On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Michael Biebl
>
>> Am 01.07.2014 19:53, schrieb Steve Langasek:
>> > new init. But the systemd maintainers are anxious to update to a newer
>> > version in unstable, and while there are plans in Ubuntu to make
>> > systemd-shim support t
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:08:59PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> Somewhere in another universe, someone proposed moving Developer's
>> Reference to the wiki. One of the arguments was that it would let
>> you make changes _quickly_. I'm shamelessl
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> > 212 was released in March. Why not package that?
>>
> Not having been there, I would guess that packaging 208 had already begun
> before the sprint, and thus should be completed and reasonably bug-free
> before going forward to
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Michael B. also updated systemd to 208 in experimental.
212 was released in March. Why not package that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [KEY-PACKAGES]
>> http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
>
> If you're curious, as I was, how this list is arrived at, here's the
> source:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-qa/udd.git;a=blob;f=sc
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 16:33 +0200, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Quoting "Charles Plessy" :
> >> I think that it would help to understand that the package contains if the
> >> acronyms ERP, CRM, POS were expanded (and maybe also GUI and *-RPC).
> >
> > I thought e
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 08:35 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> I don't think we need another tool for this.
Maybe it's better than them in some way (not necessarily overall), which
in my books would make it good enough, meaning *we need another tool for
this*.
> And I don't think such basic tools shoul
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 13:02 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Ok, I didn't see that this ITP already had a discussion. However there are
> three minor and subjective issues that I have with this ITP:
>
> - It's not really in the spirit of Open Source of Free Software to start a
> new
> project, if th
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 18:02 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I cannot speak for others, but I don't wait 3 years. I do
> regular updates/upgrades to include the most recent security
> and bug fixes. We've scheduled regular maintenance weekends
> every 3 months for this. Important updates are installed
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 08:29 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 06/04/11 19:01, Neil Williams wrote:
> >
> > Testing compatibility is the larger problem. Automated tests can only
> > go so far. Dependencies are one thing, bugs which arise because one
> > setup is using a version which h
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 16:16 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:54:00PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:10 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > > (Provided that said action does not cause unwanted side effects, like
> > >
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:54 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 06/04/11 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org?
> >
>
> Backports for Squeeze contains just about 400 package,
> AFIACS.
Would this be good enough for you if there were thousands of packages
i
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:10 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> (Provided that said action does not cause unwanted side effects, like
> the documentation being out of date, because upstream forgot to
> regenerate them before distribution - but that falls under the "upstream
> to not be a moron" above ;)
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:51 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 21.05.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> > > >
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
> > >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Ben
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:15 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:55, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
> wrote:
> > It was kind because the info was offered, but it was unkind because the
> > guy was ridiculed.
>
> you should stop speculating what others want to s
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 21:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:39:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 13:00, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
> > wrote:
> > > You are sharing good info, but you could have been more kind.
>
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 08:31 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 00:10, Erik de Castro Lopo
> wrote:
> > Is anyone looking at getting the latest version of darcs into unstable?
> >
> > If not, I will have a crack at it.
>
> Why didn't you ask its maintainers (or at least cc them)?
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 14:54 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 02:39 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > I was responding to someone who said I 'supported' inclusion of proposed
> > package.
>
> Ah, I misunderstood. My apologies.
Welcome.
> > Yea
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:56 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> We can stop CCing the bug# now, as this subthread is apparently no
> longer about the ITP itself, but about "proper" conduct in discussing an
> ITP.
>
> On 05/06/2011 01:39 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:03 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2011 19:39:26 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > > On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > > > Q: How many content man
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need?
> > A: How about zero?
> >
> > Not exactly helpful.
>
> When develop
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:29 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23:50 AM Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote:
> > Programming Lang: PHP
> > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building
> > and maintaining a dynamic website
>
> How many content management syst
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:00 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 10:49 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > What's up with the hate? It's always convenient to have a package in
> > Debian, instead of hunting for it upstream. If it rots in Debian, then
> > it
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 06 mai 2011 à 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> > On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote:
> > > Programming Lang: PHP
> > > Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 04:05, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since there has been a lot happening in the Debian Multimedia world
> during the Squeeze release, so we figured we should give you an update
> on that.
Thanks for this (excellent) update. The team has been so quite that
I've wondered
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
> wajig (U)
Can someone help me. I don't understand what the problem here is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/wajig.log
--
blog: http://tshepang.tumblr.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:34, Ben Finney wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
>> with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding
>> the computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs.
>
> Rather than RC (which is only about whether the severity of the bug is
> suffi
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:58, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:40:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>> with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
>> computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
>> the influence of this bug migh
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 15:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 11:17 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
>> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
>> > spend 5 minutes to configu
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 13:03, Ben Finney wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen writes:
>
>> ]] Sebastian Otaegui
>>
>> | * Avoid aliases forever! Lamson uses friendly regular expressions
>> | and FSM-based routing.
>>
>> What does the flying spaghetti monster have to do with email routing?
>
> You
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Sami Liedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (NOTE: Am I the only one who thinks descriptions, especially short
> descriptions as in phenny, usually shouldn't tell what language was
> used to implement the program? It's just not relevant to the user.)
Me agrees. Looks
Anyone out there?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On dim, 2008-03-30 at 16:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Things I want to se
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On dim, 2008-03-30 at 16:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Things I want to see use triggers, in approximate priority order:
> >
> > - scrollkeeper
>
> It will probably be deprecated soon, so I don't think it is necess
On 10/16/07, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
> following bdb versions installed:
>
> version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
> libdb4.2 40
> libdb4.3 26
> libdb4.4 55
> libdb4.5 64
> libdb4.6
On 4/23/07, Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2007 12:58, Alan Ezust wrote:
> let's say you need to build from source a program such as "gimp" which has
> many library dependencies. You don't know what they are, and you want
> debian to auto-install the -dev packages you
On 4/23/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway, doubling the size of the archive is less of an issue than it
might have been in the past, since we've done the archive split, and
since ftp-master has 1.4 Terabytes of disk with half that unused, but
it is still a concern, for mirrors, numb
On 4/17/07, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
then we had the result of the Debian Project Leader election. For the
second year running, I came second in a close decision[7] (boo!
*grin*), this time to Sam Hocevar instead of AJ. Congratulations to
Sam, and I wish him all the best for his
On 4/12/07, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looking at the submission numbers from
http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
submissions collected by popularity-contest, with the increment. I
On 4/10/07, Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:40:27AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 4/10/07, Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >I work in a science lab and can tell you that even though we do hav
On 4/10/07, Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:00:08AM -0700, Sean Perry wrote:
> I haven't seen much Debian in the last 6 years in the commercial
> world. RH rules that roost. If people have chosen closed source, then
> they likely are also paying for an
On 2/20/07, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 09:30, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Why the gratuitous insult to Indian and Indians here? Or do
> > you think only one country has people who deserve pity? there are
> > no unfortunate p
On 2/9/07, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Pretty surprising. Was there a discussion in which this decision was
> made or is this just the assumed position?
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/12/threads.html#0013
Hi,
The useful bjorn,haxx.se/debian lists nearly 2000 packages trying to
enter Testing which keeps on growing these days due to manual hinting
of course. By I actually wonder if the release team is able to keep
up. I know there's certain kinds of packages never meant to reach
Testing, but is ther
On 2/9/07, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> It's been a while since someone mentioned removal of gst0.8 and py2.3
> and wonder what's going on.
Concerning GStreamer 0.8, teatime, goobox and muine remain rdeps in
Hi,
It's been a while since someone mentioned removal of gst0.8 and py2.3
and wonder what's going on.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/5/07, Maarten Verwijs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
So as far as I'm concerned: Etch is ready to go!
Thanks for all the hard work! Debian is still the one and only
distribution for me. It Just Works. Thanks for your efforts.
Heroic distro, lovely testimony...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On 1/2/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not have an
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not have an extra /usr/share/doc/$source-name directory in case a
> binary package of
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I find it wasteful to install the same changelogs (both Debian and
> upstream) in binary packages which share the same sources. Why not
> h
Hi,
I find it wasteful to install the same changelogs (both Debian and
upstream) in binary packages which share the same sources. Why not
have symlinks in place of these and perhaps an extra /usr/share/doc
directory named the same as the source package in case a binary
package of the same name do
Hi,
Could we have something like this after release:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Max Spevack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 16, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: FC6 downloads and installs
To: fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
Pardon the widest possible distribution, but I hope that people
On 9/26/06, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi everybody
I just now notice the debate on mplayer going on;
so here are a few answers
[snip: mplayer is okay to go in]
I don't know if this is answered elswhere, but how come it is still
stuck in NEW?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On 10/19/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Waw, actually, i was trying to be less aggressive...
Anyways, since I'm too pissed and since I see no reason to put myself in
that mood any further, I'm taking a few days off Debian, which means my
current work on seamonkey^Hiceape will be on h
On 10/19/06, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Aurelien Jarno]
> I have just run lintian on all the archive (amd64) for both binaries and
> sources, and the results are a bit scary. It looks like a lot of
> maintainers are uploading their packages, and don't really care with the
>
On 10/10/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current plan is to ship GNOME 2.14 in etch [1]. This was a hard
decision to make, but we prefer shipping a rock-solid and polished 2.14
version rather than a buggy 2.16 version with which Ubuntu is having
many issues.
[1] http://oskur
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with th
On 7/15/05, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I previously had xorg from Ubuntu installed, and upgrading from
> that to Debian's xorg _didn't_ go smoothly: the file "/etc/X11/Xsession"
> was created by two packages, x11-common [debian], and xorg-common
> [ubuntu], and in upgrading tri
59 matches
Mail list logo
