[RFC 822 says there's no net-wide standard HTAB size]
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999 at 04:09:01PM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
That's what makes it a de-facto standard.
No, that does not make it a standard of any kind - in fact, it
suggests that not even a de facto standard existed. A de facto
standard
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 10:26:06PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 02:36:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 06:10:09PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Well, maybe. I find config menus to be infuriating. elm's config files
don't seem to have an
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 08:57:07PM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
The de-facto standard Internet tab size has always been 8 characters.
Always? The 1982 standard for ARPANET¹ email (RFC 822) explicitly
states in Section
hi
Ship's Log, Lt. Bruce Sass, Stardate 170199.0055:
number of bugs in ...elm-me+ pinemutt
---
[...]
--- --- ---
2 5 44
Which one(s) would you look
On Jan 17, Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would go for mutt, because it means people are actually using it and
finding the bugs. (AND the bugs are going to be fixed, 12+3=15 resolved
bugs in the last 28 days).
And many of those bugs are feature requests.
After adopting mutt in
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 08:57:07PM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
The de-facto standard Internet tab size has always been 8 characters.
Always? The 1982 standard for ARPANET¹ email (RFC 822) explicitly
states in Section 3.4.2 that there is no nework-wide standard tab size
and so the use of HTAB
6 matches
Mail list logo
