On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:57:31AM -0700, Alan Ezust wrote:
> Subject: apt-get -y upgrade for non-interactive sessions - and replacing conf
> files in /etc
>
> Hi - i was wondering, I'm trying to run apt-get upgrade in a
> non-interactive shell.
> I passed -y as an option, and then during the po
also sprach Alan Ezust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.06.0017 +0200]:
> Yes, I see it is indeed only prompting me for conffiles that I
> manually modified. In my particular situation, and I realize this is
> unusual/dangerous, I still would like to to clobber my handmade
> changes with newer versions
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 03:17:12PM -0700, Alan Ezust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 7/5/07, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alan, you know that it should only be prompting you on conffiles you
>> actually
>> modified? Do you really want those overwritten?
>
> Yes, I see
On 7/5/07, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05-Jul-07, 14:06 (CDT), Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Do den 5. Jul 2007 um 20:57 schrieb Alan Ezust:
> > I passed -y as an option, and then during the postinst, I have a
> > situation where the package has a configuration f
On 05-Jul-07, 14:06 (CDT), Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Do den 5. Jul 2007 um 20:57 schrieb Alan Ezust:
> > I passed -y as an option, and then during the postinst, I have a
> > situation where the package has a configuration file which is newer
> > than what it is about to replace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Do den 5. Jul 2007 um 20:57 schrieb Alan Ezust:
> I passed -y as an option, and then during the postinst, I have a
> situation where the package has a configuration file which is newer
> than what it is about to replace. I would like it to just rep
6 matches
Mail list logo
