-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:20:06 -0500
Source: hebcal
Binary: hebcal
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaya Potter spot...@cs.columbia.edu
Changed-By: Shaya Potter spot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:33:17 -0400
Source: hebcal
Binary: hebcal
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 08:50:11 -0400
Source: hebcal
Binary: hebcal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 21:25:06 -0400
Source: hebcal
Binary: hebcal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED
http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~spotter/debian/kernel/
those are Herbert's packages, archive isn't processing yet, so can get
them from the above link.
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 17:49, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
It's clear that it's important to fix the brk vulnerability.
It is intended to release
might it be more friendly to tab'ers to rename the dir base-doc instead
of doc-base
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 02:01, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 23:11, Giorgio Mandolfo wrote:
...
I am trying not to use exclusively the simbolic link to /usr/share/doc/
but to look directly to
that just solves a single instance, most people including me are not
experts on this, and just want it to work, while I get around it by
adding a '/' at the end of doc others might be just very annoyed.
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 14:25, Clint Adams wrote:
might it be more friendly to tab'ers to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 22:24:40 -0400
Source: hebcal
Binary: hebcal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 11:02, John Hasler wrote:
Russell Coker writes:
If software can't be freely used for any purpose then it can't be
released under the GPL. The NSA assert that they have the right to
release under the GPL and that therefore the patent issues have been
dealt with.
btw, when I said stole i didnt mean it to be harsh. sorry if it came
off that way.
shaya
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 04:26, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 05:35, Shaya Potter wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:09, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 17:48, Russell Coker wrote
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 06:50, Sam Vilain wrote:
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have written SE Linux policy for administration of a chroot
environment. That allows me to give full root administration
access (ability to create/delete users, kill processes running
under
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-13
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hebcal
Version : 3.2
Upstream Author : Danny Sadinoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.sadinoff.com/hebcal/
* License : GPL
Description : A Perpetual Jewish Calendar
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:09, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 17:48, Russell Coker wrote:
I have written SE Linux policy for administration of a chroot environment.
That allows me to give full root administration access (ability to
create/delete users, kill processes running
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 23:54, Adam Majer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:50:49PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
There's more, if you replace the RH system they pre-install, you're
losing the warranty on the hardware.
Where does it say that? IMHO, that would be _very_ stupid on IBM's
I've updated my unstable galeon package with a pull from the cvs that
compiles against mozilla 0.9.7
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~spotter/galeon_1.1-1_i386.deb
wget it, dpkg -i it
it seems to work fine for me. Note that this is a cvs pull from
11am'ish EST on Dec 25th, so it could be unstable.
-Original Message-
From: John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyx is currently in contrib.
Lyx is licensed under the GPL (version 2) . It is dynamically
linked against a non-free library (libforms) .
According to the GPL and our interpretation of it in the KDE
statement, this means we
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 at 09:20:55AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
Has it been verified that lyx can't be linked against fltk?
Just try and you see it won't compile. But I have not much knowledge
about
these toolkits so maybe
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alpha 2 is released at http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/gdselect/
I was trying to compile it, had a little problem with some includes on glib,
which I overcame, but it seg faulted (or something like that, said glib
caught it) in the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Private [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, October 09, 1998 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: slashdot
John Lapeyre writes:
Something that came up in the discussion. Does anyone have any idea what
the U.S. legal system (or
On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 09:27:29PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. It's too bad that he wasted time that he could have spent
finishing _The Art of Computer Programming_ on trivia like typesetting.
It's just that he realized that typesetting isn't trivia at all, but very
interesting.
I was trying to install the updated w3-el package, but it wouldn't work
with xemacs on my machine, it seemed not to do any of the compiliation
that was done for emacs20. It also killed the w3-el that came with
xemacs. Is w3-el meant to be installed with xemacs?
Shaya
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
At 12:46 PM 6/2/98 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Shaya == Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shaya Also, linuxconf shouldn't be used to configure a user's
Shaya personal information, such as .bashrc, .pinerc, those should
Shaya be left to either the program itself like in pine
I was wondering if we have reached some sort of consesus on Linuxconf.
The points that I see are
*Linuxconf can't lose any info.
--This might mean that Linuxconf will error out if it can't parse the file,
if you've made private changes to it. That's the tradeoff, you take a risk
that you won't
Ok, I see their has been a lot of talk on if the way linuxconf does its
thing is good for debian.
first things first, a user doesn't have to use linuxconf. If a user wants
to edit the file by hand they can use the existing tools that we have. Even
those aren't perfect, if I edit my sendmail.cf
Sorry for not responding directly, I only get debian-devel-digest, so I can
only respond to what I catch.
I believe linuxconf will version every change that it makes, i.e. if you
make changes w/ linuxconf and see that it didn't work, you can go back to
your previous configuration or any one of
At 14:17 28/04/98 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which is my point on, the fact that it's a little hypocritical (not very,
but a little), for the FSF to make emacs compilable out of the box for
Motif. They would never do that for Qt, which would be free
At 13:04 27/04/98 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an aside, I am beggining to think that we need a better license,
from a legal perspective, because with all the issues of shared
libraries, essential parts, and who knows what else, if someone
would really
At 13:04 27/04/98 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you did need a special license to compile for Motif.
Good point.
which is my point on, the fact that it's a little hypocritical (not very,
but a little), for the FSF to make emacs compilable out of the box
distribute such a program.
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize in advance for anyone who thinks I'm trolling, but wouldn't that
fail the discrimination part of the DFSG?
Richard has oversimplified that clause. It really says that you can't
distribute such a binary with the commonly
At 12:08 26-04-98 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're probably thinking of xemacs.
[Or, as other people have pointed out, emacs for systems where you
don't need a special license to be legally entitled to use motif.]
But you did need a special license to
At 04:14 PM 4/26/98 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an aside, I am beggining to think that we need a better license,
from a legal perspective, because with all the issues of shared
libraries, essential parts, and who knows what else, if someone
would really
Richard Braakman wrote:
Shaya Potter wrote:
What defines a standard linux installation. Each dist. in reality is it's
own OS. Red Hat ships Motif, would it be legal for them to distribute a
GPL'd program linked with Motif, and not for debian?
The GPL specifically forbids the OS vendor from
David Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 11:49:10PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
David Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why haven't we seen this enforced, or has it happend but quietly?
I do note that there is no kemacs.., but there are things like
krpm.. hrm.. I'd have
At 09:06 26-04-98 -0400, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
My main point was this: if the GPL has this clause about the
components of a program being free, what with the large quantity of
programs being Qtized, why haven't we seen any action?
Probably because it's allowed, doesn't the FSF distribute
At 09:28 26-04-98 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 1998 at 09:06:56AM -0400, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
Linking with Motif of GPL'd software only allowed on operating systems
which get shipped with Motif as an essential part of it (like Solaris).
Which means that linking with Motif on
At 09:40 26-04-98 -0600, James LewisMoss wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998 09:52:32 +0300 (IDT), Shaya Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
My main point was this: if the GPL has this clause about the
components of a program being free, what with the large quantity
of programs being Qtized, why haven't
You should make sure that you record which -dev packages are installed. You
also might be able to set up a script that can take a list of -dev packages
from bo, and tell dpkg to install the comparable packages from Hamm.
Shaya
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word
Debian has it's newest official mirror. This one is in Korea. We now
have a mirror on the mainland of Asia (yeah, I know that
Japan in in Asia too). South America and Africa are
being difficult. It'll be really be nice when we get
our first official mirror in space though.
Anybody got connections
Last week, I posted some ideas to debian-private, however, it seems to have
been read widely, as not a lot of people have responded to it, and the
people that have, have mostly been about the language used. I am therefore
resending it, however, this time to debian-devel (which is probably more
I think pgcc should be removed from the dist. because 1) the version in the
dist is probably way out of date now, 2) because egcs probably contains
everything that is in pgcc, and 3) because no one wants to adopt it.
As I was the last/only maintainer of it, I reccomend that it should probably
be
On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Christoph Lameter:
There are just the elect few who can handle X.
This comes from the man that says it's OK to require people
to have Pentium 200's... I'm sorry, but I can't really stand
idiots, especially ones who grasp any straw they can in
On 28 Jun 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Yukhimets) wrote on 22.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd expect that to be a problem for people in both parts of Jerusalem, for
example.
I am very sorry but I just don't think that debian-devel is a proper place
to
My comment was about Israel disregard for International law, that was
inappropriate. If it has to do with computers or linux, then this is the
proper forum, else it doesn't. I didn't mean to say end the posix time
discussion, but end talking about Israel's place in politics.
Shaya
On Sun, 29
I just saw a post on this, but I deleted it. How are we suppose to use
dselect with the new dist format. I have tried many things, such as
setting the dist path to /pub/mirrors/debian/dists/unstable and using main
non-free contrib as the ones I want to get. dselect chokes on this
because the
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
It's out of question that the software is very useful. I do use it
myself (the 2.0 version that is). But we must not distribute that
version at all. I wonder if it's a good idea to distribute the old
version. I'd rather have an install package for
I got a free machine, that I can use to help the port to libc6. I have it
running libc6-dev now, and also downloaded the ncurses stuff. so if
anyone wants libs packaged up, tell me where to look, and I'll make a
non-maintainer release (with the premission of the maintainer, of course).
I would
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On 25 Jun 1997, Mark Eichin wrote:
:
: IBM developed a cypher called lucifer. The NSA examined it,
: recommended some changes to the algorithm, and the result was DES.
:
:Changes which, we now know, *strengthened* it against differential
On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
The problem with SHA-1 is that it is a U.S. Federal Information Processing
Standard, and I don't trust that the U.S. government will not place export
restrictions on it. I'm also wary of U.S. FIPS for the same reason I'm wary
about DES - various spy
On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
Sorry but I disagree here. For a user who only wants to debug his own
program debugging symbols in the libraries are not needed.
I'd prefer to have several packages: checker-bin, checker-libs,
checker-dbg or something like that. Remember, we do
In trying to compile linuxconf for libc6, I think I ran into a couple of
problems with our header files, I'll send more info later, but mostly I
needed net/if.h always with netinet/ipfw.h, i.e. linuxconf had the
#iclude for ipfw.h, but not if.h, and I got an error message of IFNAMSIZ
not defined
I don't want there to be any overlap on packaging, but I hear now that
someome else is packaging linuxconf, but I don't know who. I am (was)
packaging it for libc6, and I had to make a couple of changes because
either it's glibc support is broken or our header files are broken. I
have it using
On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Raul Miller wrote:
On Jun 6, Colin R. Telmer wrote
I just noticed that Corel is just in the process porting Wordperfect 7 to
Linux and the following is on the web page
http://www.sdcorp.com/wplinux7.htm:
Certified Operating Systems
RedHat 2.0.18
Slackware
I think one thing we need to seriously work on for Debian 2.0, is our
reputation. It seems we have a reputation for being hard to install,
even though, IMO, 1.3 was very easy to install.
Just look at this c.o.l.a announcment from tri-linux
Our most popoular CD, TRI-LINUX has been completely
I'll take a look at it, but I can't gurantee anything yet, with graduation
in 2 weeks (yea), after that when I am working full time, I actually will
have more time. Who knows, I might be able to get a Pentium pro 200, to
do some work on. Well I'll look at it tomorow after I finish with my last
Well, maybe the GPL is broken when it comes to situations like this. What
I don't understand is, if something doesn't contain any GPL'd code, how
can the GPL force me to put my product under it. So it has the interface
calls to library/.dll, copyrights don't cover how something works,
patents
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
Yes, very limiting. The code actually cannot be linked statically!
Can't be linked dynamically either... read the GPL.
I'm not sure from a copyright standpoint how that works. A copyright
means that you are protected from me using your copyrighted
On 2 Jun 1997, Mark Eichin wrote:
Now, when you link -- statically or dynamically -- you are including
portions of libc5 in your binary. This results in your binary being
Umm, no, actually -- the whole point of dynamic linking is that you're
*not* including portions of libc5 in your
The website hasn't mirrored the mailing list archive (maybe everything)
since last saturday. I checked cgi.debian.org and the lists were up to
date there.
Oh, just wondering when the search will work.
Thanks,
Shaya
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
I am almost finished with my AP's, only having Biology tomorrow. During
my free time I have thaught up a way that may allow us to use Linuxconf,
and all of it's starting/stoping features w/o replacing init. The author
of linuxconf liked the idea so it looks like we might have an easier time
This is the message I got from the developer. If you have any comments
cc: me, as I have resubscribed to the lists yet.
Shaya
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 23:37:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jacques Gelinas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
60 matches
Mail list logo
