the release team think
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Sebastian Krause wrote:
Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com wrote:
I am pretty sure porting is doable and I think I can volunteer to do
this. But before it, let us collect more opinions. It would be nice to
know what does the release
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:15:35AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
/sbin and /usr/sbin, /lib and /usr/lib directories?
AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD with a root filesystem is
available (which doesn't necessarily include
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:06:48PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 23:40 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski a écrit :
Thus I repeat: the subpixel rendering of fonts in current squeeze is
suboptimal, because instead of providing flexibility and full control
it virtually limits
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:22:08AM +0200, posion bit wrote:
I've just started my love history again with squeeze.
There are 38 unquoted $i in /etc in i386 installing base+laptop+standar
There are 172 $i (maching without spaces around) 38 of them matches
whit spaces around (unquoted).
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:58:22AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:30:07AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:22:08AM +0200, posion bit wrote:
There are 38 unquoted $i in /etc in i386 installing base+laptop+standar
There are 172 $i
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:26:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Do we actually have a standardised interface that can disable a service
and then reenable it so that it is in exactly the same state as before
it was disabled, without requiring black magic and/or prior knowledge
of the correct
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
* Package name: kbdd
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Alexander V. Vershilov alexander.vershi...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/qnikst/kbdd
* License : GPL
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:48:29PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Hi,
Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com writes:
Description : Per-window keyboard layout switching daemon for X
How does this relate to the Gnome System-Keyboard-Layouts dialog that
already
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:16:22PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Stanislav Maslovski, le Tue 02 Aug 2011 00:32:29 +0400, a écrit :
KBDD stands for keyboard daemon. It is a simple keyboard layout
switching program, which is designed to run in an X11 session and
remember keyboard layouts
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
* Package name: tarix
Version : 1.0.7
Upstream Author : Matthew Cheetah Gabeler-Lee
* URL : https://github.com/fastcat/tarix;
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xtar/
* License
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:18:10 +0400
Source: fuse-convmvfs
Binary: fuse-convmvfs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:23:32 +0300
Source: fuse-convmvfs
Binary: fuse-convmvfs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:28:13 +0400
Source: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Binary: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.4.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 13:59:31 +0400
Source: fuse-convmvfs
Binary: fuse-convmvfs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 18:58:16 +0400
Source: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Binary: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:35:24 +0400
Source: glurp
Binary: glurp
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.12.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Stanislav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:50:39 +0400
Source: fuse-convmvfs
Binary: fuse-convmvfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:01:12 +0300
Source: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Binary: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 17:05:16 +0400
Source: xkbind
Binary: xkbind
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2010.05.20-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Stanislav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:16:26 +0400
Source: kbdd
Binary: kbdd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:57:39 +0400
Source: kbdd
Binary: kbdd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:45:39 +0400
Source: kbdd
Binary: kbdd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:54:30 +0400
Source: cdde
Binary: cdde
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:31:24 +0400
Source: avinfo
Binary: avinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.a15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:41:03 +0400
Source: avinfo
Binary: avinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.a15+20080730-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:11:32 +0800
Source: fuse-convmvfs
Binary: fuse-convmvfs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stanislav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:31:14 +0300
Source: avinfo
Binary: avinfo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.a15+20090102-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:07:20 +0400
Source: fuse-convmvfs
Binary: fuse-convmvfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 05:57:47 +0400
Source: kbdd
Binary: kbdd
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stanislav Maslovski stanislav.maslov...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Stanislav Maslovski
96 matches
Mail list logo
