On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:16:13PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:01:24AM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > packages such as diskless-image-secure, diskless-image-simple, xfsprogs-bf,
> > e2fsprogs-bf should automatically qualify for grave or even critic
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:31:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Would it be possible to also offer a compressed version of these files
> > (update_excuses.html, update_output.txt, etc)?
>
> Should be there as of now, without the etc.
Also without the .txt :)
Not Found
The requested URL /test
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:36:45AM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> I posted the following to -user three days ago with no response.
> Can someone here help?
>
> I have the following command in a cron.daily script:
> rdate time.mist.god
>
> This has worked consistently for a
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:32:34PM +0300, Pekka Lampila wrote:
> On 19.09.2001, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > The environment is unchanged, the aliases are unchanged,
>
> Actually it's not.
>
> ~/dbg$ diff env.before env.after
> 17c17
> < LINES=27
> ---
&
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:08:01AM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
[...]
> It works... Something's wrong with your system.
> Try strace'ing ls.
What terminal are you doing this in? Ie. console/xterm/gnome-terminal/etc..
Thanks,
Norbert
pgpBs3QIdao5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:53:10AM -0400, Chris Danis wrote:
> Did you check the COLUMNS environment variable?
Ahh, I missed that because its not displayed by /usr/bin/env.
> brooks% echo $COLUMNS
> 49151
Yep, I get the same value. Whats interesting is that this environment
variable is (somehow
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:58PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Try this:
> > apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
> > # actually necessary
>
> What does that do? The description for the purity package is
> quite useless.
Its a pr
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:36:24PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Maybe the first problem is due to the chroot environment.
> Anyone can confirm/infirm it under a plain install ?
I noticed this a couble of times in unstable as well. Its a problem with
dselect, not the locales pacakge. It happens
Hi,
It looks like more and more of these are popping up. It seems to me that
packages such as diskless-image-secure, diskless-image-simple, xfsprogs-bf,
e2fsprogs-bf should automatically qualify for grave or even critical bugs
for breaking your system if installed.
From the description of diskle
Hi,
This is probably the weirdest thing I've seen in debian so far.
I was able to re-produce it on my home and work machines, and a person on
irc also go the same results.
Try this:
apt-get install purity purity-off # Not sure if the -off package is
# actually n
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:12:46PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:35:05AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > Also, if a computer is running slowly, but top says the CPU has plenty
> > of idle time and free RAM, is there anyway I can find out what is
> > wrong?
>
> most likely sl
Ugh, this doesnt make sense the way it is.. :)
> What sorts of things can pam do? I only know that for example a long
^login
> program that uses PAM works regardless of weather the password file is
> shadowed or not, but can it do
On Sun, Jun 21, 1998 at 07:09:30PM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
>
> > I asked once earlier, but no one responded:
> > Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
>
> Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do
> kn
On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 10:51:55PM -0400, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
>
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As some of you might know, I have been working on full debs of netscape
> > 4.05. I have everything almost perfect, except for the reporting clause.
>
> Is there any possibility we
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Scott Hanson wrote:
> I have two bug reports of the mysql daemon seg faulting on startup on
> hamm (or mostly hamm) systems, one for the hamm package
> (3.21.25gamma-4) and the other for the more current slink package
> (3.21.30-2). I can neither reproduce
Hi.. I am the new xinetd maintainer, and I am looking for someone that is
somewhat experienced in writing perl scripts.
What I need is for someone to write (or help me write) a new xinetd
specific version of /usr/sbin/update-inetd. This is not a HUGE job, since
one only needs to adopt the existi
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 07:11:38PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hi again Norbert,
>
> just one question: do you know if xinetd will continue to listen at
> traffic in a service's port after it has already forked the server for
> that service and wait=no?
Hm it will not answer the request
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 10:59:10AM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hi Norbert,
>
> > It used to be there, but then it was rejected :) I am fixing it now as we
> > speak (along with some other fixes). It should be uploaded again by
> > tomorrow at the latest (tonight is more likely).
>
> Great, I
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 12:49:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's a typo in README.samba, though: it says
> "flag=RESUSE" when it should say "flags=REUSE". I'll test this further
> just to be sure.
flags is the correct keyword according to the xinet.conf man page, this will
be fixed in
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:16:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The bug report pretty much says:
> > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
> >
> > What I need is to
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 12:30:50PM -0400, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > The bug report pretty much says:
> > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
> >
> > What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user con
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 02:56:44PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > The bug report pretty much says:
> > xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
> >
> > What I need is to kn
> I can send you all e-mail messages I have sent and received about this
> bug, if you wish. Right now I don't have much time to re-investigate the
> bug.
Sure, that would be usefull, thanks.
pgpsFjS2YWP1P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The bug report pretty much says:
xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok)
What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration
problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 people
that use it successfully with xinetd. If some
24 matches
Mail list logo
