Hi,
Le dim. 7 janv. 2024 à 20:40, Ansgar a écrit :
>
> 1. libpulse0 & friends
> --
>
> libpulse0 is a client library for the Pulseaudio server. It doesn't do
> much without pulseaudio.
>
> Q: Should libpulse0 have Depends: pulseaudio?
Please don't do that. At least one pipewi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dylan Aïssi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: roc-toolkit
* URL: https://roc-streaming.org/
* License: MPL-2.0
Roc is a network transport, highly specialized for the real-time streaming use
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dylan Aïssi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libavtp
* URL: https://github.com/Avnu/libavtp
* License: BSD-3-clause
Audio Video Transport Protocol (AVTP) specified in IEEE 1722-2016 spec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dylan Aïssi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: liblc3
Version: 1.0.1
* URL : https://github.com/google/liblc3
* License : Apache-2.0
Description: Low
Hi Wouter,
Le mer. 5 oct. 2022 à 09:21, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
>
> I'm not familiar enough yet with pipewire to know which tools to use to
> debug what went wrong. Can you point me to the relevant docs? Once I
> have a better idea of what went wrong, expect a bug report coming your
> way ;-)
>
Le jeu. 15 sept. 2022 à 03:21, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>
> I understand that applications with very low latency requirements may
> need this sort of performance tweaking. But this is not the normal
> case, and PulseAudio hasn't required this. If PipeWire does, I think
> that's a serious limitati
Le mar. 13 sept. 2022 à 19:25, Michael Biebl a écrit :
>
> Afaics, Dylan asked mostly if we should do the switch. He didn't give
> any personal recommendation or preference. At least that's how I read
> his initial email.
I have a basic usage of pipewire, I only listen to music and make video cal
Le ven. 9 sept. 2022 à 21:39, Michael Biebl a écrit :
>
> Should we repeat this mistake? Or put this differently: is there a
> pressing need/compelling reason to switch to pipewire in bookworm?
> I.e. what I miss from the proposal are the benefits of pipewire over
> pulseaudio.
> Can you elaborate
Hi,
I have been asked several times regarding when Debian will switch its default
sound server from PulseAudio to PipeWire without having an official answer.
Thus, I suppose it's the right time to start a discussion about that.
As you know, PipeWire is already installed by default with Bullseye (
Le lun. 30 mai 2022 à 12:55, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>
> a) pipewire package enables pipewire service by default
Indeed, but pipewire service doesn't take control of audio over
pulseaudio. Only pipewire-pulse does that.
So, if you don't want to use pipewire for audio, then don't install
pipew
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dylan Aïssi
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-multime...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: svt-av1
Version: 0.8.7
* URL : https://gitlab.com/AOMediaCodec/SVT-AV1/
* License : BSD-2-clause
11 matches
Mail list logo
