retitle RFP: caja-extensions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Control: retitle -1 RFP: caja-extensions -- extensions for Caja file manager adding extra-functionality Hi, Please accept my apologizes for my mistake by sending an incorrect RFP for caja-extensions Descriprion and correct it with the following

Bug#727051: ITP: mate-dialogs -- Display graphical dialog boxes from shell scripts

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vangelis Mouhtsis vange...@gnugr.org * Package name: mate-dialogs Version : 1.6.1 Upstream Author : Stefano Karapetsas stef...@karapetsas.com * URL : http://www.mate-desktop.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C

Bug#726397: ITP: libmateweather -- MateWeather shared library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vangelis Mouhtsis vange...@gnugr.org * Package name: libmateweather Version : 1.6.1 Upstream Author : Stefano Karapetsas stef...@karapetsas.com * URL : http://mate-desktop.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C

Bug#726405: ITP: libmateweather -- MateWeather shared library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vangelis Mouhtsis vange...@gnugr.org * Package name: libmateweather Version : 1.6.1 Upstream Author : Stefano Karapetsas stef...@karapetsas.com * URL : http://mate-desktop.org * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C

pidstat

Dear Developers, How this package, named pidstat works on Debian? or i'm looking for ghosts? http://linuxaria.com/howto/linux-terminal-pidstat-know-everything-about-your-processes?lang=en Thanks in advance gnugr --

[SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - skipping pointless delay

Hi, I'm wondering, before a package will be orphaned is it possible/ needful the owner to ask for help or to express the reasons? Regards gnugr

orphaned packages

Hi, Can please someone explain why a package should be orphaned from maintaining? (i hope the reason is not lack of maintainers) regards gnugr