On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:53:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1]
Indeed. I think we can drop this idea altogether. How many people do use
passwords on groups anyway?
thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 01:28:53AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:53:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1]
Indeed. I think we can drop this idea altogether. How many people do use
passwords on
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 07:44:38PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 01:28:53AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 06:53:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1]
Indeed. I think we can
This may sound silly, but in fact, glibc does not support shadow groups[1]
(I'm not sure if we ever had this support), yet the shadow programs attempt
to use it. For example we convert the group file to shadow, even though glibc
does not contain the calls to get this info. If you look at the
4 matches
Mail list logo
