On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 08:37:14AM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Am 19.02.2017 um 07:12 schrieb Josh Triplett:
>> Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> Why not just create a ~/.thunderbird symlink to ~/.icedove if
>>> ~/.icedove exists?
>> This seems like the right solution. (Or, equivalently, rename
>> ~/.
(Please CC me on replies, as I'm quite behind on reading MLs. M-F-T
set accordingly.)
Taking this discussion out of bug#633256 and into debian-devel.
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 11:13:47PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 23:06:03 +0200 Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:04:53PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Given that there were a number (28?) sent before voting peoriod
> started, I'm not convinced that people will actually do that.
I wouldn't have expected receiving the call for votes before the
voting period starts :)
Independently
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:36:32PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:59:16PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> My main gpg public key seams to be a 1024 DSA key (1024D/9D025E87).
>> I would like to have a more robust main key. I've created to 4096 RSA
>> subkey to sign and
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:44:56PM +0100, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
>> Why? Is it really required to have _all_ questions in the postinst?
> No, not all. There are 4 questions asked.
> 1) brokers list, the list is received by the package-binary and the user
> selects te broker he wants to use. For t
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:57:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane writes:
>> While we are on the subject of ia32-apt-get, I'm not sure _what_
>> happened, but after the upgrade of ia32-apt-get 14 to 18, suddenly
>> aptitude had about 200 pac
While we are on the subject of ia32-apt-get, I'm not sure _what_
happened, but after the upgrade of ia32-apt-get 14 to 18, suddenly
aptitude had about 200 package in "upgradable" state that were not
upgradable before.
The issue is I don't remember for sure what /etc/apt/sources.list
looked like be
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:54:48PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> I'm contacting you as I got thinking about network capture and the
> security implications of that.
> What I've noticed is that Debian (still) requires the user to run
> Wireshark with root credentials in order to be able to launch a
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:36:28AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 22:31 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote:
>> I've set up a search engine which indexes Debian's source code:
>> http://walrus.rave.org/source/
> Cool - that looks really useful. However, it looks like you're jus
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to
> packages.debian.org, (...) it seems pretty clear so far that the
> domain does not get any significant amount of legitimate mail from
> machines other than the debian.org hosts.
I
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:12:59AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> The justification in the bug report is completely bogus. If the
> clients did not shut down by the time the UPS master goes down then
> you have bigger problems. Making the UPS daemon available for half a
> second more does not make s
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 09:25:59AM +0200, Luca Niccoli wrote:
> 2009/5/7 Brian May :
>> However, I very much dislike this Unix "feature" as it means mail can
>> accumulate on any {user,system} account on any computer and not get
>> noticed by the {user,system administrator}.
> Not getting mail fr
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove package cle from unstable / testing; source and
binaries. It is dead upstream (no release since 1999), and since I
uploaded it to Debian better alternatives have appeared (such as
rlwrap).
Some Debian-local work has been done in the rather di
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:44:54PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Heya, we have several packages implementing line-editing
> capabilities. I know at least 3 of them: "cle", "ledit", and
> "rlwrap", but there might be others.
Oh yes. Hmm... cle is dead upstream, rather buggy with no progress
w
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:46:19AM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Monday 06 April 2009 08:18:33 Lionel Elie Mamane, vous avez écrit :
>> My reasoning is that a package that has had only "team uploads" for
>> three years is a package where effectively no huma
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:27:53AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:18:33AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:52:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> I proposed[1] to silence the lintian NMU warnings in the case of
>>>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:52:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> In Debian we have several teams working on maintaining large numbers
> of packages (pkg-games, pkg-perl, pkg-gnome for example). I
> proposed[1] to silence the lintian NMU warnings in the case of "team
> uploads"; where the person doing
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:04:21AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> For my purposes, I would like to be able to specify “fetch from the
> VCS at $URL, getting the specific working tree referenced by
> identifier $ID” and then the rest of what uscan does for generating
> an original source archive from t
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:52:10PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I agree that some descriptions are definitely to long. I wonder who
> should really read some descriptions to the end. Bad examples can
> be viewn here:
>http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/typesetting.html
The very lon
reassign 515125 linux-2.6
thanks
Hi,
Thank you for your bug report.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:13:45PM +0100, Mark Poks wrote:
> i am not sure what exacly causes the problem. it maight be cpufreq,
> or kernel or maybe something else (or CPU Frequency Scalling Monitor
> applet in GNOME which is
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:39:58AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:03:09PM +0100, Joey Schulze a écrit :
>> The data archive will contain huge packages that cannot be distributed
>> through the regular archive due to their sheer size. (...)
> that sounds very, very inter
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 10:46:42AM +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> I have the bug report #489917 that complains that Jed can't handle
> 64‐bit kernel structures. (...) The error can be fixed by compiling
> Jed with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. Should I set this option for all
> 32‐bit builds or does it hav
(Please CC me on replies.)
Hi,
Context: bug#513898
There seem to be a few packages that install non-english documentation
in /usr/share/doc/LANG/${ll}/${pkgname}
where ${ll} is the two-letter language code and ${pkgname} the package
name. But it - by far - is not all packages that provide non-e
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:57:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Well, I haven't left, but I do far less with Debian now than I used
> to.
> It is still my preferred OS for a variety of reasons. (...)
> I get no joy whatsoever out of the current mailing list
> discussions. (...) We're here to mak
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> Ravel (...) Also, ssh logins are restricted to key based logins,
>>> password based logins are not allowed.
>> What's the reason for this authentication policy, which differs
>> from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: isabelle
Version : 2008
Upstream Author : University of Cambridge (Larry Paulson), Technische
Universitaet Muenchen (Tobias Nipkow, Makarius Wenzel)
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 11:45:49PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> * Package name: polyml
> Version : 5.2
> Upstream Author : David Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.polyml.org/index.html
> * License : GPLv2
Sorry, tha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: polyml
Version : 5.2
Upstream Author : David Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.polyml.org/index.html
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Standard ML
Description : Sta
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:45:49AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> b. Every tool sending automated mail to Debian Developers should add
>headers of the form
> X-Debian: $TOOL
> X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
>The X-Debian-Package: header can be omitted if it is not possible to
>n
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:05:06AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> As per policy 3.5 I'm bringing this up here. I'd like to add lzma to
> dpkg's Pre-Depends, so that we can use lzma compressed packages
> after lenny w/o having to add an lzma Pre-Depends on each .deb
> package compressed that way.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:19:01PM -0200, UlisesVitulli wrote:
> I've been talking with the maintainer[1] of xchat-xsys[2] (...)
> Unfortunately, my suggestion of orphaning the pkg made no difference
> to the current maintainer, as he showed no cares at all for it.
If he showed no care at all for
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:55:59PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> (...) If I'm running Debian, I know it well that I'm running Free
> Software and there's no warranty. Especially after having a wall of
> text pushed right in my face on login (by default), any subsequent
> notices are not only redu
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 07:17:44PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:16:03PM +0000, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> I fully support Guillem changes. C99 is almost 10 years old, we'
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:50:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I fully support Guillem changes. C99 is almost 10 years old, we're
> coding dpkg for Debian, in a sane C99/POSIX/X-OPEN/whatever
> environment.
Hmm... Not really. GCC's default mode is still C89+GNU extensions. It
is true that t
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:05:34AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:14:14PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> In Developer Locations page(*), it seems that Debian Developer is
>> in Antarctic Continent... awesome! Is it real??
> Not that one; someone made a sign error with hi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wordpress-fr
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : WordPress Francophone team (http://www.wordpress-fr.net/)
* URL : http://fr.wordpress.org/
* License : GPLv2,
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:17:10PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> (...) so it was
> decided to quickly upload to unstable a 2.7-0exp6 that would purposely
> FTBFS, so that the source would be in unstable, but no binaries would be
> available, effectively preventing building against 2.7. (*)
> (*
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:54:06AM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> This allows people to send bug reports to you directly using the
>> reportbug tool,
> I'd sort of assumed Maintainer was used for that !
It is, but not in a way that is useful to you, only useful for
packages in Debian proper (
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:11:24AM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Lionel Mamane:
>>> Roberto Sánchez:
One possible solution would be for Opera to produce a "source"
package of unlinked binary object files. This would allow relinking
against new versions of the libraries (at least
(Explicitly CCing Edward in the assumption he's not subscribed to this
list. The message I'm answering to is at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/09/msg00145.html . I'd like
to be CCed an followups, although subscribed.)
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
(Please CC me on replies; thanks.)
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:58:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> packages.debian.org was finally updated to the new code base that
> was already available some time from packages.debian.net.
What are "similar packages"? I'm trying wrap my head around the fa
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 06 août 2007 à 15:34 +, mathieu a écrit :
>> This will require yet another dependency to create debian: a diff
>> executable (hopefully this time there is no difference between GNU-
>> diff and BSD-diff)
> I don't un
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 07:58:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Ok, now to the approved release goals:
> - full IPv6 support
What does that mean precisely? Drop all packages that don't support
IPv6? IPv6 shall be enabled if supported not too buggily? Something in
between? (I'm quite certain you don'
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 01:36:49PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> I prefer reportbug-ng over any webinterface to recieve bug
>> reports. All the information about the reporters system that is
>> automatically gathered about architecture, package versions and
>> such.
> report
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 12:52:43AM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> When I'm locking at the BTS, (...) Not that it isn't effective, as
> when you have learned the whole system, you can query it pretty
> fast, but the threshold is pretty steep.
> (...) make it a bit more user friendly, but perhaps
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:56:02PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> * Package name: camlp4s
> * URL : http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/camlp4s/
> * License : BSD
> Question time: the license is BSD, but is not identical to the text
> I find in /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 02:23:35PM +, William Pitcock wrote:
> José Miguel Parrella Romero gmail.com> writes:
>> The maintainers of the xmms package in Debian are proposing the
>> removal of the aforementioned package. Please read on.
>> * Other distributions have already discussed XMMS remo
Package: ftp.debian.org
As maintainer of gnotepad+ (and gnotepad+-help) it is my opinion
they are past the end of their useful life and should be removed from
Debian.
1) It has some annoying bugs nobody intends to fix (78247, 97764)
2) I severely doubt anybody is using it anymore (it never achie
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:29:32PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On to, 2007-06-21 at 14:40 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> I am trying to figure out why texmacs has not entered into testing. I
>> visited http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=texmacs but there I
>> was not abl
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:33:12PM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> Even in the US all legitimate science and engineering is done in SI
> units.
Suurre... That's why in 1999 the NASA Mars orbiter didn't crash
because one (NASA) team worked in metric units and the other (private
contractor) in i
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:02:19PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:27:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> (The list of permitted characters in the policy is up to date AFAIK,
>>> except that "~" is
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:27:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Keep in mind that dpkg does not check for the validity of version
> numbers. "_" is in fact forbidden, and I believe there is a check in
> dak that enforces that.
> (The list of permitted characters in the policy is up to date AFAI
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:56:31PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
>> screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low
>>* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes.
>>* Rebuild to fix a bug
e0acebd2-71f1-4df8-ae4d-50355ad7aa81
[ 1 ] Choice 1: Wouter Verhelst
[ 9 ] Choice 2: Aigars Mahinovs
[ 5 ] Choice 3: Gustavo Franco
[ 3 ] Choice 4: Sam Hocevar
[ 4 ] Choice 5: Steve McIntyre
[ 2 ] Choice 6: Raphaël Hertzog
[ 8 ] Choice 7: Anthony Towns
[ 6 ] Choice 8: Simon Richter
[ 7 ] Choice 9:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:42:34PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 17 février 2007 à 11:24 +, BugScan reporter a écrit :
>> Bug stamp-out list for -17 06:00 ps (CST)
>> Total number of release-critical bugs: 541
> This list has become too long to be of any use to the d-d-a
> reade
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:53:25PM +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Why not just logging in to merkel and using "mia-todo needs-wat" ?
> As far as I can see right now there are plenty of people listed
> there with no packages and they can be the targets for the first
> run.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:07:28PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Is there no interest in fixing this even though there's patch(es!)?
A cursory glance suggests that code is not actively maintained (no
release since May 2005). That may be the reason the Debian bind
maintainers are reluctant to
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:31:12AM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> If memory serves, you need to edit /etc/ssh/sshd_config, uncomment
>> the "PasswordAuthentication yes" line, and reload ssh.
> With that, I only get:
> Jan 16 08:28:01 pumba sshd[24998]: Failed pas
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 01:16:24PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>> What about gender? How is it specified?
> Currently it is a drop down that allows you to choose:
> - unspecified
> - male
> - female
> Which in my opinion reflects sex and not gender.
And if it wants to cover the
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:26:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Paul Waring:
>> I've seen a lot of announcement/verification emails (such as Amazon
>> orders) which go out from an address that does not exist -
> In the SMTP envelope? I strongly doubt that.
Oh yeah, I have seen that rather o
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:19:33AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Marc Haber [Mon, Dec 04 2006, 08:51:51AM]:
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:05:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>>>On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But what about the middle case, i.e.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 06:13:38PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Please take ~/public_html into this consideration.
> ~/public_html (probably) won't work with 751,
Sure it will work. As well as ~/.plan (for finger), your own picture
for the GDM face browser, ... That's the whole point of 75
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 11:04:34PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:13:52 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> My question was wheter it would be appropriate to document in the
>> devref the choices of where the URL for a given VCS should point to
>> or
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:11:43AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMPROVE QA
> All discussion about "policy has problems" is really due to lack of
> quality assurance work that prevents non-sh-compliant scripts to
> enter into the packaging in the first
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 08:31:34PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Pan[0] is currently undergoing a major rewrite, and being the
> maintainer, I am currently considering what version of pan to
> include in etch. This mail[1] from one of the pan mailing lists sums
> up the situation quite nice
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> it's not the first time such a question is raised, I did that
>>> recently enough, for a foo-package I don't even remem
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:21:54PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it's not the first time such a question is raised, I did that
>> recently enough, for a foo-package I don't even remember (some
>> python messages that bounced to me). that is completely i
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:30:19PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> This may be a good time to remind maintainers that often a versioned
> conflict may be more appropriate than a versioned dependency.
This seems natural to me, but the policy contains this discouraging
language:
A Conflicts entry sh
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:59:21AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> accessible mail server. The point is that I only experience this
>> problem with Alioth and SourceForge lists, where they use braindead call
>> back mechanism to try and reach the
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 05:37:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Is the mailing list software on Alioth broken or misconfigured? If I
> send from any host on my network other than the one which happens to be
> the mail server, I get this error when I send to an Alioth list:
> Aug 27 17:26:48
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:10:46PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane:
>> Well, I have found one. Myself. You just have to interpret the part
>> after the second point as the integer part of an infinitesimal:
>> Let ε be an infinitesimal, that is a str
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:42:53AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 07:47:36PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:29:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> * Michael Biebl [Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200]:
that "dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '
s, etc
are particularly invited, as they seem to be caring for the package at
least somewhat.)
Get yourself an account on Alioth, I'll add you to the pkg-mailman
project and sponsor your uploads if you are not a DD.
Contact me with any question / proposition.
Thank you in advance and b
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to suggest to add the new linux version of the p2p Instant Messenger
>
> http://cspace.in
>
> to Debian.
See http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ on how to file a "Request For
Package".
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUB
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:22:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
>> Bingo: Legitimate mail slowed down. You think the price is worth
>> it, which is a valid opinion. I happen not to think so.
> The question becomes: aren't you in a small m
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mar 18 juillet 2006 10:00, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> Le lun 17 juillet 2006 22:29, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
>>> the
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le lun 17 juillet 2006 22:29, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
> the discussion (...) was about enabling greylisting on *certain*
> *specificaly* *suspicious* hosts. a suspicious
> host is:
> * either listed on
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:47:49AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 17 juillet 2006 à 22:29 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:36:31AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>>> Quoting Wolfgang Lonien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>>>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le lun 17 juillet 2006 22:29, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
>> Here is one: I am strongly opposed to greylisting (on mail sent to
>> me or that I send), for the reason that it delays legitimate mail.
> which sho
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:36:31AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Wolfgang Lonien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Do we use greylisting on the @debian.org domain and especially on
>> @lists.debian.org?
> So, up to now, we've found Thomas Bushnell who seems really hardly
> voting against greyli
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:51:17PM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> In particular, the primary question is: Who can write on
> debian-devel?
Anyone:
- interested
- that has constructive things to say, on-topic, that is the
technical development of Debian.
- that does so in a socially acce
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:48:43PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:56:52AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:28:40PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>>> This one time, at band camp, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said:
>>>&g
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:28:40PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said:
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>>> As I know it, the receiving MX connects the regular MX for the
>>> sender address to see if *that* is ready to receive
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:40:46PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> (...) they *have* to provide you with a passport. Not because it is
> a requirement, but because you have the *right* to travel abroad (at
> least it is in Spain)
That's a human right, as defined by the Universal De
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:19:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane spake thusly:
>> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated:
>>>> The US constitution appli
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:03:27PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote:
>>>> Apparently the US makes it very cle
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:03:27PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote:
>> Apparently the US makes it very clear that US Citizens are not to
>> be pestered at customs "OR ELSE".
> If only that were true. The Americans give me hell.
Joe probably meant "peste
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:07:22PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> The obvious example is the UK, which insists on checking your
> passport if you come from the mainland.
The www.britishembassy.gov.uk website suggests EEA nationals need only
an ID card.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Within the Schengen area (European Union plus Norway, Vatican,
> and... any others?), you travel between countries without even
> waving your passport at anybody.
Yes, but that's because the Schengen area is one area in this. You
stil
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure we can find official IDs that look so lame that you'd think
>>> it's a fake
> Al
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:09:07PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> (2) all mail passing through debian-private should, for each
> subscriber to the list, be encrypted individually to the public key
> on file for her/him.
> Come to think of it, (2) isn't a bad idea. Is it feasible for this
> to
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:42:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anywhere you
> have non-incompetent network management, unless you are on the
> business of selling full internet uplinks for server hosting, or you
> do business
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
>> Lars wrote:
The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not
RC? This does not fit.
>>> It violates policy, but not in a way enumerated on
>>>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> I am strongly against compressing PDFs
> To add insult to injury, PDF 1.5 introduces ``object streams'' which
> allow compressing arbitrarily long chunks of a PDF file without
> giving up the random-access properties of PDF. A
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:15:21AM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-10 23:11]:
>> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release
>> team whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch.
> I'm in favour of gcc 4.1 as it would provid
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:23:03AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:36:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>> Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel.
>>> * Your clean target was ineffective and caused a huge diff.gz
>> For 1.38 ? Yes. Can't cle
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:32:38PM -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> Sorry, I'm new to the dpkg system. I looking around on the web site
> and couldn't seem to find good docs on this specific
> issue. Appologies if I missed it.
> I want to take a Debian source package and make a few changes to do
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:07:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Having the key in the debian-keyring package was a nice idea but
>> ultimatly useless. Sarge users can't fetch the new etch keyring
>> package because the signature doesn't match and the signature
>> doesn'
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:54:57AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Wait a second. Optimizing for size should decrease speed.
>> That is the whole idea of size/speed optimization tradeoffs.
> A lot of the time the reduced ram requirement can stop swa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xchat-guile
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Zeeshan Ali Khattak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://piipiip.net/~zeenix/xchat-guile/
* License : GP
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
