* Paul Wise [Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:29:10 +0900]:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I’m told libbfd.so is a private/internal library of binutils that should
> > not be dynamically linked against. A static version exists (libbfd.a),
> > and packages should be using that AFAI
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> I’m told libbfd.so is a private/internal library of binutils that should
> not be dynamically linked against. A static version exists (libbfd.a),
> and packages should be using that AFAIK.
>
> Cc'ing -devel in case there’s a reason it should
Hello,
> Looks like oprofile needs a rebuild .
> $ opreport
> opreport: error while loading shared libraries: libbfd-2.18.0.20080103.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> $ dpkg -L binutils | grep libbfd-
> /usr/lib/libbfd-2.19.1.so
I’m told libbfd.so is a private
3 matches
Mail list logo
