Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
On 24 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What don't you put a personal server while we wait for them? or in experimental? (a personal server would be better). If you just want a packaged beryl, the Beryl project have packaged it. deb http://debian.beryl-project.org etch main deb-src http://debian.beryl-project.org etch main Import keys as usual and install. -- Alok Adopted kids are such a pain -- you have to teach them how to look like you ... -- Gilda Radner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
I've stopped Beryl for now since they are officially merging with compiz. I need to speak to the compiz maintainer. I have 0.2.1 in a local git repository but im likely just going to chuck it out. With the merge its moot now. - Original Message From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Anibal Avelar [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-devel@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 5:38:39 AM Subject: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages? On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. Upstream is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain these will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon). From their homepage: Mar 14: 0.2.0 Released But they also already have 0.2.1 versions available. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
Hi. On 4/23/07, Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've stopped Beryl for now since they are officially merging with compiz. I need to speak to the compiz maintainer. I know something about this. Do you know is officially? The compiz and beryl teams has problems with this process (was the last notice I knew, but I don't follow the process). What don't you put a personal server while we wait for them? or in experimental? (a personal server would be better). If both projects joins but you don't upload them in unstable, but while we can have beryl, I like beryl than compiz due to the beryl-manager ;) Regards -- Anibal Avelar (FixXxeR) http://fixxxer.cc GPG: 83B64656 - C143 4AD8 B017 53FA B742 D6AA CEEA F9F3 83B6 4656 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:55:47 -0500 Anibal Avelar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If both projects joins but you don't upload them in unstable, but while we can have beryl, I like beryl than compiz due to the beryl-manager ;) I guess beryl-manager will be merged as well (probably renamed). -- KiyuKo eof AT kiyuko DOT org Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected. pgpucz84GoT0h.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. Upstream is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain these will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon). From their homepage: Mar 14: 0.2.0 Released But they also already have 0.2.1 versions available. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
