Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: libmediawiki
Upstream Author : Team maintained; see
https://github.com/KDE/libmediawiki/blob/master/AUTHORS
* URL : https://cgit.kde.org/libmediawiki.git
* License : GPL
Programmi
Fully support Ian's proposed change.
I've been around Debian for 16 years and I STILL find this behaviour irritating
because it is contrary to my expectations.
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:26:24AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> My point was that, yes we have changed to generating relocatable code
> but that is still targetted for executables only, which preserves the
> current behavior, [...]
But something must have changed with how a static lib is now com
Hi,
I haven't been paying close attention to the "PIE by default" [1] discussions,
so I may have missed the memo, but: it seems the transition is underway?
I've seen two bugs already claiming "static library foo must be compiled with
-fPIC" -- because some reverse dependency now fails to buil
... at least not for boost.
I downloaded the latest release manually by following the links from boost.org
to https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.62.0/
boost_1_62_0.tar.bz2/download
Then I remembered that Dimitri had written a watch file to use the Files-
Excluded facility. So
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: itktools
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Marius Staring, Stefan Klein, David Doria
* URL : https://github.com/ITKTools/ITKTools
* License : Apache 2.0
Programmi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: libkgeomap
Version : 15.12.0
Upstream Author : Several; part of Digikam/KDE project
* URL : https://github.com/KDE/libkgeomap
* License : GPL v2+
Programming Lang: C++
D
Hi,
I've heard rumours that GCC 5 is coming :-)
I help maintain several C++ libraries and expect some work is required to get
through this GCC transition. I'd like to understand what I'm doing and do it
right the first time. I'm just an average C++ programmer, not an avid follower
of GCC nor
On June 10, 2015 12:26:22 AM Gert Wollny wrote:
> at least geomview is still in the upload queue [1]. It seems that the
> *.changelog file is missing. Maybe your upload didn't finish properly?
The problem turned out to be that I mistakenly used my old key. Thanks to
Ansgar for pointing me in th
Hi,
It used to be that after I "dput" an upload, I'd get an email within the hour
saying my upload was received. I have made two uploads this week but saw no
such email. I can see that the emails are still being generated [1].
This is my first upload since the last release freeze started. Ha
On April 25, 2014 11:02:29 PM Ben Finney wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 01:16:04 +0100
> >
> > Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > > I don't think that we should go and do the tedious work of repack
> > > thousands of packages because of this, with no real benefit in
On April 25, 2014 04:40:26 PM Neil Williams wrote:
> Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > part. But if the minified javascript files in the upstream tarball
> > aren't used when building the binary packages because the javascript
> > libraries are already packaged in Debian, then it isn't possible that
> >
On March 12, 2014 03:29:52 PM Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le mercredi, 12 mars 2014, 12.58:51 Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > If an interpretation of the DFSG suggests that we should be doing work
> > which does not further those objectives, then I think that
> > interpretation is a misreading.
>
> S
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 02:34:47PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> You may think a line is somewhere, but the DFSG is interpreted by the
> ftp-masters, so the question isn't what paultag or ian says, but what
> the ftp-masters say :)
I don't accept that. The interpretation must come from a conc
On March 11, 2014 10:50:10 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I'd love to see clarification of the ftp-team's position on obfuscated
> > files in source packages, preferably in an official location for future
> > reference.
Recalling that the context of th
On March 10, 2014 06:27:01 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Also, am I too pragmatic in suggesting that we should accept non-source
> files in tarballs if they are legally distributed and not used during
> the build (especially not included in the binary packages)?
I generally take that approach.
On September 21, 2013 09:04:23 PM Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Kees Cook [130921 17:08]:
> > In a theoretical sense, sure. In this particular case, why bother breaking
> > it when it's a trivial 1 line fix? My original approach was to fix it in
> > libc and do a mass bug filing. Everyone wins. If w
Philipp Kern wrote:
> Thanks for trading the R release cycle with Debian's and for
> delaying the release. The harm has already been done, so somebody
> should probably go and create a transition tracker for it?
Rather than accept the harm, surely the release team could simply roll
back the uploa
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:08:24PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> How do I disable ccache inside pbuilder?
OK, I figured this out. The workaround is detailed
in #675691.
Cheers,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 05:33:10PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >> > I'
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:54:13AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: libgmp-dev
> Version: 2:5.0.5+dfsg-2
> User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: multiarch
>
> libgmp-dev is marked as "Multi-Arch: same", but the following files
> are architecture-dependent:
>
> /usr/include/
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 01:21:57PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > I've routinely used pbuilder to build packages for years.
> > Yesterday, I have started to see the following failure:
> >
> > ccache: FA
I've routinely used pbuilder to build packages for years.
Yesterday, I have started to see the following failure:
ccache: FATAL: Failed to create /var/cache/pbuilder/ccache/0/f: Permission
denied
Any idea what's going on? Google found only one other mention of this
[1].
Thanks,
-Steve
[1] ht
Similar to a recent question from J. Berkenbilt [1], I'd like to
understand whether there is still value in producing 32- and 64-bit
variants of the GMP packages.
GMP is already Multi-Arch enabled, but it still produces a 32-bit
library for certain 64-bit architectures and, similarly, a 64-bit
lib
Hi,
I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:57:39AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 à 21:56 -0600, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
> > Naively, I don
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:47:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> But what worries me more is that you AGAIN ignored
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652681.
I was working off a rebuild of SID. Perhaps my last message didn't
clearly state that. So all the bugs reported were f
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:20:16AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > > It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
>
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 06:32:16PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 10:52 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
&
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
> > dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum seems to be able to do this: can you run
> > a rebui
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> As long as something depends on 1.46, I assume that it should be
> around. The current situation is sub-optimal, because almost everything
> depends on the non-versioned boost libs of boost-defaults, despite
> boost's tendency
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
> > to fix: either
> > (a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
>
> It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
I'll just note that an Inte
:15PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:26PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I heard of at least two failures in the last couple of hours:
> > libreoffice (#652681), and wesnoth (#652677). As such, I'd appreciate
> > if you could:
> > -
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:33:26PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 21:23:49 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Boost 1.48 was uploaded to sid about 9 days ago so it should
> > transition to "testing" in the next day
Hi,
Boost 1.48 was uploaded to sid about 9 days ago so it should
transition to "testing" in the next day or so.
My plan is to update the default boost version to 1.48 immediately
following this transition.
I'd appreciate feedback on any build failures with 1.48 for
boost-using packages.
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:06:58PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> The main culprit behind the resource usage is the wrappers for Tcl,
> Java, and Python. The underlying ITK codebase consists of heavily
> templated C++ libraries. The wrapping process generates a huge amount
> o
Hi,
I am having a huge problem getting insighttoolkit (ITK) to build due
to the fact that it takes a huge amount of disk, memory, and time to
build. In fact, the build is now generally failing because either
disk or memory is exhausted.
The main culprit behind the resource usage is the wrappers
Tollef,
> ]] Ben Finney
>
> | Neither the VCS repository link nor the VCS browse link work for
> | http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/comixcursors.html>.
>
> These have been fixed now.
>
> | The VCS browse link doesn't work for
> | http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lojban-common.html>.
>
> Ditto.
Gr
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:25:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Le 04/05/2011 07:42, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
> > > P.S. I tried rebuilding glibc myself locally, but gcc also segfaults
> > > in t
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 01:34:15PM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> And furthermore, even if Debian chooses to "fix" this, upstreams will
> be forced to eventually cater to the default glibc behavior for every
> other libc distro out there that does not have their own "fix" (and
> non-libc OS's where t
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:29:50PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm with Linus on this: let's just revert to the old behaviour. A
> > tiny amount of clock cycles saved isn't worth the instability.
>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:10:48AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Sounds like http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518
> which is fixed (sort of) by commit 0354e355 (2011-04-01).
Oh my word. So glibc 2.13 breaks random binaries that happened to
incorrectly use memcpy() instead of me
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:55:34AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" writes:
>
> >> As I've come to understanding, nowadays many libraries doesn't allow
> >> trivial static linkage,
> >
> > I don't follow; i
> As I've come to understanding, nowadays many libraries doesn't allow
> trivial static linkage,
I don't follow; it's generally as simple as using -static on
the link line. Pretty trivial.
> and that it's generally not recommended to
> link statically in packages.
That is completely separate f
Hi,
I'm cc-ing to debian-devel since I expect others are wondering about
the Boost status.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> 1.42 still appears to be the latest version available in Debian (unstable).
> Could 1.46.1 be uploaded?
I assume you're
Hi,
The buildd system is generally quite fabulous, but why does
https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=insighttoolkit show version
3.8.0-1? This version is neither sid, not stable, nor oldstable.
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 604479 + help
thanks
The Debian Qt/KDE team is planning to remove the KDE3 and Qt3
libraries from Debian shortly. The package kseg uses Qt3 presently
and needs to be modified to build with Qt4.
I'm not actively using kseg and don't have time to spend modifying
it. I'm looking for someone t
I uploaded insighttoolkit the other day, but the buildd machines
refuse to build it, claiming an installability problem [1]:
insighttoolkit/alpha dependency installability problem:
insighttoolkit (= 3.20.0-8) build-depends on one of:
- python-vtk (= 5.4.2-8)
This is repeated for all ar
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:53:34AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:17:35 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > Suddenly, I can't apply my quilt patches:
> >
> > steve@riemann{insighttoolkit-3.20.0}quilt push -a
> > Applying patch metai
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:15:12AM +0100, Ga?tan Lehmann wrote:
>
> Steve, Luis,
>
> Splitting ImageToImageFilterB into smaller modules seems to be the
> way to go in ITK v3. The attached patch should help!
Thanks, Gaetan! I'm building ITK with this patch now for upload
to Debian so we'll know
Hi,
Suddenly, I can't apply my quilt patches:
steve@riemann{insighttoolkit-3.20.0}quilt push -a
Applying patch metaio-test-vtk_source.patch
patch: unrecognized option '--unified-reject-files'
patch: Try `patch --help' for more information.
Patch metaio-test-vtk_source.patch does not app
Hi,
The Debian build of ITK 3.20.0 fails to build on the powerpc
build daemon [1] with the diagnostic:
[ 23%] Building CXX object
Wrapping/WrapITK/Modules/Base/CMakeFiles/_BasePython.dir/wrap_itkImageToImageFilterBPython.o
cd
/build/buildd-insighttoolkit_3.20.0-6-powerpc-m2NGDH/insighttoolkit-
Hi,
I've recently adopted a package (nyquist) that only builds in 32-bit
mode. I'm struggling with supporting it on amd64 and other 64-bit
architectures in Debian.
First: yes, clearly the code should be migrated to 64-bits. Upstream
is aware of that and it's a nontrivial effort. I'm interested
Hi,
This release update announced:
As hinted in the previous release update, now is the time to
decide exactly what is going in to squeeze and what isn't. Here's
what we're going to propose regarding the remaining RC bugs.
We'll be working against the list of RC bugs affecting S
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: elastix
Version : 4.4
Upstream Author : Stefan Klein and Marius Staring
* URL : http://elastix.isi.uu.nl/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : toolbox
The list of RC squeeze bugs in the UDD http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi
is growing alarmingly. However, I found one that doesn't seem like
it belongs there so I'd like to ask what to do about it.
Bug #557495 describes an undeclared conflict between packages:
libctapimkt0-dev/1.0.1-1
libtowit
Hi,
I just received notice (bug 603579) that upgrade lenny to squeeze will
break if a boost package containing an "rtupdate" script is installed.
In stable there are four such packages:
libboost-python-dev
libboost-dbg
libboost-python1.35-dev
libboost1.35-dbg
The issue is that the rtupd
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:34:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:26:39 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > So I looked at [2], clicked through to the Universal Debian Database
> > [3], selected Sort By "last modified", and clicked Search
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 04:49:04AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Squeeze Release
> ===
>
> The monthly RFH section is once more for the Squeeze Release. Trying to
> read Release Team minds, I get something like: ? the RC bug count [1] is
> proceedings in the right direction,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:25:50PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the same issue with ca-certficates-java and pbuilder, but after
> re-create base.tgz, it has gone away. Could you try to do that, please?
Thanks for the tip! Indeed, re-creating base.tgz using "pbuilder
--create" di
Hi,
I was working on gmp and insighttoolkit packages today and ran into
two new behaviours of svn-buildpackage that are very annoying. I
checked the obvious candidates that I could think of
(svn-buildpackage, pbuilder, dpkg, devscripts) but didn't see any
recent changelog messages that appear ala
More information ...
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:54:22PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > failed (VM used: java-6-openjdk).
> > dpkg: error processing ca-certificates-java (--configure):
> > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> >
pbuilder itself or a third
package. Has anyone else seen/solved this?
Thanks,
-Steve
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:24:51PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Package: ca-certificates-java
> Version: 20100412
> Severity: important
>
> I routinely build insighttoolkit using pbuilder. Ins
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: mriconvert
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Jolinda Smith joli...@uoregon.edu
* URL : http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Steve M. Robbins"
* Package name: insightapplications
Version : 3.20.0
Upstream Author : The Insight Consortium and Contributors
* URL : http://itk.org/ITK/resources/applications.html
* License : BSD (http://w
Hi,
The insighttoolkit package is a large and active code base. They use
a system of nightly build/test on a variety of machines [1] to ensure
that the code works on all supported platforms.
I run a build on my amd64 machine -- configured as the Debian ITK
packages -- to expose issues early.
Hi,
The discussion surrounding why aptitude is priority 'important' [1] is
very enlightening. Thanks to all contributors.
With respect to the priority of libboost-iostreams, the consensus
seems to be to raise it.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 02:18:52AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [ ... ] on ba
Folks,
The package "aptitude" is priority "important" and depends on
libboost-iostreams, which is "optional". This is a violation of
Policy section 2.5.
The request of Bug #588608 is to raise the priority of
libboost-iostreams to "important". Reading Policy, I note that
"important" means:
I'm a little alarmed at the attitude that "no one cares about static
linking" so that it's okay to drop the .a files. Likely relatively
few people care, but there are some that do.
One example is scientific users that need to ensure reproducibility of
computer experiments [1] over many years: one
Paul,
I read through the links you provided. There was a cogent argument
against using flags to symbolize a language. I would accept that.
However, while I understand your argument about losing contributors,
I'm not completely convinced that using a flag chosen by country X to
represent country
Hi,
The "links" box of the PTS used to have a link to the experimental
buildd logs. I think I used it last week but today it is not
there; c.f. http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gmp.html
How can I see the logs?
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Upstream released a new GMP version 5.0.0 with a scary-sounding
caveat:
The 5.0.0 release contain a very large amount of new code, and
countless improvements to existing code, please see below for the
complete list. No past GMP release has contained more new code
than 5.0.0. Most
Hi,
I agree with Charles: this is unncessary, unproductive busy-work.
On the other hand, Section 10.4 says only "the script name should not
include an extension". So you can leave the extension for
compatibility with the rest of the world. It is a bug, but Section
1.1 says:
Non-conformance w
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd appreciate someone to help with maintenance of geomview.
The package description is:
Geomview is interactive geometry software which is
particularly appropriate for mathematics research and education.
In particular, geomview can display things in hyperbo
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> >> Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
> >
> > I believe this is a
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:08:02AM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> -
> The Debian Project http://www.debian.org/
> Debian adopts time-based release freezes pr...@debian.org
> J
I use b...@packages.debian.org to contact the maintainer of "blah". I
use this to alert maintainers of reverse build-deps when I do
something drastic to one of the libraries I maintain.
I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
practice for this scenario?
Thanks,
-Steve
si
Is the NEW queue going to get processed any time soon? There are 215
packages waiting [1] about half of which have been there 3 or more
weeks.
Last time I asked [2], the result was a large thread discussing what
manual work is done in processing NEW. I suggest reading through that
thread before
Hello,
Is the NEW queue going to get processed any time soon? There's a load
of packages that are 3 weeks or more old.
Thanks,
-S
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:04:46PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Steve M. Robbins [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:06 -0500]:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
> > (or maybe build date). However that is no longer the cas
Hi,
Is there a canonical list of symbols defined by each of the
Debian architectures, e.g. do I test for Sparc using
__sparc or __sparc__ ? How about m68k, hppa, etc?
My first guess was that would be contained on http://ports.debian.org/
but no such luck.
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Descri
I have two systems. Both track unstable, and have package
locales at version 2.0.16.
On one system, package locales owns /etc/default/locale, on the other,
it doesn't. Should the file be owned by locales or not?
Could the situation arise by upgrades? One system is 4 years old
(upgraded weekl
Hi,
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since
the latest build is buried in other output.
Thanks,
-Steve
[1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.
Hi,
The Policy Manual [1] gives the following recipe for supporting
parallel make:
ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
MAKEFLAGS += -j$(NUMJOBS)
endif
Unfortunately, for packages that use recursive m
Hi,
I need some help packaging Tcl language bindings for ITK [1]. I've
read the policy (in package tcl-doc) but I'm not sure whether
I'm doing the right thing.
I am essentially tcl illiterate, so please explain things in full.
Examples help.
ITK generates about 9 shared libs and 4 .tcl files, i
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:15:39AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > My headache now is that there are 13 -dev packages in Boost. One
> > (libboost1.35-dev) contains 60+ header-only libraries, while the
> >
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:22:24AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > In contrast, the alternative strategy of having all the libfoo-dev
> > (1.34.1) packages conflict with libfoo1.35.0-dev packages
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:43:35PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:20:39PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>
> > I think new and separate boost-1.35 package is the best option we have:
> >
> > 1. It may be uploaded now and released wit
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:53:35PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> If we do decide to have co-installable -dev packages, the next
>> question is how do we handle the current non-versioned includes and
>> link libraries? Do we follow what gcc and p
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:20:39PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> I think new and separate boost-1.35 package is the best option we have:
>
> 1. It may be uploaded now and released with lenny without touching
> any reverse dependency
> 2. Never more huge transitions, reverse dependencies
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Package: boost
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> > Boost 1.35 has been released and contains great enhancements. Could you
> > please update the Debian package?
>
> Seconded--I've bee
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 07:38:14PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 05:22:45PM +0000, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A new version (1.35) of the Boost library collection was released
> > yesterday. I'd like to get it package
Hello,
A new version (1.35) of the Boost library collection was released
yesterday. I'd like to get it packaged for Debian ASAP. The question
is: whether to simply replace the existing version (1.34.1) as we have
always done, or to have the old and new both available in the library?
In the past
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:28:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:18:24PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> I don't think it makes sense to include in common-licenses something
&g
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:59:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:56AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > Git repos are not relevant here.
>
> they are fucking important, but it seems that the firewire
> lib maintainers are quite
**NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE**
The boost library short name has changed semantics in Debian. Prior
to 1.34.0-1, the short name was multi-threaded. Now it is single
threaded.
**NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE** **NOTE**
Hello,
A new versio
Hi,
I need some guidance from library packaging gurus.
Libsoqt is a library that is currently linked with Qt3. I've had a
request to rebuild it with Qt4 instead (#415382) which can be done by
simply changing the configuration.
Can I simply upload the reconfigured shared library package, which
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:40:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
> > dependencies that "apt-get install&q
Hi,
How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
Below, you will see that my attempt to install libipe1c2a claims to
have three unmet dependencies. However, as you see by "dpkg --list",
I *do* have these three packages at
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:48:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Discussed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01173.html
There's not a lot of discussion there -- just an announcement really.
> With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the 'long double'
> data type did change
Hi,
I have another "wishful thinking" idea for build machines to float.
Suppose I get a bug report saying my package has failed to build on
architecture glooble. I don't personally have a globle machine. To
debug the problem, I need to fire up www.debian.org/devel, find the
link to the list of
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
