On 2005-12-12, Linas Zvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A user should get the same visual feeling whether he chose GNOME or KDE
for his desktop, whether he decided for KDM or GDM etc. This might sound
Why try to make kde and gnome look the same?
If it is a goal to make all Bob User desktops
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: comixcursors
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Jens Luetkens j.luetkens (at) hamburg.de
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=32627
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kde-icons-korilla
Version : 1.3.5
Upstream Author : Patrick Yavitz pyavitz (at) gmail.com
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=7264
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kde-icons-gorilla
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Patrick Yavitz pyavitz (at) gmail.com
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=6927
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kwin-style-crystal
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sascha Hlusiak spam84 (at) gmx.de
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=13969
* License : GPL, LGPL
On 2006-05-27, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Odd, because my package depends on libapr0-dev (probably going to be
libapr0-dev | libapr1-dev soon), and an apt-cache search for 0-dev on my
The versionings is when stuff change to incompatible APIs, so probably
depending on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kwin-style-dekorator
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : moty rahamim moty.rahamim (at) gmail.com
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=31447
* License : GPL
On 2006-06-22, David H. Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, my question is: Is there an equivalent cmd for 'start' (e.g. for
KDE)?
kfmclient exec foobar.odt
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kwin-style-serenity
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel maxilys (at) tele2.fr
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=35954
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kde-style-serenity
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=35954
* License : LGPL-2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kommando
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Stoeckel the_docter (at) gmx.net
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=29514
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: kde-windeco-powder
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel maxilys (at) tele2.fr
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=29935
* License : GPL
On 2009-03-20, Mike O'Connor s...@debian.org wrote:
To me, it seems like since one has to go through all of the source files
anyway, creating a list of copyright holders while you are doing it is a
trivial task. I don't see why making this list takes any time at all
really. Unless you are
On 2009-03-20, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
All of what you've demonstrated is part of what Mike covered with
???one has to go through all of the source files anyway???, is it not?
The point I got from his message is that, having *already* accepted
the burden of going through
On 2009-03-22, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:31:58AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 02:58 +, Noah Slater a écrit :
Again, while the documentation of individual licenses may not be policy,
it is
certainly policy for each
On 2009-03-24, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 02:09:25PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog
hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Jerome Warnier wrote:
For files from packages, though, deduplication might be a good idea, as
dpkg is supposedly the only one to ever
On 2009-03-25, Mike O'Connor s...@debian.org wrote:
As a hint. When this happens, respond to the REJECT email you get when
you re-upload so that we know that there is a package we have already
checked, so that we know you are re-uploading and addressing our
concerns.
If you want this,
On 2009-03-29, Mateusz 'Matthew' Marek matt...@matthew.org.pl wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested in making KDE4/Qt4 based package manager. I am
2nd year student of computer science from Poland (Gdansk University of
Technology, CET/CEST) with some experience in C/C++ and Qt programming
and git
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela report...@pusling.com
* Package name: Qoreutils
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Doe j...@qoreutils.org
* URL : http://www.qoreutils.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++ with Qt
Description
On Friday 03 April 2009 23:02:28 Ehren Kret wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ehren Kret ehren.k...@gmail.com
* Package name: protobuf
Version : 2.0.3
Upstream Author : Kenton Varda ken...@google.com, et al.
* URL :
On 2009-04-11, Filipus Klutiero chea...@gmail.com wrote:
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
* KDE/Qt4 Adept 3.0 Package Manager *
-
Student: Mateusz Marek, Mentor: *NEEDS MENTOR, see below.*
Finish Adept 3.0, a fully integrated package manager for Qt4/KDE4.
Adept
On 2009-04-14, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
If we wanted to be absolutely faithful in preserving all information
about upstream copyright and licensing in the debian/copyright file,
we could just put a tarball of the entire upstream source
On 2009-04-14, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
How is your work on a useful summary of kdebase-workspace going ?
I do wish this tiresome rhetorical non-argument would stop cropping up.
I do wish that you would once try to look
On 2009-04-23, Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu wrote:
Hi.
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 22:52 +0200, Guido Günther a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:11:16PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
sure - but where was this meeting announced? I was pretty surprised by the
We contacted the
tag 531221 wontfix
thanks
On Sunday 31 May 2009 02:09:11 John Goerzen wrote:
Package: okular
Version: 4:4.2.2-2
Severity: normal
I'm CCing this to Debian-devel because I think it speaks to a larger
issue.
I just downloaded a PDF, and tried to copy and paste a bit of text
from it. I used
On 2009-05-31, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
If you prefer, we can use compiz to cube-scroll to another desktop where
we play a video of you explaining how bad DRM is.
No need to mix compiz in. The kde window manager already have such
desktop effects.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sunday 31 May 2009 15:32:25 John Goerzen wrote:
#2 and #4 especially should be exceptionally trivial patches.
Why are you tagging it wontfix, Sune?
I see no reason to deviate from upstream's choices here, no matter how trivial
the patches are.
Here is no bug, so here is nothing to fix.
(Please everybody: I read debian devel, I am maintainer of the package so I
get a copy of emails to the bug report. That's already 2 copies. I don't need
a 3rd one put directly in my mailbox)
On Sunday 31 May 2009 16:05:10 John Goerzen wrote:
Could you share your reasoning with us,
On 2009-06-10, Peter Miller pmil...@opensource.org.au wrote:
--=-N4erB4l6HGd3iNYSXuXj
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:53 +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:06:39AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
If I
On 2009-06-11, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
The BSD license says, in part:
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1.
On 2009-06-11, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:11:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
OTOH, the most complex copyright file you have is
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/planet-venus/current/copyright
where the format is still applicable.
Sure,
On 2009-06-15, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
please find below a first draft of DEP-3 that I called Patch Tagging
Guidelines. The idea is to standardize a set of meta-information to embed
Wouldn't a better first goal be to have just a freeform text field ?
With the current
On 2009-06-16, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Charles Plessyple...@debian.org wrote:
The dh_make template for debian/copyright induces many developers to put
their
packaging work under the GPL, and I have already seen packages whose license
is
otherwise
On 2009-06-19, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
+Scope and application
+-
+
+The usage of this format is highly recommended but as long as it's not
+endorsed by the Debian policy, it will not be required. It is however
And there is no plan to make it required in
On 2009-06-24, Neil Roeth n...@debian.org wrote:
I received the below email that my package, aplus-fsf, was removed from
testing. Apparently that is due to the removal of gtk 1.2, but aplus-fsf has
no direct dependency on gtk 1.2. I'm a little surprised at the removal - no
bugs were filed, no
On 2009-06-24, Neil Roeth n...@debian.org wrote:
Thanks. So, another alternative would be for xemacs to remove its dependence
on gtk 1.2, correct? I'll explore that angle as well.
Yes. that's anotehr alternative
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 2009-06-25, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
it is well known that C++ symbol mangling result in different symbol
names from one architecture to the other. It means that libraries that
want to provide symbol files have to maintain one symbol file for each
architecture. To avoid
On 2009-07-29, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
On the contrary, I think you are missing the point. The
work-unit put in by developers is not the only issue this brings up,
We do not want to have different helper package start inventing
a helper specific way of
On 2009-08-10, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
I would also add that the debug symbols should live in
/usr/lib/debug/ . /full/path/to/lib_or_binary, blessing the current
practice.
You are missing the new features of build-id as written earlier by
insisting on this.
/Sune
On 2009-08-10, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2009-08-10, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
I would also add that the debug symbols should live in
/usr/lib/debug/ . /full/path/to/lib_or_binary, blessing the current
On 2009-08-11, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
Hmm. I see very little benefit here. Firstly, to use build id,
you have to intercept the upstream build system and add --build-id
(and perhaps the --build-id-style) option to ld, instead of the current
method of letting the
On 2009-08-13, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking about removing
DD status from people based on a track record of incompetence.
Yes please.
But looking at S-V as a primary factor here is not the right thing.
More like
On 2009-09-02, Jens Peter Secher j...@debian.org wrote:
2009/9/2 Torsten Werner ftpmas...@debian.org:
why is it a native package? Why do we need this package in Debian that got
removed recently from unstable? I would expect an explanation either in bug
#541265 or in the changelog.
From the
On 2009-09-07, Andrew R Kelley andrew.r.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
--000e0cd3b27cf19d880472f5f8d4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Can we have amarok 1.4 as an option to use? in my opinion, amarok 2 is not
usable yet. I decided to give it a try when it replaced 1.4 in squeeze, but
of
punishing people ?
You and others are most welcome to take a stab at the 1000 open bugs
against the official kdepackages.
Start here:
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/bugs.html
Thanks in advance.
/Sune Vuorela
Member of the debian qt maintainers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2007-02-26, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to completely disagree here. When I started in earnest with the
effort to clean up the sasl package, I literally spent three twelve hour
days in a row doing nothing but bug triage. I really am not surprised
that people had not
On 2007-02-26, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xorg just sees activitiy to look at bugs (and it was really overdue),
libc is a beast of itself. For the others I have no strong preference,
the x-maintainers have been lucky by having a Brice Gogling suddenly
dropping in and pinging all
On 2007-02-26, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of those are obvious plusses in the big picture view of the project as=
=20
whole and the relationship of the project with our users.
Welcome as the new helper in the kde bugs in debian.
/me goes back to his bugs for now.
On 2007-02-26, Klaus Ethgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
I'm not the frontend programmer). But then come to another problem, (and
In the kde team where I are, we work in a svn archive where non-DDs like
me have commit access -
On 2007-02-27, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maintainers not always responsing to bugs, then probably the simplest
thing to do would be to code up a view in the BTS that lists bugs that
have not had a maintainer response (filtering out responses that appear
to be from the bug submitter,
On 2007-02-28, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyway. Otherwise suggesting you may forward it upstream and/or send a patch
is a bad joke.
Why is it a bad joke ?
let us take `kmail' - it has around 2500 bugs in the upstream bugzilla -
and 100 bugs not forwarded in debian.
In order
On 2007-03-01, Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A third party organization, dunc-tank, which included a number of
prominent Debian Developers, including AJ, did pay for two of the
How can it be a third party organization if it is launched by the DPL
_as_ DPL ?
(Source: AJs DPL review in
On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
getting mired in a sea of bugs.
We still miss around 600 bugs in our backlog:
On 2007-04-12, Lawrence Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On April 12, 2007 11:34:00 am Chris Lamb wrote:
Pierre THIERRY wrote:
If not, which ones?
+ http://www.gnewsense.org/ ?
Gentoo has done renames of Mozilla products such as Firefox too.
I asked one of my local gentoo devs - and he
On 2007-04-19, Evgeni Golov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can find a list of the packages here:
http://files.die-welt.net/bad-depends-in-sid
There are some false positives. AFAIK at least kde* is binNMU'able.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On 2007-04-22, Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be interested to see some numbers on the archive size impact - my
experience with C++ suggests that the size inflation caused by debug
symbols can be enormous.
Openoffice currently ships a -g1 -dbg package. If it wasn't -g1, the deb
would
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: soprano
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Sebastian Trueg and others
* URL : http://www.kde.org/
* License : LGPL-2
Programming Lang: C++, Qt
Description : A Qt
On 2007-05-09, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chrooting into the dir, the error is that base-files postinst
cannot find awk. mawk had indeed been configured earlier. So, while
/etc/alternatives/awk exists, and points to mawk, there is no symlink
/usr/bin/awk created.
On 2007-05-09, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Andr=E9 Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
[A bunch of nice positive words about the idea and the concept and ...]
I might add that I'm trying to develop some themes for presentations
especially for LaTeX
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: eigen
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Benoit Jacob (jacob at math jussieu fr) and others
* URL : http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/
* License : GPL + incorporate-in-your-software
On 2007-05-29, Pascal Speck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, i have a big problem with debian packaging.
I need to create debian packages of a program i've written, but i don't
know how to solve the following problem.
I want to have one Source Tree with a Subdirectory Drivers.
When doin a
On 2007-06-04, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--=_Part_840_15471732.1180961520043
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Then, would simply sturmbahn be a suitable name for the package?
On 2007-07-20, Carl Fürstenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if there has been any discussions about some redesign of
the system, to make it a bit more user friendly, but perhaps it's time
Please read up on the differences between 'user friendly' and 'beginner
friendly'
I am a user of
On 2007-07-21, Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bug reports pretty easy. It isn't the web frontend you'd like to see,
but I think it is a good and user friendly alternative.
I prefer reportbug-ng over any webinterface to recieve bug reports. All
the information about the reporters
On 2007-08-12, William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
karamba
This is a Qt app, and it has been mostly replaced with SuperKaramba AFAIK.
And is only using gtk1/xmms to communicate with xmms. It builds nicely
without also. (Of course, you then miss the xmms functionality, but ...)
/Sune
--
On 2007-08-13, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% type-handling -n ia64
i386 darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 netbsd-i386
pts seems to have problems with this:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wine.html - it at least looks quite
ugly.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 2008-09-08, Eugene V. Lyubimkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My proposal is make the new file named, for example, debian/divergences, =
containing
important for end users changes made in Debian package. Suggested format =
may be the same
we are using now to display lists in packages' long
On 2008-09-18, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The situation is now critical, indeed. Even though the decision is not
yet taken, there are risks that we (D-I team) finally decide to
de-activate Danish.
...
In
On Monday 29 September 2008 20:40:24 Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Leopold Palomo Avellaneda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: solid
Version : 3.5.6
Upstream Author : Gino van den Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On 2008-10-06, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sqlite3
If this is 500792, I'm not sure what has gone wrong with this one - it
was downgraded, fixed and then upgraded.
It just needs to migrate to lenny.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've brought this up in the past on debian-devel, but didn't follow
through at the time. We have lots of X-based terminal programs (xterm,
rxvt, gnome-terminal, konsole, ...) which Provide:
x-terminal-emulator. That's great and useful, but
On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sune wrote:
I dont think supporting title and stuff should be required for providing
x-terminal-emulator. I think we could require to handle -e properly, but
not much more than that.
Out of curiosity, why not support setting of title etc.?
On 2008-10-16, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are some DDs or -devel@ readers involved into Sidux development?
What's their exact technical model? They duplicate the whole archive, or
just change a few packages and use the normal Debian archive for the
rest of the packages?
On 2008-11-23, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please quote from the original email explaining to me how it is sexist.
Sexism defines the ideology of male supremacy, of male superiority and
of beliefs that support and sustain it. Sexism and patriarchy
mutually reinforce one another
On 2008-11-30, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kdebase-workspace-bin
kde-window-manager
is in experimental.
system-config-printer-common
system-config-printer-gnome
I am planning to request this split of system-config-printer quite soon,
so that we when next kde major
On 2008-12-03, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Michael Tautschnig]
Instead, currently, they get distracted by many easy-to-spot errors
(including lintian warnings/errors, which really doesn't require one
to be an ftp-master to see...).
This issue could be solved by
On 2008-12-03, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And from my maintainer point of view, lintian becomes more and more
irrelevant, as it warns about more and more stupidities, so the real
issues is being hidden in the amount of crap outputted.
If you
On 2008-12-04, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Latest, the warning about quilt patches without any description. Sure it
is nice to have a description, but I don't need lintian to tell it.
I do think the warning is correct for a lint program
On 2008-12-04, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will try to work on a dh-like command (or maybe a patch against dh_strip,
depends on what Joey prefers) that will basically scan
debian/*/foo-dbg/usr/lib/debug/(*) and try to find a file under debian/*/
matching the subgrouped
On 2008-12-04, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using ORed depends, I forgot to say.
How would OR'ed depends work?
let us look at a example:
package: kdepim-dbg
depends: korganizer (= ${binary:Version})|kaddressbook (=${binary:version})
version: 4.1.3-1
now, I install korganizer
On 2008-12-18, Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org wrote:
As to the people who emailed me that they are putting together a
petition for the DAM to have me removed from the project, I hear you
too.
I don't like this.
I am going to spend the next few days evaluating how important
On 2008-12-18, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
culture. It is even sometimes used without the intent to make an accusation
of homosexuality.
Joss was intending to make an insinuation of homosexuality in order to
offend.
I think you are seeing ghosts or just being prejudistic
On 2008-12-20, David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
trying to look at RC bugs, I just stumbled upon this one.
IMHO it's not severity serious, since binary packages are built in clean
chroots. Hence you don't have wx2.6 installed, but just the Build-Deps, =
i.e.
wx2.8.
It's still
On 2008-12-20, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:48AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
I don't agree with your arguing. Serious is defined as severe violation
of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a must or required
directive). Debian policy 7.7 says:=20
On 2008-12-20, schoappied schoapp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I work with Debian now for a few years. And I like to help the project
and also learn more about it...
Can I become a Debian package maintainer, how? I'm especially interested
in software for making music...
Try contact the
Hi!
I have been wondering over the last months about Section: kde.
What is the correct usage of this section?
Is it for packages that is related to the desktop itself or is it for
packages that links against kdelibs ?
Should a game using kdelibs go to section:games or section:kde?
should a web
On 2009-01-02, Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org wrote:
What is the correct usage of this section?
Is it for packages that is related to the desktop itself or is it for
packages that links against kdelibs ?
Should a game using kdelibs go to section:games or section:kde?
games.
should a web
On 2009-01-02, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
I'm honestly mystified as to why any of the following should be in
standard, given how obscure what they do seems to be:
consolekit
libpam-ck-connector
Consolekit will be more and more used, at least for desktop installs in
squeeze, they
On 2009-01-02, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
include X), so if they're what use consolekit, that's not an argument for
making it standard. However, it may be a good argument for why it's not
obscure. I did check a current unstable GNOME system and saw no sign of
It was mostly the
On Friday 16 January 2009 03:00:38 John Ferlito wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Ferlito jo...@inodes.org
* Package name: libkate
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Vincent Penquerc'h ogg.k.og...@googlemail.com
* URL :
On Monday 16 February 2009 20:38:38 Rafael Belmonte wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: kmess2
Version: 2.0alpha
Upstream Author: Diederik van der Boor
URL:
On 2009-02-26, Daniel Dickinson csh...@bmts.com wrote:
--Sig_/b/o0j06x1Maj8m.BfPK65gn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is that a violation of a must directive and therefore a bug that will
need fixing ASAP? AIUI packages that have a GUI
On 2009-03-03, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm looking at my local mirror (slowly) update at the moment, and I've
got to wondering: are the large -dbg packages actually really useful
to anybody? I can't imagine that more than a handful of users ever
install (to pick an
On 2009-03-09, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) gand...@le-vert.net wrote:
I would have been great if this people told me he were preparing a NMU
because I was working on new upstream release package that ALSO fix the
ffmpeg issue.
It would have been great if you write the progress in your bug report -
On 2009-03-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
It is a too complex, overengineered solution to a very minor issue.
I find it very surprising that someone can be a Debian developer and
consider copyright of works to be ???a very minor issue??? in Debian.
Perhaps I've
On 2007-09-11, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That way, the user can continue with the X session and the reload takes
place at logout. A suitable reminder can be output to remind the user
to actually logout - much like the kernel packages remind users to
reboot.
The problem is in this
On 2007-09-12, Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
You're not checking for copyright violations or for non-free stuff in
all other packages.
Yes he is.
The only reason that things like linux-2.6.XX pass through NEW is, from
my POV, because noone stepped up to fix
On 2007-10-12, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
full ack to whatever you wrote here - and thank you for your nice work
with this.
It's important to decide on reasonable delays.
- If the procedure takes too long, it will be discouraging
I think that your proposed times falls
Hi!
I have tried to make a script that converts desktop files into
reasonable menu files. My perl ability generally sucks, but I did
something that at least worked. Thanks to people around various irc
channels.
But in the process of mapping between freedesktop.org desktop categories
and menu
On 2007-10-21, Ben Goodger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--=_Part_8909_32361462.1192962485303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 21/10/2007, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried to make a script that converts
1 - 100 of 761 matches
Mail list logo
