Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Christian T. Steigies"
* Package name: gle-graphics-manual
Version : 0~20221108
Upstream Author : Vincent LaBella
* URL : https://github.com/vlabella/gle-manual.git
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Christian T. Steigies"
* Package name: gle-graphics-library
Version : 0~20221105
Upstream Author : Vincent LaBella
* URL : https://github.com/vlabella/gle-library.git
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 08:41:00PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> A recap of what happened, for those who might have lost track:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887740#10
> > The old source package contained two tar
> > balls, the "real" tarball plus a separate one with pa
Moin,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 02:21:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> There are two problems here.
>
> The first is the use of an epoch in a situation where it shouldn't be used.
>
> The actual "trap" is when a maintainer used an epoch in such a situation.
>
> Once introduced in a package an e
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:16:19PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Please don't consider the Debian Policy like a stick. Or a all-kwowing
> > never-wrong oracle.
>
> Well the maintainer refuses to make the minor change I requested. See
> th
Moin,
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 12:25:10PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2018, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Could you please file bugs for these issues? Many thanks.
>
> Done:
>
> - https://bugs.debian.org/889814
> Improve long description of epoch-change-without-comment
>
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:35:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [You had removed m68k-build from the Cc list. Was that on purpose?]
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:01:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > BTW, can you tell me anything about the dip in
> > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-qu
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> Replacement (2.6 Kernel) in the works, should be removed once 2.6 is
> stable enough:
>
> Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> kernel-image-2.4.27-m68kBuild-Depends: gcc-2
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 08:12:00AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Why can't Debian have just one tree for multiple architectures like
> > SuSE and RedHat (sometimes) do. Okay suse supports 'only' i386,
> > x86_64,ppc,ppc64,s390,s390x,ia64 but their
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: vectoroids
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Bill Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/vectoriods/
* License : GPL
Description : "Vectoroids"
Been tortured by your latin teacher with Asterix, the Gaulle? You always
wanted to impress him? Well, then hodie is for you.
What does it do?
It has the same functionality as the date (1) program, only... It
has it in grammatically correct latin.
It is distributed under the MIT license.
Moin,
to all those people, who wanted to package GLE. I got this from somebody,
who was looking for a win version, GLE has been ported (and extended):
http://www.uark.edu/misc/vlabella/gle/gle.html
I also received an email address of Axel, who ported the original gle to
OS/2 and made the 32-bit D
Hi,
www.de.debian seems to have changed a little recently?
TCP connection to 'www.de.debian.org' failed: Broken pipe.
In the morning I got a different startup page for this server. Is this a
temporary reconfiguration? Im also having some problems with
ftp.de.debian.org
Ciao,
Christian.
Hi,
I will be going to the esa/pac conference in Potsdam (31.5. - 3.6.).
On my way to there I will be in Dresden/Weissig on the 29/30.5. and in
Greifswald from the 3.6. till the 5th or 6th.
Id like to meet developers there, towns nearby (Berlin?) or on my way
from/to Kiel as time permits. Signing k
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I doubt it, since the old ssh package is already in place, so this'll
> probably get overriden.
You have a point there... I had this:
Installing:
apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1_m68k.deb
to dists/potato/non-US/main/binary-m68k/apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1.deb
An
On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127)
> Files:
> 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc
> 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net option
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> debian/control file contains:
> Section: non-us/net
>
> > or
> >
> > - unstable
> > - non-US
> > - non-free
>
> debian/control file contains:
> Section: non-us/non-free
Who decides weather a non-US package goes in non-US/main, non-US/contrib or
non-US
Hi,
several of my uploads to non-us have been processed last night. Now I have
only one question, were have the uploads landed? I mean, I am very happy
that I got confirmation messages, but now I have REJECTED:
Rejected: gnupg_0.9.5-1_m68k.deb: Old version 9.5-1' >= new version 9.5-1'.
but I cant
On 29 Dec 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> I think you overlooked part of my post. I mentioned that *I* had
> created /usr/src/linux as a link to /usr/src/linux-my-kernel-version.
> Then when I installed kernel-headers (because the new libc6-dev made
> me), kernel-headers saw the link, decided it was
19 matches
Mail list logo
