Hi all,
is anyone using interactive bugscripts? I mean scripts in
/usr/share/bug/ which interactively demand answers from the user.
I made a quick search on my system and I only found the texlive packages
using getkey to force a user to read a text before the script is
executed. In that case
Bastian Venthur wrote:
is anyone using interactive bugscripts? I mean scripts in
/usr/share/bug/ which interactively demand answers from the user.
The installation-reports script is quite interactive.
Why do you continue to want to cripple bug reporting because of
reportbug-ng? I appreciate
Bastian Venthur wrote:
is anyone using interactive bugscripts? I mean scripts in
/usr/share/bug/ which interactively demand answers from the user.
I made a quick search on my system and I only found the texlive
packages using getkey to force a user to read a text before the
script is executed
Frans Pop schrieb:
Bastian Venthur wrote:
is anyone using interactive bugscripts? I mean scripts in
/usr/share/bug/ which interactively demand answers from the user.
The installation-reports script is quite interactive.
Ok.
Why do you continue to want to cripple bug reporting because
Le lundi 08 juin 2009 à 14:06 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
The installation-reports script is quite interactive.
Ok.
If no packages (or only a handfull) used this feature than asking to
depreciate this feature would have been an option, but in this case I
have to see how I can handle
Hi!
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
From now on, I’d say we can either:
* force such scripts to use an abstraction layer to prompt the
user;
Wouldn't it be possible to use debconf for that? It already has interfaces
for different user interfaces (TTBOMK including KDE, GNOME, Dialog
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
Le lundi 08 juin 2009 à 14:06 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
The installation-reports script is quite interactive.
Ok.
If no packages (or only a handfull) used this feature than asking to
depreciate this feature would have been an option, but in this case I
have
Le lundi 08 juin 2009 à 14:31 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
My medium term solution is to make rng depend on xterm and use that
instead of x-terminal-emulator. xterm -e cmd seems to return only if
the cmd returned.
Why not use vte (or whatever is the Qt equivalent) instead?
--
.''`.
Josselin Mouette schrieb:
Le lundi 08 juin 2009 à 14:31 +0200, Bastian Venthur a écrit :
My medium term solution is to make rng depend on xterm and use that
instead of x-terminal-emulator. xterm -e cmd seems to return only if
the cmd returned.
Why not use vte (or whatever is the Qt
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 01:24:15PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Bastian Venthur wrote:
is anyone using interactive bugscripts? I mean scripts in
/usr/share/bug/ which interactively demand answers from the user.
The installation-reports script is quite interactive.
Maybe that is a special case
10 matches
Mail list logo
