Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 22:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I do not see any reason for waiting instead of sending the binNMU  > request right now. I didn't see any movement on the dpkg front so I went ahead and did so: #843139. Thanks, Ian.

Lua [Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:54:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > LUA The language is named "Lua", which means "moon" in Portuguese. https://www.lua.org/about.html#name LUA is an acronym for "Lua Uppercase Accident" ;-). Peter

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:23:51PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi Ian, > > 2016-10-31 14:19 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : > > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:17 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : > >> > If possible I'd also prefer a

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

Hi Ian, 2016-10-31 14:19 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:17 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : >> > If possible I'd also prefer a solution which fixed qcontrol-static >> > without opting out for the normal

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:17 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : > > If possible I'd also prefer a solution which fixed qcontrol-static > > without opting out for the normal dynamic/non-udeb binary. > > I ran the build tests on amd64, this is

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

2016-10-31 12:52 GMT+01:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh : > On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:27 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie >> > ? >> >> Thanks, but that doesn't appear to help, I think the

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:27 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie > > ? > > Thanks, but that doesn't appear to help, I think the issue is to do > with the changed default in gcc rather than the hardening

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

Hi Ian, 2016-10-31 10:38 GMT+01:00 Ian Campbell : > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:27 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie >> ? > > Thanks, but that doesn't appear to help, I think the issue is to do > with the changed default in gcc rather

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:27 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie > ? Thanks, but that doesn't appear to help, I think the issue is to do with the changed default in gcc rather than the hardening settings injected into the build by

Re: Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

VW_ABS_NC against `luaO_nilobject_' can not be used > when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > > I've checked the wiki and the recent '"PIE by default" transition is > underway -- wiki needs updating' thread on d-devel but I'm none the > wiser on what my next co

Static linking and fPIC (Was: Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating)

qcontrol-static /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/liblua5.1.a(lapi.o): relocation R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC against `luaO_nilobject_' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC I've checked the wiki and the recent '"PIE by default" transition is underway --

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi, 2016-10-27 4:03 GMT+02:00 Steve M. Robbins : > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:26:24AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> My point was that, yes we have changed to generating relocatable code >> but that is still targetted for executables only, which preserves the >> current

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:26:24AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > My point was that, yes we have changed to generating relocatable code > but that is still targetted for executables only, which preserves the > current behavior, [...] But something must have changed with how a static lib is now

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi, On 26.10.2016 05:37, Adam Borowski wrote: > What's your reason for building something as big and with as extensive > dependencies statically? Some parts of the test suite use private functions not exposed in the shared libraries, so they need the static libraries. > Let's delegate static

Re: Bug#837478: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi, On 26.10.2016 05:26, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 00:37:18 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> On 25.10.2016 13:55, Guillem Jover wrote: >>> For many static libraries, >>> making them embeddable into other shared libraries is really not >>> desirable. And those should be using

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:37:06AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > > The current policy says: > > > "As to the static libraries, the common case is not to have relocatable > > > code"

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:37:06AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > The current policy says: > > "As to the static libraries, the common case is not to have relocatable > > code" > > > > As of gcc-6 version 6.2.0-7 this is

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 at 05:37:06 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > > The current ffmpeg packages builds shared and static libraries > > What's your reason for building something as big and with as extensive > dependencies statically?

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > The current policy says: > "As to the static libraries, the common case is not to have relocatable code" > > As of gcc-6 version 6.2.0-7 this is factually wrong, because the compiler > enables PIE by default, which means it

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi! On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 00:37:18 +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 25.10.2016 13:55, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I don't think the reasoning there is sound (as I've mentioned > > elsewhere), and the policy bug should be closed. > > > > Switching from no-PIE to PIE by default preserves our

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi, On 25.10.2016 13:55, Guillem Jover wrote: > I don't think the reasoning there is sound (as I've mentioned > elsewhere), and the policy bug should be closed. > > Switching from no-PIE to PIE by default preserves our current behavior > WRT static libraries vs shared libraries. The current

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi! On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 09:44:44 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2016-10-25 5:31 GMT+02:00 Steve M. Robbins : > > I haven't been paying close attention to the "PIE by default" [1] > > discussions, > > so I may have missed the memo, but: it seems the transition is underway? > >

Re: "PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi Steve, 2016-10-25 5:31 GMT+02:00 Steve M. Robbins : > Hi, > > I haven't been paying close attention to the "PIE by default" [1] discussions, > so I may have missed the memo, but: it seems the transition is underway? GCC have been changed to enable PIE by default but dpkg has

"PIE by default" transition is underway -- wiki needs updating

Hi, I haven't been paying close attention to the "PIE by default" [1] discussions, so I may have missed the memo, but: it seems the transition is underway? I've seen two bugs already claiming "static library foo must be compiled with -fPIC" -- because some reverse dependency now fails to