2013/5/8 Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org:
Wrong list, please bring this up instead on fhs-discuss. (If that
still exists - it looks a bit stale - but anyway, debian-devel is not
for FHS discussion.)
I'd like to have an open discussion.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 05/08/2013 01:54 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
Currently /var/lib contains data for system utilities (dpkg, apt,
aptitute) and for user application like databases.
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
Think about modern fs like btrfs and zfs:
One may want to create
2013/5/8 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org:
How about moving /home
into /usr?
I proposed exactly an opposite thing for databases :-)
If do not like /usr/home, you might not like to have your data under
/var/lib ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 11:59 +0400, Игорь Пашев a écrit :
I proposed exactly an opposite thing for databases :-)
If do not like /usr/home, you might not like to have your data under
/var/lib ;-)
The FHS has the perfect place for such data: /srv. I agree we should
move the data there, but
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:51:33PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
How about moving /etc into /home? How about moving /home
into /usr?
Note that / was moved to /usr and /usr to /home just for HDD size reasons
[1].
[1]: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2010-December/074114.html
--
WBR,
2013/5/8 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org:
The FHS has the perfect place for such data: /srv. I agree we should
move the data there, but there is no reason to invent a new place.
Yeah. /export was my typo ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
2013/5/8 Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:51:33PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
How about moving /etc into /home? How about moving /home
into /usr?
Note that / was moved to /usr and /usr to /home just for HDD size reasons
[1].
[1]:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:18:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I always rm -rf /media after a fresh install, where T F did that
come from.
Funny you say that, given that the canonical reference document we use
even provides an explanation for why it was created.
If you'd said /srv, I'd sort
Hi,
On 08.05.2013 10:11, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 11:59 +0400, Игорь Пашев a écrit :
I proposed exactly an opposite thing for databases :-)
If do not like /usr/home, you might not like to have your data under
/var/lib ;-)
The FHS has the perfect place for such
Currently /var/lib contains data for system utilities (dpkg, apt,
aptitute) and for user application like databases.
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
Think about modern fs like btrfs and zfs:
One may want to create a snapshot of the entire system, user data
Игорь Пашев pashev.igor at gmail.com writes:
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
*NO*!
/sys was already bad. /run is a catastrophe, although an understandable
one. I always rm -rf /media after a fresh install, where T F did that
come from. As a BSD person, seeing
[Igor Pashev]
Currently /var/lib contains data for system utilities (dpkg, apt,
aptitute) and for user application like databases.
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
Wrong list, please bring this up instead on fhs-discuss. (If that
still exists - it looks a
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:18:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Игорь Пашев pashev.igor at gmail.com writes:
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
/run is a catastrophe, although an understandable one.
Is there anything specific that's wrong with it? Is there
13 matches
Mail list logo
