Re: Red team attacks vs. cracking

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 30 May 2006 15:09:25 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:15, Linas Žvirblis wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > >> See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian > > >> accent can sell you a

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 27 May 2006 16:21:22 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 27 May 2006 16:12, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:12, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > >> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:5

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 26 May 2006 16:24:27 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 26 May 2006 15:20, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > >> On Thursd

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:06:40 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require > > at least two photo ID's issued by the govern

Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 25 May 2006 16:21:35 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ian Jackson wrote: > > Kevin B. McCarty writes ("Re: sending debian-private postings to > > gmail"): > >> Ian Jackson wrot

Re: ???????????????????? ????????????????!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:52:12 -0800 Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Jacob S, > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:48:38 -0800 > >

Re: Уникальн ые семинары!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:48:38 -0800 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:41, Henning Makholm wrote: > > Scripsit Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:45, Henning Makholm wrote: > > >

Re: co-maintainers sought

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:01:37 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - [RFA] bcm4400-source - module source for Broadcom's bcm4400 > > ethernet driver > > : http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bcm4400-source.html > > What problems do you see with the in-kernel b44 driver that y

Re: Keysigning without physically meeting ... thoughts?

On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:13:54 -0600 "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:11, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > > > I wrote this up to someone. I thought I'd share it, and get your > > > thoughts. (

Re: Little help about Intel865PERLL with ICH5

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:03:20 +0300 Ivan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you explain what do you mean? Thanks allot What motherboards call RAID is really a tricky way to make Windows see and use software RAID. You will probably want to Google about "software raid" in Linux for more info. I'

Re: Bug#304266: ITP: sdate -- never ending september date

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:28:54 -0300 Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ben Pfaff wrote: > > >Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>Games serve a purpose: they entertain the user. What is the purpose > >of >sdate? > > > >The same. If you are not entertained by sdate, then you do

Re: Serious kernel problems on new i386 hardware

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:04:55 +0100 (CET) Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jacob S wrote: > > > Which version of the Debian-Installer did you use? We had similar > > symptoms on a new Dell recently at work and had to grab the latest > >

Re: Serious kernel problems on new i386 hardware

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:48:55 +0100 (CET) Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource busy > >> ERROR: Removing

Re: Popularity-contest http POST: call for testers

On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 04:19:53 -0600 Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:17:22PM -0600, Jacob S wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:48:21 +0100 > > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello developers, &g

Re: Popularity-contest http POST: call for testers

On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:48:21 +0100 Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello developers, > > We have plans to add support in popularity-contest to send the > report through http POST. Both the server part an the client part have > been developed. The last issue is to actually use it in th

Re: amd64 is already the 2nd most important arch (WasRe: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space])

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:25:25 -0500 Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:11AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > reports percent > > hurd-i386 1 0.0175 > > kfreebsd-i386 1 0.0175 > > ppc64 1 0.0175 > > arm

Re: Slightly Off Topic: Laptops for Debian

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:58:58 +1100 Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:58:55PM -0600, Jacob Schroeder said > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:31:53 + > > Ben Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm looking for a new laptop, and wondered what DDs used. I might > > >