. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities.
binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files)
binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities.
binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files)
binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities.
binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files)
binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities.
binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files)
binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities.
binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files)
binutils-doc - Documentation for the GNU assembler, linker and binary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2002 02:58:02 -0400
Source: libipc-sharelite-perl
Binary: libipc-sharelite-perl
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.08-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:28:50AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
Other platforms aren't nearly as significant as i386 (not many users, no
much new hardware).
You're arrogance makes me wonder if George W. Bush is related to you.
Hehehehee...
Lasse, I guess if the other platforms aren't
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately it seems that a kernel that supports both i386 and SMP
would have to use very slow methods for locking since instructions
allowing faster locking only came in with the 486 and above.
I'm wondering when this whole discussion will
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Josh Huber wrote:
built. Should I just do it myself? I also know that there's no
(automated :) autobuilder for Alpha, so I understand that there might
be some delay for alpha.
In Alpha's case, I'm normally very on-top of the builds, but am going to
be slow for the next
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, erik wrote:
Yep, I do -and it worked great before he had to repackage it. You could
have simply copied them from tdyc and had done with it.
Ok, this is where I have to voice my opinion as well...
First off, the packages WILL NOT build on Alpha (and possibly other
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, erik wrote:
Thank you for a cool response - I was really hoping that would eventually
happen. I realize I stirred up a hornets nest; I did it intentionally
because otherwise nobody seems to notice and I think that at least some of
what I originally wrote (goading aside)
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
On
http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html
I read that for glibc 2.1.3 in order to support large files it needs to be
compiled against headers from a 2.4 kernel. As this is currently not the
case, glibc 2.1.3 should be rebuilt.
Woody is shortly
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
[2] New Maintainer is a tough job, with a lot of work to be done
(especially because we weren't processing applications at all, last
year, because things had gotten so out of hand and the people dealing
with it had gotten so stressed out). In spite of
On 13 Sep 2000, James Troup wrote:
Actually, no, way less than half the current backlog are applicants
from the shut down period.
Yeah, after looking at more of the records, I see this.
If that's all I had to do in my life, no, of course it wouldn't.
Unfortunately it's not. Granted, DAM
Looks like i spoke too soon. The qt2.2-2.2.0-2906 package that was
installed into master today dies during compile (despite working around
the optimiser bug...there's something going wrong with the build procedure
I believe). I'll be filing a bug against qt2.2 once I figure out what's
going
it requires qt2.2 to be installed before compiling (a build dependency on
itself if it remains lumped in with the qt2.2 source package).
I'm cc'ing the maintainer in hopes that we can resolve this without filing
a bug at this time.
C
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
Looks
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
Yup...I hosed the rules script and had a $(QTDIR)/libs instead of a
$(QTDIR)/lib
Yeah, that'll do it :-P I'll double-check this on my end and see if
changing that will fix compilation here. If so, I'll upload this version
since you'll be
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Ullrich Martini wrote:
I am trying to compile qt 2.2 on a alpha with potato, g++ 2.95.2-13
using rkrustys patches from the
intel qt 2.2 diffs. I get lots of internal compiler errors on the files
generated by moc (moc_*.cpp), and
uic segfaults when compiling
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Yep, I ITP'ed sourcenav and insight.. a _minor_ problem with
the tcl/tk stuff, but I think I'll just wrap it up soon.
Fantastic. I emailed you off-list about some ideas on how to handle that,
in case you needed the tips (doubt you will, but just in
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Source-Navigator works with the Insight GUI interface for GDB.
Speaking of which, has anyone packaged Insight? If not, I'll look into it
(not ITP yet... :-P)
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
It can now be maintained on alpha, IIRC. I looked into it awhile ago and
they had brought it up to date with a modern gcc (so long 2.7.x, which
didn't work on alpha unless severely patched).
C
On 31 Aug 2000, John Goerzen wrote:
At the time, it would build only on i386. I don't know if this
I had the same problem...I had to manually edit the messages after
reading them.
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
Package: imap
Version: 4.7c-1
(Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Matthias Klose wrote:
Maintainer: Debian GCC maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[HELP] For gcc/g++ bug reports to be sent to the upstream maintainers,
certain procedures must be followed, so help from clueful people is
required
48530 g++ [alpha]: internal compiler
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
* jeanette (ants)
Cons: official and liberal logo might be too different
Cons: tends to cause people to associate Debian with bugs.
I got the same
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
wu-ftpd-academ30931 wu-ftpd-academ: Can't build from source!
I have compiled wu-ftpd-academ from source on saens at least 10 times, I
did not get the problems described in the bug.
The problem seemed to be Alpha-related. I tried unsuccessfully to port
the
Rob Tillotson wrote:
I just tried rebuilding pilot-link, after making the changes in
debian/rules suggested in the BTS entry (changing all egcc to
gcc), and could not reproduce the bug.
The bug is really for potato and is Alpha-based (again). I'll look into
this one now as well. It
Rob Tillotson wrote:
I just tried rebuilding pilot-link, after making the changes in
debian/rules suggested in the BTS entry (changing all egcc to
gcc), and could not reproduce the bug.
Ok...I fixed this one and am uploading it shortly (NMU binary with
patches going to BTS). The rules file
Buddha Buck wrote:
How does that differ from -any- binary-only NMU, regardless of
architechture? If binary-only NMU's for i386 are bad, why are
binary-only NMUs for m68k OK?
The only -real- problem I see with normal NMUs is that then the i386
and m68k binaries are built from different
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one, MAJOR, huge, massive, 'program' which egcs will not
properly compile, this is the kernel, 2.0.x is officially not going to
operate 100% correctly when compiled with gcc 2.8.x or egcs..
Any suggestions?
On the Alpha? I've had
Paul Slootman wrote:
The last time I tried (about 10 sec. ago, on a.d.nl :-):
make[2]: Entering directory `/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/drivers/net'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/extra/home/debian/psl/kernel/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Probably 4-6 weeks. I'd like to ship it before the end of November.
Fantastic!
Guy, is there any problem with freezing the alpha architecture some time
after the main freeze?
About the only thing I'm really concerned with is egcs. As much as I hate
After some discussion with Galen, I'm taking over the binutils package
altogether. Hopefully, I can resolve some of the long-outstanding bugs
(already think I can knock a few of them out of existance).
Thanks...
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The perl package is in incoming. So here is the list of the 33 packages that
need to be updated. The maintainers are listed. The list corresponds to
package which contains filenames matching /usr/lib/perl5.*\.so.
FYI, this package doesn't build properly on the Alpha
On 19 Jun 1998, Douglas Bates wrote:
On a Digital Unix system it does nothing because the program dies as
soon as it starts up. On other systems you get several .Rout files
and one great gronking .ps file from the graphics. Take a look at it
under gv or something similar. If you get
On 19 Jun 1998, Douglas Bates wrote:
On a Digital Unix system it does nothing because the program dies as
soon as it starts up. On other systems you get several .Rout files
and one great gronking .ps file from the graphics. Take a look at it
under gv or something similar. If you get
On 19 Jun 1998, Douglas Bates wrote:
I am the maintainer of the r-base package which provides a language
for statistical computing and graphics. I am also on the development
team for the upstream sources. We recently released R-0.62.1 which I
packaged it up for slink (it was too late for
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
editor.exe is the only editor that you can count on being there if all else
fails and it's absence or replacement would be VERY notable to those who
expect editor.exe
lets do a ratio of dos/win* users that will install linux,
and unix users that will install linux.
Philip Hands wrote:
Please don't do this. It used to drive me nuts to type vi and get ae (whether
in ae or braindamaged-vi mode). If there is some vital reason for removing
vi, it should be replaced with a script that says something along the lines
of:
VI is missing from this rescue
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Dale Scheetz wrote:
If vi would fit on the rescue disk, do you think we would be discussing
ae?
I guess not, then...
To be able to do an install with the rescue disk the space priorities
don't allow anything but ae in that environment. When you can get vi's
binary
Paul Slootman wrote:
There's been a lot of porting going on for Alpha, however, I can't
really say that the number of packages that need to be ported to Alpha
has been decreasing since the freeze; every time 20 packages are
uploaded for Alpha, there are 22 new packages for i386 :-(
I
Kamel SEHIL wrote:
hi people i want to know if an DEC ALPHA (beta or less) is avaible
for now i install red-hat5 , but i'm an debian user's (free software)
and red-hat is not really stable
Actually, yes, Debian has a stable port for the Alpha. Right now, it's
still considered technically
(I'm ignoring them actually), but I
just wanted to tell whomever I needed to about this :)
Thanks :)
Chris
--
Christopher C. Chimelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Supervisor
Division of Biomedical Communications
University
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, Santiago Vila wrote:
Please, tell Brian White about this.
Will do. Thanks!
Current maintainer for bibindex in
hamm is Debian-QA Group, so you should not receive any message about
that because of bibindex.
Yeah, looking back through
Adrian Bridgett wrote:
Ah, on re-reading my first sentence, I think I should have added in theory
:-) I agree with your point that having hundreds of symlinks from
binary-i586 to binary-i386 allows us to use the current tools with very
little changes.
FYI, we may have the same problem with
45 matches
Mail list logo
