list of packages that FTBFS on i386

of the FTBFS bugs seem to occur on non i386 architectures. Since I do not have access to non-i386 machines, it will be difficult to help with those. So, I just want to stick to bugs pertaining to i386 architecture. Any ideas/suggestions? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http

Re: list of packages that FTBFS on i386

Cyril Brulebois wrote: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi raju.mailingli...@gmail.com (25/08/2010): How do I obtain a list of packages that have FTBFS bugs filed on them and that are currently failing to build on i386 architecture? https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=i386suite=unstable

Re: which gfortran version is used to compile liblapack.so.3gf.0

in the Debian testing branch, 3.2.2-1 package on i386 in the Debian sid branch thanks raju Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Is there a way to find out the version of gfortran compiler used to build /usr/lib/lapack/liblapack.so.3gf.0 in the package liblapack3gf 3.2.1-8 on i386 Debian testing machine

which gfortran version is used to compile liblapack.so.3gf.0

. thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i387e1$aq...@dough.gmane.org

default gfortran in debian

help to make this transition? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

latest sid image is broken?

the build env - removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//5515 and its subdirectories Is this a known problem? or should this be reported on BTS? If so, against which package? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http

Re: Wireless

raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

how to pass --no-ignore option to svn-import

? The --no-ignore is the usual option one passes to svn import command so as to disregard the default and svn:ignore property ignores. thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: old bugs are still shown on the bugs page

Don Armstrong wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339581 has been fixed on Apr 17, 2007. But it still shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/texmacs . Is this a bug in the BTS or am I missing something stupid? 1:1.0.6-11

old bugs are still shown on the bugs page

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339581 has been fixed on Apr 17, 2007. But it still shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/texmacs . Is this a bug in the BTS or am I missing something stupid? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http

why MIA database restricted only for DDs

raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

configure script cannot find doc/goops/Makefile.in

. Is this a bug in guile? Despite this problem, the package actually builds fine with $fakeroot debian/rules build thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures

Steve Langasek wrote: Here's the problem: value: 9007199254740991.00, floor: 9007199254740990.00 This is evidently a bug in glibc, calculating the floor() value wrong on alpha. Thanks. Reported as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442568 raju -- Kamaraju S

IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures

should not fail provided IEEE 745 standard is followed for performing floating point arithmetic. What is the status of this on various architectures (especially on alpha)? thanks in advance raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com

what happened to g77-3.4-doc?

what this option does. However, the lack of manual page for g77 prevents me understand the significance of this option. Can someone help me? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: what happened to g77-3.4-doc?

Neil Williams wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:43:23 -0400 Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Can someone tell me what happened to the g77-3.4-doc package? GFDL problems, AFAICT. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/g77/Getting-Started.html Thanks for the reply. I

transition of packages into testing

? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: transition of packages into testing

Lars Wirzenius wrote: On to, 2007-06-21 at 14:40 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: I am trying to figure out why texmacs has not entered into testing. I visited http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texmacs but there I was not able to find any useful information. All it says

Re: rampant offtopic and offensive posts to debian-user

a lot from) your posts on this mailing list. thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (OT) Re: rampant offtopic and offensive posts to debian-user

is just backing up his claims with proof/evidence whatever you may call it. I think that is a pretty neat way of doing it (especially when you are addressing to listsmasters etc., and asking for a change in policy). raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

be the correct way, but this method sure does seem inefficient and waste of resources. hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

spam from bugs.debian.org

Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)? hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http

debian tex policy

Can someone point me to a page where debian's policy towards tex is explained. In particular, should the dependencies on tetex-bin etc., be replaced with texlive etc.? Any ideas? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com

Re: debian tex policy

Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Kamaraju! On Mit, 11 Apr 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Can someone point me to a page where debian's policy towards tex is explained. In particular, should the dependencies on tetex-bin etc., be replaced with texlive etc.? /usr/share/doc/tex-common/Debian