: 4.7.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser (libraries)
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser
: 4.7.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser (libraries)
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser
: 4.6.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser (libraries)
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser
: 4.6.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser (libraries)
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I either need help with this package to have a DD who can sponsor
uploads on a regular basis or I'll be forced to put link-grammar up
for adoption, becuase lacking a sponsor I haven't gotten a new version
into the archive in ages. (Despite the fact that I've been
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 16:26 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
What has the initramfs got to do with this?
For / to be on LVM you need an initramfs. / on raid (with custom
kernel) or plain partition works without one.
I already know that,
Steffem Joeris wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:10:12 pm Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2
Package: general
Severity: normal
Something that I ran this morning decided to pollute my home directory
creating the following directories:
Desktop/
Documents/
Download/
Music/
Pictures/
Public/
Templates/
Videos/
I haven't figured out what it is yet, but Debian needs to be more
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 19:48 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 20 avril 2009 à 19:13 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
Something that I ran this morning decided to pollute my home directory
creating the following directories:
Desktop/
Documents/
Download/
Music/
: 4.3.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser
: 4.3.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser
: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
liblink-grammar4-java
Could someone sponsor the latest version of link-grammar, version
4.3.2, for which I have uploaded at
http://lingcog.iit.edu/~bloom/link-grammar/
Thanks in advance.
--Ken
--
Ken (Chanoch) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon University's
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: assogiate
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Kevin Daughtridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.kdau.com/projects/assogiate/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
uploads accompanied by binaries from the
offending archs?
--
Ken Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology.
http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/
pgpTg1xg9HOI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon University's
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon University's
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon University's
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon University's
.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon University's
to have been told. Actually, we were told
on debain-devel-announce. Writing patches is not hard. I'm not
complaining. If a change comes along, we'll write a new patch. What's to
worry about?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:53:04PM -0600, Adam M. wrote:
Ken Bloom wrote:
I noticed that glabels is broken on i386 because it's not binary NMU
safe, and someone did a binary NMU.
After poking around a bit, I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2005/11/msg0
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Ken Bloom]
$substvar{'Source-Version'}= $fi{L Version};
+#Indep-Version is for supporting binary NMUs when a strict
+#version dependancy is required against an arch independant package
+$substvar{'Indep-Version'}= $fi{L Version};
+#strip out the +bN
Ken Bloom wrote:
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Ken Bloom]
$substvar{'Source-Version'}= $fi{L Version};
+#Indep-Version is for supporting binary NMUs when a strict
+#version dependancy is required against an arch independant package
+$substvar{'Indep-Version'}= $fi{L Version
on the arch-independant packages corresponding to the
current verision of the other binary packages.
I'm not sure where to submit this, or whether there's a bug open for it
already, so I'm submitting this here.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Paul TBBle Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the one-true-stable-key idea is the way to go after all...
One key by distribution?
Well, I meant a different one for each stable, which I guess
: low
Maintainer: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
liblink-grammar4 - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for English
liblink-grammar4-dev - Carnegie Mellon University's link grammar parser for
English
link-grammar - Carnegie Mellon
the brokenness, submit the patch to bug 342892.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
not be worth the trouble to try to
fix things locally.
It's not. When querying for Call Wave remove, the top hits are on a
message from opensubscriber.com. When googling for callwave remove we
get a page on lists.debian.org:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01444.html
--Ken Bloom
--
I
, but accept the arch:all debs from
that upload?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:13:23AM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote:
Why not accept the AMD64 binaries, then dump the AMD64 binaries because
you don't know what to do with them, but accept the arch:all debs from
that upload?
Why would ftp-master want to work on special-casing
Shaun Jackman wrote:
In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
to call Azureus. This seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do, but
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Ken Bloom wrote:
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Nick Jacobs wrote:
In-Reply-To=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You mean, it's seriously been proposed that a
significant amount of work should be done to restore
support for a processor that has not been manufactured
for 10 years? While
Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 06, Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'll ask again. What would be the process for rename i386 to x86 or ia32?
Complex enough that it will never happen, so please do not waste more
time over this.
Thanks for the answer. Now everyone else can drop
it takes ot resupport i386. What kind of work would
be needed to rename i386 to x86 or ia32?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
to tell the original developers about your
improvements either, even if you are distributing the code. You can let
them search the *whole* internet to find the improvements if you want.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: link-grammar
Version : 4.1b
Upstream Author : Daniel Sleator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davy Temperley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Lafferty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
for what could be accepted and what couldn't. Hence, the DFSG.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
I'm tracking through some old bugs I submitted, cleaning up. I'd like
to close bug 256715, because jpilot and gtk-engines-smooth no longer
interact (because jpilot uses GTK+2 now). What's the appropriate
version to specify to the BTS?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature
, a couple of new members to the BTS team,
maybe some other stuff I've forgotten...
The only new stuff that seems to be documented in the help files for BTS
is the version tracking stuff. Everything else (bug subscriptions, user
tags) hasn't hit the documentation yet.
--Ken Bloom
--
I
that
actually has name recognition out there in the rest of the world, and I
don't think that we can drop it *or* rebrand it.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
to beat these bugs
into submission.
Too bad it is only an April fool joke...
Cheers,
Look again at bugs.debian.org/release-critical, or the automatic mail of
release-critical bugs that gets sent out every Friday. At the very least,
this last part is true.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have
of your normal stanza)
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
ffmpeg and OpenDivx code to en/decode MPEG4.
Solution:
the DeCSS is deleted from the package proposed for Debian
What functionality do we lose by doing this?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about
in your postinst.
When do the other 11 postinst's run?
Besides the philosophical problems with rebooting without permission,
the administrator action that you're trying to avoid will be necessary
*anyway* when he has to apt-get -f install or dpkg --configure -a the
other 11 packages.
-Ken Bloom
build-essential.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:18:49 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2005-01-11 Ken Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded to cdrecord version 2.01+01a01-2.[1] I found that with
permissions -rwsr-xr-- on /usr/bin/cdrecord [2] that I was able to
record a CD without having to become root first
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:04:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:08:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Ken Bloom wrote:
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the
ReleaseProposals topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of
speeding up the release process
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:16:49 -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
Paul van der Vlis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-04 14:40:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
I guess one man's meat is another man's poison.
Since I
release Sarge (barring any unforseen consequences). Would it be possible
to start testing this proposal out now by increasing the frequency of
dinstall, perhaps to once every 6 hours until release?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:36:11 +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the
release process by running dinstall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:34:33 -0700
Source: adjtimex
Binary: adjtimex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.18-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ken Bloom [EMAIL
Is it possible to upgrade GPM in unstable to 1.20.1 (at least) which has
been out for a long time now. It would fix a lot of brokenness in GPM.
There was a previous discussion in March about this topic, nothing ever
came of it.
55 matches
Mail list logo
