* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de, 2010-09-22, 11:39:
apt-get install linux-2.6:src
where src is just another architecture (at least for the user
interface).
apt-get install foo:src
should then install the source and also all Build-Depends(-Indep) of the
source. Besides packages
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 03:08 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
* Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com, 2010-09-15, 21:26:
c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst
idea.
On the contrary, I think that allowing source
Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com writes:
Dear developers,
ABSTRACT
How to enable in some special cases a way to allow one source
package have multiple maintainers within Debian archive.
It might be better to say they have different flavours which should (out
of practicallity) or must be
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Going by what multiarch proposed and apt already supports that should be
apt-get install linux-2.6:src
where src is just another architecture (at least for the user
interface).
Why do people hate vowels so much?
Julien Cristau writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
Why do people hate vowels so much?
Bcs f y lv thm t y cn wrt ncmprhnsbl gbbrsh mch mr ffctvly. Ls y sv
smll mnt f typng.
Ian.
(sorry)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 22 Sep 12:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Cristau writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
Why do people hate vowels so much?
Bcs f y lv thm t y cn wrt ncmprhnsbl gbbrsh mch mr ffctvly. Ls y sv
smll mnt f typng
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Going by what multiarch proposed and apt already supports that should be
apt-get install linux-2.6:src
where src is just another architecture (at least for the user
interface).
Brett Parker writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
On 22 Sep 12:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Cristau writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
Why do people hate vowels so much?
Bcs f y lv thm t y cn wrt ncmprhnsbl gbbrsh mch mr ffctvly. Ls y sv
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
Brett Parker writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
On 22 Sep 12:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
Julien Cristau writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
Why do people hate vowels
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Call it source if you like. The point was that the arch follows the
package name.
It's interesting that this is exactly backwards from the way the BTS
does it. [Source packages are src:foopkg.]
Don Armstrong
--
[The] JK-88 [coffee] percolator
Matt Zagrabelny writes (Re: [RFC] Binary packages containing the source):
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Ian Jackson
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
No :-). Perhaps ls rather than Ls would have been more correct.
I'm not sure of the correct rule for this situation
Le jeudi 16 septembre 2010 à 03:08 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
* Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com, 2010-09-15, 21:26:
c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst
idea.
On the contrary, I think that allowing source packages to be installable
in the same way
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:22:57AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Plus, these packages would (in the current state of affairs) lack a
description.
On this topic, we have our friend #555743. /shameless-plug
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
Le 16/09/2010 09:22, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I agree this is a cleaner solution, but how do you ensure there are
sources (deb-src) referenced in the sources.list ?
You don't need to. The package would be reported as uninstallable. Some
message suggesting to add deb-src lines to sources.list
Dear developers,
ABSTRACT
How to enable in some special cases a way to allow one source
package have multiple maintainers within Debian archive.
RATIONALE
There are already a number of packages in the archive which ship
sources in a binary package, in some cases this is very useful, so
* Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com, 2010-09-15, 21:26:
c) allow build depends on source packages, which it is probably a worst idea.
On the contrary, I think that allowing source packages to be installable
in the same way as binary packages is an excellent idea. Imagine you can
do:
16 matches
Mail list logo
