Hello!
Uoti Urpala has written on Friday, 30 November, at 1:00:
[...]
I think there's already enough evidence to show that systemd is clearly
the best choice. How much more would you expect to have before it would
not be premature any more?
I should thank you all, John Paul Adrian
Hello!
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz has written on Friday, 30 November, at 1:04:
Absolutely true. And this is actually why I don't understand so many
people get so emotional when it comes to software like systemd or
Pulse-Audio.
Well, without any emotions. In last 2 years I've installed
Hello!
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez has written on Saturday, 24 November, at 19:20:
FYI, Yet another episode of the Linux init drama:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/RaringUpstartUserSessions
https://plus.google.com/115547683951727699051/posts/ZZWLtq6tYdn
It is only me
Hello!
Gergely Nagy has written on Thursday, 22 November, at 0:05:
If you read my mail further, your question is answered there. But I'll
repeat it, for good measures: no, it does not mean that. I only means
that your syslogd of choice is getting its input from
/run/systemd/journal/syslog
Hello!
Gergely Nagy has written on Wednesday, 21 November, at 10:29:
Matthias Klumpp matth...@tenstral.net writes:
For syslogd, systemd provides journald for those who want to use it,
but the Journal is no dependency of systemd.
Wrong. You can't have any recent systemd without the
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Wednesday, 21 November, at 15:48:
However, if people choose to migrate to XFCE instead of GNOME3, then a
migration to a GNOME2-alike in Jessie isn't as hard but might still not
be wise. Who knows how XFCE will change with a bunch of new users
reporting
Hello!
Salvo Tomaselli has written on Saturday, 3 November, at 20:36:
Linux/open source developers are usually not interested in fixing bugs if
they cannot easily reproduce them. This problem plagues virtually all Open
Source projects.
Well in proprietary software you are usually required
Hello!
Ben Hutchings has written on Saturday, 3 November, at 19:30:
Don't feed the troll.
I believe that was not trolling but rather list of what every good
developer should pay attention - especially moments that give biggest
inconveniences for the users. At least from my experience I
Hello!
Tzafrir Cohen has written on Tuesday, 30 October, at 17:04:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:18:41PM +0200, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
Stefano Rivera has written on Monday, 29 October, at 16:57:
Hi Tzafrir (2012.10.29_16:29:06_+0200)
While clearing your throat, mind telling us how
Hello!
Stefano Rivera has written on Monday, 29 October, at 16:57:
Hi Tzafrir (2012.10.29_16:29:06_+0200)
While clearing your throat, mind telling us how this works in Ubuntu
with PPAs? What happens if you installed a package from a PPA and you
want to generate a backtrace of a program
Hello!
Игорь Пашев has written on Friday, 12 October, at 12:29:
dh-make should be deprecated :-)
I don't agree with that. dh-make is very useful in some cases. And I have
created a lot of own packages already, some of them without dh-make but I
know good sides of it.
Andriy.
--
To
Hello!
I have a question. Since maintainers of LXDE are extremely busy last
few months I would like to find a way to upload latest upstream version
of libfm and pcmanfm into experimental repository. I feel sorry that I
constantly bug the maintainers with the same question and I think they
Hello!
Salvatore Bonaccorso has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 12:35:
This is indeed intentional, that dpkg never replaces directories with
symlinks if directory is present, see [1] and [2] (under 4.).
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/404850
[2]:
Hello!
Vincent Bernat has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 17:31:
❦ 29 septembre 2012 17:17 CEST, Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua :
This is indeed intentional, that dpkg never replaces directories with
symlinks if directory is present, see [1] and [2] (under 4.).
[1]: http
Hello!
Nikolaus Rath has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 18:56:
Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua writes:
I've solved that in the
preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
a right step since upgrade 1.0.1 - 1.0.2 went smooth.
Somehow that sounds
Hello!
I have written on Sunday, 30 September, at 2:12:
Nikolaus Rath has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 18:56:
Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua writes:
I've solved that in the
preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
a right step since upgrade
Hello!
darkestkhan has written on Monday, 3 September, at 19:15:
I'm long time user of pcmanfm (though I'm using it under fluxbox) and
I didn't have any REAL problems with it since...
10 months or so? While there are some bugs here and there (like not
being able to run 2 instances of it,
Hello!
There is a problem with libfm and pcmanfm that are coming into next
stable debian release. Those are much outdated. The version libfm 0.1.17
and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
- lock up of X server on drag drop operation;
- frequent random
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 19:17:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:30:31 +0300
Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua wrote:
The version libfm 0.1.17
and pcmanfm 0.9.10 have few tens of critical bugs. Some of them are:
None of which appear to have been filed against
Hello!
Neil Williams has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 21:51:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 22:33:14 +0300
Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua wrote:
You may hate me saying this but that's sad fact. If you think it's normal
then I'll shut up and let users ask you why their bugreports
Hello!
Ansgar Burchardt has written on Sunday, 2 September, at 22:04:
Andrej N. Gritsenko and...@rep.kiev.ua writes:
Tell me, please, how I can achieve the inclusion of stable version of
libfm/pcmanfm into next debian release? BTW, next release of Ubuntu will
have 1.0 (or even 1.0.1
Hello!
Andrew Shadura has written on Wednesday, 8 August, at 13:30:
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:26:27 +0800
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
This kind of remark make be say that probably, it'd be
nice to have ifconfig display a warning as this one:
ifconfig is deprecated, please use ip
Hello!
Thomas Goirand has written on Wednesday, 8 August, at 22:01:
On 08/08/2012 09:11 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
And ip is not standard (not present on every Linux systems), whereas
I don't know any system without ifconfig.
Then, what do you use to list multiple IPs on a single
Hello!
Ben Hutchings has written on Wednesday, 8 August, at 16:24:
On 08/08/2012 09:11 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
IMHO, if there's distros with ifconfig but not ip, then such distro
doesn't deserve much attention. The standard *is* ip, it's a much
more powerful tool that does all you
24 matches
Mail list logo
