Accepted averell 1.2.5-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:01:13 +0200 Source: averell Binary: averell Architecture: source all Version: 1.2.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Jean Parpaillon <jean.parpail...@free.fr> Changed-By: Jean Parpaillon <jean.parpail...@free.fr> Description: averell- incredibly stupid web server Closes: 773793 Changes: averell (1.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release * Closes: #773793 Checksums-Sha1: a5c14f71d871973577e1c9a9e6610dd69f358df2 1895 averell_1.2.5-1.dsc 22b0dbbc17cc516431c5087907b78d6c539352d0 72688 averell_1.2.5.orig.tar.xz e52c41b8b3384cc1f84246b380c40902874392e1 2140 averell_1.2.5-1.debian.tar.xz a5d848623ab07d1b11baabc9caae76063cf745d9 38514 averell_1.2.5-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 6572b3135e41a4befa699df2784fd8313c78076c0b196357c5a7cab084d6c80d 1895 averell_1.2.5-1.dsc 5ef59f07083dc5db436a537b978ff7e74661a475bbbc97dc02419998e386c62b 72688 averell_1.2.5.orig.tar.xz e916cc3fddd5d2b438938ef8a00c7e9e2f8a5f5fce343d0c3e6cd10abedc8200 2140 averell_1.2.5-1.debian.tar.xz 8acab4d1355071eb9ad30fe565f6db7f9df193a16c91d6ebfaa434a5400f76fe 38514 averell_1.2.5-1_all.deb Files: ecae7dca38029efc83456b9b79200a6a 1895 httpd optional averell_1.2.5-1.dsc 7c3c8e97791582e2beee1daa495847aa 72688 httpd optional averell_1.2.5.orig.tar.xz da85105a73d410955014ccf321758507 2140 httpd optional averell_1.2.5-1.debian.tar.xz 8b590b7da4712402330680e982c9236b 38514 httpd optional averell_1.2.5-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXFQzNAAoJEPNPCXROn13ZKnEP/2SwCOZobyjmZAb+0xLomciI 2N/4JAhdpJTPycyvBsyUj4KRXOcb4RVH1a4q2E1v2g6T7jIjXYnMAiV9CWLzDaah VafDaS16j2xu4qzicwZWQXu2+h7MGbfXfI/iAzzJjBgjhjRsSIRvzNCmz1xP+woZ 3IyZnvKIVnTggz4uYYFgrvOHg20a9LjhLtTZsw2HO+SaCdHhMXWuCgMwPOCzmTvk vHuc4ZdgZ6r2NH0cYgloH+k1qewgujB+h/2PSy0y5CeDGo9yc9DgHeJ6R1/IsG/x OwmCpMD7IYJWp1P4hANdg6xeo5jCzJegHIhHbh7V086zHV4P8Rpibw9kK3R8lsPM nVTMhbo4orJ870mJOGht2gCwrT+sEO/sRoJI3hoUv2UMe1qeLv1gSTkfJTFtS32I 6+RKkO0PfvG1C4fBk/AG90s64bmZbdWdeaA8KmeeeNDJu8SOwUlY2cAja7+n/T4u wZrf8sot9HXPsRzSyaOBAVhJTYzyQL5BbgA2Xdw9VTm+lpkez7f7ZVx9BprvkvYz RDZsYIwjl+NjRAnfHLT8Fo1ij7zi1fHuSsU1773OzGtff+e4IsKqei+PSOGqbbYb wSa/CU93XMUfNFKrrQAGMt4eF20sSQK2lr1Nwd19PrgsuwiVyfkd818KdCoPCJCY Dhlg+DQo9ltKSmt+zHwO =8CEa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#773793: ITP: averell -- An incredibly stupid web server
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jean Parpaillon jean.parpail...@free.fr * Package name: averell Version : 1.0a Upstream Author : Jean Parpaillon jean.parpail...@free.fr * URL : http://github.com/jeanparpaillon/averell * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: erlang Description : An incredibly stupid web server averell is a really simple, but efficient web server. It is particularly intended for serving static content, for instance when developing javascript applications. It is as simple as starting it in a directory to serve it. Options include: - select port - serve index.html automatically - enabling CORS Thanks to the erlang/OTP platform, it is particularly portable, resources efficient and scalable. Future developments: - handling of htaccess-like file for directory specific directives - daemon mode - handling of HTTP standard authentications - HTTPS mode - distributed mode (keeping it simple...) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141223111040.3088.30491.report...@malo.home
Re: Bug#773793: ITP: averell -- An incredibly stupid web server
Hi, Thanks for your feedback. The platform itself is portable on many architectures: http://www.erlang.org/faq/implementations.html Unfortunately, Debian package is not modular enough to avoid what you mention (because of wxwidgets dependancies, mainly). An alternative packaging remove this dependancy providing a so-called erlang-mini package, which works perfectly on raspberry pi, for instance: https://www.erlang-solutions.com/downloads/download-erlang-otp So, I suppose I should give an hand on official Debian package to make my assertion a reality ;) Regards, Jean Le mardi 23 décembre 2014 à 14:46 +0100, Adam Borowski a écrit : On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:10:40PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon wrote: Thanks to the erlang/OTP platform, it is particularly portable, resources efficient and scalable. Hmm... let's see how it fares portability-wise: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=erlangsuite=unstable This stands in contrast to most languages we have in Debian. I'd thus delete this paragraph, as it's false advertising. -- Jean Parpaillon Open Source Consultant Phone: +33 6 30 10 92 86 im: jean.parpail...@gmail.com skype: jean.parpaillon linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeanparpaillon/en -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419344586.4584.28.ca...@free.fr
Bug#519407: ITP: hpcc -- HPC Challenge Benchmark
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jean Parpaillon jean.parpail...@kerlabs.com * Package name: hpcc Version : 1.3.1 Upstream Author : HPC Challenge team h...@cs.utk.edu * URL : http://icl.cs.utk.edu/hpcc/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C, mpi Description : HPC Challenge Benchmark This is a suite of benchmarks that measure performance of CPU, memory subsytem and the interconnect. In essence, HPC Challenge consists of a number of subbenchmarks each of which tests different aspect of the system. hpcc binaries are available in a variety of configuration/ optimization, called arch. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
MPI binaries location
Hi, I'm currently packaging hpcc (HPC Challenge Benchmark). Several binary packages will be available, each one with different mpi implementations. Is there a preferred place to put mpi binaries ? I've seen that each mpi implementation has it's own bin/lib/share/include/etc hierarchy into /usr/lib/mpi Should I put the binaries into it ? Regards, -- Jean Parpaillon - Kerlabs Engineer Bâtiment Germanium 80 avenue des buttes de Coësmes 35700 Rennes - France Tel.: +33 6 80 332 73 85 http://www.kerlabs.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: xcdroast does no longer work with wodim: Who to blame?
I am the psychotherapist. Please, describe your problems. Each time you are finished talking, type RET twice. Le vendredi 27 février 2009 11:03:55 Joerg Schilling, vous avez écrit : John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org wrote: The code that was taken by Debian for the fork WAS free but now it is no longer because Debian did apply changes that are forbidden by law. When will you enumerate these? Until you do, I can't see your arguments being taken seriously by anyone. As long as Debian hides related Bug reports and as long as Debian continues to publish slander against me and my software, I cannot see any will to change the current situation that is 100% a result of activities from some people that called themself Debian maintainers. Is it because is 100% a result of activities from some people that called themself debian maintainers that you came to me? Explaining the situation in more details, than I did in the open during the past years already, takes time. Please understand that I am not going to waste my time with trolls. Does it bother you that you are not going to waste your time with trolls? Debian as whole did lose any credibility because of the cdrtools attacks that have been initated by Eduard Bloch and that have been supported by other Debian people. Are you sure that is the real reason? If you are seriously interested to change this situation, give me a strong sign that there is a will at Debian to get rid of the situation that has been created by Eduard Bloch by attacking me and my projects in 2004 . When did you first know that there is a will at debian to get rid of the situation that has been created by eduard bloch by attacking you and your projects in 2004? As I mentioned already: the license change in cdrtools was a _reaction_ on the attacks run by Eduard Bloch and others. Why do you say that? The attacks from this person started in May 2004 as personal attacks and increased over time. Earlier you said is 100% a result of activities from some people that called themself debian maintainers? I understand that in bigger associations there is a higher probability to also have bad people but any assicoation needs to find ways to deal with problems that result from bad people's actions. Is the fact that in bigger associations there is a higher probability to also have bad people but any assicoation needs to find ways to deal with problems that result from bad people's actions the real reason? Are aou interested to change this situation? Maybe the cdrtools attacks that have been initated by eduard bloch and that have been supported by other debian people have something to do with this. Jörg Can you elaborate on that? -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- Jean Parpaillon - Kerlabs Engineer Bâtiment Germanium 80 avenue des buttes de Coësmes 35700 Rennes - France Tel.: +33 6 80 332 73 85 http://www.kerlabs.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#502063: ITP: conmux -- A abstracted console multiplexor
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jean Parpaillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: conmux Version : 0r2277 Upstream Author : Andy Whitcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://autotest.kernel.org/wiki/Conmux * License : GPL v2 Programming Lang: Perl Description : A abstracted console multiplexor CONMUX is a console abstractor. Presenting any console with a consistent location, naming and semantic. Access to the console, and hardreset of the machine is the same regardless of the underlying access methodology. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#496627: ITP: hpl -- High performance computing linpack benchmark
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jean Parpaillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: hpl Version : 1.0a Upstream Author : Antoine P. Petitet * URL : http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/hpl/index.html * License : 4-Clause BSD Programming Lang: C, Fortran Description : High performance computing linpack benchmark HPL is a software package that solves a (random) dense linear system in double precision (64 bits) arithmetic on distributed-memory computers. It can thus be regarded as a portable as well as freely available implementation of the High Performance Computing Linpack Benchmark. . The HPL software package requires the availibility on your system of an implementation of the Message Passing Interface MPI (1.1 compliant). An implementation of either the Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms BLAS or the Vector Signal Image Processing Library VSIPL is also needed. Machine-specific as well as generic implementations of MPI, the BLAS and VSIPL are available for a large variety of systems. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdebootstrap description
Hi, I'm using (c)debootstrap in scripts and I found that debootstrap and cdebootstrap are not options compatible. For instance, --include options are not the same: - in cdebootstrap: one --include option by additional package - in debootstrap: one --include with a list of comma-separated packages I don't mind if debootstrap and cdebootstrap are not options compatible, but this could be written somewhere as, by the function and the name, they look really similar. I'm not the only one to think about it: http://bugs.debian.org/254248 Regards, -- Mr Jean Parpaillon Engineer - Development and Support Kerlabs 80 Av des Buttes de Coësmes -- 35700 Rennes; France Tel: +33 6 80 32 73 85
Copyright question
Hi, I intend to package HPL benchmarks. Copyright file contains the following statements: -- 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions, and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software must display the following acknowledgement: This product includes software developed at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Innovative Computing Laboratories. 4. The name of the University, the name of the Laboratory, or the names of its contributors may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific written permission. I've read DFSG and I'm not sure if items 3 and 4 are problematic. Can someone help me ? If it's not ok, may it be in contrib ? Regards, Jean -- Nul ne sera condamné pour des actions ou omissions qui, au moment où elles ont été commises, ne constituaient pas un acte délictueux d'après le droit national ou international. De même, il ne sera infligé aucune peine plus forte que celle qui était applicable au moment où l'acte délictueux a été commis. Article 11.2. Déclaration Universelle des Droits de l'Homme - No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed. Article 11.2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights begin:vcard fn:Jean Parpaillon n:Parpaillon;Jean org:Kerlabs adr:;;;Rennes;;;France email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:+33 2 99 84 25 99 tel;cell:+33 6 80 32 73 85 version:2.1 end:vcard signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Question sur udev : sur quelle liste ?
Hi,
About the question itself, a devel-* list may be good, but about the
form, this is an English spoken list. Either ask your question in
English or post to debian-devel-french list.
Regards,
Jean
Le 21.12.2007 15:12, David BERCOT a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je suis hors-sujet sur ma question, mais, vu les personnes présentes
ici, je pense que quelqu'un va pouvoir m'orienter...
J'ai discuté, sur la ml user-french, de questions autour d'udev. Par
exemple, j'ai rajouté ces règles-ci :
SUBSYSTEM==sound, ATTRS{device}==0x266e, ATTRS{vendor}==0x8086,
NAME+=snd/controlC0, SYMLINK+=carte_son
SUBSYSTEM==sound, ATTRS{device}==0x266d, ATTRS{vendor}==0x8086,
NAME+=snd/controlC1, SYMLINK+=modem
SUBSYSTEM==sound, ATTRS{idProduct}==08ad, ATTRS{idVendor}==046d,
NAME+=snd/controlC2, SYMLINK+=webcam
qui me plantent Alsa.
Il semblerait que j'ai à présent besoin de discuter sur une ml moins
généraliste (ce n'est en aucun cas péjoratif pour la ml
user-french, où, d'ailleurs, j'en connais nettement moins que de
nombreuses personnes, mais peut-être que celles-ci manquent de temps),
et je ne sais pas vraiment laquelle choisir (en anglais ou en français).
Pourriez-vous m'indiquer la ml la plus indiquée pour ce genre de
questions ?
Merci d'avance.
David.
begin:vcard
fn:Jean Parpaillon
n:Parpaillon;Jean
org:Kerlabs;Support - Development
adr:;;Campus Universitaire de Beaulieu;Rennes Cedex;;35042;France
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Engineer
tel;work:+33 2 99 84 25 99
url:http://kerlabs.com/
version:2.1
end:vcard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: what happened to social contract?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 30.08.2007 18:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Quoting Maarten Verwijs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What?!?! You've sent 60+ silly posts to the devel-list and only *one* nasty reply off list!?? And people dare insinuate Debian Devs are rude. One is too many. In addition you may consider that your perception of silly may not be held by the rest of the world, and is just what it is - your perception of silly. I confirm, your post are mostly silly. If you want to participate in Debian, just do it. There are 100+ (1000+) of contributors in Debian, I think you can do it also, with good will. If you want to convince everyone here that Debian does not care about its users, post it on your blog and let us work, please. If you want to make me laugh, go on posting :-) Regards, Jean Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein - -- _ / Quand les événements nous dépassent, \ | feignons d'en être les organisateurs. | \ -+- Pierre Desproges -+-/ - \ ^__^ \ (@@)\___ (__)\ )\/\ ||w | || || -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG1vFz8P+pSEjr0u4RAoROAJ9PL5fZlTqWMtBbp69QTgKHFO4C7gCeI6jB 3tsdzbegaDlLLGI+nrilDpA= =Thht -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cmake build-depends
Hi all, I maintain the package wormux and my dear upstream devels decided to switch from autotools to cmake, for the best and the worse. Are there people with experiences with it ? Maybe kde packagers are already working on it ? As a side effect, can someone tell me if there is a command to search for packages regarding Build-Depends ? Best regards, Jean -- _ / La théorie est absurde dans la \ | pratique et la pratique est aveugle | \ sans la théorie. -+- Emmanuel Kant -+- / - \ ^__^ \ (--)\___ (__)\ )\/\ ||w | || || -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cdrtools
Hi Joerg, Le 09.08.2006 15:33, Joerg Schilling a écrit : If you don't know that you just need to use a clearly _different_ _name_ for such a fork, I can't help you. Read the preamble from the GPL to understand your fault. Beside the licensing issues, why do you care so much patched version of your software to be distributed with big WARNINGS, a different name and tutti quanti ? AFAIK, each Linux distribution have a huge bag of patches it applies on the Linux kernel and the reputation of the kernel devels is not compromised. And it's quite the same about gcc and many pieces of free softwares. Aren't you afraid that your reputation is _far_ more about the issues to ditribute your software than about the quality of your software ? Regards, Jean Parpaillon -- _ / La science a fait de nous des dieux \ | avant même que nous méritions d'être | | des hommes. -+- Jean Rostand| \ (1894-1977) -+- / - \ ^__^ \ (**)\___ (__)\ )\/\ U ||w | || || -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382195: ITP: libmtp -- Implementation of Media Transfer Protocol (MTP)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jean Parpaillon (artefact) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package name: libmtp Version : 0.0.10 Upstream Author : Richard Low [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linus Walleij [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://libmtp.sourceforge.net/ License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : Implementation of Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) libmtp is an implementation of Microsoft's Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) in the form of a library suitable primarily for POSIX compliant operating systems. It was initially based on (forked from) the great libptp2 library by Mariusz Woloszyn but has since been moved over to follow Marcus Meissners and Hubert Figuere's libgphoto2 fork of libptp2 (or is libptp2 a fork of libgphoto?). The core implementation is identical to libgphoto2, there is just a different API adapted to portable media players. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CDBS and dh_install
Uhhh, I did not want to launch such a big discussion :-) Here is my opinion (this is my first packages for Debian, and people on debian-mentors know it has not been easy to follow the whole policy ;-) - I first used a simple rules script, because I can not imagine using a wrapper while not knowing the system it is around. - But now, I use CDBS because it is much simpler to follow the policies with it, and to have good practices, ie using *.install, *.dirs, etc. files. - I can use CDBS because the upstream sources are standards. Moreover, I'm upstream devel too and I can easily fix issues in upstream rather than writing hacks in the Debian sources. To conclude, I will use CDBS because : - I know how to write a package without it - and there are no hacks in the packaging. Jean Le 10.06.2006 10:03, Loïc Minier a écrit : On Fri, Jun 09, 2006, martin f krafft wrote: This is my opinion and others will disagree: Please don't. CDBS is a major pain to use for those who didn't (co-)author it. It's just too much about obfuscation. Yeah, I and others we disagree! :) CDBS makes maintenance of some packages damn easy: most changes are done in debian/* files, where they belong. Here's some piece of pure statistics, completely biased by the fact all sources come from the same project: - we have 84 GNOME desktop packages - 71 of these are CDBS - they have an average debian/rules length of 18 lines (empty lines included, 13 lines if you exclude empty lines) Of course, the shortest code is not necessarily the easiest to read, but I don't consider these lines to be obfuscated either. They might be CDBS specific though, and require some CDBS understanding to parse. My feeling is that CDBS works best with upstream tarballs following a standard layout. CDBS pushes us into storing meta-information about the Debian packaging in separate files (debian/*.install, debian/*.examples, debian/*.docs). (Yes, this is an indirect consequence of debhelper being well thought.) The debian/rules ends up storing the _delta_ between what a normal package would do and what is needed for this particular package. But I understand CDBS can be slightly dangerous in subtle cases, and difficult to grasp the first time you encounter CDBSized packages. It's an useful evil. -- / Il y a trois types de mathématiciens, \ | ceux qui savent compter et ceux qui ne | \ savent pas./ \ ^__^ \ (xx)\___ (__)\ )\/\ U ||w | || || -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDBS and dh_install
Hi, I want to migrate my package (wormux) to CDBS. In the package.install files, path are not prefixed by debian/tmp so the building fail. It seems that I can correct this in 2 ways: - either I prefix the paths with debian/tmp - or I can set a special variable (DEB_DESTDIR, am I right ?) to debian/tmp Why do the default behaviour of dh_install is not to get files in 'debian/tmp' ? And am I right with my solutions ? Jean -- / Les petits lits font les grandes \ \ maîtresses. -+- Pierre Perret -+- / \ ^__^ \ (xx)\___ (__)\ )\/\ U ||w | || || -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CDBS and dh_install
Le 09.06.2006 13:37, Andreas Metzler a écrit : Jean Parpaillon artefact at altern.org writes: I want to migrate my package (wormux) to CDBS. In the package.install files, path are not prefixed by debian/tmp so the building fail. It seems that I can correct this in 2 ways: - either I prefix the paths with debian/tmp - or I can set a special variable (DEB_DESTDIR, am I right ?) to debian/tmp [...] Hej, I am using DEB_DH_INSTALL_SOURCEDIR = debian/tmp for that purpose. cu andreas Thanks, it works fine. But the real question is : why it is not the default behaviour ? Is it a bug in CDBS or a feature ;-) Jean -- / J'ai emprunté ma chaumière Aux puces \ | et aux moustiques Et j'ai dormi -+-| \ Issa -+- / \ ^__^ \ (..)\___ (__)\ )\/\ ||w | || || -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
